code-review

skillcreatorai/ai-agent-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/skillcreatorai/ai-agent-skills --skill code-review
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Automated code review across security, performance, quality, and testing dimensions.

  • Analyzes pull requests for four distinct review categories: security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, hardcoded secrets), performance issues (N+1 queries, memory leaks, missing caches), code quality (duplication, SRP violations, poor naming), and test coverage gaps
  • Flags issues at three severity levels (critical, suggestions, nits) with explanations and suggested fixes for each finding
  • Includes a
skill.md

Code Review

Review Categories

1. Security Review

Check for:

  • SQL injection vulnerabilities
  • XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
  • Command injection
  • Insecure deserialization
  • Hardcoded secrets/credentials
  • Improper authentication/authorization
  • Insecure direct object references

2. Performance Review

Check for:

  • N+1 queries
  • Missing database indexes
  • Unnecessary re-renders (React)
  • Memory leaks
  • Blocking operations in async code
  • Missing caching opportunities
  • Large bundle sizes

3. Code Quality Review

Check for:

  • Code duplication (DRY violations)
  • Functions doing too much (SRP violations)
  • Deep nesting / complex conditionals
  • Magic numbers/strings
  • Poor naming
  • Missing error handling
  • Incomplete type coverage

4. Testing Review

Check for:

  • Missing test coverage for new code
  • Tests that don't test behavior
  • Flaky test patterns
  • Missing edge cases
  • Mocked external dependencies

Review Output Format

## Code Review Summary

### 🔴 Critical (Must Fix)
- **[File:Line]** [Issue description]
  - **Why:** [Explanation]
  - **Fix:** [Suggested fix]

### 🟡 Suggestions (Should Consider)
- **[File:Line]** [Issue description]
  - **Why:** [Explanation]
  - **Fix:** [Suggested fix]

### 🟢 Nits (Optional)
- **[File:Line]** [Minor suggestion]

### ✅ What's Good
- [Positive feedback on good patterns]

Common Patterns to Flag

Security

// BAD: SQL injection
const query = `SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${userId}`;

// GOOD: Parameterized query
const query = 'SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1';
await db.query(query, [userId]);

Performance

// BAD: N+1 query
users.forEach(async user => {
  const posts = await getPosts(user.id);
});

// GOOD: Batch query
const userIds = users.map(u => u.id);
const posts = await getPostsForUsers(userIds);

Error Handling

// BAD: Swallowing errors
try {
  await riskyOperation();
} catch (e) {}

// GOOD: Handle or propagate
try {
  await riskyOperation();
} catch (e) {
  logger.error('Operation failed', { error: e });
  throw new AppError('Operation failed', { cause: e });
}

Review Checklist

  • No hardcoded secrets
  • Input validation present
  • Error handling complete
  • Types/interfaces defined
  • Tests added for new code
  • No obvious performance issues
  • Code is readable and documented
  • Breaking changes documented
how to use code-review

How to use code-review on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add code-review
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/skillcreatorai/ai-agent-skills --skill code-review

The skills CLI fetches code-review from GitHub repository skillcreatorai/ai-agent-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/code-review

Reload or restart Cursor to activate code-review. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /code-review) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.733 reviews
  • Chen Malhotra· Dec 24, 2024

    code-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Dec 8, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: code-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Piyush G· Nov 27, 2024

    We added code-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Alexander Thompson· Nov 15, 2024

    code-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Rahul Santra· Nov 7, 2024

    I recommend code-review for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Alexander Abebe· Nov 7, 2024

    I recommend code-review for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Pratham Ware· Oct 26, 2024

    Useful defaults in code-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Li White· Oct 26, 2024

    Useful defaults in code-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Shikha Mishra· Oct 18, 2024

    code-review fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Sofia Chawla· Oct 6, 2024

    We added code-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

showing 1-10 of 33

1 / 4