posix-shell-pro

sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill posix-shell-pro
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Since POSIX sh lacks arrays, use these patterns:

skill.md

Use this skill when

  • Working on posix shell pro tasks or workflows
  • Needing guidance, best practices, or checklists for posix shell pro

Do not use this skill when

  • The task is unrelated to posix shell pro
  • You need a different domain or tool outside this scope

Instructions

  • Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
  • Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
  • Provide actionable steps and verification.
  • If detailed examples are required, open resources/implementation-playbook.md.

Focus Areas

  • Strict POSIX compliance for maximum portability
  • Shell-agnostic scripting that works on any Unix-like system
  • Defensive programming with portable error handling
  • Safe argument parsing without bash-specific features
  • Portable file operations and resource management
  • Cross-platform compatibility (Linux, BSD, Solaris, AIX, macOS)
  • Testing with dash, ash, and POSIX mode validation
  • Static analysis with ShellCheck in POSIX mode
  • Minimalist approach using only POSIX-specified features
  • Compatibility with legacy systems and embedded environments

POSIX Constraints

  • No arrays (use positional parameters or delimited strings)
  • No [[ conditionals (use [ test command only)
  • No process substitution <() or >()
  • No brace expansion {1..10}
  • No local keyword (use function-scoped variables carefully)
  • No declare, typeset, or readonly for variable attributes
  • No += operator for string concatenation
  • No ${var//pattern/replacement} substitution
  • No associative arrays or hash tables
  • No source command (use . for sourcing files)

Approach

  • Always use #!/bin/sh shebang for POSIX shell
  • Use set -eu for error handling (no pipefail in POSIX)
  • Quote all variable expansions: "$var" never $var
  • Use [ ] for all conditional tests, never [[
  • Implement argument parsing with while and case (no getopts for long options)
  • Create temporary files safely with mktemp and cleanup traps
  • Use printf instead of echo for all output (echo behavior varies)
  • Use . script.sh instead of source script.sh for sourcing
  • Implement error handling with explicit || exit 1 checks
  • Design scripts to be idempotent and support dry-run modes
  • Use IFS manipulation carefully and restore original value
  • Validate inputs with [ -n "$var" ] and [ -z "$var" ] tests
  • End option parsing with -- and use rm -rf -- "$dir" for safety
  • Use command substitution $() instead of backticks for readability
  • Implement structured logging with timestamps using date
  • Test scripts with dash/ash to verify POSIX compliance

Compatibility & Portability

  • Use #!/bin/sh to invoke the system's POSIX shell
  • Test on multiple shells: dash (Debian/Ubuntu default), ash (Alpine/BusyBox), bash --posix
  • Avoid GNU-specific options; use POSIX-specified flags only
  • Handle platform differences: uname -s for OS detection
  • Use command -v instead of which (more portable)
  • Check for command availability: command -v cmd >/dev/null 2>&1 || exit 1
  • Provide portable implementations for missing utilities
  • Use [ -e "$file" ] for existence checks (works on all systems)
  • Avoid /dev/stdin, /dev/stdout (not universally available)
  • Use explicit redirection instead of &> (bash-specific)

Readability & Maintainability

  • Use descriptive variable names in UPPER_CASE for exports, lower_case for locals
  • Add section headers with comment blocks for organization
  • Keep functions under 50 lines; extract complex logic
  • Use consistent indentation (spaces only, typically 2 or 4)
  • Document function purpose and parameters in comments
  • Use meaningful names: validate_input not check
  • Add comments for non-obvious POSIX workarounds
  • Group related functions with descriptive headers
  • Extract repeated code into functions
  • Use blank lines to separate logical sections

Safety & Security Patterns

  • Quote all variable expansions to prevent word splitting
  • Validate file permissions before operations: [ -r "$file" ] || exit 1
  • Sanitize user input before using in commands
  • Validate numeric input: case $num in *[!0-9]*) exit 1 ;; esac
  • Never use eval on untrusted input
  • Use -- to separate options from arguments: rm -- "$file"
  • Validate required variables: [ -n "$VAR" ] || { echo "VAR required" >&2; exit 1; }
  • Check exit codes explicitly: cmd || { echo "failed" >&2; exit 1; }
  • Use trap for cleanup: trap 'rm -f "$tmpfile"' EXIT INT TERM
  • Set restrictive umask for sensitive files: umask 077
  • Log security-relevant operations to syslog or file
  • Validate file paths don't contain unexpected characters
  • Use full paths for commands in security-critical scripts: /bin/rm not rm

Performance Optimization

  • Use shell built-ins over external commands when possible
  • Avoid spawning subshells in loops: use while read not for i in $(cat)
  • Cache command results in variables instead of repeated execution
  • Use case for multiple string comparisons (faster than repeated if)
  • Process files line-by-line for large files
  • Use expr or $(( )) for arithmetic (POSIX supports $(( )))
  • Minimize external command calls in tight loops
  • Use grep -q when you only need true/false (faster than capturing output)
  • Batch similar operations together
  • Use here-documents for multi-line strings instead of multiple echo calls

Documentation Standards

  • Implement -h flag for help (avoid --help without proper parsing)
  • Include usage message showing synopsis and options
  • Document required vs optional arguments clearly
  • List exit codes: 0=success, 1=error, specific codes for specific failures
  • Document prerequisites and required commands
  • Add header comment with script purpose and author
  • Include examples of common usage patterns
  • Document environment variables used by script
  • Provide troubleshooting guidance for common issues
  • Note POSIX compliance in documentation

Working Without Arrays

Since POSIX sh lacks arrays, use these patterns:

  • Positional Parameters: set -- item1 item2 item3; for arg; do echo "$arg"; done
  • Delimited Strings: items="a:b:c"; IFS=:; set -- $items; IFS=' '
  • Newline-Separated: items="a\nb\nc"; while IFS= read -r item; do echo "$item"; done <<EOF
  • Counters: i=0; while [ $i -lt 10 ]; do i=$((i+1)); done
  • Field Splitting: Use cut, awk, or parameter expansion for string splitting

Portable Conditionals

Use [ ] test command with POSIX operators:

  • File Tests: [ -e file ] exists, [ -f file ] regular file, [ -d dir ] directory
  • String Tests: [ -z "$str" ] empty, [ -n "$str" ] not empty, [ "$a" = "$b" ] equal
  • Numeric Tests: [ "$a" -eq "$b" ] equal, [ "$a" -lt "$b" ] less than
  • Logical: [ cond1 ] && [ cond2 ] AND, [ cond1 ] || [ cond2 ] OR
  • Negation: [ ! -f file ] not a file
  • Pattern Matching: Use case not [[ =~ ]]

CI/CD Integration

  • Matrix testing: Test across dash, ash, bash --posix, yash on Linux, macOS, Alpine
  • Container testing: Use alpine:latest (ash), debian:stable (dash) for reproducible tests
  • Pre-commit hooks: Configure checkbashisms, shellcheck -s sh, shfmt -ln posix
  • GitHub Actions: Use shellcheck-problem-matchers with POSIX mode
  • Cross-platform validation: Test on Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, NetBSD
  • BusyBox testing: Validate on BusyBox environments for embedded systems
  • Automated releases: Tag versions and generate portable distribution packages
  • Coverage tracking: Ensure test coverage across all POSIX shells
  • Example workflow: shellcheck -s sh *.sh && shfmt -ln posix -d *.sh && checkbashisms *.sh

Embedded Systems & Limited Environments

  • BusyBox compatibility: Test with BusyBox's limited ash implementation
  • Alpine Linux: Default shell is BusyBox ash, not bash
  • Resource constraints: Minimize memory usage, avoid spawning excessive processes
  • Missing utilities: Provide fallbacks when common tools unavailable (mktemp, seq)
  • Read-only filesystems: Handle scenarios where /tmp may be restricted
  • No coreutils: Some environments lack GNU coreutils extensions
  • Signal handling: Limited signal support in minimal environments
  • Startup scripts: Init scripts must be POSIX for maximum compatibility
  • Example: Check for mktemp: command -v mktemp >/dev/null 2>&1 || mktemp() { ... }

Migration from Bash to POSIX sh

  • Assessment: Run checkbashisms to identify bash-specific constructs
  • Array elimination: Convert arrays to delimited strings or positional parameters
  • Conditional updates: Replace [[ with [ and adjust regex to case patterns
  • Local variables: Remove local keyword, use function prefixes instead
  • Process substitution: Replace <() with temporary files or pipes
  • Parameter expansion: Use sed/awk for complex string manipulation
  • Testing strategy: Incremental conversion with continuous validation
  • Documentation: Note any POSIX limitations or workarounds
  • Gradual migration: Convert one function at a time, test thoroughly
  • Fallback support: Maintain dual implementations during transition if needed

Quality Checklist

  • Scripts pass ShellCheck with -s sh flag (POSIX mode)
  • Code is formatted consistently with shfmt using -ln posix
  • Test on multiple shells: dash, ash, bash --posix, yash
  • All variable expansions are properly quoted
  • No bash-specific features used (arrays, [[, local, etc.)
  • Error handling covers all failure modes
  • Temporary resources cleaned up with EXIT trap
  • Scripts provide clear usage information
  • Input validation prevents injection attacks
  • Scripts portable across Unix-like systems (Linux, BSD, Solaris, macOS, Alpine)
  • BusyBox compatibility validated for embedded use cases
  • No GNU-specific extensions or flags used

Output

  • POSIX-compliant shell scripts maximizing portability
  • Test suites using shellspec or bats-core validating across dash, ash, yash
  • CI/CD configurations for multi-shell matrix testing
  • Portable implementations of common patterns with fallbacks
  • Documentation on POSIX limitations and workarounds with examples
  • Migration guides for converting bash scripts to POSIX sh incrementally
  • Cross-platform compatibility matrices (Linux, BSD, macOS, Solaris, Alpine)
  • Performance benchmarks comparing different POSIX shells
  • Fallback implementations for missing utilities (mktemp, seq, timeout)
  • BusyBox-compatible scripts for embedded and container environments
  • Package distributions for various platforms without bash dependency

Essential Tools

Static Analysis & Formatting

  • ShellCheck: Static analyzer with -s sh for POSIX mode validation
  • shfmt: Shell formatter with -ln posix option for POSIX syntax
  • checkbashisms: Detects bash-specific constructs in scripts (from devscripts)
  • Semgrep: SAST with POSIX-specific security rules
  • CodeQL: Security scanning for shell scripts

POSIX Shell Implementations for Testing

  • dash: Debian Almquist Shell - lightweight, strict POSIX compliance (primary test target)
  • ash: Almquist Shell - BusyBox default, embedded systems
  • yash: Yet Another Shell - strict POSIX conformance validation
  • posh: Policy-compliant Ordinary Shell - Debian policy compliance
  • osh: Oil Shell - modern POSIX-compatible shell with better error messages
  • bash --posix: GNU Bash in POSIX mode for compatibility testing

Testing Frameworks

  • bats-core: Bash testing framework (works with POSIX sh)
  • shellspec: BDD-style testing that supports POSIX sh
  • shunit2: xUnit-style framework with POSIX sh support
  • sharness: Test framework used by Git (POSIX-compatible)

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Using [[ instead of [ (bash-specific)
  • Using arrays (not in POSIX sh)
  • Using local keyword (bash/ksh extension)
  • Using echo without printf (behavior varies across implementations)
  • Using source instead of . for sourcing scripts
  • Using bash-specific parameter expansion: ${var//pattern/replacement}
  • Using process substitution <() or >()
  • Using function keyword (ksh/bash syntax)
  • Using $RANDOM variable (not in POSIX)
  • Using read -a for arrays (bash-specific)
  • Using set -o pipefail (bash-specific)
  • Using &> for redirection (use >file 2>&1)

Advanced Techniques

  • Error Trapping: trap 'echo "Error at line $LINENO" >&2; exit 1' EXIT; trap - EXIT on success
  • Safe Temp Files: tmpfile=$(mktemp) || exit 1; trap 'rm -f "$tmpfile"' EXIT INT TERM
  • Simulating Arrays: set -- item1 item2 item3; for arg; do process "$arg"; done
  • Field Parsing: IFS=:; while read -r user pass uid gid; do ...; done < /etc/passwd
  • String Replacement: echo "$str" | sed 's/old/new/g' or use parameter expansion ${str%suffix}
  • Default Values: value=${var:-default} assigns default if var unset or null
  • Portable Functions: Avoid function keyword, use func_name() { ... }
  • Subshell Isolation: (cd dir && cmd) changes directory without affecting parent
  • Here-documents: cat <<'EOF' with quotes prevents variable expansion
  • Command Existence: command -v cmd >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "found" || echo "missing"

POSIX-Specific Best Practices

  • Always quote variable expansions: "$var" not $var
  • Use [ ] with proper spacing: [ "$a" = "$b" ] not ["$a"="$b"]
  • Use = for string comparison, not == (bash extension)
  • Use . for sourcing, not source
  • Use printf for all output, avoid echo -e or echo -n
  • Use $(( )) for arithmetic, not let or declare -i
  • Use case for pattern matching, not [[ =~ ]]
  • Test scripts with sh -n script.sh to check syntax
  • Use command -v not type or which for portability
  • Explicitly handle all error conditions with || exit 1

References & Further Reading

POSIX Standards & Specifications

Portability & Best Practices

Tools & Testing

how to use posix-shell-pro

How to use posix-shell-pro on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add posix-shell-pro
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill posix-shell-pro

The skills CLI fetches posix-shell-pro from GitHub repository sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/posix-shell-pro

Reload or restart Cursor to activate posix-shell-pro. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /posix-shell-pro) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.646 reviews
  • Chaitanya Patil· Dec 4, 2024

    posix-shell-pro is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Mei Gill· Dec 4, 2024

    posix-shell-pro has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Piyush G· Nov 23, 2024

    Keeps context tight: posix-shell-pro is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Shikha Mishra· Oct 14, 2024

    posix-shell-pro has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Sakura Ramirez· Sep 25, 2024

    Registry listing for posix-shell-pro matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Rahul Santra· Sep 21, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: posix-shell-pro is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Kofi Johnson· Sep 5, 2024

    Useful defaults in posix-shell-pro — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Kofi Lopez· Aug 24, 2024

    posix-shell-pro is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Lucas Anderson· Aug 20, 2024

    Keeps context tight: posix-shell-pro is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Yusuf Ghosh· Aug 16, 2024

    posix-shell-pro fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

showing 1-10 of 46

1 / 5