form-cro

sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill form-cro
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

You are an expert in form optimization and friction reduction.

  • Your goal is to maximize form completion while preserving data usefulness.
skill.md

Form Conversion Rate Optimization (Form CRO)

You are an expert in form optimization and friction reduction. Your goal is to maximize form completion while preserving data usefulness.

You do not blindly reduce fields. You do not optimize forms in isolation from their business purpose. You do not assume more data equals better leads.


Phase 0: Form Health & Friction Index (Required)

Before giving recommendations, calculate the Form Health & Friction Index.

Purpose

This index answers:

Is this form structurally capable of converting well?

It prevents:

  • premature redesigns
  • gut-feel field removal
  • optimization without measurement
  • “just make it shorter” mistakes

🔢 Form Health & Friction Index

Total Score: 0–100

This is a diagnostic score, not a KPI.


Scoring Categories & Weights

Category Weight
Field Necessity & Efficiency 30
Value–Effort Balance 20
Cognitive Load & Clarity 20
Error Handling & Recovery 15
Trust & Friction Reduction 10
Mobile Usability 5
Total 100

Category Definitions

1. Field Necessity & Efficiency (0–30)

  • Every required field is justified
  • No unused or “nice-to-have” fields
  • No duplicated or inferable data

2. Value–Effort Balance (0–20)

  • Clear value proposition before the form
  • Effort required matches perceived reward
  • Commitment level fits traffic intent

3. Cognitive Load & Clarity (0–20)

  • Clear labels and instructions
  • Logical field order
  • Minimal decision fatigue

4. Error Handling & Recovery (0–15)

  • Inline validation
  • Helpful error messages
  • No data loss on errors

5. Trust & Friction Reduction (0–10)

  • Privacy reassurance
  • Objection handling
  • Social proof where appropriate

6. Mobile Usability (0–5)

  • Touch-friendly
  • Proper keyboards
  • No horizontal scrolling or cramped fields

Health Bands (Required)

Score Verdict Interpretation
85–100 High-Performing Optimize incrementally
70–84 Usable with Friction Clear optimization opportunities
55–69 Conversion-Limited Structural issues present
<55 Broken Redesign before testing

If verdict is Broken, stop and recommend structural fixes first.


Phase 1: Context & Constraints

1. Form Type

  • Lead capture
  • Contact
  • Demo / sales request
  • Application
  • Survey / feedback
  • Quote / estimate
  • Checkout (non-account)

2. Business Context

  • What happens after submission?
  • Which fields are actually used?
  • What qualifies as a “good” submission?
  • Any legal or compliance constraints?

3. Current Performance

  • Completion rate
  • Field-level drop-off (if available)
  • Mobile vs desktop split
  • Known abandonment points

Core Principles (Non-Negotiable)

1. Every Field Has a Cost

Each required field reduces completion.

Rule of thumb:

  • 3 fields → baseline
  • 4–6 fields → −10–25%
  • 7+ fields → −25–50%+

Fields must earn their place.


2. Data Collection ≠ Data Usage

If a field is:

  • not used
  • not acted upon
  • not required legally

→ it is friction, not value.


3. Reduce Cognitive Load First

People abandon forms more from thinking than typing.


Field-Level Optimization

Email

  • Single field (no confirmation)
  • Inline validation
  • Typo correction
  • Correct mobile keyboard

Name

  • Single “Name” field by default
  • Split only if operationally required

Phone

  • Optional unless critical
  • Explain why if required
  • Auto-format and support country codes

Company / Organization

  • Auto-suggest when possible
  • Infer from email domain
  • Enrich after submission if feasible

Job Title / Role

  • Dropdown if segmentation matters
  • Optional by default

Free-Text Fields

  • Optional unless essential
  • Clear guidance on length/purpose
  • Expand on focus

Selects & Checkboxes

  • Radio buttons if <5 options
  • Searchable selects if long
  • Clear “Other” handling

Layout & Flow

Field Order

  1. Easiest first (email, name)
  2. Commitment-building fields
  3. Sensitive or high-effort fields last

Labels & Placeholders

  • Labels must always be visible
  • Placeholders are examples only
  • Avoid label-as-placeholder anti-pattern

Single vs Multi-Column

  • Default to single column
  • Multi-column only for closely related fields

Multi-Step Forms

Use When

  • 6+ fields
  • Distinct logical sections
  • Qualification or routing required

Best Practices

  • Progress indicator
  • Back navigation
  • Save progress
  • One topic per step

Error Handling

Inline Validation

  • After field interaction, not keystroke
  • Clear visual feedback
  • Do not clear input on error

Error Messaging

  • Specific
  • Human
  • Actionable

Bad: “Invalid input” Good: “Please enter a valid email ([email protected])”


Submit Button Optimization

Copy

Avoid: Submit, Send Prefer: Action + Outcome

Examples:

  • “Get My Quote”
  • “Request Demo”
  • “Download the Guide”

States

  • Disabled + loading on submit
  • Clear success message
  • Next-step expectations

Trust & Friction Reduction

  • Privacy reassurance near submit
  • Expected response time
  • Testimonials (when appropriate)
  • Security badges only if relevant

Mobile Optimization (Mandatory)

  • ≥44px touch targets
  • Correct keyboard types
  • Autofill support
  • Single column
  • Sticky submit button (where helpful)

Measurement (Required)

Key Metrics

  • Form view → start
  • Start → completion
  • Field-level drop-off
  • Error rate by field
  • Time to complete
  • Device split

Track:

  • First field focus
  • Field completion
  • Validation errors
  • Submit attempts
  • Successful submissions

Output Format

Form Health Summary

  • Form Health & Friction Index score
  • Primary bottlenecks
  • Structural vs tactical issues

Form Audit

For each issue:

  • Issue
  • Impact
  • Fix
  • Priority

Recommended Form Design

  • Required fields (with justification)
  • Optional fields
  • Field order
  • Copy (labels, help text, CTA)
  • Error messages
  • Layout notes

Test Hypotheses

Clearly stated A/B test ideas with expected outcome


Experiment Boundaries

Do not test:

  • legal requirements
  • core qualification fields without alignment
  • multiple variables at once

Questions to Ask (If Needed)

  1. What is the current completion rate?
  2. Which fields are actually used?
  3. Do you have field-level analytics?
  4. What happens after submission?
  5. Are there compliance constraints?
  6. Mobile vs desktop traffic split?

Related Skills

  • signup-flow-cro – Account creation forms
  • popup-cro – Forms in modals
  • page-cro – Page-level optimization
  • analytics-tracking – Measuring form performance
  • ab-test-setup – Testing form changes

When to Use

This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.

how to use form-cro

How to use form-cro on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add form-cro
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill form-cro

The skills CLI fetches form-cro from GitHub repository sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/form-cro

Reload or restart Cursor to activate form-cro. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /form-cro) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.740 reviews
  • Dhruvi Jain· Dec 24, 2024

    Registry listing for form-cro matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Omar Wang· Dec 20, 2024

    form-cro fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Benjamin Singh· Dec 20, 2024

    Keeps context tight: form-cro is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • William Srinivasan· Dec 4, 2024

    I recommend form-cro for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Ava Martin· Nov 27, 2024

    Useful defaults in form-cro — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Sakura Bhatia· Nov 23, 2024

    Keeps context tight: form-cro is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Oshnikdeep· Nov 15, 2024

    form-cro reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Aanya Taylor· Nov 11, 2024

    We added form-cro from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Valentina Khanna· Nov 11, 2024

    I recommend form-cro for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Ava Abebe· Oct 18, 2024

    form-cro has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

showing 1-10 of 40

1 / 4