coding-standards▌
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Universal coding standards and best practices for TypeScript, JavaScript, React, and Node.js projects.
- ›Covers core principles (readability, KISS, DRY, YAGNI) with practical code examples showing good vs. bad patterns
- ›Includes TypeScript/JavaScript standards for naming, immutability, error handling, async/await, and type safety
- ›Provides React-specific guidance on component structure, custom hooks, state management, and conditional rendering
- ›Details API design conventions, REST endp
Coding Standards & Best Practices
Universal coding standards applicable across all projects.
Code Quality Principles
1. Readability First
- Code is read more than written
- Clear variable and function names
- Self-documenting code preferred over comments
- Consistent formatting
2. KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid)
- Simplest solution that works
- Avoid over-engineering
- No premature optimization
- Easy to understand > clever code
3. DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself)
- Extract common logic into functions
- Create reusable components
- Share utilities across modules
- Avoid copy-paste programming
4. YAGNI (You Aren't Gonna Need It)
- Don't build features before they're needed
- Avoid speculative generality
- Add complexity only when required
- Start simple, refactor when needed
TypeScript/JavaScript Standards
Variable Naming
// ✅ GOOD: Descriptive names
const marketSearchQuery = 'election'
const isUserAuthenticated = true
const totalRevenue = 1000
// ❌ BAD: Unclear names
const q = 'election'
const flag = true
const x = 1000
Function Naming
// ✅ GOOD: Verb-noun pattern
async function fetchMarketData(marketId: string) { }
function calculateSimilarity(a: number[], b: number[]) { }
function isValidEmail(email: string): boolean { }
// ❌ BAD: Unclear or noun-only
async function market(id: string) { }
function similarity(a, b) { }
function email(e) { }
Immutability Pattern (CRITICAL)
// ✅ ALWAYS use spread operator
const updatedUser = {
...user,
name: 'New Name'
}
const updatedArray = [...items, newItem]
// ❌ NEVER mutate directly
user.name = 'New Name' // BAD
items.push(newItem) // BAD
Error Handling
// ✅ GOOD: Comprehensive error handling
async function fetchData(url: string) {
try {
const response = await fetch(url)
if (!response.ok) {
throw new Error(`HTTP ${response.status}: ${response.statusText}`)
}
return await response.json()
} catch (error) {
console.error('Fetch failed:', error)
throw new Error('Failed to fetch data')
}
}
// ❌ BAD: No error handling
async function fetchData(url) {
const response = await fetch(url)
return response.json()
}
Async/Await Best Practices
// ✅ GOOD: Parallel execution when possible
const [users, markets, stats] = await Promise.all([
fetchUsers(),
fetchMarkets(),
fetchStats()
])
// ❌ BAD: Sequential when unnecessary
const users = await fetchUsers()
const markets = await fetchMarkets()
const stats = await fetchStats()
Type Safety
// ✅ GOOD: Proper types
interface Market {
id: string
name: string
status: 'active' | 'resolved' | 'closed'
created_at: Date
}
function getMarket(id: string): Promise<Market> {
// Implementation
}
// ❌ BAD: Using 'any'
function getMarket(id: any): Promise<any> {
// Implementation
}
React Best Practices
Component Structure
// ✅ GOOD: Functional component with types
interface ButtonProps {
children: React.ReactNode
onClick: () => void
disabled?: boolean
variant?: 'primary' | 'secondary'
}
export function Button({
children,
onClick,
disabled = false,
variant = 'primary'
}: ButtonProps) {
return (
<button
onClick={onClick}
disabled={disabled}
className={`btn btn-${variant}`}
>
{children}
</button>
)
}
// ❌ BAD: No types, unclear structure
export function Button(props) {
return <button onClick={props.onClick}>{props.children}</button>
}
Custom Hooks
// ✅ GOOD: Reusable custom hook
export function useDebounce<T>(value: T, delay: number): T {
const [debouncedValue, setDebouncedValue] = useState<T>(value)
useEffect(() => {
const handler = setTimeout(() => {
setDebouncedValue(value)
}, delay)
How to use coding-standards on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add coding-standards
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches coding-standards from GitHub repository sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate coding-standards. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /coding-standards) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★53 reviews- ★★★★★Mei Ndlovu· Dec 24, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: coding-standards is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Daniel Abebe· Dec 24, 2024
coding-standards has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 20, 2024
I recommend coding-standards for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Advait Sharma· Dec 20, 2024
coding-standards fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Alexander Robinson· Dec 20, 2024
coding-standards reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Sakura Singh· Nov 15, 2024
I recommend coding-standards for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Nikhil Thompson· Nov 15, 2024
coding-standards reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 11, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: coding-standards is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Anaya Srinivasan· Nov 11, 2024
We added coding-standards from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Mei Gupta· Oct 6, 2024
Keeps context tight: coding-standards is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 53