ab-test-setup▌
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Structured framework for designing statistically rigorous A/B tests with mandatory validation gates.
- ›Enforces hypothesis lock, metric freezing, and sample size calculation before any implementation begins
- ›Includes hard gates at three critical points: hypothesis validation, assumptions review, and execution readiness
- ›Defines primary, secondary, and guardrail metrics to prevent harmful wins and ensure valid interpretation
- ›Covers test type selection, duration estimation, and strict r
A/B Test Setup
1️⃣ Purpose & Scope
Ensure every A/B test is valid, rigorous, and safe before a single line of code is written.
- Prevents "peeking"
- Enforces statistical power
- Blocks invalid hypotheses
2️⃣ Pre-Requisites
You must have:
- A clear user problem
- Access to an analytics source
- Roughly estimated traffic volume
Hypothesis Quality Checklist
A valid hypothesis includes:
- Observation or evidence
- Single, specific change
- Directional expectation
- Defined audience
- Measurable success criteria
3️⃣ Hypothesis Lock (Hard Gate)
Before designing variants or metrics, you MUST:
- Present the final hypothesis
- Specify:
- Target audience
- Primary metric
- Expected direction of effect
- Minimum Detectable Effect (MDE)
Ask explicitly:
“Is this the final hypothesis we are committing to for this test?”
Do NOT proceed until confirmed.
4️⃣ Assumptions & Validity Check (Mandatory)
Explicitly list assumptions about:
- Traffic stability
- User independence
- Metric reliability
- Randomization quality
- External factors (seasonality, campaigns, releases)
If assumptions are weak or violated:
- Warn the user
- Recommend delaying or redesigning the test
5️⃣ Test Type Selection
Choose the simplest valid test:
- A/B Test – single change, two variants
- A/B/n Test – multiple variants, higher traffic required
- Multivariate Test (MVT) – interaction effects, very high traffic
- Split URL Test – major structural changes
Default to A/B unless there is a clear reason otherwise.
6️⃣ Metrics Definition
Primary Metric (Mandatory)
- Single metric used to evaluate success
- Directly tied to the hypothesis
- Pre-defined and frozen before launch
Secondary Metrics
- Provide context
- Explain why results occurred
- Must not override the primary metric
Guardrail Metrics
- Metrics that must not degrade
- Used to prevent harmful wins
- Trigger test stop if significantly negative
7️⃣ Sample Size & Duration
Define upfront:
- Baseline rate
- MDE
- Significance level (typically 95%)
- Statistical power (typically 80%)
Estimate:
- Required sample size per variant
- Expected test duration
Do NOT proceed without a realistic sample size estimate.
8️⃣ Execution Readiness Gate (Hard Stop)
You may proceed to implementation only if all are true:
- Hypothesis is locked
- Primary metric is frozen
- Sample size is calculated
- Test duration is defined
- Guardrails are set
- Tracking is verified
If any item is missing, stop and resolve it.
Running the Test
During the Test
DO:
- Monitor technical health
- Document external factors
DO NOT:
- Stop early due to “good-looking” results
- Change variants mid-test
- Add new traffic sources
- Redefine success criteria
Analyzing Results
Analysis Discipline
When interpreting results:
- Do NOT generalize beyond the tested population
- Do NOT claim causality beyond the tested change
- Do NOT override guardrail failures
- Separate statistical significance from business judgment
Interpretation Outcomes
| Result | Action |
|---|---|
| Significant positive | Consider rollout |
| Significant negative | Reject variant, document learning |
| Inconclusive | Consider more traffic or bolder change |
| Guardrail failure | Do not ship, even if primary wins |
Documentation & Learning
Test Record (Mandatory)
Document:
- Hypothesis
- Variants
- Metrics
- Sample size vs achieved
- Results
- Decision
- Learnings
- Follow-up ideas
Store records in a shared, searchable location to avoid repeated failures.
Refusal Conditions (Safety)
Refuse to proceed if:
- Baseline rate is unknown and cannot be estimated
- Traffic is insufficient to detect the MDE
- Primary metric is undefined
- Multiple variables are changed without proper design
- Hypothesis cannot be clearly stated
Explain why and recommend next steps.
Key Principles (Non-Negotiable)
- One hypothesis per test
- One primary metric
- Commit before launch
- No peeking
- Learning over winning
- Statistical rigor first
Final Reminder
A/B testing is not about proving ideas right. It is about learning the truth with confidence.
If you feel tempted to rush, simplify, or “just try it” — that is the signal to slow down and re-check the design.
When to Use
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
How to use ab-test-setup on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add ab-test-setup
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches ab-test-setup from GitHub repository sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate ab-test-setup. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /ab-test-setup) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★56 reviews- ★★★★★Carlos Reddy· Dec 24, 2024
Keeps context tight: ab-test-setup is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Ava Abebe· Dec 20, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: ab-test-setup is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 8, 2024
Registry listing for ab-test-setup matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Sofia Sanchez· Dec 8, 2024
ab-test-setup is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Amelia Thomas· Dec 8, 2024
We added ab-test-setup from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 27, 2024
Keeps context tight: ab-test-setup is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Daniel Sharma· Nov 27, 2024
ab-test-setup fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Ava Jain· Nov 19, 2024
ab-test-setup is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Diego Rahman· Nov 15, 2024
Registry listing for ab-test-setup matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Oct 18, 2024
I recommend ab-test-setup for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
showing 1-10 of 56