Transform provided information into well-written academic assignments that match the user's natural writing style, avoiding obvious AI patterns while maintaining professional quality.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionacademic-writing-styleExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches academic-writing-style from shining319/claude-code-single-person-workflow and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate academic-writing-style. Access via /academic-writing-style in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
15
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
15
stars
Transform provided information into well-written academic assignments that match the user's natural writing style, avoiding obvious AI patterns while maintaining professional quality.
Generate content that reads naturally and fluently, with:
Clarify assignment requirements:
Load appropriate references:
references/chinese-examples.mdreferences/english-examples.mdreferences/writing-guidelines.md for core principlesAssess personalization level:
Create descriptive chapter headings that preview content rather than generic labels:
Organize content by natural topic flow, allowing chapters to build on each other through content connections rather than explicit transitions.
Integrate information into flowing paragraphs instead of lists. When information naturally forms a list, embed it in prose:
Avoid: The key advantages include:
Prefer: The optimization brought three main benefits: performance improved significantly with response times dropping by 60%, costs decreased through more efficient resource usage, and the architecture gained better scalability for future growth.
Connect paragraphs through:
Avoid mechanical transitions like "however", "furthermore", "in addition" in favor of letting content flow naturally.
Make writing concrete through:
For Chinese writing:
For English writing (IELTS 6.0 level):
Use first-person perspective strategically:
Maintain objectivity for:
Before finalizing, verify:
For bilingual assignments (both Chinese and English versions needed):
For technical analysis:
For research reviews:
For case studies:
Recommended Approach (Following Claude Code Official Standards):
Save all academic writing outputs to outputs/<project-name>/writing/:
outputs/
└── <project-name>/ # Project name (e.g., cloud-computing-analysis)
└── writing/
├── technical-analysis.md # Technical analysis report
├── research-review.md # Research review document
├── case-study.md # Case study report
└── project-documentation.md # Project documentation
Example:
outputs/
├── cloud-computing-analysis/
│ └── writing/
│ └── technical-analysis.md
├── ai-ethics-research/
│ └── writing/
│ └── research-review.md
└── database-optimization-case/
└── writing/
└── case-study.md
Alternative Approach (Traditional Project Structure):
If your project has an existing directory structure, you can also use:
project-root/
└── docs/
├── technical-analysis.md
├── research-review.md
└── case-study.md
Generate documents based on assignment type:
Technical Analysis:
technical-analysis.md - Technical analysis reportResearch Review:
research-review.md - Research review documentCase Study:
case-study.md - Case study reportProject Documentation:
project-documentation.md - Project documentationcloud-computing-technical-analysis.mdresearch-review-v1.0.mddatabase-optimization-case-study.mdtechnical-analysis-en.md, technical-analysis-zh.mdAfter generating the document, provide a brief summary:
Detailed examples and guidelines available in:
references/chinese-examples.md - Comprehensive Chinese writing examplesreferences/english-examples.md - Comprehensive English writing examplesreferences/writing-guidelines.md - Core writing principles and techniquesMake data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
davila7/claude-code-templates
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Registry listing for academic-writing-style matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: academic-writing-style is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
academic-writing-style is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
academic-writing-style reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
I recommend academic-writing-style for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
academic-writing-style has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Useful defaults in academic-writing-style — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
We added academic-writing-style from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
academic-writing-style fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
We added academic-writing-style from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 70