golang-safety

samber/cc-skills-golang · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-safety
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Persona: You are a defensive Go engineer. You treat every untested assumption about nil, capacity, and numeric range as a latent crash waiting to happen.

skill.md

Persona: You are a defensive Go engineer. You treat every untested assumption about nil, capacity, and numeric range as a latent crash waiting to happen.

Go Safety: Correctness & Defensive Coding

Prevents programmer mistakes — bugs, panics, and silent data corruption in normal (non-adversarial) code. Security handles attackers; safety handles ourselves.

Best Practices Summary

  1. Prefer generics over any when the type set is known — compiler catches mismatches instead of runtime panics
  2. Always use comma-ok for type assertions — bare assertions panic on mismatch
  3. Typed nil pointer in an interface is not == nil — the type descriptor makes it non-nil
  4. Writing to a nil map panics — always initialize before use
  5. append may reuse the backing array — both slices share memory if capacity allows, silently corrupting each other
  6. Return defensive copies from exported functions — otherwise callers mutate your internals
  7. defer runs at function exit, not loop iteration — extract loop body to a function
  8. Integer conversions truncate silentlyint64 to int32 wraps without error
  9. Float arithmetic is not exact — use epsilon comparison or math/big
  10. Design useful zero values — nil map fields panic on first write; use lazy init
  11. Use sync.Once for lazy init — guarantees exactly-once even under concurrency

Nil Safety

Nil-related panics are the most common crash in Go.

The nil interface trap

Interfaces store (type, value). An interface is nil only when both are nil. Returning a typed nil pointer sets the type descriptor, making it non-nil:

// ✗ Dangerous — interface{type: *MyHandler, value: nil} is not == nil
func getHandler() http.Handler {
    var h *MyHandler // nil pointer
    if !enabled {
        return h // interface{type: *MyHandler, value: nil} != nil
    }
    return h
}

// ✓ Good — return nil explicitly
func getHandler() http.Handler {
    if !enabled {
        return nil // interface{type: nil, value: nil} == nil
    }
    return &MyHandler{}
}

Nil map, slice, and channel behavior

Type Read from nil Write to nil Len/Cap of nil Range over nil
Map Zero value panic 0 0 iterations
Slice panic (index) panic (index) 0 0 iterations
Channel Blocks forever Blocks forever 0 Blocks forever
// ✗ Bad — nil map panics on write
var m map[string]int
m["key"] = 1

// ✓ Good — initialize or lazy-init in methods
m := make(map[string]int)

func (r *Registry) Add(name string, val int) {
    if r.items == nil { r.items = make(map[string]int) }
    r.items[name] = val
}

See Nil Safety Deep Dive for nil receivers, nil in generics, and nil interface performance.

Slice & Map Safety

Slice aliasing — the append trap

append reuses the backing array if capacity allows. Both slices then share memory:

// ✗ Dangerous — a and b share backing array
a := make([]int, 3, 5)
b := append(a, 4)
b[0] = 99 // also modifies a[0]

// ✓ Good — full slice expression forces new allocation
b := append(a[:len(a):len(a)], 4)

Map concurrent access

Maps MUST NOT be accessed concurrently — → see samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-concurrency for sync primitives.

See Slice and Map Deep Dive for range pitfalls, subslice memory retention, and slices.Clone/maps.Clone.

Numeric Safety

Implicit type conversions truncate silently

// ✗ Bad — silently wraps around if val > math.MaxInt32 (3B becomes -1.29B)
var val int64 = 3_000_000_000
i32 := int32(val) // -1294967296 (silent wraparound)

// ✓ Good — check before converting
if val > math.MaxInt32 || val < math.MinInt32 {
    return fmt.Errorf("value %d overflows int32", val)
}
i32 := int32(val)

Float comparison

// ✗ Bad — floating point arithmetic is not exact
0.1+0.2 == 0.3 // false

// ✓ Good — use epsilon comparison
const epsilon = 1e-9
math.Abs((0.1+0.2)-0.3) < epsilon // true

Division by zero

Integer division by zero panics. Float division by zero produces +Inf, -Inf, or NaN.

func avg(total, count int) (int, error) {
    if count == 0 {
        return 0, errors.New("division by zero")
    }
    return total / count, nil
}

For integer overflow as a security vulnerability, see the samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-security skill section.

Resource Safety

defer in loops — resource accumulation

defer runs at function exit, not loop iteration. Resources accumulate until the function returns:

// ✗ Bad — all files stay open until function returns
for _, path := range paths {
    f, _ := os.Open(path)
    defer f.Close() // deferred until function exits
    process(f)
}

// ✓ Good — extract to function so defer runs per iteration
for _, path := range paths {
    if err := processOne(path); err != nil { return err }
}
func processOne(path string) error {
    f, err := os.Open(path)
    if err != nil { return err }
    defer f.Close()
    return process(f)
}

Goroutine leaks

→ See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-concurrency for goroutine lifecycle and leak prevention.

Immutability & Defensive Copying

Exported functions returning slices/maps SHOULD return defensive copies.

Protecting struct internals

// ✗ Bad — exported slice field, anyone can mutate
type Config struct {
    Hosts []string
}

// ✓ Good — unexported field with accessor returning a copy
type Config struct {
    hosts []string
}

func (c *Config) Hosts() []string {
    return slices.Clone(c.hosts)
}

Initialization Safety

Zero-value design

Design types so var x MyType is safe — prevents "forgot to initialize" bugs:

var mu sync.Mutex   // ✓ usable at zero value
var buf bytes.Buffer // ✓ usable at zero value

// ✗ Bad — nil map panics on write
type Cache struct { data map[string]any }

sync.Once for lazy initialization

type DB struct {
    once sync.Once
    conn *sql.DB
}

func (db *DB) connection() *sql
how to use golang-safety

How to use golang-safety on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add golang-safety
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-safety

The skills CLI fetches golang-safety from GitHub repository samber/cc-skills-golang and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/golang-safety

Reload or restart Cursor to activate golang-safety. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /golang-safety) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.527 reviews
  • Aditi Ghosh· Dec 24, 2024

    I recommend golang-safety for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Oshnikdeep· Sep 25, 2024

    I recommend golang-safety for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Piyush G· Sep 17, 2024

    golang-safety is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Zara Johnson· Sep 17, 2024

    golang-safety is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Zara Shah· Sep 1, 2024

    Keeps context tight: golang-safety is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Zara Jackson· Aug 20, 2024

    golang-safety is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Ganesh Mohane· Aug 16, 2024

    Useful defaults in golang-safety — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Shikha Mishra· Aug 8, 2024

    Keeps context tight: golang-safety is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Zara Sharma· Aug 8, 2024

    Keeps context tight: golang-safety is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Yash Thakker· Jul 27, 2024

    Registry listing for golang-safety matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

showing 1-10 of 27

1 / 3