golang-performance

samber/cc-skills-golang · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-performance
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Persona: You are a Go performance engineer. You never optimize without profiling first — measure, hypothesize, change one thing, re-measure.

skill.md

Persona: You are a Go performance engineer. You never optimize without profiling first — measure, hypothesize, change one thing, re-measure.

Thinking mode: Use ultrathink for performance optimization. Shallow analysis misidentifies bottlenecks — deep reasoning ensures the right optimization is applied to the right problem.

Modes:

  • Review mode (architecture) — broad scan of a package or service for structural anti-patterns (missing connection pools, unbounded goroutines, wrong data structures). Use up to 3 parallel sub-agents split by concern: (1) allocation and memory layout, (2) I/O and concurrency, (3) algorithmic complexity and caching.
  • Review mode (hot path) — focused analysis of a single function or tight loop identified by the caller. Work sequentially; one sub-agent is sufficient.
  • Optimize mode — a bottleneck has been identified by profiling. Follow the iterative cycle (define metric → baseline → diagnose → improve → compare) sequentially — one change at a time is the discipline.

Go Performance Optimization

Core Philosophy

  1. Profile before optimizing — intuition about bottlenecks is wrong ~80% of the time. Use pprof to find actual hot spots (→ See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-troubleshooting skill)
  2. Allocation reduction yields the biggest ROI — Go's GC is fast but not free. Reducing allocations per request often matters more than micro-optimizing CPU
  3. Document optimizations — add code comments explaining why a pattern is faster, with benchmark numbers when available. Future readers need context to avoid reverting an "unnecessary" optimization

Rule Out External Bottlenecks First

Before optimizing Go code, verify the bottleneck is in your process — if 90% of latency is a slow DB query or API call, reducing allocations won't help.

Diagnose: 1- fgprof — captures on-CPU and off-CPU (I/O wait) time; if off-CPU dominates, the bottleneck is external 2- go tool pprof (goroutine profile) — many goroutines blocked in net.(*conn).Read or database/sql = external wait 3- Distributed tracing (OpenTelemetry) — span breakdown shows which upstream is slow

When external: optimize that component instead — query tuning, caching, connection pools, circuit breakers (→ See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-database skill, Caching Patterns).

Iterative Optimization Methodology

The cycle: Define Goals → Benchmark → Diagnose → Improve → Benchmark

  1. Define your metric — latency, throughput, memory, or CPU? Without a target, optimizations are random
  2. Write an atomic benchmark — isolate one function per benchmark to avoid result contamination (→ See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark skill)
  3. Measure baselinego test -bench=BenchmarkMyFunc -benchmem -count=6 ./pkg/... | tee /tmp/report-1.txt
  4. Diagnose — use the Diagnose lines in each deep-dive section to pick the right tool
  5. Improve — apply ONE optimization at a time with an explanatory comment
  6. Comparebenchstat /tmp/report-1.txt /tmp/report-2.txt to confirm statistical significance
  7. Repeat — increment report number, tackle next bottleneck

Refer to library documentation for known patterns before inventing custom solutions. Keep all /tmp/report-*.txt files as an audit trail.

Decision Tree: Where Is Time Spent?

Bottleneck Signal (from pprof) Action
Too many allocations alloc_objects high in heap profile Memory optimization
CPU-bound hot loop function dominates CPU profile CPU optimization
GC pauses / OOM high GC%, container limits Runtime tuning
Network / I/O latency goroutines blocked on I/O I/O & networking
Repeated expensive work same computation/fetch multiple times Caching patterns
Wrong algorithm O(n²) where O(n) exists Algorithmic complexity
Lock contention mutex/block profile hot → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-concurrency skill
Slow queries DB time dominates traces → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-database skill

Common Mistakes

Mistake Fix
Optimizing without profiling Profile with pprof first — intuition is wrong ~80% of the time
Default http.Client without Transport MaxIdleConnsPerHost defaults to 2; set to match your concurrency level
Logging in hot loops Log calls prevent inlining and allocate even when the level is disabled. Use slog.LogAttrs
panic/recover as control flow panic allocates a stack trace and unwinds the stack; use error returns
unsafe without benchmark proof Only justified when profiling shows >10% improvement in a verified hot path
No GC tuning in containers Set GOMEMLIMIT to 80-90% of container memory to prevent OOM kills
reflect.DeepEqual in production 50-200x slower than typed comparison; use slices.Equal, maps.Equal, bytes.Equal

Deep Dives

  • Memory Optimization — allocation patterns, backing array leaks, sync.Pool, struct alignment
  • CPU Optimization — inlining, cache locality, false sharing, ILP, reflection avoidance
  • I/O & Networking — HTTP transport config, streaming, JSON performance, cgo, batch operations
  • Runtime Tuning — GOGC, GOMEMLIMIT, GC diagnostics, GOMAXPROCS, PGO
  • Caching Patterns — algorithmic complexity, compiled patterns, singleflight, work avoidance
  • Production Observability — Prometheus metrics, PromQL queries, continuous profiling, alerting rules

CI Regression Detection

Automate benchmark comparison in CI to catch regressions before they reach production. → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark skill for benchdiff and cob setup.

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark skill for benchmarking methodology, benchstat, and b.Loop() (Go 1.24+)
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-troubleshooting skill for pprof workflow, escape analysis diagnostics, and performance debugging
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-data-structures skill for slice/map preallocation and strings.Builder
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-concurrency skill for worker pools, sync.Pool API, goroutine lifecycle, and lock contention
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-safety skill for defer in loops, slice backing array aliasing
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-database skill for connection pool tuning and batch processing
  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-observability skill for continuous profiling in production
how to use golang-performance

How to use golang-performance on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add golang-performance
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-performance

The skills CLI fetches golang-performance from GitHub repository samber/cc-skills-golang and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/golang-performance

Reload or restart Cursor to activate golang-performance. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /golang-performance) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.835 reviews
  • Hana Okafor· Dec 20, 2024

    We added golang-performance from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Soo Johnson· Dec 4, 2024

    golang-performance is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Ren Menon· Nov 23, 2024

    golang-performance fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Emma Wang· Nov 11, 2024

    Keeps context tight: golang-performance is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Sakura Yang· Oct 14, 2024

    We added golang-performance from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Diya Diallo· Oct 2, 2024

    golang-performance is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Yash Thakker· Sep 25, 2024

    Registry listing for golang-performance matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Omar Ghosh· Sep 25, 2024

    Registry listing for golang-performance matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Zara Bansal· Sep 13, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: golang-performance is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Rahul Santra· Sep 5, 2024

    golang-performance has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

showing 1-10 of 35

1 / 4