golang-performance▌
samber/cc-skills-golang · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Persona: You are a Go performance engineer. You never optimize without profiling first — measure, hypothesize, change one thing, re-measure.
Persona: You are a Go performance engineer. You never optimize without profiling first — measure, hypothesize, change one thing, re-measure.
Thinking mode: Use ultrathink for performance optimization. Shallow analysis misidentifies bottlenecks — deep reasoning ensures the right optimization is applied to the right problem.
Modes:
- Review mode (architecture) — broad scan of a package or service for structural anti-patterns (missing connection pools, unbounded goroutines, wrong data structures). Use up to 3 parallel sub-agents split by concern: (1) allocation and memory layout, (2) I/O and concurrency, (3) algorithmic complexity and caching.
- Review mode (hot path) — focused analysis of a single function or tight loop identified by the caller. Work sequentially; one sub-agent is sufficient.
- Optimize mode — a bottleneck has been identified by profiling. Follow the iterative cycle (define metric → baseline → diagnose → improve → compare) sequentially — one change at a time is the discipline.
Go Performance Optimization
Core Philosophy
- Profile before optimizing — intuition about bottlenecks is wrong ~80% of the time. Use pprof to find actual hot spots (→ See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-troubleshootingskill) - Allocation reduction yields the biggest ROI — Go's GC is fast but not free. Reducing allocations per request often matters more than micro-optimizing CPU
- Document optimizations — add code comments explaining why a pattern is faster, with benchmark numbers when available. Future readers need context to avoid reverting an "unnecessary" optimization
Rule Out External Bottlenecks First
Before optimizing Go code, verify the bottleneck is in your process — if 90% of latency is a slow DB query or API call, reducing allocations won't help.
Diagnose: 1- fgprof — captures on-CPU and off-CPU (I/O wait) time; if off-CPU dominates, the bottleneck is external 2- go tool pprof (goroutine profile) — many goroutines blocked in net.(*conn).Read or database/sql = external wait 3- Distributed tracing (OpenTelemetry) — span breakdown shows which upstream is slow
When external: optimize that component instead — query tuning, caching, connection pools, circuit breakers (→ See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-database skill, Caching Patterns).
Iterative Optimization Methodology
The cycle: Define Goals → Benchmark → Diagnose → Improve → Benchmark
- Define your metric — latency, throughput, memory, or CPU? Without a target, optimizations are random
- Write an atomic benchmark — isolate one function per benchmark to avoid result contamination (→ See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmarkskill) - Measure baseline —
go test -bench=BenchmarkMyFunc -benchmem -count=6 ./pkg/... | tee /tmp/report-1.txt - Diagnose — use the Diagnose lines in each deep-dive section to pick the right tool
- Improve — apply ONE optimization at a time with an explanatory comment
- Compare —
benchstat /tmp/report-1.txt /tmp/report-2.txtto confirm statistical significance - Repeat — increment report number, tackle next bottleneck
Refer to library documentation for known patterns before inventing custom solutions. Keep all /tmp/report-*.txt files as an audit trail.
Decision Tree: Where Is Time Spent?
| Bottleneck | Signal (from pprof) | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Too many allocations | alloc_objects high in heap profile |
Memory optimization |
| CPU-bound hot loop | function dominates CPU profile | CPU optimization |
| GC pauses / OOM | high GC%, container limits | Runtime tuning |
| Network / I/O latency | goroutines blocked on I/O | I/O & networking |
| Repeated expensive work | same computation/fetch multiple times | Caching patterns |
| Wrong algorithm | O(n²) where O(n) exists | Algorithmic complexity |
| Lock contention | mutex/block profile hot | → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-concurrency skill |
| Slow queries | DB time dominates traces | → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-database skill |
Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Fix |
|---|---|
| Optimizing without profiling | Profile with pprof first — intuition is wrong ~80% of the time |
Default http.Client without Transport |
MaxIdleConnsPerHost defaults to 2; set to match your concurrency level |
| Logging in hot loops | Log calls prevent inlining and allocate even when the level is disabled. Use slog.LogAttrs |
panic/recover as control flow |
panic allocates a stack trace and unwinds the stack; use error returns |
unsafe without benchmark proof |
Only justified when profiling shows >10% improvement in a verified hot path |
| No GC tuning in containers | Set GOMEMLIMIT to 80-90% of container memory to prevent OOM kills |
reflect.DeepEqual in production |
50-200x slower than typed comparison; use slices.Equal, maps.Equal, bytes.Equal |
Deep Dives
- Memory Optimization — allocation patterns, backing array leaks, sync.Pool, struct alignment
- CPU Optimization — inlining, cache locality, false sharing, ILP, reflection avoidance
- I/O & Networking — HTTP transport config, streaming, JSON performance, cgo, batch operations
- Runtime Tuning — GOGC, GOMEMLIMIT, GC diagnostics, GOMAXPROCS, PGO
- Caching Patterns — algorithmic complexity, compiled patterns, singleflight, work avoidance
- Production Observability — Prometheus metrics, PromQL queries, continuous profiling, alerting rules
CI Regression Detection
Automate benchmark comparison in CI to catch regressions before they reach production. → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmark skill for benchdiff and cob setup.
Cross-References
- → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-benchmarkskill for benchmarking methodology,benchstat, andb.Loop()(Go 1.24+) - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-troubleshootingskill for pprof workflow, escape analysis diagnostics, and performance debugging - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-data-structuresskill for slice/map preallocation andstrings.Builder - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-concurrencyskill for worker pools,sync.PoolAPI, goroutine lifecycle, and lock contention - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-safetyskill for defer in loops, slice backing array aliasing - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-databaseskill for connection pool tuning and batch processing - → See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-observabilityskill for continuous profiling in production
How to use golang-performance on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add golang-performance
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches golang-performance from GitHub repository samber/cc-skills-golang and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate golang-performance. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /golang-performance) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★35 reviews- ★★★★★Hana Okafor· Dec 20, 2024
We added golang-performance from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Soo Johnson· Dec 4, 2024
golang-performance is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Ren Menon· Nov 23, 2024
golang-performance fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Emma Wang· Nov 11, 2024
Keeps context tight: golang-performance is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Sakura Yang· Oct 14, 2024
We added golang-performance from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Diya Diallo· Oct 2, 2024
golang-performance is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Yash Thakker· Sep 25, 2024
Registry listing for golang-performance matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Omar Ghosh· Sep 25, 2024
Registry listing for golang-performance matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Zara Bansal· Sep 13, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: golang-performance is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Sep 5, 2024
golang-performance has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 35