create-branch▌
ruchernchong/claude-kit · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Create and checkout git branches with smart validation and GitHub issue integration.
- ›Automatically links branches to GitHub issues when an issue number is provided, using gh issue develop for seamless project tracking
- ›Intelligently applies semantic prefixes (feature/, bugfix/, hotfix/, chore/, docs/) based on keywords in the branch name
- ›Validates branch names for kebab-case formatting, forbidden characters, length limits, and duplicate detection across local and remote branches
- ›De
Language Conventions
Infer language style from the project:
- Analyze existing branches, commit messages, and documentation to detect the project's language variant (US English, UK English, etc.)
- Match the spelling conventions found in the project (e.g., "synchronize" vs "synchronise", "center" vs "centre")
- Maintain consistency with the project's established language style throughout branch names and command outputs
Create Branch Command
This command creates and checks out a new git branch with intelligent validation and GitHub issue integration.
Priority: GitHub Issue Integration
IMPORTANT: If the user provides an issue number (e.g., "#123", "123", or "issue 123"), ALWAYS prioritise using GitHub CLI's issue development workflow:
-
Check for GitHub CLI availability:
gh --versionIf not available, inform the user and fall back to manual branch creation.
-
Verify the issue exists:
gh issue view <issue-number>Display issue title and status to confirm.
-
Create branch linked to issue:
gh issue develop <issue-number> -c- The
-cflag automatically checks out the newly created branch - GitHub automatically generates an appropriate branch name from the issue title
- The branch is linked to the issue for better project tracking
- The
-
Skip to remote push step (step 8 below)
Manual Branch Creation Workflow
If no issue number is provided, follow this workflow:
1. Check Repository Status
git status
Verify:
- Clean working directory or acceptable uncommitted changes
- Current branch information
- Whether we're in a git repository
2. Get Branch Name Input
Ask the user for the desired branch name. Accept input in any format - the command will handle formatting and validation.
3. Auto-Detect and Apply Prefix
Analyse the branch name input for keywords and automatically add appropriate prefixes:
- feature/ - Keywords: "add", "implement", "create", "new", "feature"
- bugfix/ - Keywords: "fix", "bug", "resolve", "patch", "repair"
- hotfix/ - Keywords: "hotfix", "urgent", "critical", "emergency"
- chore/ - Keywords: "chore", "refactor", "update", "upgrade", "maintain"
- docs/ - Keywords: "docs", "documentation", "readme", "guide"
If the user's input already starts with a recognised prefix (feature/, bugfix/, etc.), keep it as-is.
4. Validate Branch Name
Apply comprehensive validation:
Kebab-Case Enforcement
- Convert to lowercase
- Replace spaces and underscores with hyphens
- Ensure format is:
prefix/kebab-case-name
Character Validation
Reject branch names containing:
- Spaces (convert to hyphens)
- Special characters:
~,^,:,?,*,[,],\,@{,.. - Control characters or non-ASCII (except hyphens and slashes)
- Leading or trailing slashes or hyphens
Length Validation
- Minimum: 3 characters (excluding prefix)
- Maximum: 100 characters (total)
5. Check for Duplicates
Check both local and remote branches:
# Check local branches
git branch --list "<branch-name>"
# Check remote branches
git ls-remote --heads origin "<branch-name>"
If branch exists:
- Locally: Offer to checkout existing branch instead
- Remotely: Warn user and suggest alternative name
- Both: Inform user and ask if they want to checkout or choose different name
6. Determine Base Branch
Use smart defaulting:
-
Check if
mainexists:git rev-parse --verify main -
If not, check if
masterexists:git rev-parse --verify master -
If neither exists, use current HEAD
-
Allow user to specify different base branch if needed (ask before creating)
7. Create and Checkout Branch
git checkout -b <validated-branch-name> <base-branch>
Confirm successful creation with a message showing:
- Branch name
- Base branch used
- Current status
8. Remote Push Recommendation
Ask the user: "Would you like to push this branch to remote and set up tracking?"
If yes:
git push -u origin <branch-name>
This enables:
- Remote backup of the branch
- Collaboration with team members
- GitHub PR creation workflow
- Branch visibility in GitHub UI
Error Handling
Provide clear, actionable error messages:
- Not a git repository: "This directory is not a git repository. Initialise one with
git initor navigate to a repository." - GitHub CLI not available: "GitHub CLI (
gh) is not installed. Install it from https://cli.github.com or use manual branch creation." - Issue not found: "Issue #123 not found. Check the issue number or create a branch manually."
- Invalid branch name: "Branch name contains invalid characters. Suggested:
feature/valid-branch-name" - Branch exists: "Branch
feature/existingalready exists. Switch to it withgit checkout feature/existingor choose a different name." - Network issues: "Unable to check remote branches. Proceeding with local creation only."
Examples
Example 1: GitHub Issue Integration
User: "Create a branch for issue #456"
Command: gh issue view 456
Output: #456 - Add user authentication (open)
Command: gh issue develop 456 -c
Output: Created and checked out branch: feature/456-add-user-authentication
Example 2: Manual with Auto-Prefix
User: "Create branch: fix login bug"
Analysis: Contains "fix" → apply "bugfix/" prefix
Validated: "bugfix/login-bug"
Command: git checkout -b bugfix/login-bug main
Example 3: Custom Prefix
User: "Create branch: docs/update readme"
Analysis: Already has "docs/" prefix → keep as-is
Validated: "docs/update-readme"
Command: git checkout -b docs/update-readme main
Best Practises
- Always prioritise GitHub issue workflow when issue numbers are mentioned
- Validate thoroughly before creating branches to avoid git errors
- Use descriptive names that clearly indicate the purpose
- Follow team conventions - check existing branch names for patterns
- Push to remote early for backup and collaboration
- Link branches to issues whenever possible for better project tracking
How to use create-branch on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add create-branch
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches create-branch from GitHub repository ruchernchong/claude-kit and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate create-branch. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /create-branch) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★46 reviews- ★★★★★Luis Wang· Dec 16, 2024
create-branch fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 12, 2024
We added create-branch from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Harper Sanchez· Dec 4, 2024
create-branch reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Evelyn Sethi· Dec 4, 2024
I recommend create-branch for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Li Taylor· Nov 23, 2024
create-branch is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Luis Okafor· Nov 7, 2024
We added create-branch from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 3, 2024
create-branch fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Evelyn Brown· Nov 3, 2024
Keeps context tight: create-branch is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Evelyn Thomas· Oct 26, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: create-branch is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Oct 22, 2024
Registry listing for create-branch matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 46