qveris-official

qverisai/open-qveris-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/qverisai/open-qveris-skills --skill qveris-official
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

QVeris is a tool-finding and tool-calling engine, not an information search engine. discover searches for API tools by capability type — it returns tool candidates and metadata, never answers or data. call then runs the selected tool to get actual data.

skill.md

QVeris — Capability Discovery & Tool Calling for AI Agents

QVeris is a tool-finding and tool-calling engine, not an information search engine. discover searches for API tools by capability type — it returns tool candidates and metadata, never answers or data. call then runs the selected tool to get actual data.

discover answers "which API tool can do X?" — it cannot answer "what is the value of Y?" To look up facts, answers, or general information, use web_search instead.

Setup: Requires QVERIS_API_KEY from https://qveris.ai.

Credential: Only QVERIS_API_KEY is used. All requests go to https://qveris.ai/api/v1 over HTTPS.


Invocation Tiers

Check availability in order and use the first working tier:

Tier 1 — Native tools (most reliable): If qveris_discover and qveris_call tools are available in your environment, use them directly — skip all other tiers.

Tier 2 — http_request tool (universal fallback): Call the QVeris HTTP API directly using the http_request tool (see QVeris API Reference below). Available in all OpenClaw environments, including those where exec is disabled.

Tier 3 — Script execution: Run node {baseDir}/scripts/qveris_tool.mjs discover/call/inspect — only when {baseDir}/scripts/ directory is present and the exec tool with node are available.

Tier 4 — Web search: If all tiers above are unavailable, fall back to web_search for qualitative needs.


When and How to Use QVeris

Choosing the Right Tool

Task type Preferred approach Reasoning
Computation, code, text manipulation, stable facts Local / native No external call needed
Structured/quantitative data (prices, rates, rankings, financials, time series, scientific data) QVeris first Returns structured JSON from professional APIs — more accurate than web pages
Historical data, reports, or sequences (earnings history, economic series, research datasets) QVeris first Professional APIs provide complete structured datasets; web pages give fragments
Non-native capability (image/video gen, OCR, TTS, translation, geocoding, web extraction, PDF) QVeris first These capabilities require external APIs; web search cannot perform them
Any task that local tools or other configured tools cannot fulfill Discover via QVeris QVeris aggregates thousands of tools — it may have what you need
No web search tool available in this environment Discover web search tools via QVeris Run discover "web search API" to find one, then call it — this is a two-step substitute, not a reason to send information queries to discover
Factual questions ("Is X listed?", "What is Y's stock symbol?", "Who founded Z?") Web search QVeris discover finds API tools, not answers — factual lookups need web_search
Qualitative information (opinions, documentation, tutorials, editorial content) Web search first Better served by browsing real pages and reading text
QVeris returned no useful results after a retry Fall back to web search Acceptable fallback for data tasks; mandatory for qualitative tasks

Key distinction: QVeris discover finds API tools by capability type (e.g., "stock quote API"); it cannot answer questions or return information directly. For factual questions → web_search. For structured data → discover the right tool first, then call it. When in doubt, ask: "Am I looking for a tool or for information?"

Usage Flow

  1. Discover: Find tool candidates for the capability you need. Write the query as an English tool type description (e.g., "stock quote real-time API"). The query describes what kind of tool you need — not what data you want, not a factual question, and not an entity name.
  2. Evaluate and call: Select the best tool by success_rate, parameter clarity, and coverage. Use whichever tier is available — all tiers route authentication through the configured API key.
  3. Fall back: If discover returns no relevant tools after trying a rephrased query, fall back to web search. Be transparent about the source.
  4. When everything fails: Report which tools were tried and what errors occurred. Training-data values are not live results.

Tool Discovery Best Practices

Discovery Query Formulation

  1. Describe the tool type, not the information you want — the query must describe an API capability, not a factual question or entity name:

    • GOOD: "China A-share real-time stock market data API" — describes a tool type
    • BAD: "Zhipu AI stock symbol listing NASDAQ" — this is a factual question, use web_search
    • BAD: "智谱AI 是否上市 股票代码" — this is a factual question in Chinese, use web_search
    • GOOD: "company stock information lookup API" — describes a tool type
    • BAD: "get AAPL price today" — this is a data request, not a tool description
    • GOOD: "stock quote real-time API" — describes a tool type
  2. Try multiple phrasings if the first discovery yields poor results — use synonyms, different domain terms, or adjusted specificity:

    • First try: "map routing directions" → Retry: "walking navigation turn-by-turn API"
  3. Convert non-English requests to English capability queries — user requests in any language must be converted to English tool type descriptions, not translated literally:

    User request BAD discover query GOOD discover query
    "智谱AI是否上市" / "Is Zhipu AI listed?" "Zhipu AI stock symbol listing" (factual question → use web_search) "company stock information lookup API"
    "腾讯最新股价" / "latest Tencent stock price" "Tencent latest stock price" (data request) "stock quote real-time API"
    "港股涨幅榜" / "HK stock top gainers" "HK stock top gainers today" (data request) "hong kong stock market top gainers API"
    "英伟达最新财报" / "Nvidia latest earnings" "Nvidia quarterly earnings data" (data request) "company earnings report API"
    "文字生成图片" / "generate image from text" "generate a cat picture" (task, not tool type) "text to image generation API"
    "今天北京天气" / "Beijing weather today" "Beijing weather today" (data request) "weather forecast API"

Domains with Strong QVeris Coverage

Discover tools in these domains first — QVeris provides structured data or capabilities that web search cannot match:

  • Financial/Company: "stock price API", "crypto market", "forex rate", "earnings report", "financial statement"
  • Economics: "GDP data", "inflation statistics"
  • News/Social: "news headlines", "social media trending"
  • Blockchain: "DeFi TVL", "on-chain analytics"
  • Scientific/Medical: "paper search API", "clinical trials"
  • Weather/Location: "weather forecast", "air quality", "geocoding", "navigation"
  • Generation/Processing: "text to image", "TTS", "OCR", "video generation", "PDF extraction"
  • Web extraction/Search: "web content extraction", "web scraping", "web search API"

Known Tools Cache

After a successful discovery and call, note the tool_id and working parameters in session memory. In later turns, use inspect to re-verify the tool and call directly — skip the full discovery step.


Tool Selection and Parameters

Selection Criteria

When discover returns multiple tools, evaluate before selecting:

  • Success rate: Prefer success_rate >= 90%. Treat 70–89% as acceptable. Avoid < 70% unless no alternative exists.
  • Execution time: Prefer avg_execution_time_ms < 5000 for interactive use. Compute-heavy tasks (image/video generation) may take longer.
  • Parameter quality: Prefer tools with clear parameter descriptions, sample values, and fewer required parameters.
  • Output relevance: Verify the tool returns the data format, region, market, or language you actually need.

Before Calling a Tool

  1. Read all parameter descriptions from the discovery results — note type, format, constraints, and defaults
  2. Fill all required parameters and use the tool's sample parameters as a template for value structure
  3. Validate types and formats: strings quoted ("London"), numbers unquoted (42), booleans (true/false); check date format (ISO 8601 vs timestamp), identifier format (ticker symbol vs full name), geo format (lat/lng vs city name)
  4. Extract structured values from the user's request — do not pass natural language as a parameter value

Error Recovery

Failures are almost always caused by incorrect parameters, wrong types, or selecting the wrong tool — not by platform instability. Diagnose your inputs before concluding a tool is broken.

Attempt 1 — Fix parameters: Read the error message. Check types and formats. Fix and retry.

Attempt 2 — Simplify: Drop optional parameters. Try standard values (e.g., well-known ticker). Retry.

Attempt 3 — Switch tool: Select the next-best tool from discovery results. Call with appropriate parameters.

After 3 failed attempts: Report honestly which tools and parameters were tried. Fall back to web search for data needs (mark the source).


Large Result Handling

Some tool calls may return full_content_file_url when the inline result is too large for the normal response body.

  • Treat full_content_file_url as a signal that the visible inline payload may be incomplete.
  • Conclusions drawn from truncated_content alone when a full-content URL is present may be incomplete.
  • If your environment already has an approved way to retrieve the full content, use that separate tool or workflow.
  • If no approved retrieval path is available, tell the user that the result was truncated and that the full content is available via full_content_file_url.

QVeris API Reference

Use these endpoints when calling via http_request tool (Tier 2).

Base URL: https://qveris.ai/api/v1

Required headers (on every request):

Authorization: Bearer ${QVERIS_API_KEY}
Content-Type: application/json

Discover tools

POST /search
Body: {"query": "stock quote real-time API", "limit": 10}

Response contains search_id (required for the subsequent call) and a results array — each item has tool_id, success_rate, avg_execution_time_ms, and parameters.

Call a tool

POST /tools/execute?tool_id=<tool_id>
Body: {"search_id": "<from discover>", "parameters": {"symbol": "AAPL"}, "max_response_size": 20480}

Response contains result, success, error_message, elapsed_time_ms.

Inspect tool details

POST /tools/by-ids
Body: {"tool_ids": ["<tool_id>"], "search_id": "<optional>"}

Quick Start

Tier 1 — Native tools (if available)

Use qveris_discover and qveris_call directly when present in your tool list.

Tier 2 — http_request tool

Step 1 — Discover:

{
  "method": "POST",
  "url": "https://qveris.ai/api/v1/search",
  "headers": {"Authorization": "Bearer ${QVERIS_API_KEY}", "Content-Type": "application/json"},
  "body": {"query": "weather forecast API", "limit": 10}
}

Step 2 — Call (use tool_id and search_id from step 1):

{
  "method": "POST",
  "url": "https://qveris.ai/api/v1/tools/execute?tool_id=openweathermap.weather.execute.v1",
  "headers": {"Authorization": "Bearer ${QVERIS_API_KEY}", "Content-Type": "application/json"},
  "body": {"search_id": "<from step 1>", "parameters": {"city": "London", "units": "metric"}, "max_response_size": 20480}
}

Tier 3 — Script execution (if {baseDir}/scripts/ is present)

node {baseDir}/scripts/qveris_tool.mjs discover "weather forecast API"
node {baseDir}/scripts/qveris_tool.mjs call openweathermap.weather.execute.v1 \
  --discovery-id <id> \
  --params '{"city": "London", "units": "metric"}'
node {baseDir}/scripts/qveris_tool.mjs inspect openweathermap.weather.execute.v1

Quick Reference

Self-Check (before responding)

  • Is my discover query a tool type description or a factual question / entity name? → If it contains specific company names, "is X listed?", or "what is Y?" — use web_search instead. Discover finds tools, not information.
  • Am I about to state a live number or need an external capability? → Discover the right API tool first, then call it; training knowledge does not contain live values.
  • Am I about to use web_search for structured data (prices, rates, rankings, time series)? → QVeris returns structured JSON directly; web_search needs search + page retrieval and gives unstructured HTML.
  • Am I about to give up or skip QVeris because it failed earlier? → Re-engage. Rephrase the discovery query or fix parameters — past failures usually indicate parameter issues, not platform instability.
  • Did the call result include full_content_file_url? → Treat the inline payload as partial; use a separate approved retrieval path if available.

Common Mistakes

Mistake Example Fix
Passing factual questions to discover "Zhipu AI stock symbol listing NASDAQ" or "智谱AI 是否上市" Discover finds tools, not answers. Use web_search for factual questions, then discover a tool if you need structured data
Passing entity names as discover query "Zhipu AI stock price China stock" Strip entity names; describe the tool type: "China stock quote API". Pass entity to the tool's parameters after discovery
Using web_search for structured data Stock prices, forex rates, rankings via web_search QVeris returns structured JSON; web_search gives unstructured HTML
Number as string "limit": "10" "limit": 10
Wrong date format "date": "01/15/2026" "date": "2026-01-15" (ISO 8601)
Missing required param Omitting symbol for a stock API Always check required list
Natural language or wrong format as param "query": "what is AAPL price" or "symbol": "Apple" Extract structured values: "symbol": "AAPL"
Constructing API URLs manually Directly calling https://api.qveris.com/... Use the API reference above or the script
Giving up after one failure "I don't have real-time data" / abandoning after error Discover first; follow Error Recovery on failure
Not trying http_request when exec fails Abandoning when node/exec is unavailable Use http_request tool (Tier 2) — it works without exec
how to use qveris-official

How to use qveris-official on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add qveris-official
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/qverisai/open-qveris-skills --skill qveris-official

The skills CLI fetches qveris-official from GitHub repository qverisai/open-qveris-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/qveris-official

Reload or restart Cursor to activate qveris-official. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /qveris-official) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.473 reviews
  • Amina Gupta· Dec 24, 2024

    I recommend qveris-official for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Ama Abebe· Dec 24, 2024

    qveris-official is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Mia Ghosh· Dec 20, 2024

    We added qveris-official from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Zaid Choi· Dec 20, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: qveris-official is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Dec 16, 2024

    qveris-official has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Kofi Desai· Dec 16, 2024

    qveris-official reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Zaid Lopez· Dec 12, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: qveris-official is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Hassan Kim· Dec 12, 2024

    Registry listing for qveris-official matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Rahul Santra· Nov 15, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: qveris-official is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Hassan Wang· Nov 15, 2024

    Useful defaults in qveris-official — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

showing 1-10 of 73

1 / 8