aoti-debug▌
pytorch/pytorch · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
This skill helps diagnose and fix common AOTInductor issues.
AOTI Debugging Guide
This skill helps diagnose and fix common AOTInductor issues.
Error Pattern Routing
Check the error message and route to the appropriate sub-guide:
Triton Index Out of Bounds
If the error matches this pattern:
Assertion `index out of bounds: 0 <= tmpN < ksM` failed
→ Follow the guide in triton-index-out-of-bounds.md
All Other Errors
Continue with the sections below.
First Step: Always Check Device and Shape Matching
For ANY AOTI error (segfault, exception, crash, wrong output), ALWAYS check these first:
- Compile device == Load device: The model must be loaded on the same device type it was compiled on
- Input devices match: Runtime inputs must be on the same device as the compiled model
- Input shapes match: Runtime input shapes must match the shapes used during compilation (or satisfy dynamic shape constraints)
# During compilation - note the device and shapes
model = MyModel().eval() # What device? CPU or .cuda()?
inp = torch.randn(2, 10) # What device? What shape?
compiled_so = torch._inductor.aot_compile(model, (inp,))
# During loading - device type MUST match compilation
loaded = torch._export.aot_load(compiled_so, "???") # Must match model/input device above
# During inference - device and shapes MUST match
out = loaded(inp.to("???")) # Must match compile device, shape must match
If any of these don't match, you will get errors ranging from segfaults to exceptions to wrong outputs.
Key Constraint: Device Type Matching
AOTI requires compile and load to use the same device type.
- If you compile on CUDA, you must load on CUDA (device index can differ)
- If you compile on CPU, you must load on CPU
- Cross-device loading (e.g., compile on GPU, load on CPU) is NOT supported
Common Error Patterns
1. Device Mismatch Segfault
Symptom: Segfault, exception, or crash during aot_load() or model execution.
Example error messages:
The specified pointer resides on host memory and is not registered with any CUDA device- Crash during constant loading in AOTInductorModelBase
Expected out tensor to have device cuda:0, but got cpu instead
Cause: Compile and load device types don't match (see "First Step" above).
Solution: Ensure compile and load use the same device type. If compiled on CPU, load on CPU. If compiled on CUDA, load on CUDA.
2. Input Device Mismatch at Runtime
Symptom: RuntimeError during model execution.
Cause: Input device doesn't match compile device (see "First Step" above).
Better Debugging: Run with AOTI_RUNTIME_CHECK_INPUTS=1 for clearer errors. This flag validates all input properties including device type, dtype, sizes, and strides:
AOTI_RUNTIME_CHECK_INPUTS=1 python your_script.py
This produces actionable error messages like:
Error: input_handles[0]: unmatched device type, expected: 0(cpu), but got: 1(cuda)
Debugging CUDA Illegal Memory Access (IMA) Errors
If you encounter CUDA illegal memory access errors, follow this systematic approach:
Step 1: Sanity Checks
Before diving deep, try these debugging flags:
AOTI_RUNTIME_CHECK_INPUTS=1
TORCHINDUCTOR_NAN_ASSERTS=1
These flags take effect at compilation time (at codegen time):
AOTI_RUNTIME_CHECK_INPUTS=1checks if inputs satisfy the same guards used during compilationTORCHINDUCTOR_NAN_ASSERTS=1adds codegen before and after each kernel to check for NaN
Step 2: Pinpoint the CUDA IMA
CUDA IMA errors can be non-deterministic. Use these flags to trigger the error deterministically:
PYTORCH_NO_CUDA_MEMORY_CACHING=1
CUDA_LAUNCH_BLOCKING=1
These flags take effect at runtime:
PYTORCH_NO_CUDA_MEMORY_CACHING=1disables PyTorch's Caching Allocator, which allocates bigger buffers than needed immediately. This is usually why CUDA IMA errors are non-deterministic.CUDA_LAUNCH_BLOCKING=1forces kernels to launch one at a time. Without this, you get "CUDA kernel errors might be asynchronously reported" warnings since kernels launch asynchronously.
Step 3: Identify Problematic Kernels with Intermediate Value Debugger
Use the AOTI Intermediate Value Debugger to pinpoint the problematic kernel:
AOT_INDUCTOR_DEBUG_INTERMEDIATE_VALUE_PRINTER=3
This prints kernels one by one at runtime. Together with previous flags, this shows which kernel was launched right before the error.
To inspect inputs to a specific kernel:
AOT_INDUCTOR_FILTERED_KERNELS_TO_PRINT="triton_poi_fused_add_ge_logical_and_logical_or_lt_231,_add_position_embeddings_kernel_5" AOT_INDUCTOR_DEBUG_INTERMEDIATE_VALUE_PRINTER=2
If inputs to the kernel are unexpected, inspect the kernel that produces the bad input.
Additional Debugging Tools
Logging and Tracing
- tlparse / TORCH_TRACE: Provides complete output codes and records guards used
- TORCH_LOGS: Use
TORCH_LOGS="+inductor,output_code"to see more PT2 internal logs - TORCH_SHOW_CPP_STACKTRACES: Set to
1to see more stack traces
Common Sources of Issues
- Dynamic shapes: Historically a source of many IMAs. Pay special attention when debugging dynamic shape scenarios.
- Custom ops: Especially when implemented in C++ with dynamic shapes. The meta function may need to be Symint'ified.
API Notes
Deprecated API
torch._export.aot_compile() # Deprecated
torch._export.aot_load() # Deprecated
Current API
torch._inductor.aoti_compile_and_package()
torch._inductor.aoti_load_package()
The new API stores device metadata in the package, so aoti_load_package() automatically uses the correct device type. You can only change the device index (e.g., cuda:0 vs cuda:1), not the device type.
Environment Variables Summary
| Variable | When | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
AOTI_RUNTIME_CHECK_INPUTS=1 |
Compile time | Validate inputs match compilation guards |
TORCHINDUCTOR_NAN_ASSERTS=1 |
Compile time | Check for NaN before/after kernels |
PYTORCH_NO_CUDA_MEMORY_CACHING=1 |
Runtime | Make IMA errors deterministic |
CUDA_LAUNCH_BLOCKING=1 |
Runtime | Force synchronous kernel launches |
AOT_INDUCTOR_DEBUG_INTERMEDIATE_VALUE_PRINTER=3 |
Compile time | Print kernels at runtime |
TORCH_LOGS="+inductor,output_code" |
Runtime | See PT2 internal logs |
TORCH_SHOW_CPP_STACKTRACES=1 |
Runtime | Show C++ stack traces |
How to use aoti-debug on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add aoti-debug
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches aoti-debug from GitHub repository pytorch/pytorch and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate aoti-debug. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /aoti-debug) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★32 reviews- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Dec 12, 2024
aoti-debug reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Omar Huang· Dec 8, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: aoti-debug is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Maya White· Nov 27, 2024
We added aoti-debug from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 3, 2024
I recommend aoti-debug for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Oct 22, 2024
Useful defaults in aoti-debug — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Maya Perez· Oct 18, 2024
aoti-debug fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Mia Chen· Sep 21, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: aoti-debug is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Soo Torres· Sep 9, 2024
Registry listing for aoti-debug matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Sep 5, 2024
aoti-debug is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Meera Haddad· Sep 1, 2024
Keeps context tight: aoti-debug is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 32