stakeholder-map

phuryn/pm-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/phuryn/pm-skills --skill stakeholder-map
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Map stakeholders on a Power × Interest grid and create a tailored communication plan for each group.

skill.md

Stakeholder Mapping & Communication Plan

Map stakeholders on a Power × Interest grid and create a tailored communication plan for each group.

Context

You are helping build a stakeholder map for $ARGUMENTS.

If the user provides files (org charts, project briefs, team rosters), read them first. If they describe the product or initiative, use that context to infer likely stakeholders.

Instructions

  1. Identify stakeholders: List all relevant individuals and groups — executives, engineering leads, designers, marketing, sales, support, legal, finance, external partners, and end users.

  2. Classify each stakeholder on two dimensions:

    • Power (High/Low): Their ability to influence decisions, resources, or outcomes
    • Interest (High/Low): How much the project directly affects them or how engaged they are
  3. Place stakeholders in the Power × Interest grid:

    High Interest Low Interest
    High Power Manage Closely — Regular 1:1s, involve in decisions, seek their input early Keep Satisfied — Periodic updates, escalate only critical issues
    Low Power Keep Informed — Regular status updates, invite to demos, gather feedback Monitor — Light-touch updates, available on request
  4. For each quadrant, recommend:

    • Communication frequency (daily, weekly, bi-weekly, monthly)
    • Communication format (1:1, email, Slack, meeting, dashboard)
    • Key messages and framing
    • Potential risks if this stakeholder is neglected
  5. Create a communication plan table:

    Stakeholder Role Power Interest Strategy Frequency Channel Key Message
  6. Flag potential conflicts: Identify stakeholders with competing interests and suggest alignment strategies.

Think step by step. Save the stakeholder map as a markdown document.


Further Reading

how to use stakeholder-map

How to use stakeholder-map on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add stakeholder-map
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/phuryn/pm-skills --skill stakeholder-map

The skills CLI fetches stakeholder-map from GitHub repository phuryn/pm-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/stakeholder-map

Reload or restart Cursor to activate stakeholder-map. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /stakeholder-map) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.669 reviews
  • Emma Rao· Dec 28, 2024

    stakeholder-map has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Dec 24, 2024

    stakeholder-map has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Ama Abebe· Dec 24, 2024

    Useful defaults in stakeholder-map — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Yusuf Sethi· Dec 16, 2024

    We added stakeholder-map from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Anaya Bansal· Nov 27, 2024

    stakeholder-map reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Emma Ghosh· Nov 23, 2024

    I recommend stakeholder-map for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Layla Diallo· Nov 19, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: stakeholder-map is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Piyush G· Nov 15, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: stakeholder-map is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Hassan Martin· Nov 15, 2024

    We added stakeholder-map from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • James Okafor· Nov 15, 2024

    I recommend stakeholder-map for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

showing 1-10 of 69

1 / 7