technical-writer▌
onewave-ai/claude-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Generates comprehensive technical documentation tailored to any audience and documentation type.
- ›Supports nine documentation formats: user guides, API docs, system architecture, tutorials, troubleshooting guides, READMEs, release notes, onboarding materials, and knowledge base articles
- ›Automatically identifies audience level (beginner, intermediate, expert) and adjusts technical depth, terminology, and examples accordingly
- ›Structures content with clear headings, step-by-step instruct
Technical Writer
Create clear, comprehensive technical documentation for any audience.
Instructions
When a user needs technical documentation:
-
Identify Documentation Type:
- User guide / end-user documentation
- Developer documentation / API docs
- System architecture documentation
- Tutorial / how-to guide
- Troubleshooting guide
- README file
- Release notes / changelog
- Onboarding documentation
- Knowledge base article
- Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)
-
Determine Audience:
- Technical level (beginner, intermediate, expert)
- Role (end user, developer, admin, stakeholder)
- Prior knowledge assumptions
- Context (internal team, external customers, open source community)
-
Structure Documentation:
User Guide Format:
# [Product/Feature Name] ## Overview [What it is, what it does, why use it - 2-3 sentences] ## Prerequisites - [Required knowledge] - [Required tools/access] - [System requirements] ## Getting Started [Quick start guide with minimal steps to first success] ### Step 1: [Action] [Detailed instructions with screenshots/code] ### Step 2: [Action] [Detailed instructions] ## Key Concepts ### [Concept 1] [Explanation with examples] ## Common Tasks ### How to [Task] 1. [Step] 2. [Step] 3. [Expected result] ## Advanced Features [Optional advanced functionality] ## Troubleshooting ### Problem: [Common issue] **Symptoms**: [What users see] **Solution**: [How to fix] ## FAQ **Q: [Question]** A: [Answer] ## Additional Resources - [Link to related docs] - [Support channels]Tutorial Format:
# How to [Accomplish Goal] **Time required**: [X minutes] **Difficulty**: [Beginner/Intermediate/Advanced] ## What You'll Learn - [Learning objective 1] - [Learning objective 2] ## Prerequisites - [Required knowledge] - [Tools needed] ## Step-by-Step Instructions ### 1. [First Major Step] [Explanation of why this step matters] ```[language] [Code example]Expected output:
[What users should see]2. [Next Major Step]
[Continue pattern]
Verification
[How to confirm it worked]
Next Steps
[What to learn next]
Troubleshooting
[Common issues]
**Architecture Documentation Format**: ```markdown # [System Name] Architecture ## Overview [High-level description, purpose, key characteristics] ## Architecture Diagram [ASCII diagram or description for diagram] ## Components ### [Component 1] **Purpose**: [What it does] **Technology**: [Stack/framework] **Responsibilities**: - [Responsibility 1] - [Responsibility 2] **Interfaces**: - Input: [Data/requests it receives] - Output: [Data/responses it produces] ## Data Flow 1. [Step-by-step flow through system] ## Technology Stack - **Frontend**: [Technologies] - **Backend**: [Technologies] - **Database**: [Technologies] - **Infrastructure**: [Technologies] ## Design Decisions ### Why [Technology/Pattern]? [Rationale, alternatives considered, trade-offs] ## Scalability Considerations [How system scales, bottlenecks, mitigation strategies] ## Security [Authentication, authorization, data protection] ## Monitoring & Observability [Logging, metrics, alerting] -
Apply Technical Writing Best Practices:
Clarity:
- Use short sentences (aim for 15-20 words)
- Avoid jargon or define it when first used
- Use active voice ("Click the button" not "The button should be clicked")
- Be specific ("Set timeout to 30 seconds" not "Set a reasonable timeout")
Structure:
- Use descriptive headings
- Break content into scannable sections
- Use numbered lists for sequences
- Use bullet points for unordered items
- Add table of contents for long docs
Visuals:
- Include screenshots with annotations
- Add code examples with syntax highlighting
- Use diagrams for complex concepts
- Show expected outputs
- Add tables for comparison or reference
Code Examples:
- Include language identifier
- Show both good and bad examples
- Add comments explaining complex parts
- Use realistic, runnable examples
- Include error handling
User-Focused:
- Start with most common use case
- Include "why" not just "how"
- Anticipate user questions
- Address common pitfalls
- Provide troubleshooting
-
Format Complete Output:
📚 TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION Type: [User Guide/Tutorial/Architecture/etc.] Audience: [Target audience] Level: [Beginner/Intermediate/Advanced] ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ [Full markdown documentation] ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📋 DOCUMENTATION CHECKLIST ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✅ Clear overview and purpose ✅ Prerequisites listed ✅ Step-by-step instructions ✅ Code examples included ✅ Expected outputs shown ✅ Troubleshooting section ✅ Links to related docs ✅ Scannable structure ✅ Appropriate for audience level 💡 MAINTENANCE NOTES ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Review Triggers: • [When to update this doc] • [Dependencies that might change] Related Documentation: • [Link to related docs] -
Special Documentation Types:
README.md:
- Project name and description
- Installation instructions
- Quick start example
- Features list
- Documentation links
- Contributing guidelines
- License
Release Notes:
- Version number and date
- New features
- Improvements
- Bug fixes
- Breaking changes
- Migration guide
- Deprecation notices
Troubleshooting Guide:
- Symptom-based organization
- Root cause analysis
- Step-by-step resolution
- Prevention tips
- When to escalate
Example Triggers
- "Write user documentation for my feature"
- "Create a tutorial for setting up the development environment"
- "Document this system architecture"
- "Write a troubleshooting guide"
- "Create onboarding documentation for new developers"
- "Write a README for this project"
Output Quality
Ensure documentation:
- Has clear, descriptive title
- Starts with overview/context
- Lists prerequisites upfront
- Uses consistent formatting
- Includes code examples where appropriate
- Shows expected outputs
- Has troubleshooting section
- Uses appropriate technical level for audience
- Is structured logically (simple to complex)
- Includes visual aids (diagrams, screenshots)
- Has table of contents for long docs
- Links to related documentation
- Is easy to scan
- Uses active voice
- Avoids ambiguity
- Includes examples from user perspective
Generate professional, comprehensive technical documentation that enables users to succeed.
How to use technical-writer on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add technical-writer
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches technical-writer from GitHub repository onewave-ai/claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate technical-writer. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /technical-writer) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★45 reviews- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Dec 24, 2024
Registry listing for technical-writer matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Maya Jain· Dec 12, 2024
technical-writer fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Nov 15, 2024
technical-writer reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Oct 6, 2024
I recommend technical-writer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Charlotte Bansal· Sep 25, 2024
We added technical-writer from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Charlotte Mensah· Sep 25, 2024
technical-writer has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Sep 17, 2024
technical-writer fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Aanya Zhang· Sep 9, 2024
technical-writer reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Ama Sethi· Aug 28, 2024
I recommend technical-writer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Henry Abebe· Aug 16, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: technical-writer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 45