triaging-security-incident▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Performs initial triage of security incidents to determine severity, scope, and required response actions using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks. Classifies incidents by type, assigns priority based on business impact, and routes to appropriate response teams. Activates for requests involving incident triage, security alert classification, severity assessment, incident prioritization, or initial incident analysis.
| name | triaging-security-incident |
| description | 'Performs initial triage of security incidents to determine severity, scope, and required response actions using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks. Classifies incidents by type, assigns priority based on business impact, and routes to appropriate response teams. Activates for requests involving incident triage, security alert classification, severity assessment, incident prioritization, or initial incident analysis. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | incident-response |
| tags | - incident-triage - NIST-800-61 - SANS-PICERL - severity-classification - SOC-operations |
| mitre_attack | - T1190 - T1566 - T1078 - T1059 |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| d3fend_techniques | - Executable Denylisting - Execution Isolation - File Metadata Consistency Validation - Content Format Conversion - File Content Analysis |
| nist_csf | - RS.MA-01 - RS.MA-02 - RS.AN-03 - RC.RP-01 |
Triaging Security Incidents
When to Use
- A SIEM or EDR alert fires and requires human classification before escalation
- Multiple concurrent alerts arrive and the SOC must prioritize response order
- An end user reports suspicious activity and the incident needs initial categorization
- A threat intelligence feed matches an IOC observed in the environment
Do not use for routine vulnerability scanning results or compliance audit findings that do not represent active security incidents.
Prerequisites
- Access to SIEM platform (Splunk, Elastic, Microsoft Sentinel) with current alert data
- Incident classification taxonomy aligned to NIST SP 800-61r3 categories
- Predefined severity matrix mapping asset criticality to threat type
- Contact roster for escalation paths (Tier 1 through Tier 3 and CIRT)
- Asset inventory with business criticality ratings
Workflow
Step 1: Collect Initial Alert Data
Gather all available context from the triggering alert before making classification decisions:
- Alert source: Which detection system generated the alert (EDR, SIEM, IDS/IPS, firewall, user report)
- Timestamp: When the event occurred and when it was detected (dwell time gap)
- Affected assets: Hostnames, IP addresses, user accounts involved
- Alert fidelity: Historical true-positive rate for this detection rule
- Raw evidence: Log entries, packet captures, process execution chains
Example SIEM alert context:
Source: CrowdStrike Falcon
Detection: Suspicious PowerShell Execution (T1059.001)
Host: WORKSTATION-FIN-042
User: [email protected]
Timestamp: 2025-11-15T14:23:17Z
Severity: High (detection rule confidence: 92%)
Process: powershell.exe -enc SQBFAFgAIAAoAE4AZQB3AC0ATwBiAGoA...
Parent: outlook.exe (PID 4812)
Step 2: Classify the Incident Type
Map the alert to a standard incident category per NIST SP 800-61r3:
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Unauthorized Access | Compromised credentials, privilege escalation, IDOR |
| Denial of Service | Volumetric DDoS, application-layer flood, resource exhaustion |
| Malicious Code | Malware execution, ransomware detonation, cryptominer |
| Improper Usage | Policy violation, insider data exfiltration, shadow IT |
| Reconnaissance | Port scanning, directory enumeration, credential spraying |
| Web Application Attack | SQL injection, XSS, SSRF exploitation |
Step 3: Assign Severity Using Impact Matrix
Calculate severity by combining asset criticality with threat severity:
Severity = f(Asset Criticality, Threat Type, Data Sensitivity, Lateral Movement Potential)
Critical (P1): Crown jewel systems compromised, active data exfiltration, ransomware spreading
High (P2): Production system compromise, confirmed malware execution, privileged account takeover
Medium (P3): Non-production compromise, unsuccessful exploitation attempt, single endpoint malware
Low (P4): Reconnaissance activity, policy violation, benign true positive
Response SLA targets:
- P1: Acknowledge within 15 minutes, containment within 1 hour
- P2: Acknowledge within 30 minutes, containment within 4 hours
- P3: Acknowledge within 2 hours, investigation within 24 hours
- P4: Acknowledge within 8 hours, investigation within 72 hours
Step 4: Perform Initial Enrichment
Before escalation, enrich the alert with contextual data:
- Threat intelligence: Check IOCs (IP, hash, domain) against TI platforms (VirusTotal, OTX, MISP)
- Asset context: Query CMDB for asset owner, business function, data classification
- User context: Check identity provider for recent authentication anomalies, MFA status
- Historical correlation: Search for related alerts on the same host/user in the past 30 days
- Network context: Verify if source/destination IPs are internal, known partners, or external threat actors
Step 5: Document and Escalate
Create a structured triage record and route to the appropriate response tier:
Incident Triage Record
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Ticket ID: INC-2025-1547
Triage Analyst: [analyst name]
Triage Time: 2025-11-15T14:35:00Z (12 min from alert)
Classification: Malicious Code - Macro-based initial access
Severity: P2 - High
Affected Assets: WORKSTATION-FIN-042 (Finance dept, handles PII)
Affected Users: [email protected]
IOCs Identified: powershell.exe spawned by outlook.exe, encoded command
TI Matches: Base64 payload matches known Qakbot loader pattern
Escalation: Tier 2 - Malware IR team
Recommended: Isolate endpoint, preserve memory dump, block sender domain
Step 6: Initiate Containment Hold
If severity is P1 or P2, initiate immediate containment actions while awaiting full investigation:
- Network-isolate the affected endpoint via EDR (CrowdStrike contain, Defender isolate)
- Disable compromised user accounts in Active Directory or identity provider
- Block identified malicious IPs/domains at firewall and DNS sinkhole
- Preserve volatile evidence (memory dump) before any remediation
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Triage | Rapid assessment process to classify and prioritize security incidents based on severity and business impact |
| PICERL | SANS incident response framework: Preparation, Identification, Containment, Eradication, Recovery, Lessons Learned |
| Dwell Time | Duration between initial compromise and detection; average is 10 days per Mandiant M-Trends 2025 |
| True Positive Rate | Percentage of alerts from a detection rule that represent genuine security incidents |
| Crown Jewel Assets | Systems and data critical to business operations whose compromise would cause severe organizational impact |
| Alert Fatigue | Degraded analyst performance caused by high volumes of low-fidelity or false-positive alerts |
| Mean Time to Acknowledge (MTTA) | Average time from alert generation to analyst acknowledgment; key SOC performance metric |
Tools & Systems
- Splunk Enterprise Security: SIEM platform for alert aggregation, correlation, and triage workflow management
- CrowdStrike Falcon: EDR platform providing endpoint telemetry, detection, and one-click host containment
- TheHive: Open-source incident response platform for case management, task tracking, and team collaboration
- MISP: Threat intelligence sharing platform for IOC enrichment during triage
- Cortex XSOAR: SOAR platform for automating enrichment playbooks and triage decision trees
Common Scenarios
Scenario: Encoded PowerShell from Email Client
Context: SOC analyst receives a P2 alert showing powershell.exe with a Base64-encoded command spawned as a child process of outlook.exe on a finance department workstation.
Approach:
- Decode the Base64 payload to determine the command intent
- Check the parent process chain for anomalies (Outlook spawning PowerShell is abnormal)
- Query VirusTotal for the decoded payload hash
- Correlate with email gateway logs to identify the triggering email and sender
- Check if other recipients in the organization received the same email
- Isolate the endpoint and escalate to Tier 2 with full triage context
Pitfalls:
- Dismissing encoded PowerShell as a false positive without decoding the payload
- Failing to check for lateral spread to other recipients of the same phishing email
- Remediating the endpoint before capturing volatile memory evidence
Output Format
INCIDENT TRIAGE REPORT
======================
Ticket: INC-[YYYY]-[NNNN]
Date/Time: [ISO 8601 timestamp]
Triage Analyst: [Name]
Time to Triage: [minutes from alert to classification]
CLASSIFICATION
Type: [NIST category]
Severity: [P1-P4] - [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
Confidence: [High/Medium/Low]
MITRE ATT&CK: [Technique ID and name]
AFFECTED SCOPE
Assets: [hostname(s), IP(s)]
Users: [account(s)]
Data at Risk: [classification level]
Business Unit: [department]
EVIDENCE SUMMARY
[Bullet list of key observations]
ENRICHMENT RESULTS
TI Matches: [Yes/No - details]
Historical: [Related prior incidents]
Asset Criticality: [rating]
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
1. [Immediate action]
2. [Investigation step]
3. [Escalation target]
ESCALATION
Routed To: [Team/Individual]
SLA Target: [Containment deadline]
How to use triaging-security-incident on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add triaging-security-incident
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches triaging-security-incident from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate triaging-security-incident. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /triaging-security-incident) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★45 reviews- ★★★★★Naina Malhotra· Dec 24, 2024
triaging-security-incident has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Sofia Bansal· Dec 20, 2024
triaging-security-incident fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★William Srinivasan· Dec 8, 2024
We added triaging-security-incident from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Hana Yang· Nov 27, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: triaging-security-incident is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 23, 2024
triaging-security-incident is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Soo Bansal· Nov 23, 2024
triaging-security-incident is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Meera Rao· Nov 15, 2024
triaging-security-incident fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Diya Li· Nov 11, 2024
triaging-security-incident has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★William Rao· Oct 18, 2024
triaging-security-incident has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Oct 14, 2024
Keeps context tight: triaging-security-incident is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 45