performing-security-headers-audit▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Auditing HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and cookie attributes to identify missing or misconfigured browser-level protections.
| name | performing-security-headers-audit |
| description | Auditing HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and cookie attributes to identify missing or misconfigured browser-level protections. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | web-application-security |
| tags | - penetration-testing - security-headers - csp - hsts - owasp - web-security - hardening |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - PR.PS-01 - ID.RA-01 - PR.DS-10 - DE.CM-01 |
Performing Security Headers Audit
When to Use
- During authorized web application security assessments as a standard configuration review
- When evaluating browser-level protections against XSS, clickjacking, and data leakage
- For compliance assessments requiring security header implementation (PCI DSS, SOC 2)
- When performing initial reconnaissance to identify easy-win security improvements
- During CI/CD pipeline security gate checks for new deployments
Prerequisites
- Authorization: Written scope for the target application (header review is low-risk)
- curl: For fetching response headers from target endpoints
- SecurityHeaders.com: Online scanner for quick header assessment
- Mozilla Observatory: Mozilla's web security testing tool
- Burp Suite: For comprehensive header analysis across multiple pages
- Browser DevTools: For examining headers and CSP violations in real-time
Workflow
Step 1: Collect Security Headers from Target
Retrieve and catalog all security-related response headers.
# Fetch all response headers
curl -s -I "https://target.example.com/" | grep -iE \
"(strict-transport|content-security|x-frame|x-content-type|x-xss|referrer-policy|permissions-policy|feature-policy|x-permitted|cross-origin|set-cookie|server|x-powered-by|cache-control)"
# Check headers across multiple pages
PAGES=("/" "/login" "/api/health" "/admin" "/account/settings" "/static/app.js")
for page in "${PAGES[@]}"; do
echo "=== $page ==="
curl -s -I "https://target.example.com$page" 2>/dev/null | grep -iE \
"(strict-transport|content-security|x-frame|x-content-type|x-xss|referrer-policy|permissions-policy|set-cookie|server|x-powered)"
echo
done
# Check both HTTP and HTTPS responses
echo "=== HTTP Response ==="
curl -s -I "http://target.example.com/" | head -20
echo "=== HTTPS Response ==="
curl -s -I "https://target.example.com/" | head -20
Step 2: Assess Transport Security (HSTS)
Evaluate HTTP Strict Transport Security configuration.
# Check HSTS header
curl -s -I "https://target.example.com/" | grep -i "strict-transport-security"
# Expected: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
# Verify HSTS attributes:
# max-age: Should be >= 31536000 (1 year) for preload eligibility
# includeSubDomains: Protects all subdomains
# preload: Eligible for browser HSTS preload list
# Check if HTTP redirects to HTTPS
curl -s -I "http://target.example.com/" | head -5
# Should be 301/302 redirect to https://
# Check if HSTS is on the preload list
# Visit: https://hstspreload.org/?domain=target.example.com
# Test for HTTPS-only cookies
curl -s -I "https://target.example.com/login" | grep -i "set-cookie"
# All session cookies should have Secure flag
# Check for mixed content
curl -s "https://target.example.com/" | grep -oP "http://[^\"']+" | head -20
# HTTP resources loaded on HTTPS pages create mixed content vulnerabilities
Step 3: Audit Content Security Policy (CSP)
Analyze CSP headers for effectiveness and potential bypasses.
# Extract CSP header
CSP=$(curl -s -I "https://target.example.com/" | grep -i "content-security-policy" | cut -d: -f2-)
echo "$CSP"
# Check for dangerous directives:
# 'unsafe-inline' in script-src: Allows inline scripts (XSS risk)
# 'unsafe-eval' in script-src: Allows eval() (XSS risk)
# * in any directive: Allows loading from any origin
# data: in script-src: Allows data: URI scripts
# Missing default-src: No fallback policy
echo "$CSP" | tr ';' '\n' | while read directive; do
echo " $directive"
if echo "$directive" | grep -q "unsafe-inline"; then
echo " WARNING: unsafe-inline allows inline script execution"
fi
if echo "$directive" | grep -q "unsafe-eval"; then
echo " WARNING: unsafe-eval allows eval() calls"
fi
if echo "$directive" | grep -q " \* "; then
echo " WARNING: wildcard allows loading from any origin"
fi
done
# Check for CSP report-only (not enforcing)
curl -s -I "https://target.example.com/" | grep -i "content-security-policy-report-only"
# Report-only does NOT block violations, only logs them
# Test CSP with Google's evaluator
# https://csp-evaluator.withgoogle.com/
# Paste the CSP header for automated analysis
# Check for CSP bypass via whitelisted domains
# If CDN domains are whitelisted, check for JSONP endpoints or angular libraries
Step 4: Check Frame Protection and Click Defense Headers
Verify anti-clickjacking and iframe embedding controls.
# X-Frame-Options
curl -s -I "https://target.example.com/" | grep -i "x-frame-options"
# Expected: DENY or SAMEORIGIN
# ALLOW-FROM is deprecated and not supported in modern browsers
# CSP frame-ancestors (supersedes X-Frame-Options)
curl -s -I "https://target.example.com/" | grep -i "content-security-policy" | grep -o "frame-ancestors[^;]*"
# Expected: frame-ancestors 'none' or frame-ancestors 'self'
# X-Content-Type-Options
curl -s -I "https://target.example.com/" | grep -i "x-content-type-options"
# Expected: nosniff (prevents MIME type sniffing)
# X-XSS-Protection (legacy, but still useful for older browsers)
curl -s -I "https://target.example.com/" | grep -i "x-xss-protection"
# Expected: 1; mode=block (or 0 if CSP is comprehensive)
# Note: Modern recommendation is 0 (disable) when CSP is present
# Referrer-Policy
curl -s -I "https://target.example.com/" | grep -i "referrer-policy"
# Expected: strict-origin-when-cross-origin or no-referrer
# Prevents sensitive URL data from leaking via Referer header
Step 5: Audit Cookie Security Attributes
Examine session and authentication cookies for security flags.
# Fetch all Set-Cookie headers
curl -s -I -L "https://target.example.com/login" | grep -i "set-cookie"
# Check each cookie for required attributes:
# Secure: Only sent over HTTPS
# HttpOnly: Not accessible via JavaScript (prevents XSS cookie theft)
# SameSite: Controls cross-site cookie sending (Strict, Lax, None)
# Path: Restricts cookie scope
# Domain: Controls which domains receive the cookie
# Max-Age/Expires: Cookie lifetime
# Automated cookie check
curl -s -I "https://target.example.com/login" | grep -i "set-cookie" | while read line; do
echo "Cookie: $(echo "$line" | grep -oP '[^:]+=[^;]+')"
missing=""
echo "$line" | grep -qi "secure" || missing="$missing Secure"
echo "$line" | grep -qi "httponly" || missing="$missing HttpOnly"
echo "$line" | grep -qi "samesite" || missing="$missing SameSite"
if [ -n "$missing" ]; then
echo " MISSING:$missing"
else
echo " All flags present"
fi
done
# Check for __Host- and __Secure- cookie prefixes
# __Host- cookies must have Secure, Path=/, no Domain
# __Secure- cookies must have Secure flag
Step 6: Check Permissions Policy and Information Disclosure
Review browser feature controls and information leakage headers.
# Permissions-Policy (formerly Feature-Policy)
curl -s -I "https://target.example.com/" | grep -i "permissions-policy"
# Controls browser features: camera, microphone, geolocation, etc.
# Expected: Restrict unused features
# Example: permissions-policy: camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()
# Cross-Origin headers
curl -s -I "https://target.example.com/" | grep -iE "(cross-origin-embedder|cross-origin-opener|cross-origin-resource)"
# COEP: Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy: require-corp
# COOP: Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy: same-origin
# CORP: Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy: same-origin
# Information disclosure headers to flag
curl -s -I "https://target.example.com/" | grep -iE "(server|x-powered-by|x-aspnet|x-generator)"
# Server: Apache/2.4.52 (should be removed or generic)
# X-Powered-By: PHP/8.1.2 (should be removed)
# These headers reveal technology stack to attackers
# Cache-Control for sensitive pages
curl -s -I "https://target.example.com/account/settings" | grep -i "cache-control"
# Sensitive pages should have: Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
# Prevents browser caching of sensitive data
# Generate comprehensive report using online tools
echo "Scan with SecurityHeaders.com: https://securityheaders.com/?q=target.example.com"
echo "Scan with Mozilla Observatory: https://observatory.mozilla.org/analyze/target.example.com"
Key Concepts
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| HSTS | Forces browsers to only use HTTPS for the domain, preventing protocol downgrade attacks |
| CSP | Restricts which resources (scripts, styles, images) can load on the page |
| X-Frame-Options | Controls whether the page can be embedded in iframes (clickjacking defense) |
| X-Content-Type-Options | Prevents MIME type sniffing; forces browser to respect declared Content-Type |
| Referrer-Policy | Controls how much referrer information is sent with cross-origin requests |
| Permissions-Policy | Restricts browser features (camera, microphone, geolocation) available to the page |
| SameSite Cookie | Controls when cookies are sent in cross-site contexts (Strict, Lax, None) |
| HSTS Preloading | Hardcoding HSTS policy in browser source code for first-visit protection |
Tools & Systems
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| SecurityHeaders.com | Online scanner providing letter-grade security header assessment |
| Mozilla Observatory | Comprehensive web security scanner with scoring and recommendations |
| CSP Evaluator (Google) | Analyzes Content Security Policy for weaknesses and bypasses |
| Burp Suite Professional | Inspecting response headers across all application pages |
| securityheaders (CLI) | Command-line security header scanner |
| Hardenize | TLS and security header monitoring service |
Common Scenarios
Scenario 1: Complete Header Absence
A legacy application returns no security headers at all. No HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, or cookie security flags. Every page is vulnerable to clickjacking, XSS has no browser-level mitigation, and cookies are sent over HTTP.
Scenario 2: Weak CSP with unsafe-inline
The CSP header includes script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'. While it restricts external script loading, the unsafe-inline directive allows any inline script to execute, rendering the CSP ineffective against XSS.
Scenario 3: Session Cookie Without Secure Flag
The session cookie is set without the Secure flag. On mixed HTTP/HTTPS sites, the session token can be intercepted by a network attacker via a plain HTTP request.
Scenario 4: Missing HSTS Enabling SSL Stripping
No HSTS header is present. An attacker on the network can perform an SSL stripping attack, downgrading the victim's HTTPS connection to HTTP and intercepting all traffic.
Output Format
## Security Headers Audit Report
**Target**: target.example.com
**Grade**: D (SecurityHeaders.com)
**Assessment Date**: 2024-01-15
### Headers Assessment
| Header | Status | Current Value | Recommended |
|--------|--------|---------------|-------------|
| Strict-Transport-Security | MISSING | - | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload |
| Content-Security-Policy | WEAK | script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' | script-src 'self' 'nonce-{random}' |
| X-Frame-Options | MISSING | - | DENY |
| X-Content-Type-Options | PRESENT | nosniff | nosniff (OK) |
| Referrer-Policy | MISSING | - | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| Permissions-Policy | MISSING | - | camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=() |
| X-XSS-Protection | MISSING | - | 0 (with strong CSP) |
### Cookie Security
| Cookie | Secure | HttpOnly | SameSite | Path |
|--------|--------|----------|----------|------|
| session | NO | YES | Not set | / |
| user_pref | NO | NO | Not set | / |
| csrf_token | YES | NO | Strict | / |
### Information Disclosure
| Header | Value | Risk |
|--------|-------|------|
| Server | Apache/2.4.52 | Technology fingerprinting |
| X-Powered-By | PHP/8.1.2 | Version-specific exploit targeting |
### Recommendation Priority
1. **Critical**: Add Secure and SameSite flags to session cookie
2. **High**: Implement HSTS with min 1-year max-age
3. **High**: Replace 'unsafe-inline' in CSP with nonce-based policy
4. **Medium**: Add X-Frame-Options: DENY
5. **Medium**: Add Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
6. **Low**: Remove Server and X-Powered-By version information
7. **Low**: Add Permissions-Policy to restrict unused browser features
How to use performing-security-headers-audit on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add performing-security-headers-audit
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches performing-security-headers-audit from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate performing-security-headers-audit. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /performing-security-headers-audit) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★52 reviews- ★★★★★Sophia Sethi· Dec 28, 2024
performing-security-headers-audit fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Dev Chen· Dec 28, 2024
We added performing-security-headers-audit from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Dec 24, 2024
Registry listing for performing-security-headers-audit matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Dev Martin· Dec 12, 2024
performing-security-headers-audit has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Arya Sanchez· Dec 8, 2024
Registry listing for performing-security-headers-audit matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Mateo Smith· Dec 4, 2024
Keeps context tight: performing-security-headers-audit is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Carlos Johnson· Nov 19, 2024
We added performing-security-headers-audit from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Carlos Jain· Nov 19, 2024
performing-security-headers-audit fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Amelia Malhotra· Nov 19, 2024
I recommend performing-security-headers-audit for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Carlos Kapoor· Nov 11, 2024
Registry listing for performing-security-headers-audit matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 52