performing-cloud-forensics-investigation▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Conduct forensic investigations in cloud environments by collecting and analyzing logs, snapshots, and metadata from AWS, Azure, and GCP services.
| name | performing-cloud-forensics-investigation |
| description | Conduct forensic investigations in cloud environments by collecting and analyzing logs, snapshots, and metadata from AWS, Azure, and GCP services. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | digital-forensics |
| tags | - forensics - cloud-forensics - aws - azure - gcp - incident-response - log-analysis |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - RS.AN-01 - RS.AN-03 - DE.AE-02 - RS.MA-01 |
Performing Cloud Forensics Investigation
When to Use
- When investigating a security breach in AWS, Azure, or GCP cloud environments
- For collecting volatile and non-volatile evidence from cloud infrastructure
- When tracing unauthorized access through cloud service API logs
- During incident response requiring preservation of cloud-based evidence
- For analyzing compromised virtual machines, containers, or serverless functions
Prerequisites
- Administrative access to the cloud account under investigation
- AWS CLI, Azure CLI, or gcloud CLI configured with appropriate permissions
- Understanding of cloud-native logging (CloudTrail, Activity Log, Audit Log)
- Forensic workstation with cloud SDKs installed
- Knowledge of IAM, networking, and compute services in target cloud
- Evidence preservation procedures for cloud environments
Workflow
Step 1: Preserve Cloud Evidence and Establish Scope
# === AWS Evidence Preservation ===
# Snapshot compromised EC2 instance volumes
INSTANCE_ID="i-0abc123def456789"
VOLUME_IDS=$(aws ec2 describe-instances --instance-ids $INSTANCE_ID \
--query 'Reservations[].Instances[].BlockDeviceMappings[].Ebs.VolumeId' --output text)
for vol in $VOLUME_IDS; do
aws ec2 create-snapshot --volume-id $vol \
--description "Forensic snapshot - Case 2024-001 - $(date -u)" \
--tag-specifications "ResourceType=snapshot,Tags=[{Key=Case,Value=2024-001},{Key=Evidence,Value=true}]"
done
# Capture instance metadata
aws ec2 describe-instances --instance-ids $INSTANCE_ID \
> /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/instance_metadata.json
# Capture security group rules
aws ec2 describe-security-groups --group-ids $(aws ec2 describe-instances \
--instance-ids $INSTANCE_ID --query 'Reservations[].Instances[].SecurityGroups[].GroupId' --output text) \
> /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/security_groups.json
# Capture network interfaces
aws ec2 describe-network-interfaces --filters "Name=attachment.instance-id,Values=$INSTANCE_ID" \
> /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/network_interfaces.json
# Isolate the instance (replace security group with forensic isolation SG)
aws ec2 modify-instance-attribute --instance-id $INSTANCE_ID \
--groups sg-forensic-isolation
# === Azure Evidence Preservation ===
# Snapshot a compromised VM disk
az snapshot create --resource-group forensics-rg \
--name "case-2024-001-osdisk-snapshot" \
--source "/subscriptions/SUB_ID/resourceGroups/RG/providers/Microsoft.Compute/disks/vm-osdisk"
# === GCP Evidence Preservation ===
gcloud compute disks snapshot compromised-disk \
--snapshot-names="case-2024-001-forensic" \
--zone=us-central1-a
Step 2: Collect Cloud API and Access Logs
# === AWS CloudTrail Logs ===
# Download CloudTrail events for the investigation period
aws cloudtrail lookup-events \
--start-time "2024-01-15T00:00:00Z" \
--end-time "2024-01-20T23:59:59Z" \
--max-results 1000 \
> /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/cloudtrail_events.json
# Filter for specific user activity
aws cloudtrail lookup-events \
--lookup-attributes AttributeKey=Username,AttributeValue=compromised-user \
--start-time "2024-01-15T00:00:00Z" \
> /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/user_activity.json
# Download S3 access logs
aws s3 sync s3://my-cloudtrail-bucket/AWSLogs/ /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/cloudtrail_s3/
# Query CloudTrail with Athena for large-scale analysis
aws athena start-query-execution \
--query-string "SELECT eventTime, eventName, userIdentity.arn, sourceIPAddress, errorCode
FROM cloudtrail_logs
WHERE eventTime BETWEEN '2024-01-15' AND '2024-01-20'
AND sourceIPAddress NOT IN ('10.0.0.0/8')
ORDER BY eventTime" \
--result-configuration OutputLocation=s3://forensics-bucket/athena-results/
# === AWS VPC Flow Logs ===
aws logs filter-log-events \
--log-group-name "vpc-flow-logs" \
--start-time $(date -d "2024-01-15" +%s000) \
--end-time $(date -d "2024-01-20" +%s000) \
--filter-pattern "ACCEPT" \
> /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/vpc_flow_logs.json
# === Azure Activity Log ===
az monitor activity-log list \
--start-time "2024-01-15T00:00:00Z" \
--end-time "2024-01-20T23:59:59Z" \
--output json > /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/azure_activity.json
# === GCP Audit Logs ===
gcloud logging read 'logName="projects/PROJECT_ID/logs/cloudaudit.googleapis.com%2Factivity"
AND timestamp>="2024-01-15T00:00:00Z"
AND timestamp<="2024-01-20T23:59:59Z"' \
--format=json > /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/gcp_audit.json
Step 3: Analyze IAM and Access Patterns
# Analyze compromised credentials usage
python3 << 'PYEOF'
import json
from collections import defaultdict
with open('/cases/case-2024-001/cloud/cloudtrail_events.json') as f:
data = json.load(f)
# Analyze by source IP
ip_events = defaultdict(list)
error_events = []
critical_actions = []
for event in data.get('Events', []):
ct = json.loads(event.get('CloudTrailEvent', '{}'))
source_ip = ct.get('sourceIPAddress', 'Unknown')
event_name = ct.get('eventName', 'Unknown')
user_arn = ct.get('userIdentity', {}).get('arn', 'Unknown')
error = ct.get('errorCode')
timestamp = ct.get('eventTime', '')
ip_events[source_ip].append(event_name)
if error:
error_events.append({'time': timestamp, 'action': event_name, 'error': error, 'ip': source_ip})
# Flag critical actions
critical = ['CreateUser', 'CreateAccessKey', 'AttachUserPolicy', 'CreateRole',
'PutBucketPolicy', 'StopLogging', 'DeleteTrail', 'CreateKeyPair',
'RunInstances', 'AuthorizeSecurityGroupIngress']
if event_name in critical:
critical_actions.append({'time': timestamp, 'action': event_name, 'user': user_arn, 'ip': source_ip})
print("=== SOURCE IP ANALYSIS ===")
for ip, events in sorted(ip_events.items(), key=lambda x: len(x[1]), reverse=True):
print(f" {ip}: {len(events)} events ({len(set(events))} unique actions)")
print(f"\n=== ACCESS ERRORS ({len(error_events)} total) ===")
for e in error_events[:10]:
print(f" [{e['time']}] {e['action']} -> {e['error']} from {e['ip']}")
print(f"\n=== CRITICAL ACTIONS ({len(critical_actions)} total) ===")
for a in critical_actions:
print(f" [{a['time']}] {a['action']} by {a['user']} from {a['ip']}")
PYEOF
Step 4: Acquire and Analyze VM Disk Image
# Create a forensic analysis instance from the snapshot
SNAPSHOT_ID="snap-0abc123def456789"
# Create volume from snapshot in isolated forensic VPC
FORENSIC_VOL=$(aws ec2 create-volume --snapshot-id $SNAPSHOT_ID \
--availability-zone us-east-1a \
--tag-specifications "ResourceType=volume,Tags=[{Key=Case,Value=2024-001}]" \
--query 'VolumeId' --output text)
# Attach to forensic analysis instance (read-only mount)
aws ec2 attach-volume --volume-id $FORENSIC_VOL \
--instance-id i-forensic-workstation \
--device /dev/xvdf
# On the forensic instance, mount read-only
sudo mount -o ro /dev/xvdf1 /mnt/evidence
# Perform standard disk forensics on the mounted volume
# Extract logs, analyze file system, check for persistence
ls /mnt/evidence/var/log/
cp -r /mnt/evidence/var/log/ /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/vm_logs/
cp -r /mnt/evidence/etc/crontab /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/persistence/
cp -r /mnt/evidence/home/*/.ssh/ /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/ssh_keys/
cp -r /mnt/evidence/home/*/.bash_history /cases/case-2024-001/cloud/bash_history/
Step 5: Generate Cloud Forensics Report
# Compile findings into structured report
python3 << 'PYEOF'
report = """
CLOUD FORENSICS INVESTIGATION REPORT
======================================
Case: 2024-001
Cloud Provider: AWS (Account: 123456789012)
Region: us-east-1
Investigation Period: 2024-01-15 to 2024-01-20
EVIDENCE PRESERVED:
- EC2 Instance Snapshot: snap-0abc123def456789 (i-0abc123def456789)
- CloudTrail Logs: 2024-01-15 to 2024-01-20
- VPC Flow Logs: 2024-01-15 to 2024-01-20
- Instance Metadata: captured and hashed
- Security Group Configuration: captured at time of isolation
FINDINGS:
1. Initial Access:
- Compromised IAM access key AKIA... used from IP 203.0.113.45
- First unauthorized API call: 2024-01-15 14:32:00 UTC
- IP geolocation: Foreign jurisdiction (not company IP range)
2. Persistence:
- New IAM user 'backup-admin' created with AdministratorAccess
- New access key pair generated for backup-admin
- SSH key added to EC2 instance authorized_keys
3. Lateral Movement:
- S3 bucket policies modified to allow public access
- Security group rules modified to allow SSH from 0.0.0.0/0
- 3 additional EC2 instances launched for crypto-mining
4. Data Exfiltration:
- S3 bucket 'company-confidential' accessed 234 times
- 12 GB of data downloaded via GetObject API calls
- Data transferred to external IP 185.x.x.x
5. Anti-Forensics:
- CloudTrail logging disabled at 2024-01-18 03:00 UTC
- CloudWatch log groups deleted
RECOMMENDATIONS:
- Rotate all IAM credentials immediately
- Enable MFA on all accounts
- Restore CloudTrail logging
- Review and restrict S3 bucket policies
- Implement GuardDuty for continuous monitoring
"""
with open('/cases/case-2024-001/cloud/cloud_forensics_report.txt', 'w') as f:
f.write(report)
print(report)
PYEOF
Key Concepts
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| Cloud API logging | Service logs recording all API calls (CloudTrail, Activity Log, Audit Log) |
| Volume snapshots | Point-in-time copies of cloud disk volumes for forensic preservation |
| VPC Flow Logs | Network traffic metadata logs showing source, destination, and action |
| IAM credential compromise | Unauthorized use of access keys, tokens, or assumed roles |
| Instance metadata | EC2/VM configuration data including network, storage, and security settings |
| Shared responsibility | Cloud provider secures infrastructure; customer secures data and access |
| Evidence volatility | Cloud resources can be terminated; evidence must be preserved quickly |
| Multi-region artifacts | Attacks may span regions requiring cross-region log collection |
Tools & Systems
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| AWS CLI | Command-line interface for AWS service interaction and log collection |
| CloudTrail | AWS API call logging service for investigation and auditing |
| Azure Monitor | Azure logging and diagnostics platform |
| GCP Cloud Logging | Google Cloud audit and access logging service |
| Athena | AWS serverless SQL query service for analyzing CloudTrail logs at scale |
| Prowler | Open-source AWS security assessment and forensic collection tool |
| ScoutSuite | Multi-cloud security auditing tool |
| CADO Response | Cloud-native digital forensics and incident response platform |
Common Scenarios
Scenario 1: Compromised IAM Access Keys Identify the compromised key in CloudTrail, trace all API calls made with the key, determine the source IPs and actions taken, check for persistence mechanisms (new users, roles, keys), revoke the compromised credentials, assess data access scope.
Scenario 2: Cryptojacking on EC2 Instances Detect unauthorized instance launches in CloudTrail, snapshot the mining instances for analysis, examine security group changes that allowed C2 communication, identify the initial access vector (stolen keys, SSRF), calculate resource costs incurred.
Scenario 3: S3 Data Breach Analyze S3 access logs and CloudTrail for GetObject/PutBucketPolicy events, identify who modified bucket policies to allow public access, determine the scope of data exposure, check for data downloads from unauthorized IPs, assess regulatory reporting requirements.
Scenario 4: Container Escape in EKS/AKS/GKE Collect Kubernetes audit logs and cloud provider logs, analyze pod creation events for privilege escalation attempts, examine node-level logs for container escape evidence, check for unauthorized access to cloud metadata service (169.254.169.254), trace lateral movement to cloud APIs.
Output Format
Cloud Forensics Summary:
Cloud: AWS (us-east-1) Account: 123456789012
Investigation: 2024-01-15 to 2024-01-20
Incident Type: IAM Credential Compromise + Data Exfiltration
Evidence Collected:
EBS Snapshots: 3 volumes preserved
CloudTrail Events: 12,456 (1,234 from attacker IP)
VPC Flow Logs: 45,678 records
S3 Access Logs: 2,345 entries
Attack Timeline:
2024-01-15 14:32 - Compromised access key first used from 203.0.113.45
2024-01-15 14:45 - New IAM user created with admin privileges
2024-01-16 02:00 - S3 bucket policy modified (public access enabled)
2024-01-16 03:00 - 12 GB downloaded from company-confidential bucket
2024-01-18 03:00 - CloudTrail logging disabled
Impact Assessment:
Data Exposed: 12 GB from 3 S3 buckets
Resources Created: 3 EC2 instances (crypto mining)
Estimated Cost: $4,500 in unauthorized compute
How to use performing-cloud-forensics-investigation on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add performing-cloud-forensics-investigation
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches performing-cloud-forensics-investigation from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate performing-cloud-forensics-investigation. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /performing-cloud-forensics-investigation) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★55 reviews- ★★★★★Dev Li· Dec 28, 2024
I recommend performing-cloud-forensics-investigation for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 16, 2024
performing-cloud-forensics-investigation is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Michael Abebe· Dec 16, 2024
Keeps context tight: performing-cloud-forensics-investigation is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Diego Bhatia· Dec 8, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-cloud-forensics-investigation is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Kwame Lopez· Dec 8, 2024
We added performing-cloud-forensics-investigation from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Harper Park· Nov 27, 2024
Registry listing for performing-cloud-forensics-investigation matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Advait Taylor· Nov 27, 2024
performing-cloud-forensics-investigation fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 7, 2024
Keeps context tight: performing-cloud-forensics-investigation is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Diego Johnson· Nov 7, 2024
performing-cloud-forensics-investigation is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Dev Rahman· Nov 3, 2024
performing-cloud-forensics-investigation reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 55