performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Uses Microsoft RESTler to perform stateful REST API fuzzing by automatically generating and executing test sequences that exercise API endpoints, discover producer-consumer dependencies between requests, and find security and reliability bugs. The tester compiles an OpenAPI specification into a RESTler fuzzing grammar, configures authentication, runs test/fuzz-lean/fuzz modes, and analyzes results for 500 errors, authentication bypasses, resource leaks, and payload injection vulnerabilities. Activates for requests involving API fuzzing, RESTler testing, stateful API testing, or automated API security scanning.
| name | performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler |
| description | 'Uses Microsoft RESTler to perform stateful REST API fuzzing by automatically generating and executing test sequences that exercise API endpoints, discover producer-consumer dependencies between requests, and find security and reliability bugs. The tester compiles an OpenAPI specification into a RESTler fuzzing grammar, configures authentication, runs test/fuzz-lean/fuzz modes, and analyzes results for 500 errors, authentication bypasses, resource leaks, and payload injection vulnerabilities. Activates for requests involving API fuzzing, RESTler testing, stateful API testing, or automated API security scanning. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | api-security |
| tags | - api-security - fuzzing - restler - automated-testing - openapi - stateful-testing |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - PR.PS-01 - ID.RA-01 - PR.DS-10 - DE.CM-01 |
Performing API Fuzzing with RESTler
When to Use
- Performing automated security testing of REST APIs using their OpenAPI/Swagger specifications
- Discovering bugs that only manifest through specific sequences of API calls (stateful testing)
- Finding 500 Internal Server Error responses that indicate unhandled exceptions or crash conditions
- Testing API input validation by fuzzing parameters with malformed, boundary, and injection payloads
- Running continuous security regression testing in CI/CD pipelines for API changes
Do not use against production environments without explicit authorization and monitoring. RESTler creates and deletes resources aggressively during fuzzing.
Prerequisites
- Written authorization specifying the target API and acceptable testing scope
- Python 3.12+ and .NET 8.0 runtime installed
- RESTler downloaded from https://github.com/microsoft/restler-fuzzer
- OpenAPI/Swagger specification (v2 or v3) for the target API
- API authentication credentials (tokens, API keys, or OAuth credentials)
- Isolated test/staging environment (RESTler can create thousands of resources per hour)
Workflow
Step 1: RESTler Installation and Setup
# Clone and build RESTler
git clone https://github.com/microsoft/restler-fuzzer.git
cd restler-fuzzer
# Build RESTler
python3 ./build-restler.py --dest_dir /opt/restler
# Verify installation
/opt/restler/restler/Restler --help
# Alternative: Use pre-built release
# Download from https://github.com/microsoft/restler-fuzzer/releases
Step 2: Compile the API Specification
# Compile the OpenAPI spec into a RESTler fuzzing grammar
/opt/restler/restler/Restler compile \
--api_spec /path/to/openapi.yaml
# Output directory structure:
# Compile/
# grammar.py - Generated fuzzing grammar
# grammar.json - Grammar in JSON format
# dict.json - Custom dictionary for fuzzing values
# engine_settings.json - Engine configuration
# config.json - Compilation config
Custom dictionary for targeted fuzzing (dict.json):
{
"restler_fuzzable_string": [
"fuzzstring",
"' OR '1'='1",
"\" OR \"1\"=\"1",
"<script>alert(1)</script>",
"../../../etc/passwd",
"${7*7}",
"{{7*7}}",
"a]UNION SELECT 1,2,3--",
"\"; cat /etc/passwd; echo \"",
"AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"
],
"restler_fuzzable_int": [
"0",
"-1",
"999999999",
"2147483647",
"-2147483648"
],
"restler_fuzzable_bool": ["true", "false", "null", "1", "0"],
"restler_fuzzable_datetime": [
"2024-01-01T00:00:00Z",
"0000-00-00T00:00:00Z",
"9999-12-31T23:59:59Z",
"invalid-date"
],
"restler_fuzzable_uuid4": [
"00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000",
"aaaaaaaa-aaaa-aaaa-aaaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa"
],
"restler_custom_payload": {
"/users/{userId}": ["1", "0", "-1", "admin", "' OR 1=1--"],
"/orders/{orderId}": ["1", "0", "999999999"]
}
}
Step 3: Configure Authentication
# authentication_token.py - RESTler authentication module
import requests
import json
import time
class AuthenticationProvider:
def __init__(self):
self.token = None
self.token_expiry = 0
self.auth_url = "https://target-api.example.com/api/v1/auth/login"
self.credentials = {
"email": "[email protected]",
"password": "FuzzerPass123!"
}
def get_token(self):
"""Get or refresh authentication token."""
current_time = time.time()
if self.token and current_time < self.token_expiry - 60:
return self.token
resp = requests.post(self.auth_url, json=self.credentials)
if resp.status_code == 200:
data = resp.json()
self.token = data["access_token"]
self.token_expiry = current_time + 3600 # Assume 1-hour TTL
return self.token
else:
raise Exception(f"Authentication failed: {resp.status_code}")
def get_auth_header(self):
"""Return the authentication header for RESTler."""
token = self.get_token()
return f"Authorization: Bearer {token}"
# Export the token refresh command for RESTler
auth = AuthenticationProvider()
print(auth.get_auth_header())
Engine settings for authentication (engine_settings.json):
{
"authentication": {
"token": {
"token_refresh_interval": 300,
"token_refresh_cmd": "python3 /path/to/authentication_token.py"
}
},
"max_combinations": 20,
"max_request_execution_time": 30,
"global_producer_timing_delay": 2,
"no_ssl": false,
"host": "target-api.example.com",
"target_port": 443,
"garbage_collection_interval": 300,
"max_sequence_length": 10
}
Step 4: Run RESTler in Test Mode (Smoke Test)
# Test mode: Quick validation that all endpoints are reachable
/opt/restler/restler/Restler test \
--grammar_file Compile/grammar.py \
--dictionary_file Compile/dict.json \
--settings Compile/engine_settings.json \
--no_ssl \
--target_ip target-api.example.com \
--target_port 443
# Review test results
cat Test/ResponseBuckets/runSummary.json
# Parse test results
import json
with open("Test/ResponseBuckets/runSummary.json") as f:
summary = json.load(f)
print("Test Mode Summary:")
print(f" Total requests: {summary.get('total_requests_sent', {}).get('num_requests', 0)}")
print(f" Successful (2xx): {summary.get('num_fully_valid', 0)}")
print(f" Client errors (4xx): {summary.get('num_invalid', 0)}")
print(f" Server errors (5xx): {summary.get('num_server_error', 0)}")
# Identify uncovered endpoints
covered = summary.get('covered_endpoints', [])
total = summary.get('total_endpoints', [])
uncovered = set(total) - set(covered)
if uncovered:
print(f"\nUncovered endpoints ({len(uncovered)}):")
for ep in uncovered:
print(f" - {ep}")
Step 5: Run Fuzz-Lean Mode
# Fuzz-lean: One pass through all endpoints with security checkers enabled
/opt/restler/restler/Restler fuzz-lean \
--grammar_file Compile/grammar.py \
--dictionary_file Compile/dict.json \
--settings Compile/engine_settings.json \
--target_ip target-api.example.com \
--target_port 443 \
--time_budget 1 # 1 hour max
# Checkers automatically enabled in fuzz-lean:
# - UseAfterFree: Tests accessing resources after deletion
# - NamespaceRule: Tests accessing resources across namespaces/tenants
# - ResourceHierarchy: Tests child resources with wrong parent IDs
# - LeakageRule: Tests for information disclosure in error responses
# - InvalidDynamicObject: Tests with malformed dynamic object IDs
Step 6: Run Full Fuzzing Mode
# Full fuzz mode: Extended fuzzing for comprehensive coverage
/opt/restler/restler/Restler fuzz \
--grammar_file Compile/grammar.py \
--dictionary_file Compile/dict.json \
--settings Compile/engine_settings.json \
--target_ip target-api.example.com \
--target_port 443 \
--time_budget 4 \
--enable_checkers UseAfterFree NamespaceRule ResourceHierarchy LeakageRule InvalidDynamicObject PayloadBody
# Analyze fuzzing results
python3 <<'EOF'
import json
import os
results_dir = "Fuzz/ResponseBuckets"
bugs_dir = "Fuzz/bug_buckets"
# Parse bug buckets
if os.path.exists(bugs_dir):
for bug_file in os.listdir(bugs_dir):
if bug_file.endswith(".txt"):
with open(os.path.join(bugs_dir, bug_file)) as f:
content = f.read()
print(f"\n=== Bug: {bug_file} ===")
print(content[:500])
# Parse response summary
summary_file = os.path.join(results_dir, "runSummary.json")
if os.path.exists(summary_file):
with open(summary_file) as f:
summary = json.load(f)
print(f"\nFuzz Summary:")
print(f" Duration: {summary.get('time_budget_hours', 0)} hours")
print(f" Total requests: {summary.get('total_requests_sent', {}).get('num_requests', 0)}")
print(f" Bugs found: {summary.get('num_bugs', 0)}")
print(f" 500 errors: {summary.get('num_server_error', 0)}")
EOF
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Stateful Fuzzing | API fuzzing that maintains state across requests by using responses from earlier requests as inputs to later ones, enabling testing of multi-step workflows |
| Producer-Consumer Dependencies | RESTler's inference that a value produced by one API call (e.g., a created resource ID) should be consumed by a subsequent call |
| Fuzzing Grammar | Compiled representation of the API specification that defines how to generate valid and invalid requests for each endpoint |
| Checker | RESTler security rule that tests for specific vulnerability patterns like use-after-free, namespace isolation, or information leakage |
| Bug Bucket | RESTler's categorization of discovered bugs by type and endpoint, grouping similar failures for efficient triage |
| Garbage Collection | RESTler's periodic cleanup of resources created during fuzzing to prevent resource exhaustion on the target system |
Tools & Systems
- RESTler: Microsoft Research's stateful REST API fuzzing tool that compiles OpenAPI specs into fuzzing grammars
- Schemathesis: Property-based API testing tool that generates test cases from OpenAPI/GraphQL schemas
- Dredd: API testing tool that validates API implementations against OpenAPI/API Blueprint documentation
- Fuzz-lightyear: Yelp's stateless API fuzzer focused on finding authentication and authorization vulnerabilities
- API Fuzzer: OWASP tool for API endpoint fuzzing with customizable payload dictionaries
Common Scenarios
Scenario: Microservice API Fuzzing Campaign
Context: A fintech company has 12 microservice APIs with OpenAPI specifications. Before a major release, the security team runs RESTler fuzzing against each service in the staging environment to catch bugs.
Approach:
- Collect OpenAPI specs for all 12 services and compile each into a RESTler grammar
- Configure authentication for each service with service-specific credentials
- Run test mode on each service to validate endpoint reachability and fix grammar issues
- Run fuzz-lean mode (1 hour per service) to identify quick wins
- Find 23 bugs in fuzz-lean mode: 8 unhandled 500 errors, 5 use-after-free patterns, 4 namespace isolation failures, 6 information leakage in error responses
- Run full fuzz mode (4 hours per service) on the 5 services with the most bugs
- Discover 47 additional bugs including a critical authentication bypass where deleting a user and reusing their token still allows access
- Generate bug reports and track remediation through JIRA integration
Pitfalls:
- Running RESTler against production without understanding that it creates and deletes thousands of resources
- Not configuring authentication correctly, causing RESTler to only test unauthenticated access
- Using the default dictionary without adding application-specific injection payloads
- Not setting a time budget, allowing RESTler to run indefinitely
- Ignoring the compilation warnings that indicate endpoints RESTler cannot reach due to dependency issues
Output Format
## RESTler API Fuzzing Report
**Target**: User Service API (staging.example.com)
**Specification**: OpenAPI 3.0 (42 endpoints)
**Duration**: 4 hours (full fuzz mode)
**Total Requests**: 145,832
### Bug Summary
| Category | Count | Severity |
|----------|-------|----------|
| 500 Internal Server Error | 12 | High |
| Use After Free | 3 | Critical |
| Namespace Rule Violation | 5 | Critical |
| Information Leakage | 8 | Medium |
| Resource Leak | 4 | Low |
### Critical Findings
**1. Use-After-Free: Deleted user token still valid**
- Sequence: POST /users -> DELETE /users/{id} -> GET /users/{id}
- After deleting user, GET with the deleted user's token returns 200
- Impact: Deleted accounts can still access the API
**2. Namespace Violation: Cross-tenant data access**
- Sequence: POST /users (tenant A) -> GET /users/{id} (tenant B token)
- User created by tenant A is accessible with tenant B's credentials
- Impact: Multi-tenant isolation breach
**3. 500 Error: Unhandled integer overflow**
- Request: POST /orders {"quantity": 2147483648}
- Response: 500 Internal Server Error with stack trace
- Impact: DoS potential, information disclosure via stack trace
### Coverage
- Endpoints covered: 38/42 (90.5%)
- Uncovered: POST /admin/migrate, DELETE /admin/cache,
PUT /config/advanced, POST /webhooks/test
How to use performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★54 reviews- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 28, 2024
Useful defaults in performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Mateo Mehta· Dec 28, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Sofia Sethi· Dec 16, 2024
Useful defaults in performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Ishan Srinivasan· Dec 12, 2024
performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Daniel Tandon· Dec 4, 2024
Registry listing for performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Diya Kim· Nov 23, 2024
Keeps context tight: performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Yash Thakker· Nov 19, 2024
performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Nikhil Johnson· Nov 19, 2024
I recommend performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Charlotte Lopez· Nov 11, 2024
We added performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Xiao Sanchez· Nov 7, 2024
performing-api-fuzzing-with-restler has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 54