investigating-phishing-email-incident▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Investigates phishing email incidents from initial user report through header analysis, URL/attachment detonation, impacted user identification, and containment actions using SOC tools like Splunk, Microsoft Defender, and sandbox analysis platforms. Use when a reported phishing email requires full incident investigation to determine scope and impact.
| name | investigating-phishing-email-incident |
| description | 'Investigates phishing email incidents from initial user report through header analysis, URL/attachment detonation, impacted user identification, and containment actions using SOC tools like Splunk, Microsoft Defender, and sandbox analysis platforms. Use when a reported phishing email requires full incident investigation to determine scope and impact. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | soc-operations |
| tags | - soc - phishing - incident-response - email-security - splunk - defender - sandbox |
| mitre_attack | - T1566.001 - T1566.002 - T1204.001 - T1598.003 |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - DE.CM-01 - DE.AE-02 - RS.MA-01 - DE.AE-06 |
Investigating Phishing Email Incident
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- A user reports a suspicious email via the phishing report button or helpdesk ticket
- Email security gateway flags a message that bypassed initial filters
- Automated detection identifies credential harvesting URLs or malicious attachments
- A phishing campaign targeting the organization requires scope assessment
Do not use for spam or marketing emails without malicious intent — route those to email administration for filter tuning.
Prerequisites
- Access to email gateway logs (Proofpoint, Mimecast, or Microsoft Defender for Office 365)
- Splunk or SIEM with email log ingestion (O365 Message Trace, Exchange tracking logs)
- Sandbox access (Any.Run, Joe Sandbox, or Hybrid Analysis) for URL/attachment detonation
- Microsoft Graph API or Exchange Admin Center for email search and purge operations
- URLScan.io and VirusTotal API keys
Workflow
Step 1: Extract and Analyze Email Headers
Obtain the full email headers (.eml file) from the reported message:
import email
from email import policy
with open("phishing_sample.eml", "rb") as f:
msg = email.message_from_binary_file(f, policy=policy.default)
# Extract key headers
print(f"From: {msg['From']}")
print(f"Return-Path: {msg['Return-Path']}")
print(f"Reply-To: {msg['Reply-To']}")
print(f"Subject: {msg['Subject']}")
print(f"Message-ID: {msg['Message-ID']}")
print(f"X-Originating-IP: {msg['X-Originating-IP']}")
# Parse Received headers (bottom-up for true origin)
for header in reversed(msg.get_all('Received', [])):
print(f"Received: {header[:120]}")
# Check authentication results
print(f"Authentication-Results: {msg['Authentication-Results']}")
print(f"DKIM-Signature: {msg.get('DKIM-Signature', 'NONE')[:80]}")
Key checks:
- SPF: Does
Return-Pathdomain match sending IP? Look forspf=passorspf=fail - DKIM: Is the signature valid?
dkim=passconfirms the email was not modified in transit - DMARC: Does the
Fromdomain align with SPF/DKIM domains?dmarc=failindicates spoofing
Step 2: Analyze URLs and Attachments
URL Analysis:
import requests
# Submit URL to URLScan.io
url_to_scan = "https://evil-login.example.com/office365"
response = requests.post(
"https://urlscan.io/api/v1/scan/",
headers={"API-Key": "YOUR_KEY", "Content-Type": "application/json"},
json={"url": url_to_scan, "visibility": "unlisted"}
)
scan_id = response.json()["uuid"]
print(f"Scan URL: https://urlscan.io/result/{scan_id}/")
# Check VirusTotal for URL reputation
import vt
client = vt.Client("YOUR_VT_API_KEY")
url_id = vt.url_id(url_to_scan)
url_obj = client.get_object(f"/urls/{url_id}")
print(f"VT Score: {url_obj.last_analysis_stats}")
client.close()
Attachment Analysis:
import hashlib
# Calculate file hashes
with open("attachment.docx", "rb") as f:
content = f.read()
md5 = hashlib.md5(content).hexdigest()
sha256 = hashlib.sha256(content).hexdigest()
print(f"MD5: {md5}")
print(f"SHA256: {sha256}")
# Submit to MalwareBazaar for lookup
response = requests.post(
"https://mb-api.abuse.ch/api/v1/",
data={"query": "get_info", "hash": sha256}
)
print(response.json()["query_status"])
Submit to sandbox (Any.Run or Joe Sandbox) for dynamic analysis of macros, PowerShell execution, and C2 callbacks.
Step 3: Determine Campaign Scope
Search for all recipients of the same phishing email in Splunk:
index=email sourcetype="o365:messageTrace"
(SenderAddress="[email protected]" OR Subject="Urgent: Password Reset Required"
OR MessageId="<[email protected]>")
earliest=-7d
| stats count by RecipientAddress, DeliveryStatus, MessageTraceId
| sort - count
Alternatively, use Microsoft Graph API:
import requests
headers = {"Authorization": f"Bearer {access_token}"}
params = {
"$filter": f"subject eq 'Urgent: Password Reset Required' and "
f"receivedDateTime ge 2024-03-14T00:00:00Z",
"$select": "sender,toRecipients,subject,receivedDateTime",
"$top": 100
}
response = requests.get(
"https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/users/[email protected]/messages",
headers=headers, params=params
)
messages = response.json()["value"]
print(f"Found {len(messages)} matching messages")
Step 4: Identify Impacted Users (Who Clicked)
Check proxy/web logs for users who visited the phishing URL:
index=proxy dest="evil-login.example.com" earliest=-7d
| stats count, values(action) AS actions, latest(_time) AS last_access
by src_ip, user
| lookup asset_lookup_by_cidr ip AS src_ip OUTPUT owner, category
| sort - count
| table user, src_ip, owner, actions, count, last_access
Check if credentials were submitted (POST requests to phishing domain):
index=proxy dest="evil-login.example.com" http_method=POST earliest=-7d
| stats count by src_ip, user, url, status
Step 5: Containment Actions
Purge emails from all mailboxes:
# Microsoft 365 Compliance Search and Purge
New-ComplianceSearch -Name "Phishing_Purge_2024_0315" `
-ExchangeLocation All `
-ContentMatchQuery '(From:[email protected]) AND (Subject:"Urgent: Password Reset Required")'
Start-ComplianceSearch -Identity "Phishing_Purge_2024_0315"
# After search completes, execute purge
New-ComplianceSearchAction -SearchName "Phishing_Purge_2024_0315" -Purge -PurgeType SoftDelete
Block indicators:
- Add sender domain to email gateway block list
- Add phishing URL domain to web proxy block list
- Add attachment hash to endpoint detection block list
- Create DNS sinkhole entry for phishing domain
Reset compromised credentials:
# Force password reset for impacted users
$impactedUsers = @("[email protected]", "[email protected]")
foreach ($user in $impactedUsers) {
Set-MsolUserPassword -UserPrincipalName $user -ForceChangePassword $true
Revoke-AzureADUserAllRefreshToken -ObjectId (Get-AzureADUser -ObjectId $user).ObjectId
}
Step 6: Document and Report
Create incident report with full timeline, IOCs, impacted users, and remediation actions taken.
| makeresults
| eval incident_id="PHI-2024-0315",
reported_time="2024-03-15 09:12:00",
sender="attacker@evil-domain[.]com",
subject="Urgent: Password Reset Required",
url="hxxps://evil-login[.]example[.]com/office365",
recipients_count=47,
clicked_count=5,
credentials_submitted=2,
emails_purged=47,
passwords_reset=2,
domains_blocked=1,
disposition="True Positive - Credential Phishing Campaign"
| table incident_id, reported_time, sender, subject, url, recipients_count,
clicked_count, credentials_submitted, emails_purged, passwords_reset, disposition
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| SPF (Sender Policy Framework) | DNS TXT record specifying which mail servers are authorized to send on behalf of a domain |
| DKIM | DomainKeys Identified Mail — cryptographic signature proving email content was not altered in transit |
| DMARC | Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance — policy combining SPF and DKIM alignment |
| Credential Harvesting | Phishing technique using fake login pages to capture username/password combinations |
| Business Email Compromise (BEC) | Social engineering attack using compromised or spoofed executive email for financial fraud |
| Message Trace | O365/Exchange log showing email routing, delivery status, and filtering actions for forensic analysis |
Tools & Systems
- Microsoft Defender for Office 365: Email security platform with Safe Links, Safe Attachments, and Threat Explorer for investigation
- URLScan.io: Free URL analysis service capturing screenshots, DOM, cookies, and network requests
- Any.Run: Interactive sandbox for detonating malicious files and URLs with real-time behavior analysis
- Proofpoint TAP: Targeted Attack Protection dashboard showing clicked URLs and delivered threats per user
- PhishTool: Dedicated phishing email analysis platform automating header parsing and IOC extraction
Common Scenarios
- Credential Phishing: Fake O365 login page — check proxy for POST requests, force password resets for submitters
- Macro-Enabled Document: Word doc with VBA macro — sandbox shows PowerShell download cradle, check endpoints for execution
- QR Code Phishing (Quishing): Email contains QR code linking to credential harvester — decode QR, submit URL to sandbox
- Thread Hijacking: Attacker uses compromised mailbox to reply in existing threads — check for impossible travel or new inbox rules
- Voicemail Phishing: Fake voicemail notification with HTML attachment — analyze attachment for redirect chains
Output Format
PHISHING INCIDENT REPORT — PHI-2024-0315
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Reported: 2024-03-15 09:12 UTC by jsmith (Finance)
Sender: attacker@evil-domain[.]com (SPF: FAIL, DKIM: NONE, DMARC: FAIL)
Subject: Urgent: Password Reset Required
Payload: Credential harvesting URL
IOCs:
URL: hxxps://evil-login[.]example[.]com/office365
Domain: evil-login[.]example[.]com (registered 2024-03-14, Namecheap)
IP: 185.234.xx.xx (VT: 12/90 malicious)
Scope:
Recipients: 47 users across Finance and HR departments
Clicked: 5 users visited phishing URL
Submitted: 2 users entered credentials (confirmed via POST in proxy logs)
Containment:
[DONE] 47 emails purged via Compliance Search
[DONE] Domain blocked on proxy and DNS sinkhole
[DONE] 2 user passwords reset, sessions revoked
[DONE] MFA enforced for both compromised accounts
[DONE] Inbox rules audited — no forwarding rules found
Status: RESOLVED — No evidence of lateral movement post-compromise
How to use investigating-phishing-email-incident on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add investigating-phishing-email-incident
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches investigating-phishing-email-incident from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate investigating-phishing-email-incident. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /investigating-phishing-email-incident) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★58 reviews- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 28, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: investigating-phishing-email-incident is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Charlotte Agarwal· Dec 28, 2024
Registry listing for investigating-phishing-email-incident matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Li Taylor· Dec 28, 2024
Useful defaults in investigating-phishing-email-incident — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Alexander Mensah· Dec 12, 2024
investigating-phishing-email-incident reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Zara Rahman· Dec 8, 2024
Registry listing for investigating-phishing-email-incident matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Henry Torres· Nov 27, 2024
investigating-phishing-email-incident is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Li Ghosh· Nov 27, 2024
Useful defaults in investigating-phishing-email-incident — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 19, 2024
We added investigating-phishing-email-incident from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Tariq Iyer· Nov 19, 2024
Useful defaults in investigating-phishing-email-incident — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Kaira Chen· Nov 19, 2024
Registry listing for investigating-phishing-email-incident matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 58