Vulnerability remediation SLAs define mandatory timeframes for patching or mitigating identified vulnerabilities based on severity, asset criticality, and exploit availability. Effective SLA programs
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example: Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example: Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example: Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Time estimate: 15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Prerequisites
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
epx add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/implementing-vulnerability-remediation-slaCompatible with
Supported agents
| name | implementing-vulnerability-remediation-sla |
| description | Vulnerability remediation SLAs define mandatory timeframes for patching or mitigating identified vulnerabilities based on severity, asset criticality, and exploit availability. Effective SLA programs |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | vulnerability-management |
| tags | - vulnerability-management - cve - sla - remediation - patch-management - risk |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - ID.RA-01 - ID.RA-02 - ID.IM-02 - ID.RA-06 |
Vulnerability remediation SLAs define mandatory timeframes for patching or mitigating identified vulnerabilities based on severity, asset criticality, and exploit availability. Effective SLA programs drive accountability, ensure consistent remediation timelines, and provide measurable KPIs for vulnerability management maturity.
| Severity | Tier 1 (Critical) | Tier 2 (Important) | Tier 3 (Standard) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical (CVSS 9.0-10.0) | 24-48 hours | 72 hours | 7 days |
| High (CVSS 7.0-8.9) | 7 days | 14 days | 30 days |
| Medium (CVSS 4.0-6.9) | 30 days | 45 days | 60 days |
| Low (CVSS 0.1-3.9) | 90 days | 90 days | 90 days |
| CISA KEV Listed | 24 hours | 48 hours | 7 days |
Tier 1 (Critical Assets):
- Customer-facing production systems
- Payment processing infrastructure
- Domain controllers and identity systems
- Core network infrastructure (firewalls, routers)
- Databases containing PII/PHI/PCI data
Tier 2 (Important Assets):
- Internal production applications
- Email and collaboration systems
- Development/staging environments with production data
- Backup and recovery infrastructure
- VPN and remote access gateways
Tier 3 (Standard Assets):
- End-user workstations
- Development/test environments
- Print servers and peripheral management
- Non-critical internal tools
Key sections to include:
# ServiceNow / Jira integration for automatic ticket creation
# See process.py for full implementation
# Key fields for remediation tickets:
# - Vulnerability ID (CVE/Plugin ID)
# - Affected host(s)
# - Severity (CVSS + contextual factors)
# - Asset tier
# - SLA deadline (calculated from discovery date)
# - Assignment group
# - Remediation instructions
# - Verification criteria
SLA Status Action Notify
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
75% elapsed Warning email Asset owner
100% elapsed SLA breach notification Manager + CISO
100% + 7 days Executive escalation VP/CTO
100% + 30 days Risk acceptance required CISO approval
100% + 90 days Compensating controls mandatory Board report
Valid exception reasons:
Exception requirements:
| KPI | Definition | Target |
|---|---|---|
| SLA Compliance Rate | % of vulns remediated within SLA | >90% |
| Mean Time to Remediate (MTTR) | Average days from discovery to fix | Critical: <3d, High: <10d |
| Vulnerability Backlog | Open vulnerabilities past SLA | <5% of total |
| Exception Rate | % of findings with active exceptions | <10% |
| Recurrence Rate | % of vulns that reappear after remediation | <5% |
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionimplementing-vulnerability-remediation-slaExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
epx add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/implementing-vulnerability-remediation-slaFetches implementing-vulnerability-remediation-sla from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/implementing-vulnerability-remediation-sla
Restart Cursor to activate implementing-vulnerability-remediation-sla. Access via /implementing-vulnerability-remediation-slain your agent's command palette.
Learn more:View source on GitHubSkills CLI docsAbout CursorWhat are agent skills?
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
exploiting-vulnerabilities-with-metasploit-framework
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · exploiting-vulnerabilities-with-metasploit-framework · same repo
performing-thick-client-application-penetration-test
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · performing-thick-client-application-penetration-test · same repo
scanning-docker-images-with-trivy
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · scanning-docker-images-with-trivy · same repo
building-red-team-c2-infrastructure-with-havoc
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · building-red-team-c2-infrastructure-with-havoc · same repo
hunting-credential-stuffing-attacks
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · hunting-credential-stuffing-attacks · same repo
monitoring-darkweb-sources
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · monitoring-darkweb-sources · same repo
We added implementing-vulnerability-remediation-sla from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Useful defaults in implementing-vulnerability-remediation-sla — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
implementing-vulnerability-remediation-sla fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
implementing-vulnerability-remediation-sla is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Useful defaults in implementing-vulnerability-remediation-sla — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
We added implementing-vulnerability-remediation-sla from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
implementing-vulnerability-remediation-sla fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
implementing-vulnerability-remediation-sla has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: implementing-vulnerability-remediation-sla is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
We added implementing-vulnerability-remediation-sla from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 40