implementing-soar-playbook-for-phishing▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Automate phishing incident response using Splunk SOAR REST API to create containers, add artifacts, and trigger playbooks
| name | implementing-soar-playbook-for-phishing |
| description | Automate phishing incident response using Splunk SOAR REST API to create containers, add artifacts, and trigger playbooks |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | security-operations |
| tags | - soar - splunk-phantom - phishing - incident-response |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - DE.CM-01 - RS.MA-01 - GV.OV-01 - DE.AE-02 |
Implementing SOAR Playbook for Phishing
Overview
This skill implements a phishing incident response workflow using the Splunk SOAR (formerly Phantom) REST API. When a suspected phishing email is reported, the agent parses email headers and body, creates a SOAR container representing the incident, attaches artifacts containing indicators of compromise (sender address, URLs, IP addresses, file hashes), triggers an automated investigation playbook, and polls for action results.
Splunk SOAR orchestrates and automates security operations through playbooks that chain together investigative and response actions. The REST API at /rest/container, /rest/artifact, and /rest/playbook_run enables programmatic incident creation and automation triggering from external tools, email gateways, and SIEM alerts.
When to Use
- When deploying or configuring implementing soar playbook for phishing capabilities in your environment
- When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements
- When building or improving security architecture for this domain
- When conducting security assessments that require this implementation
Prerequisites
- Python 3.9 or later with
requestsandemailmodules - Splunk SOAR instance (Cloud or On-Premises) with REST API access
- SOAR API token with permissions to create containers and trigger playbooks
- Network connectivity to SOAR instance on port 443
- A configured phishing investigation playbook in SOAR
Steps
-
Parse the phishing email: Read the email file (.eml format) and extract headers including From, To, Subject, Reply-To, Return-Path, Received, Message-ID, X-Mailer, and authentication results (SPF, DKIM, DMARC). Extract URLs and IP addresses from the email body.
-
Authenticate to SOAR REST API: Use the API token in the
ph-auth-tokenheader to authenticate all REST API requests to the SOAR instance. -
Create a container: POST to
/rest/containerwith the incident label, name, description, severity, and status. The container represents the phishing incident and receives a container ID in the response. -
Add email header artifacts: POST to
/rest/artifactwithcontainer_idand CEF (Common Event Format) fields containing sender address (fromAddress), recipient (toAddress), subject, originating IP (sourceAddress), and Message-ID. Setrun_automationto False for all but the last artifact. -
Add URL artifacts: For each URL extracted from the email body, create an artifact with CEF field
requestURLand typeurl. These artifacts feed into URL reputation checks in the playbook. -
Trigger the playbook: POST to
/rest/playbook_runwith the playbook ID or name and the container ID. This initiates the automated investigation workflow. -
Poll action results: GET
/rest/action_runfiltered by container ID to monitor playbook progress. Poll until all actions reach a terminal state (success, failed, or cancelled). -
Compile response report: Aggregate playbook action results into a summary report with verdicts from URL reputation, domain reputation, IP geolocation, and email header analysis.
Expected Output
{
"incident": {
"container_id": 1542,
"status": "new",
"severity": "high",
"artifacts_created": 5
},
"playbook": {
"name": "phishing_investigate",
"run_id": 892,
"status": "success",
"actions_completed": 8
},
"verdict": "malicious",
"indicators": {
"sender_domain_reputation": "malicious",
"urls_flagged": 2,
"spf_result": "fail",
"dkim_result": "fail"
}
}
How to use implementing-soar-playbook-for-phishing on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add implementing-soar-playbook-for-phishing
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches implementing-soar-playbook-for-phishing from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate implementing-soar-playbook-for-phishing. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /implementing-soar-playbook-for-phishing) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★48 reviews- ★★★★★Soo Gill· Dec 28, 2024
implementing-soar-playbook-for-phishing has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★William Diallo· Dec 24, 2024
implementing-soar-playbook-for-phishing reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 16, 2024
I recommend implementing-soar-playbook-for-phishing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Kaira Bhatia· Dec 16, 2024
We added implementing-soar-playbook-for-phishing from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Ira Patel· Dec 4, 2024
Keeps context tight: implementing-soar-playbook-for-phishing is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Evelyn Khanna· Nov 19, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: implementing-soar-playbook-for-phishing is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★William Torres· Nov 15, 2024
Registry listing for implementing-soar-playbook-for-phishing matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Ira Dixit· Nov 11, 2024
We added implementing-soar-playbook-for-phishing from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Nov 7, 2024
implementing-soar-playbook-for-phishing fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Oct 26, 2024
implementing-soar-playbook-for-phishing has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 48