hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Detect NTFS timestamp manipulation (MITRE T1070.006) by comparing $STANDARD_INFORMATION vs $FILE_NAME timestamps in the MFT. Uses analyzeMFT and Python to identify files with anomalous temporal patterns indicating anti-forensic timestomping activity.
| name | hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping |
| description | 'Detect NTFS timestamp manipulation (MITRE T1070.006) by comparing $STANDARD_INFORMATION vs $FILE_NAME timestamps in the MFT. Uses analyzeMFT and Python to identify files with anomalous temporal patterns indicating anti-forensic timestomping activity. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | threat-hunting |
| tags | - timestomping - ntfs-forensics - mft-analysis - defense-evasion |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| d3fend_techniques | - File Metadata Consistency Validation - Content Format Conversion - File Content Analysis - Platform Hardening - File Format Verification |
| nist_csf | - DE.CM-01 - DE.AE-02 - DE.AE-07 - ID.RA-05 |
Hunting for Defense Evasion via Timestomping
Detect timestamp manipulation by analyzing NTFS MFT entries for discrepancies between $STANDARD_INFORMATION and $FILE_NAME attributes.
When to Use
- Investigating suspected anti-forensic activity where an adversary may have altered file timestamps to blend malware into legitimate directories
- Threat hunting for defense evasion (MITRE ATT&CK T1070.006) across compromised Windows systems
- Validating timeline integrity during forensic examinations of disk images or live acquisitions
- Triaging suspicious files that appear to have creation dates older than the OS installation or inconsistent with known deployment timelines
- Detecting tools like Timestomp (Metasploit), NTimeStomp, SetMACE, or PowerShell Set-ItemProperty used to alter timestamps
- Building automated detection pipelines that flag temporal anomalies in MFT data for SOC analysts
Do not use as the sole detection method; advanced adversaries can manipulate both $STANDARD_INFORMATION and $FILE_NAME timestamps (though the latter requires raw disk access and is much harder). Combine with USN Journal, $LogFile, and ShimCache/Amcache analysis for corroboration.
Prerequisites
- Raw $MFT file extracted from a Windows system (via FTK Imager, KAPE, or live extraction)
MFTECmd(Eric Zimmerman tool) oranalyzeMFTfor MFT parsing- Python 3.8+ with
pandasfor analysis - Optional:
mftPython library (pip install mft) for programmatic MFT parsing - Optional: KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) for automated artifact collection
- Timeline Explorer or Excel for visual analysis of parsed MFT output
Workflow
Step 1: Extract the $MFT from a Live System or Disk Image
# Method 1: Using KAPE to collect MFT and related artifacts
.\kape.exe --tsource C: --tdest D:\Evidence\MFT_Collection --target !SANS_Triage
# Method 2: Using FTK Imager CLI to extract $MFT
ftkimager.exe \\.\C: D:\Evidence\mft_raw.bin --e01 --include $MFT
# Method 3: Raw copy using RawCopy (handles locked NTFS system files)
RawCopy.exe /FileNamePath:C:0 /OutputPath:D:\Evidence\ /OutputName:$MFT
# Method 4: On a mounted forensic image in Linux
sudo mount -o ro,norecovery /dev/sdb1 /mnt/evidence
sudo icat -o 2048 /dev/sdb 0 > /mnt/output/$MFT
# Method 5: Using sleuthkit to extract MFT from disk image
icat -o 2048 evidence.E01 0 > extracted_MFT
Step 2: Parse the MFT with MFTECmd
Use Eric Zimmerman's MFTECmd to produce a CSV with both $STANDARD_INFORMATION and $FILE_NAME timestamps:
# Parse MFT to CSV with all timestamp columns
MFTECmd.exe -f "D:\Evidence\$MFT" --csv D:\Evidence\Parsed\ --csvf mft_parsed.csv
# The output CSV contains these critical columns:
# Created0x10 - $STANDARD_INFORMATION Created timestamp
# LastModified0x10 - $STANDARD_INFORMATION Modified timestamp
# LastAccess0x10 - $STANDARD_INFORMATION Accessed timestamp
# LastRecordChange0x10 - $STANDARD_INFORMATION Entry Modified timestamp
# Created0x30 - $FILE_NAME Created timestamp
# LastModified0x30 - $FILE_NAME Modified timestamp
# LastAccess0x30 - $FILE_NAME Accessed timestamp
# LastRecordChange0x30 - $FILE_NAME Entry Modified timestamp
Step 3: Detect Timestomping via SI vs FN Comparison
The core detection: $STANDARD_INFORMATION timestamps are easily modified by user-mode tools, but $FILE_NAME timestamps are updated only by the NTFS driver (kernel-mode). When SI timestamps are OLDER than FN timestamps, timestomping is likely:
import pandas as pd
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
def load_mft_data(csv_path):
"""Load MFTECmd parsed CSV output."""
df = pd.read_csv(csv_path, low_memory=False)
# Parse timestamp columns
timestamp_cols = [
"Created0x10", "LastModified0x10", "LastAccess0x10", "LastRecordChange0x10",
"Created0x30", "LastModified0x30", "LastAccess0x30", "LastRecordChange0x30"
]
for col in timestamp_cols:
if col in df.columns:
df[col] = pd.to_datetime(df[col], errors="coerce")
return df
def detect_timestomping(df):
"""Detect timestamp manipulation by comparing SI and FN attributes.
Key indicators:
1. SI Created < FN Created (SI timestamp pushed back in time)
2. SI timestamps have nanoseconds = 0000000 (tool artifact)
3. SI Created < FN Entry Modified (impossible under normal NTFS behavior)
4. Large gap between SI and FN timestamps
"""
results = []
for idx, row in df.iterrows():
si_created = row.get("Created0x10")
fn_created = row.get("Created0x30")
si_modified = row.get("LastModified0x10")
fn_modified = row.get("LastModified0x30")
si_entry = row.get("LastRecordChange0x10")
fn_entry = row.get("LastRecordChange0x30")
if pd.isna(si_created) or pd.isna(fn_created):
continue
filepath = row.get("FileName", "unknown")
parent_path = row.get("ParentPath", "")
full_path = f"{parent_path}\\{filepath}" if parent_path else filepath
indicators = []
# Detection 1: SI Created is BEFORE FN Created
# Under normal NTFS operations, SI Created >= FN Created
if si_created < fn_created:
delta = fn_created - si_created
indicators.append({
"check": "SI_Created < FN_Created",
"si_value": str(si_created),
"fn_value": str(fn_created),
"delta": str(delta),
"confidence": "high"
})
# Detection 2: SI Modified is BEFORE FN Created
# A file cannot be modified before it was created
if pd.notna(si_modified) and si_modified < fn_created:
indicators.append({
"check": "SI_Modified < FN_Created",
"si_value": str(si_modified),
"fn_value": str(fn_created),
"confidence": "high"
})
# Detection 3: Nanosecond precision check
# Many timestomping tools set timestamps with zero nanoseconds
if pd.notna(si_created):
si_created_str = str(si_created)
if ".000000" in si_created_str or si_created_str.endswith("00:00:00"):
# Check if FN has normal nanosecond precision
fn_str = str(fn_created)
if ".000000" not in fn_str:
indicators.append({
"check": "SI_nanoseconds_zeroed",
"si_value": si_created_str,
"fn_value": fn_str,
"confidence": "medium"
})
# Detection 4: Large time gap between SI and FN
# Normal gap is seconds to minutes, not years
if abs((si_created - fn_created).days) > 365:
indicators.append({
"check": "SI_FN_gap_exceeds_1_year",
"si_value": str(si_created),
"fn_value": str(fn_created),
"delta_days": abs((si_created - fn_created).days),
"confidence": "high"
})
# Detection 5: SI Entry Modified much later than SI Created
# Indicates the SI attribute was rewritten
if pd.notna(si_entry) and pd.notna(si_created):
entry_delta = si_entry - si_created
if entry_delta.days > 365 * 5: # Entry modified years after creation
indicators.append({
"check": "SI_entry_modified_years_after_creation",
"si_created": str(si_created),
"si_entry_modified": str(si_entry),
"confidence": "medium"
})
if indicators:
results.append({
"file_path": full_path,
"entry_number": row.get("EntryNumber", ""),
"in_use": row.get("InUse", True),
"si_created": str(si_created),
"fn_created": str(fn_created),
"indicators": indicators,
"highest_confidence": max(i["confidence"] for i in indicators),
})
return results
# Run detection
df = load_mft_data("D:\\Evidence\\Parsed\\mft_parsed.csv")
stomped_files = detect_timestomping(df)
print(f"\nTimestomping Detection Results")
print(f"{'='*60}")
print(f"Total MFT entries analyzed: {len(df)}")
print(f"Suspicious entries found: {len(stomped_files)}")
print()
for entry in sorted(stomped_files, key=lambda x: x["highest_confidence"], reverse=True):
print(f"[{entry['highest_confidence'].upper()}] {entry['file_path']}")
print(f" SI Created: {entry['si_created']}")
print(f" FN Created: {entry['fn_created']}")
for ind in entry["indicators"]:
print(f" Check: {ind['check']} (confidence: {ind['confidence']})")
print()
Step 4: Corroborate with USN Journal Analysis
The USN Journal records metadata change events that persist even after timestomping:
def correlate_with_usn_journal(stomped_files, usn_csv_path):
"""Cross-reference timestomped files with USN Journal entries.
The USN Journal records a BASIC_INFO_CHANGE reason when timestamps
are modified, providing corroborating evidence of timestomping.
"""
usn_df = pd.read_csv(usn_csv_path, low_memory=False)
usn_df["UpdateTimestamp"] = pd.to_datetime(usn_df["UpdateTimestamp"], errors="coerce")
corroborated = []
for entry in stomped_files:
filename = entry["file_path"].split("\\")[-1]
# Find USN entries for this file with BASIC_INFO_CHANGE
usn_matches = usn_df[
(usn_df["Name"] == filename) &
(usn_df["UpdateReasons"].str.contains("BASIC_INFO_CHANGE", na=False))
]
if not usn_matches.empty:
entry["usn_corroboration"] = True
entry["usn_change_times"] = usn_matches["UpdateTimestamp"].tolist()
entry["highest_confidence"] = "critical"
corroborated.append(entry)
print(f"[CORROBORATED] {filename} - USN Journal confirms "
f"BASIC_INFO_CHANGE at {usn_matches['UpdateTimestamp'].iloc[0]}")
return corroborated
# Parse USN Journal (use MFTECmd or ANJP)
# MFTECmd.exe -f "$J" --csv D:\Evidence\Parsed\ --csvf usn_parsed.csv
Step 5: Check ShimCache and Amcache for Timeline Validation
def check_shimcache_timeline(stomped_files, shimcache_csv):
"""Validate timestamps against ShimCache (AppCompatCache) entries.
ShimCache records the last modification time of executables
independently of NTFS timestamps, providing another corroboration point.
"""
shim_df = pd.read_csv(shimcache_csv, low_memory=False)
shim_df["LastModifiedTimeUTC"] = pd.to_datetime(
shim_df["LastModifiedTimeUTC"], errors="coerce"
)
for entry in stomped_files:
filepath = entry["file_path"]
shim_match = shim_df[
shim_df["Path"].str.lower() == filepath.lower()
]
if not shim_match.empty:
shim_time = shim_match["LastModifiedTimeUTC"].iloc[0]
si_modified = pd.to_datetime(entry.get("si_created"))
if pd.notna(shim_time) and pd.notna(si_modified):
delta = abs((shim_time - si_modified).days)
if delta > 30:
entry["shimcache_mismatch"] = True
entry["shimcache_time"] = str(shim_time)
print(f"[SHIMCACHE MISMATCH] {filepath}")
print(f" SI timestamp: {si_modified}")
print(f" ShimCache timestamp: {shim_time}")
print(f" Delta: {delta} days")
return stomped_files
Step 6: Generate a Timestomping Detection Report
import json
def generate_report(stomped_files, output_path):
"""Generate a structured JSON report of all timestomping detections."""
report = {
"report_title": "Timestomping Detection Analysis",
"generated_at": datetime.utcnow().isoformat() + "Z",
"mitre_technique": "T1070.006 - Indicator Removal: Timestomp",
"total_suspicious_files": len(stomped_files),
"critical_findings": len([f for f in stomped_files if f["highest_confidence"] == "critical"]),
"high_findings": len([f for f in stomped_files if f["highest_confidence"] == "high"]),
"medium_findings": len([f for f in stomped_files if f["highest_confidence"] == "medium"]),
"findings": stomped_files,
}
with open(output_path, "w") as f:
json.dump(report, f, indent=2, default=str)
print(f"Report written to {output_path}")
print(f" Critical: {report['critical_findings']}")
print(f" High: {report['high_findings']}")
print(f" Medium: {report['medium_findings']}")
generate_report(stomped_files, "D:\\Evidence\\timestomping_report.json")
Verification
- Confirm MFTECmd parses the $MFT without errors and produces both 0x10 (SI) and 0x30 (FN) timestamp columns
- Create a test file and use a timestomping tool (e.g., NTimeStomp) in a lab to verify the detection logic catches the manipulation
- Validate that the nanosecond-zeroed check does not produce excessive false positives on files created by installers that legitimately set timestamps
- Cross-reference flagged files with the USN Journal to confirm BASIC_INFO_CHANGE events exist at the expected times
- Verify ShimCache and Amcache timestamps provide independent corroboration of timeline inconsistencies
- Test against known-clean system images to establish a false-positive baseline (some backup/imaging software legitimately resets timestamps)
- Confirm the detection pipeline correctly handles deleted MFT entries (InUse=false) which may contain evidence of timestomped files that were later removed
How to use hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★50 reviews- ★★★★★Soo Smith· Dec 16, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Soo Garcia· Dec 12, 2024
Registry listing for hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Diego Chen· Dec 4, 2024
hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 27, 2024
Registry listing for hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Liam Farah· Nov 23, 2024
Useful defaults in hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Diya Martinez· Nov 7, 2024
I recommend hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Diya Mehta· Oct 26, 2024
Useful defaults in hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Oct 18, 2024
hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Diego Patel· Oct 14, 2024
I recommend hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Diya Yang· Sep 25, 2024
I recommend hunting-for-defense-evasion-via-timestomping for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
showing 1-10 of 50