detecting-rootkit-activity

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/detecting-rootkit-activity
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Detects rootkit presence on compromised systems by identifying hidden processes, hooked system calls, modified kernel structures, hidden files, and covert network connections using memory forensics, cross-view detection, and integrity checking techniques. Activates for requests involving rootkit detection, hidden process discovery, kernel integrity checking, or system call hook analysis.

skill.md
name
detecting-rootkit-activity
description
'Detects rootkit presence on compromised systems by identifying hidden processes, hooked system calls, modified kernel structures, hidden files, and covert network connections using memory forensics, cross-view detection, and integrity checking techniques. Activates for requests involving rootkit detection, hidden process discovery, kernel integrity checking, or system call hook analysis. '
domain
cybersecurity
subdomain
malware-analysis
tags
- malware - rootkit - detection - kernel-analysis - memory-forensics
version
1.0.0
author
mahipal
license
Apache-2.0
nist_csf
- DE.AE-02 - RS.AN-03 - ID.RA-01 - DE.CM-01

Detecting Rootkit Activity

When to Use

  • System shows signs of compromise but standard tools (Task Manager, netstat) show nothing abnormal
  • Antivirus/EDR detects rootkit signatures but cannot identify the specific hiding mechanism
  • Memory forensics reveals discrepancies between kernel data structures and user-mode tool output
  • Investigating a persistent threat that survives remediation attempts and system reboots
  • Validating system integrity after a suspected kernel-level compromise

Do not use as a first-line detection method; start with standard malware triage and escalate to rootkit analysis when hiding behavior is suspected.

Prerequisites

  • Volatility 3 for memory forensics and kernel structure analysis
  • GMER or Rootkit Revealer (Windows) for live system scanning
  • rkhunter and chkrootkit (Linux) for filesystem and process integrity checks
  • Sysinternals tools (Process Explorer, Autoruns, RootkitRevealer) for Windows analysis
  • Memory dump from the suspected system (WinPmem, LiME)
  • Clean baseline of the OS for comparison (known-good kernel module hashes)

Workflow

Step 1: Cross-View Detection for Hidden Processes

Compare process lists from different data sources to find discrepancies:

# Volatility: Compare process enumeration methods
# pslist - walks ActiveProcessLinks (EPROCESS linked list - what rootkits manipulate)
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.pslist > pslist_output.txt

# psscan - scans physical memory for EPROCESS pool tags (rootkit-resistant)
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.psscan > psscan_output.txt

# Compare outputs to find hidden processes
python3 << 'PYEOF'
pslist_pids = set()
psscan_pids = set()

with open("pslist_output.txt") as f:
    for line in f:
        parts = line.split()
        if len(parts) > 1 and parts[1].isdigit():
            pslist_pids.add(int(parts[1]))

with open("psscan_output.txt") as f:
    for line in f:
        parts = line.split()
        if len(parts) > 1 and parts[1].isdigit():
            psscan_pids.add(int(parts[1]))

hidden = psscan_pids - pslist_pids
if hidden:
    print(f"[!] HIDDEN PROCESSES DETECTED (in psscan but not pslist):")
    for pid in hidden:
        print(f"    PID: {pid}")
else:
    print("[*] No hidden processes detected via cross-view analysis")
PYEOF

Step 2: Detect System Call Hooking

Identify hooks in the System Service Descriptor Table (SSDT) and Import Address Tables:

# Check SSDT for hooked system calls
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.ssdt

# Identify hooks pointing outside ntoskrnl.exe or win32k.sys
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.ssdt | grep -v "ntoskrnl\|win32k"

# Check for Inline hooks (detour patching)
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.apihooks --pid 4  # System process

# IDT (Interrupt Descriptor Table) analysis
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.idt

# Check for IRP (I/O Request Packet) hooking on drivers
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.driverscan
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.driverirp
Types of Rootkit Hooks:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
SSDT Hook:         Modifies System Service Descriptor Table entries to redirect
                   system calls through rootkit code (filters process/file listings)

IAT Hook:          Patches Import Address Table of a process to intercept API calls
                   before they reach the kernel

Inline Hook:       Overwrites the first bytes of a function with a JMP to rootkit code
                   (detour/trampoline technique)

IRP Hook:          Intercepts I/O Request Packets to filter disk/network operations
                   at the driver level

DKOM:              Direct Kernel Object Manipulation - unlinking structures like
                   EPROCESS from the ActiveProcessLinks list without hooking

Step 3: Analyze Kernel Modules and Drivers

Identify unauthorized kernel drivers that may be rootkit components:

# List all loaded kernel modules
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.modules

# Scan for drivers in memory (including hidden/unlinked)
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.driverscan

# Compare module lists to find hidden drivers
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.modscan > modscan.txt
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.modules > modules.txt

# Check driver signatures and verify against known-good baselines
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.verinfo

# Dump suspicious driver for static analysis
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.moddump --base 0xFFFFF80012340000 --dump

Step 4: Detect File and Registry Hiding

Identify files and registry keys hidden by the rootkit:

# Linux rootkit detection with rkhunter
rkhunter --check --skip-keypress --report-warnings-only

# chkrootkit scanning
chkrootkit -q

# Windows: Compare filesystem views
# Live system file listing vs Volatility filescan
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.filescan > mem_files.txt

# Check for hidden registry keys
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.registry.hivelist
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.registry.printkey --key "SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services"

# Look for hidden services (loaded but not in service registry)
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.svcscan | grep -i "kernel"

Step 5: Network Connection Analysis

Find hidden network connections and backdoors:

# Memory-based network connection enumeration
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.netscan

# Compare with live netstat (if available) to find hidden connections
# Hidden connections: present in memory but not shown by netstat

# Look for raw sockets (often used by rootkits for covert communication)
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.netscan | grep RAW

# Check for network filter drivers (NDIS hooks)
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.driverscan | grep -i "ndis\|tcpip\|afd"

# Analyze callback routines registered by drivers
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.callbacks

Step 6: Integrity Verification

Verify system file and kernel integrity:

# Check kernel code integrity (compare in-memory kernel to on-disk copy)
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.moddump --base 0xFFFFF80070000000 --dump
# Compare SHA-256 of dumped ntoskrnl.exe with known-good copy

# Windows: System File Checker (on live system)
sfc /scannow

# Linux: Package integrity verification
rpm -Va  # RPM-based systems
debsums -c  # Debian-based systems

# Compare critical system binaries
find /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin -type f -exec sha256sum {} \; > current_hashes.txt
# Compare against baseline: diff baseline_hashes.txt current_hashes.txt

# YARA scan for known rootkit signatures
vol3 -f memory.dmp yarascan.YaraScan --yara-file rootkit_rules.yar

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
RootkitMalware designed to maintain persistent, privileged access while hiding its presence from system administrators and security tools
DKOMDirect Kernel Object Manipulation; technique of modifying kernel data structures (e.g., unlinking EPROCESS) to hide objects without hooking
SSDT HookingReplacing entries in the System Service Descriptor Table to intercept and filter system call results (hide processes, files, connections)
Inline HookingPatching the first instructions of a function with a jump to rootkit code; the rootkit can filter the function output before returning
Cross-View DetectionComparing results from multiple enumeration methods (linked list walk vs memory scan) to identify discrepancies caused by hiding
Kernel DriverCode running in kernel mode (Ring 0) with full system access; rootkits use malicious drivers to gain kernel-level control
BootkitsRootkits that infect the boot process (MBR, VBR, or UEFI firmware) to load before the operating system and security tools

Tools & Systems

  • Volatility: Memory forensics framework providing cross-view detection, SSDT analysis, and kernel structure inspection for rootkit detection
  • GMER: Free Windows rootkit detection tool scanning for SSDT hooks, IDT hooks, IRP hooks, and hidden processes/files/registry
  • rkhunter: Linux rootkit detection tool checking for known rootkit signatures, suspicious files, and system binary modifications
  • chkrootkit: Linux tool for detecting rootkit presence through signature-based and anomaly-based checks
  • Sysinternals RootkitRevealer: Microsoft tool comparing Windows API results with raw filesystem/registry scans to find discrepancies

Common Scenarios

Scenario: Investigating a System Where Standard Tools Show No Compromise

Context: An endpoint shows network beaconing to a known C2 IP in firewall logs, but the local EDR, Task Manager, and netstat show no suspicious processes or connections. A memory dump has been acquired for analysis.

Approach:

  1. Run Volatility psscan and compare with pslist to identify processes hidden via DKOM
  2. Run windows.ssdt to check for system call hooks that filter process and network listings
  3. Run windows.malfind to detect injected code in legitimate processes
  4. Run windows.netscan to find network connections hidden from user-mode tools
  5. Run windows.driverscan to identify malicious kernel drivers enabling the hiding
  6. Dump the rootkit driver and analyze with Ghidra to understand its hooking mechanism
  7. Check for boot persistence (MBR/VBR modifications, UEFI firmware implants)

Pitfalls:

  • Running detection tools on the live compromised system (rootkit may hide from or subvert them)
  • Assuming kernel integrity because no SSDT hooks are found (rootkit may use DKOM or inline hooks instead)
  • Not checking for both user-mode and kernel-mode rootkit components (many rootkits have both)
  • Trusting the rootkit scanner results on a live system; always verify with offline memory forensics

Output Format

ROOTKIT DETECTION ANALYSIS REPORT
====================================
Dump File:        memory.dmp
System:           Windows 10 21H2 x64
Analysis Tool:    Volatility 3.2

CROSS-VIEW DETECTION
Process List Comparison:
  pslist processes:  127
  psscan processes:  129
  [!] HIDDEN PROCESSES: 2
    PID 6784: sysmon64.exe (hidden rootkit component)
    PID 6812: netfilter.exe (hidden network filter)

SSDT HOOK ANALYSIS
[!] Entry 0x004A (NtQuerySystemInformation) hooked -> driver.sys+0x1200
[!] Entry 0x0055 (NtQueryDirectoryFile) hooked -> driver.sys+0x1400
[!] Entry 0x0119 (NtDeviceIoControlFile) hooked -> driver.sys+0x1600
Hook Target: driver.sys at 0xFFFFF800ABCD0000 (unsigned, suspicious)

KERNEL DRIVER ANALYSIS
[!] driver.sys - No digital signature, loaded at 0xFFFFF800ABCD0000
    Size: 45,056 bytes
    SHA-256: abc123def456...
    IRP Hooks: IRP_MJ_CREATE, IRP_MJ_DEVICE_CONTROL
    Registry: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MalDriver

HIDDEN NETWORK CONNECTIONS
PID 6812: 10.1.5.42:49152 -> 185.220.101.42:443 (ESTABLISHED)
  - Not visible via netstat or user-mode tools
  - Filtered by NtDeviceIoControlFile SSDT hook

ROOTKIT CAPABILITIES
- Process hiding (DKOM + SSDT)
- File hiding (NtQueryDirectoryFile hook)
- Network connection hiding (NtDeviceIoControlFile hook)
- Kernel-mode persistence (driver service)

REMEDIATION
- Boot from clean media for offline remediation
- Remove malicious driver from offline registry
- Verify MBR/VBR/UEFI integrity for boot persistence
- Full system rebuild recommended for kernel-level compromise
how to use detecting-rootkit-activity

How to use detecting-rootkit-activity on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add detecting-rootkit-activity
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/detecting-rootkit-activity

The skills CLI fetches detecting-rootkit-activity from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/detecting-rootkit-activity

Reload or restart Cursor to activate detecting-rootkit-activity. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /detecting-rootkit-activity) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.431 reviews
  • Mateo Huang· Dec 24, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: detecting-rootkit-activity is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Isabella Wang· Dec 24, 2024

    detecting-rootkit-activity reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Tariq Huang· Dec 12, 2024

    We added detecting-rootkit-activity from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Valentina Bhatia· Nov 15, 2024

    detecting-rootkit-activity has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Zara Reddy· Nov 3, 2024

    Keeps context tight: detecting-rootkit-activity is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Kiara White· Oct 22, 2024

    detecting-rootkit-activity has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Mateo Torres· Oct 6, 2024

    Keeps context tight: detecting-rootkit-activity is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Benjamin Singh· Sep 25, 2024

    detecting-rootkit-activity is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Rahul Santra· Sep 21, 2024

    detecting-rootkit-activity reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Kaira Garcia· Sep 1, 2024

    Useful defaults in detecting-rootkit-activity — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

showing 1-10 of 31

1 / 4