detecting-email-account-compromise▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Detect compromised O365 and Google Workspace email accounts by analyzing inbox rule creation, suspicious sign-in locations, mail forwarding rules, and unusual API access patterns via Microsoft Graph and audit logs.
| name | detecting-email-account-compromise |
| description | Detect compromised O365 and Google Workspace email accounts by analyzing inbox rule creation, suspicious sign-in locations, mail forwarding rules, and unusual API access patterns via Microsoft Graph and audit logs. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | incident-response |
| tags | - email-compromise - office365 - microsoft-graph - bec - inbox-rules - sign-in-analysis - account-takeover |
| mitre_attack | - T1114 - T1566 - T1078 - T1534 |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - RS.MA-01 - RS.MA-02 - RS.AN-03 - RC.RP-01 |
Detecting Email Account Compromise
Overview
Email account compromise (EAC) is a prevalent attack vector where adversaries gain unauthorized access to mailboxes to exfiltrate sensitive data, conduct business email compromise (BEC), or establish persistence through inbox rule manipulation. Attackers commonly create forwarding rules to siphon emails, delete rules to hide evidence, or use OAuth tokens for persistent access. Detection relies on analyzing Microsoft 365 Unified Audit Logs, Azure AD sign-in logs for impossible travel or suspicious locations, inbox rule creation events (Set-InboxRule, New-InboxRule), and Microsoft Graph API access patterns. Key indicators include forwarding rules to external addresses, rules that delete or move messages matching keywords like "invoice" or "payment", and sign-ins from unusual user agents such as python-requests.
When to Use
- When investigating security incidents that require detecting email account compromise
- When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
- When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
- When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques
Prerequisites
- Microsoft 365 with Unified Audit Logging enabled
- Azure AD P1/P2 for risk detection APIs
- Python 3.9+ with
requests,msallibraries - Microsoft Graph API application registration with Mail.Read, AuditLog.Read.All permissions
- Understanding of OAuth2 client credential flows
Steps
- Export audit logs or connect to Microsoft Graph API using MSAL authentication
- Query inbox rules for all monitored mailboxes via
/users/{id}/mailFolders/inbox/messageRules - Analyze rules for external forwarding (ForwardTo, RedirectTo external addresses)
- Detect suspicious rule patterns: deletion rules, keyword-matching rules targeting financial terms
- Query sign-in logs via
/auditLogs/signInsfor unusual locations and impossible travel - Check for suspicious user agent strings (python-requests, PowerShell, curl)
- Identify OAuth application consent grants for suspicious third-party apps
- Correlate findings across users to detect campaign-level compromise
- Generate compromise indicators report with severity scores
Expected Output
A JSON report listing compromised or suspicious accounts, malicious inbox rules detected, impossible travel events, suspicious OAuth grants, and recommended containment actions with severity ratings.
How to use detecting-email-account-compromise on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add detecting-email-account-compromise
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches detecting-email-account-compromise from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate detecting-email-account-compromise. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /detecting-email-account-compromise) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★29 reviews- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 20, 2024
Useful defaults in detecting-email-account-compromise — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Ishan Choi· Dec 20, 2024
I recommend detecting-email-account-compromise for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 11, 2024
detecting-email-account-compromise is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Jin Martinez· Nov 11, 2024
Keeps context tight: detecting-email-account-compromise is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Oct 2, 2024
Keeps context tight: detecting-email-account-compromise is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Ava Okafor· Oct 2, 2024
detecting-email-account-compromise is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Sep 21, 2024
detecting-email-account-compromise has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Valentina Verma· Sep 21, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: detecting-email-account-compromise is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Charlotte Abbas· Sep 21, 2024
We added detecting-email-account-compromise from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Aug 12, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: detecting-email-account-compromise is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 29