conducting-phishing-incident-response

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/conducting-phishing-incident-response
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Responds to phishing incidents by analyzing reported emails, extracting indicators, assessing credential compromise, quarantining malicious messages across the organization, and remediating affected accounts. Covers email header analysis, URL/attachment sandboxing, and mailbox-wide purge operations. Activates for requests involving phishing response, email incident, credential phishing, spear phishing investigation, or phishing remediation.

skill.md
name
conducting-phishing-incident-response
description
'Responds to phishing incidents by analyzing reported emails, extracting indicators, assessing credential compromise, quarantining malicious messages across the organization, and remediating affected accounts. Covers email header analysis, URL/attachment sandboxing, and mailbox-wide purge operations. Activates for requests involving phishing response, email incident, credential phishing, spear phishing investigation, or phishing remediation. '
domain
cybersecurity
subdomain
incident-response
tags
- phishing-response - email-security - credential-compromise - email-header-analysis - mailbox-remediation
mitre_attack
- T1566 - T1204 - T1534 - T1598
version
1.0.0
author
mahipal
license
Apache-2.0
nist_csf
- RS.MA-01 - RS.MA-02 - RS.AN-03 - RC.RP-01

Conducting Phishing Incident Response

When to Use

  • A user reports receiving a suspicious email via the phishing report button or abuse mailbox
  • Email gateway detects a malicious email that bypassed initial filtering
  • Threat intelligence indicates an active phishing campaign targeting the organization
  • A user confirms they clicked a link or opened an attachment from a suspicious email
  • Credentials have been entered on a suspected phishing page

Do not use for business email compromise (BEC) involving compromised internal accounts; use BEC response procedures which focus on account takeover investigation.

Prerequisites

  • Email security gateway with message trace and quarantine capabilities (Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint, Mimecast)
  • Microsoft 365 admin access or Google Workspace admin for mailbox search and purge
  • Malware sandbox for attachment and URL analysis (ANY.RUN, Joe Sandbox, Hybrid Analysis)
  • Email header analysis tools (MXToolbox Header Analyzer, Google Admin Toolbox)
  • Identity provider access for account remediation (Azure AD, Okta, Duo)
  • Phishing report intake process (dedicated mailbox or integrated report button)

Workflow

Step 1: Receive and Triage the Phishing Report

Evaluate the reported email to determine if it is malicious:

  • Extract the email as an .EML or .MSG file (preserves headers)
  • Analyze email headers to determine the true sender, relay path, and authentication results
Email Header Analysis Checklist:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Return-Path:     billing@spoofed-domain[.]com
From:            "IT Support" <support@corp-lookalike[.]com>
Reply-To:        attacker@gmail[.]com (different from From)
SPF:             FAIL (sender IP not authorized for domain)
DKIM:            FAIL (signature invalid)
DMARC:           FAIL (policy: none - no enforcement)
Received:        from mail.attacker-infra[.]net [45.33.x.x]
X-Originating-IP: 45.33.x.x
Message-ID:      <[email protected]>

Classification criteria:

  • Confirmed Phishing: Malicious URL/attachment, spoofed sender, credential harvesting page
  • Suspicious: Anomalous headers but no confirmed malicious content
  • Spam/Marketing: Unwanted but not malicious
  • Legitimate: Not a phishing email (false report)

Step 2: Analyze Malicious Content

Examine URLs and attachments in a safe environment:

URL Analysis:

  • Check URL against VirusTotal, URLscan.io, and Google Safe Browsing
  • Open URL in a sandbox browser to capture the landing page
  • Check if the URL redirects to a credential harvesting page
  • Identify the phishing kit type (Microsoft 365 login clone, Okta clone, generic)
  • Determine if the phishing page is still active

Attachment Analysis:

  • Calculate file hash (SHA-256) and check against VirusTotal
  • Detonate in sandbox (ANY.RUN, Joe Sandbox)
  • Analyze document for macros (olevba for Office files)
  • Check for embedded exploits (CVE exploitation in document parsers)

Step 3: Determine Scope of Impact

Identify all recipients and assess who interacted with the phishing email:

Scope Assessment:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Total Recipients:     47 users
Delivered to Inbox:   38 users (9 caught by email gateway)
Opened Email:         24 users (email tracking pixel data)
Clicked Link:         8 users (proxy/firewall logs)
Entered Credentials:  3 users (phishing page submitted form data)
Opened Attachment:    2 users (EDR process execution telemetry)

Search methods:

  • Microsoft 365: Use Threat Explorer or Content Search to find all instances of the email
  • Google Workspace: Use Admin Console > Investigation tool for message search
  • Proxy logs: Search for connections to the phishing URL from internal IPs
  • EDR: Search for attachment file hash execution across all endpoints

Step 4: Contain the Threat

Execute containment actions based on impact assessment:

Email Containment:

  • Purge the phishing email from all mailboxes using Microsoft 365 Content Search and Purge or Google Workspace Admin delete
  • Block the sender domain at the email gateway
  • Add the phishing URL to the web proxy blocklist
  • Add attachment hash to email gateway and EDR blocklists

Account Containment (for users who entered credentials):

  • Force password reset immediately
  • Revoke all active sessions and OAuth tokens
  • Enable or re-verify MFA enrollment
  • Review mailbox rules for attacker-created forwarding rules
  • Check for unauthorized OAuth application grants
  • Review recent sign-in activity for suspicious locations
# Microsoft 365: Revoke sessions and reset password
Connect-AzureAD
Revoke-AzureADUserAllRefreshToken -ObjectId "[email protected]"
Set-AzureADUserPassword -ObjectId "[email protected]" -ForceChangePasswordNextLogin $true

# Check for mailbox forwarding rules
Get-InboxRule -Mailbox "[email protected]" | Where-Object {$_.ForwardTo -or $_.RedirectTo}

# Remove suspicious forwarding rules
Remove-InboxRule -Mailbox "[email protected]" -Identity "Rule Name"

Step 5: Eradicate and Recover

Remove all traces of the phishing attack:

  • Confirm email purge completed successfully across all mailboxes
  • Verify compromised accounts have been secured (password changed, sessions revoked, MFA verified)
  • Remove any malware installed via phishing attachments from affected endpoints
  • Monitor compromised accounts for 72 hours for signs of continued unauthorized access
  • Check for data exfiltration from compromised accounts during the exposure window

Step 6: Post-Incident Actions

Strengthen defenses against similar phishing attacks:

  • Report the phishing URL to Google Safe Browsing and Microsoft SmartScreen
  • Submit the phishing domain for takedown via the domain registrar abuse contact
  • Update email gateway filtering rules based on observed evasion techniques
  • Send targeted security awareness notification to affected users
  • Update phishing simulation program to include the observed technique

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
Spear PhishingTargeted phishing attack crafted for a specific individual or organization using personalized content
Credential HarvestingPhishing technique that mimics a legitimate login page to capture usernames and passwords
SPF (Sender Policy Framework)Email authentication protocol that specifies which mail servers are authorized to send email for a domain
DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail)Email authentication method using cryptographic signatures to verify that an email was not altered in transit
DMARCPolicy framework that uses SPF and DKIM to determine email authenticity and instructs receivers on handling failures
OAuth Consent PhishingAttack that tricks users into granting malicious OAuth applications access to their email and data
Email HeaderMetadata embedded in every email containing routing, authentication, and sender information used for forensic analysis

Tools & Systems

  • Microsoft Defender for Office 365: Email threat protection with Threat Explorer for investigation and automated purge
  • Proofpoint TAP (Targeted Attack Protection): Email security platform with URL rewriting and attachment sandboxing
  • URLscan.io: Online service that scans URLs and captures screenshots of phishing pages for evidence
  • PhishTool: Phishing analysis platform that automates header analysis, URL inspection, and IOC extraction
  • GoPhish: Open-source phishing simulation platform for security awareness testing

Common Scenarios

Scenario: Microsoft 365 Credential Phishing via QR Code

Context: Users report an email claiming to be from IT requiring MFA re-enrollment. The email contains a QR code that links to a convincing Microsoft 365 login page clone hosted on a compromised WordPress site.

Approach:

  1. Scan the QR code in a sandbox to extract the URL
  2. Analyze the phishing page: captures credentials and MFA tokens (adversary-in-the-middle attack)
  3. Search email gateway for all recipients using message subject and sender as search criteria
  4. Cross-reference with proxy logs to identify users who visited the phishing URL
  5. Force password reset and revoke sessions for all users who visited the URL
  6. Purge the email from all mailboxes and block the sender domain
  7. Notify users about the specific campaign with visual examples of the phishing email

Pitfalls:

  • Not checking for adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) capability that captures session tokens even with MFA
  • Only resetting passwords without revoking active sessions (attacker retains access via stolen session cookies)
  • Not searching for mailbox forwarding rules created by the attacker after compromising an account
  • Missing QR code phishing (quishing) because URL scanning tools cannot decode QR code images

Output Format

PHISHING INCIDENT RESPONSE REPORT
===================================
Incident:          INC-2025-1602
Date Reported:     2025-11-16T09:15:00Z
Reported By:       [email protected]
Classification:    Credential Phishing (AiTM)

EMAIL ANALYSIS
Subject:       "Action Required: MFA Re-enrollment"
Sender:        it-support@corp-security[.]com (spoofed)
SPF:           FAIL | DKIM: FAIL | DMARC: FAIL
Phishing URL:  hxxps://compromised-site[.]com/ms365/login
Phishing Type: Microsoft 365 AiTM credential harvester

IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Recipients:        47
Clicked Link:      8
Credentials Entered: 3 (confirmed via proxy POST data)

CONTAINMENT ACTIONS
[x] Email purged from all 47 mailboxes
[x] Phishing domain blocked at web proxy
[x] Sender domain blocked at email gateway
[x] 3 compromised accounts: passwords reset, sessions revoked
[x] Mailbox forwarding rules reviewed (1 malicious rule removed)
[x] OAuth app grants reviewed (no unauthorized grants found)

IOCs EXTRACTED
Domain:  corp-security[.]com
URL:     hxxps://compromised-site[.]com/ms365/login
IP:      104.21.x.x (Cloudflare-hosted)
Sender:  it-support@corp-security[.]com

RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Implement DMARC enforcement (p=reject) for corp domain
2. Deploy QR code scanning in email gateway
3. Send targeted awareness notification to all 47 recipients
4. Request domain takedown via registrar abuse contact
how to use conducting-phishing-incident-response

How to use conducting-phishing-incident-response on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add conducting-phishing-incident-response
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/conducting-phishing-incident-response

The skills CLI fetches conducting-phishing-incident-response from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/conducting-phishing-incident-response

Reload or restart Cursor to activate conducting-phishing-incident-response. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /conducting-phishing-incident-response) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.572 reviews
  • Hassan Abbas· Dec 28, 2024

    I recommend conducting-phishing-incident-response for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Sophia Chawla· Dec 24, 2024

    conducting-phishing-incident-response reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Carlos Wang· Dec 24, 2024

    conducting-phishing-incident-response has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Ganesh Mohane· Dec 20, 2024

    We added conducting-phishing-incident-response from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Shikha Mishra· Dec 16, 2024

    I recommend conducting-phishing-incident-response for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Naina Wang· Dec 12, 2024

    Registry listing for conducting-phishing-incident-response matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Arjun Haddad· Dec 8, 2024

    conducting-phishing-incident-response fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Jin Lopez· Dec 4, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: conducting-phishing-incident-response is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Arjun Malhotra· Nov 27, 2024

    We added conducting-phishing-incident-response from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Carlos Srinivasan· Nov 23, 2024

    Registry listing for conducting-phishing-incident-response matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

showing 1-10 of 72

1 / 8