Responds to phishing incidents by analyzing reported emails, extracting indicators, assessing credential compromise, quarantining malicious messages across the organization, and remediating affected accounts. Covers email header analysis, URL/attachment sandboxing, and mailbox-wide purge operations. Activates for requests involving phishing response, email incident, credential phishing, spear phishing investigation, or phishing remediation.
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example: Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example: Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example: Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Time estimate: 15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Prerequisites
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
epx add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/conducting-phishing-incident-responseCompatible with
Supported agents
| name | conducting-phishing-incident-response |
| description | 'Responds to phishing incidents by analyzing reported emails, extracting indicators, assessing credential compromise, quarantining malicious messages across the organization, and remediating affected accounts. Covers email header analysis, URL/attachment sandboxing, and mailbox-wide purge operations. Activates for requests involving phishing response, email incident, credential phishing, spear phishing investigation, or phishing remediation. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | incident-response |
| tags | - phishing-response - email-security - credential-compromise - email-header-analysis - mailbox-remediation |
| mitre_attack | - T1566 - T1204 - T1534 - T1598 |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - RS.MA-01 - RS.MA-02 - RS.AN-03 - RC.RP-01 |
Do not use for business email compromise (BEC) involving compromised internal accounts; use BEC response procedures which focus on account takeover investigation.
Evaluate the reported email to determine if it is malicious:
Email Header Analysis Checklist:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Return-Path: billing@spoofed-domain[.]com
From: "IT Support" <support@corp-lookalike[.]com>
Reply-To: attacker@gmail[.]com (different from From)
SPF: FAIL (sender IP not authorized for domain)
DKIM: FAIL (signature invalid)
DMARC: FAIL (policy: none - no enforcement)
Received: from mail.attacker-infra[.]net [45.33.x.x]
X-Originating-IP: 45.33.x.x
Message-ID: <random@attacker-infra.net>
Classification criteria:
Examine URLs and attachments in a safe environment:
URL Analysis:
Attachment Analysis:
Identify all recipients and assess who interacted with the phishing email:
Scope Assessment:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Total Recipients: 47 users
Delivered to Inbox: 38 users (9 caught by email gateway)
Opened Email: 24 users (email tracking pixel data)
Clicked Link: 8 users (proxy/firewall logs)
Entered Credentials: 3 users (phishing page submitted form data)
Opened Attachment: 2 users (EDR process execution telemetry)
Search methods:
Execute containment actions based on impact assessment:
Email Containment:
Account Containment (for users who entered credentials):
# Microsoft 365: Revoke sessions and reset password
Connect-AzureAD
Revoke-AzureADUserAllRefreshToken -ObjectId "user@corp.com"
Set-AzureADUserPassword -ObjectId "user@corp.com" -ForceChangePasswordNextLogin $true
# Check for mailbox forwarding rules
Get-InboxRule -Mailbox "user@corp.com" | Where-Object {$_.ForwardTo -or $_.RedirectTo}
# Remove suspicious forwarding rules
Remove-InboxRule -Mailbox "user@corp.com" -Identity "Rule Name"
Remove all traces of the phishing attack:
Strengthen defenses against similar phishing attacks:
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Spear Phishing | Targeted phishing attack crafted for a specific individual or organization using personalized content |
| Credential Harvesting | Phishing technique that mimics a legitimate login page to capture usernames and passwords |
| SPF (Sender Policy Framework) | Email authentication protocol that specifies which mail servers are authorized to send email for a domain |
| DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail) | Email authentication method using cryptographic signatures to verify that an email was not altered in transit |
| DMARC | Policy framework that uses SPF and DKIM to determine email authenticity and instructs receivers on handling failures |
| OAuth Consent Phishing | Attack that tricks users into granting malicious OAuth applications access to their email and data |
| Email Header | Metadata embedded in every email containing routing, authentication, and sender information used for forensic analysis |
Context: Users report an email claiming to be from IT requiring MFA re-enrollment. The email contains a QR code that links to a convincing Microsoft 365 login page clone hosted on a compromised WordPress site.
Approach:
Pitfalls:
PHISHING INCIDENT RESPONSE REPORT
===================================
Incident: INC-2025-1602
Date Reported: 2025-11-16T09:15:00Z
Reported By: jdoe@corp.example.com
Classification: Credential Phishing (AiTM)
EMAIL ANALYSIS
Subject: "Action Required: MFA Re-enrollment"
Sender: it-support@corp-security[.]com (spoofed)
SPF: FAIL | DKIM: FAIL | DMARC: FAIL
Phishing URL: hxxps://compromised-site[.]com/ms365/login
Phishing Type: Microsoft 365 AiTM credential harvester
IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Recipients: 47
Clicked Link: 8
Credentials Entered: 3 (confirmed via proxy POST data)
CONTAINMENT ACTIONS
[x] Email purged from all 47 mailboxes
[x] Phishing domain blocked at web proxy
[x] Sender domain blocked at email gateway
[x] 3 compromised accounts: passwords reset, sessions revoked
[x] Mailbox forwarding rules reviewed (1 malicious rule removed)
[x] OAuth app grants reviewed (no unauthorized grants found)
IOCs EXTRACTED
Domain: corp-security[.]com
URL: hxxps://compromised-site[.]com/ms365/login
IP: 104.21.x.x (Cloudflare-hosted)
Sender: it-support@corp-security[.]com
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Implement DMARC enforcement (p=reject) for corp domain
2. Deploy QR code scanning in email gateway
3. Send targeted awareness notification to all 47 recipients
4. Request domain takedown via registrar abuse contact
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionconducting-phishing-incident-responseExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
epx add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/conducting-phishing-incident-responseFetches conducting-phishing-incident-response from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/conducting-phishing-incident-response
Restart Cursor to activate conducting-phishing-incident-response. Access via /conducting-phishing-incident-responsein your agent's command palette.
Learn more:View source on GitHubSkills CLI docsAbout CursorWhat are agent skills?
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
implementing-dmarc-dkim-spf-email-security
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · implementing-dmarc-dkim-spf-email-security · same repo
performing-thick-client-application-penetration-test
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · performing-thick-client-application-penetration-test · same repo
performing-cryptographic-audit-of-application
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · performing-cryptographic-audit-of-application · same repo
implementing-soar-playbook-with-palo-alto-xsoar
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · implementing-soar-playbook-with-palo-alto-xsoar · same repo
analyzing-network-traffic-for-incidents
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · analyzing-network-traffic-for-incidents · same repo
building-red-team-c2-infrastructure-with-havoc
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · building-red-team-c2-infrastructure-with-havoc · same repo
I recommend conducting-phishing-incident-response for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
conducting-phishing-incident-response reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
conducting-phishing-incident-response has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
We added conducting-phishing-incident-response from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
I recommend conducting-phishing-incident-response for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
Registry listing for conducting-phishing-incident-response matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
conducting-phishing-incident-response fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: conducting-phishing-incident-response is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
We added conducting-phishing-incident-response from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Registry listing for conducting-phishing-incident-response matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 72