analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Analyze Microsoft Outlook PST and OST files for email forensic evidence including message content, headers, attachments, deleted items, and metadata using libpff, pst-utils, and forensic email analysis tools for legal investigations and incident response.
| name | analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics |
| description | Analyze Microsoft Outlook PST and OST files for email forensic evidence including message content, headers, attachments, deleted items, and metadata using libpff, pst-utils, and forensic email analysis tools for legal investigations and incident response. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | digital-forensics |
| tags | - email-forensics - pst - ost - outlook - mapi - email-headers - attachments - deleted-emails - libpff - eml-extraction |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_ai_rmf | - MANAGE-2.4 - MANAGE-3.1 - MEASURE-3.1 |
| nist_csf | - RS.AN-01 - RS.AN-03 - DE.AE-02 - RS.MA-01 |
Analyzing Outlook PST for Email Forensics
Overview
Microsoft Outlook PST (Personal Storage Table) and OST (Offline Storage Table) files are critical evidence sources in digital forensics investigations. PST files store email messages, calendar events, contacts, tasks, and notes in a proprietary binary format based on the MAPI (Messaging Application Programming Interface) property system. Forensic analysis of these files enables recovery of deleted emails (from the Recoverable Items folder), extraction of email headers for tracing message routes, analysis of attachments for malware or exfiltrated data, and reconstruction of communication patterns. Modern PST files use Unicode format with 4KB pages and can grow up to 50GB, while legacy ANSI format is limited to 2GB.
When to Use
- When investigating security incidents that require analyzing outlook pst for email forensics
- When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
- When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
- When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques
Prerequisites
- libpff/pffexport (open-source PST parser)
- Python 3.8+ with pypff or libratom libraries
- MailXaminer, Forensic Email Collector, or SysTools PST Forensics (commercial)
- Microsoft Outlook (optional, for native PST access)
- Sufficient disk space for extracted content
PST File Locations
| Source | Path |
|---|---|
| Outlook 2016+ Default | %USERPROFILE%\Documents\Outlook Files*.pst |
| Outlook Legacy | %LOCALAPPDATA%\Microsoft\Outlook*.pst |
| OST Cache | %LOCALAPPDATA%\Microsoft\Outlook*.ost |
| Archive | %USERPROFILE%\Documents\Outlook Files\archive.pst |
Analysis with Open-Source Tools
libpff / pffexport
# Export all items from PST file
pffexport -m all evidence.pst -t exported_pst
# Export only email messages
pffexport -m items evidence.pst -t exported_emails
# Export recovered/deleted items
pffexport -m recovered evidence.pst -t recovered_items
# Get PST file information
pffinfo evidence.pst
Python PST Analysis
import pypff
import os
import json
import hashlib
import email
import sys
from datetime import datetime
from collections import defaultdict
class PSTForensicAnalyzer:
"""Forensic analysis of Outlook PST/OST files."""
def __init__(self, pst_path: str, output_dir: str):
self.pst_path = pst_path
self.output_dir = output_dir
os.makedirs(output_dir, exist_ok=True)
self.pst = pypff.file()
self.pst.open(pst_path)
self.messages = []
self.attachments = []
self.stats = defaultdict(int)
def process_folder(self, folder, folder_path: str = ""):
"""Recursively process PST folders and extract messages."""
folder_name = folder.name or "Root"
current_path = f"{folder_path}/{folder_name}" if folder_path else folder_name
for i in range(folder.number_of_sub_messages):
try:
message = folder.get_sub_message(i)
msg_data = self.extract_message(message, current_path)
if msg_data:
self.messages.append(msg_data)
self.stats["total_messages"] += 1
except Exception as e:
self.stats["parse_errors"] += 1
for i in range(folder.number_of_sub_folders):
try:
subfolder = folder.get_sub_folder(i)
self.process_folder(subfolder, current_path)
except Exception:
continue
def extract_message(self, message, folder_path: str) -> dict:
"""Extract forensic metadata from a single email message."""
msg_data = {
"folder": folder_path,
"subject": message.subject or "",
"sender": message.sender_name or "",
"sender_email": "",
"creation_time": str(message.creation_time) if message.creation_time else None,
"delivery_time": str(message.delivery_time) if message.delivery_time else None,
"modification_time": str(message.modification_time) if message.modification_time else None,
"has_attachments": message.number_of_attachments > 0,
"attachment_count": message.number_of_attachments,
"body_size": len(message.plain_text_body or b""),
"html_size": len(message.html_body or b""),
}
# Extract transport headers for routing analysis
headers = message.transport_headers
if headers:
msg_data["headers_present"] = True
msg_data["headers_size"] = len(headers)
# Parse key headers
parsed = email.message_from_string(headers)
msg_data["from_header"] = parsed.get("From", "")
msg_data["to_header"] = parsed.get("To", "")
msg_data["date_header"] = parsed.get("Date", "")
msg_data["message_id"] = parsed.get("Message-ID", "")
msg_data["x_originating_ip"] = parsed.get("X-Originating-IP", "")
msg_data["received_headers"] = parsed.get_all("Received", [])
# Process attachments
for j in range(message.number_of_attachments):
try:
attachment = message.get_attachment(j)
att_data = {
"message_subject": msg_data["subject"],
"name": attachment.name or f"attachment_{j}",
"size": attachment.size,
"content_type": "",
}
self.attachments.append(att_data)
self.stats["total_attachments"] += 1
except Exception:
continue
return msg_data
def save_attachments(self, max_size_mb: int = 100):
"""Export attachments to disk for analysis."""
att_dir = os.path.join(self.output_dir, "attachments")
os.makedirs(att_dir, exist_ok=True)
root = self.pst.get_root_folder()
self._save_attachments_recursive(root, att_dir, max_size_mb)
def _save_attachments_recursive(self, folder, att_dir, max_size_mb):
for i in range(folder.number_of_sub_messages):
try:
message = folder.get_sub_message(i)
for j in range(message.number_of_attachments):
att = message.get_attachment(j)
if att.size and att.size < max_size_mb * 1024 * 1024:
name = att.name or f"unknown_{i}_{j}"
safe_name = "".join(c if c.isalnum() or c in ".-_" else "_" for c in name)
path = os.path.join(att_dir, safe_name)
try:
data = att.read_buffer(att.size)
with open(path, "wb") as f:
f.write(data)
except Exception:
continue
except Exception:
continue
for i in range(folder.number_of_sub_folders):
try:
self._save_attachments_recursive(folder.get_sub_folder(i), att_dir, max_size_mb)
except Exception:
continue
def generate_report(self) -> str:
"""Generate comprehensive PST forensic analysis report."""
root = self.pst.get_root_folder()
self.process_folder(root)
report = {
"analysis_timestamp": datetime.now().isoformat(),
"pst_file": self.pst_path,
"pst_size_bytes": os.path.getsize(self.pst_path),
"statistics": dict(self.stats),
"messages": self.messages[:500],
"attachments": self.attachments[:200],
}
report_path = os.path.join(self.output_dir, "pst_forensic_report.json")
with open(report_path, "w") as f:
json.dump(report, f, indent=2, default=str)
print(f"[*] Total messages: {self.stats['total_messages']}")
print(f"[*] Total attachments: {self.stats['total_attachments']}")
print(f"[*] Parse errors: {self.stats['parse_errors']}")
return report_path
def close(self):
self.pst.close()
def main():
if len(sys.argv) < 3:
print("Usage: python process.py <pst_file> <output_dir>")
sys.exit(1)
analyzer = PSTForensicAnalyzer(sys.argv[1], sys.argv[2])
analyzer.generate_report()
analyzer.close()
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Email Header Analysis
Key headers for forensic investigation:
| Header | Forensic Value |
|---|---|
| Received | Message routing chain (read bottom to top) |
| X-Originating-IP | Sender's actual IP address |
| Message-ID | Unique identifier for correlation |
| Date | Send timestamp |
| Return-Path | Bounce address (may differ from From) |
| DKIM-Signature | Domain authentication signature |
| Authentication-Results | SPF, DKIM, DMARC verification results |
| X-Mailer | Email client used |
References
- MailXaminer PST Forensics: https://www.mailxaminer.com/blog/outlook-pst-file-forensics/
- libpff Documentation: https://github.com/libyal/libpff
- PST File Format Specification: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/office_file_formats/ms-pst/
- SANS Email Forensics: https://www.sans.org/blog/email-forensics/
Example Output
$ pffexport /evidence/jsmith_archive.pst -t /analysis/pst_output
pffexport 20231205 - libpff PST/OST Export Tool
=================================================
Input: /evidence/jsmith_archive.pst (2.3 GB)
Exporting PST contents...
Folders: 45
Messages: 12,456
Attachments: 3,234
Contacts: 567
Calendar: 234
Tasks: 89
Export completed in 3m 42s.
$ python3 pst_analyzer.py /analysis/pst_output /analysis/email_report
PST Forensic Analysis Report
==============================
Source: jsmith_archive.pst ([email protected])
Date Range: 2023-06-01 to 2024-01-18
--- Mailbox Statistics ---
Total Emails: 12,456
Sent: 4,567
Received: 7,889
With Attachments: 3,234
Deleted (recovered): 234
--- Phishing / Suspicious Emails ---
Email #8923
Date: 2024-01-15 14:30:22 UTC
From: "IT Support" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Urgent: Password Reset Required
Headers:
Return-Path: [email protected]
X-Originating-IP: 203.0.113.55
Received: from mail-relay.c0rporate-help.com (203.0.113.55)
SPF: FAIL (domain c0rporate-help.com)
DKIM: NONE
DMARC: FAIL
Attachments:
- Password_Reset_Form.xlsm (245 KB) SHA-256: 7a3b8c9d...e1f2a3b4
Body Preview: "Dear Employee, Your password will expire in 24 hours.
Please open the attached form to reset your credentials..."
--- Data Exfiltration Indicators ---
Email #9102
Date: 2024-01-16 03:15:45 UTC
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: (no subject)
Attachments:
- archive_part1.7z (24.5 MB) - encrypted
- archive_part2.7z (24.5 MB) - encrypted
Email #9103
Date: 2024-01-16 03:18:22 UTC
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re:
Attachments:
- archive_part3.7z (18.2 MB) - encrypted
--- Keyword Hits ---
"confidential": 45 emails
"password": 23 emails
"transfer": 12 emails
"resign": 3 emails
"delete evidence": 1 email (Email #9200, 2024-01-17 22:30:00 UTC)
Summary:
Phishing emails detected: 1 (initial compromise vector)
Suspicious sent emails: 5 (to personal accounts with attachments)
Encrypted attachments: 3 (67.2 MB total - possible exfiltration)
Report: /analysis/email_report/pst_forensic_report.json
How to use analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★28 reviews- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 24, 2024
We added analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Yusuf Torres· Dec 12, 2024
analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 15, 2024
analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Alexander Smith· Nov 3, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Benjamin Chen· Oct 22, 2024
I recommend analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Oct 6, 2024
analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Sep 13, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Benjamin Choi· Sep 9, 2024
analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Kwame Iyer· Aug 28, 2024
analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Aug 4, 2024
I recommend analyzing-outlook-pst-for-email-forensics for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
showing 1-10 of 28