analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Analyze the NTFS Master File Table ($MFT) to recover metadata and content of deleted files by examining MFT record entries, $LogFile, $UsnJrnl, and MFT slack space using MFTECmd, analyzeMFT, and X-Ways Forensics.
| name | analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery |
| description | Analyze the NTFS Master File Table ($MFT) to recover metadata and content of deleted files by examining MFT record entries, $LogFile, $UsnJrnl, and MFT slack space using MFTECmd, analyzeMFT, and X-Ways Forensics. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | digital-forensics |
| tags | - mft - ntfs - deleted-files - file-recovery - mftecmd - usn-journal - logfile - mft-slack-space - file-system-forensics - dfir |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - RS.AN-01 - RS.AN-03 - DE.AE-02 - RS.MA-01 |
Analyzing MFT for Deleted File Recovery
Overview
The NTFS Master File Table ($MFT) is the central metadata repository for every file and directory on an NTFS volume. Each file is represented by at least one 1024-byte MFT record containing attributes such as $STANDARD_INFORMATION (timestamps, permissions), $FILE_NAME (name, parent directory, timestamps), and $DATA (file content or cluster run pointers). When a file is deleted, its MFT record is marked as inactive (InUse flag cleared) but the metadata remains until the entry is reallocated by a new file. This persistence makes MFT analysis a primary technique for recovering deleted file evidence, reconstructing file system timelines, and detecting anti-forensic activity such as timestomping.
When to Use
- When investigating security incidents that require analyzing mft for deleted file recovery
- When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
- When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
- When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques
Prerequisites
- Forensic disk image (E01, raw/dd, VMDK, or VHDX format)
- MFTECmd (Eric Zimmerman) or analyzeMFT (Python-based)
- FTK Imager, Arsenal Image Mounter, or similar for image mounting
- Timeline Explorer or Excel for CSV analysis
- Python 3.8+ for custom analysis scripts
- Understanding of NTFS file system internals
MFT Structure and Record Layout
MFT Record Header
Each MFT record begins with the signature "FILE" (0x46494C45) and contains:
| Offset | Size | Field |
|---|---|---|
| 0x00 | 4 bytes | Signature ("FILE") |
| 0x04 | 2 bytes | Offset to update sequence |
| 0x06 | 2 bytes | Size of update sequence |
| 0x08 | 8 bytes | $LogFile sequence number |
| 0x10 | 2 bytes | Sequence number |
| 0x12 | 2 bytes | Hard link count |
| 0x14 | 2 bytes | Offset to first attribute |
| 0x16 | 2 bytes | Flags (0x01 = InUse, 0x02 = Directory) |
| 0x18 | 4 bytes | Used size of MFT record |
| 0x1C | 4 bytes | Allocated size of MFT record |
| 0x20 | 8 bytes | Base file record reference |
| 0x28 | 2 bytes | Next attribute ID |
Key MFT Attributes
| Type ID | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 0x10 | $STANDARD_INFORMATION | Timestamps, flags, owner ID, security ID |
| 0x30 | $FILE_NAME | Filename, parent MFT reference, timestamps |
| 0x40 | $OBJECT_ID | Unique GUID for the file |
| 0x50 | $SECURITY_DESCRIPTOR | ACL permissions |
| 0x60 | $VOLUME_NAME | Volume label (volume metadata files only) |
| 0x80 | $DATA | File content (resident if <700 bytes) or cluster run list |
| 0x90 | $INDEX_ROOT | B-tree index root for directories |
| 0xA0 | $INDEX_ALLOCATION | B-tree index entries for large directories |
| 0xB0 | $BITMAP | Allocation bitmap for index or MFT |
Deleted File Recovery Techniques
Technique 1: MFT Record Analysis with MFTECmd
# Extract $MFT from forensic image using KAPE or FTK Imager
# Parse the $MFT with MFTECmd
MFTECmd.exe -f "C:\Evidence\$MFT" --csv C:\Output --csvf mft_full.csv
# Filter for deleted files (InUse = FALSE) in Timeline Explorer
# Look for entries where InUse column is False
Identifying Deleted Files in CSV Output:
InUse= False indicates a deleted or reallocated recordParentPathshows original file location before deletionFileSizeshows the original size (may still be recoverable)- Timestamps in
$STANDARD_INFORMATIONand$FILE_NAMEattributes persist
Technique 2: USN Journal ($UsnJrnl:$J) Analysis
The USN Journal records all changes to files on an NTFS volume, including creation, deletion, rename, and data modification events.
# Parse USN Journal with MFTECmd
MFTECmd.exe -f "C:\Evidence\$J" --csv C:\Output --csvf usn_journal.csv
# Key USN reason codes for deletion evidence:
# USN_REASON_FILE_DELETE = 0x00000200
# USN_REASON_CLOSE = 0x80000000
# USN_REASON_RENAME_OLD_NAME = 0x00001000
# USN_REASON_RENAME_NEW_NAME = 0x00002000
Technique 3: $LogFile Transaction Analysis
The $LogFile stores NTFS transaction records that can reveal file operations even after the USN Journal has been cycled.
# Parse $LogFile with LogFileParser
LogFileParser.exe -l "C:\Evidence\$LogFile" -o C:\Output
# Look for REDO and UNDO operations indicating file deletion:
# - DeallocateFileRecordSegment
# - DeleteAttribute
# - UpdateResidentValue (clearing InUse flag)
Technique 4: MFT Slack Space Analysis
MFT slack space exists between the end of the used portion of an MFT record and the end of the allocated 1024 bytes. This area may contain remnants of previous file records.
import struct
def parse_mft_slack(mft_path: str, output_path: str):
"""Extract and analyze MFT slack space for deleted file remnants."""
with open(mft_path, "rb") as f:
record_size = 1024
record_num = 0
slack_findings = []
while True:
record = f.read(record_size)
if len(record) < record_size:
break
# Verify FILE signature
if record[:4] != b"FILE":
record_num += 1
continue
# Get used size from offset 0x18
used_size = struct.unpack("<I", record[0x18:0x1C])[0]
if used_size < record_size:
slack = record[used_size:]
# Check if slack contains readable strings or attribute headers
if any(c > 0x20 and c < 0x7F for c in slack[:50]):
slack_findings.append({
"record": record_num,
"used_size": used_size,
"slack_size": record_size - used_size,
"slack_preview": slack[:100].hex()
})
record_num += 1
return slack_findings
Correlation with Supporting Artifacts
Cross-Reference MFT with $Recycle.Bin
# Parse Recycle Bin with RBCmd
RBCmd.exe -d "C:\Evidence\$Recycle.Bin" --csv C:\Output --csvf recycle_bin.csv
# Correlate: $I files contain original path and deletion timestamp
# Match MFT entry numbers from $R files back to original MFT records
Cross-Reference MFT with Volume Shadow Copies
# List volume shadow copies
vssadmin list shadows
# Mount shadow copies and extract $MFT from each
# Compare MFT records across shadow copies to track file changes over time
Forensic Value
- Deleted file metadata recovery: Original filename, path, size, and timestamps
- Timeline reconstruction: File creation, modification, access, and deletion events
- Timestomping detection: Comparing $SI vs $FN timestamps
- Data carving guidance: MFT cluster runs point to file content on disk
- Anti-forensic detection: Identifying wiped or manipulated MFT records
References
- NTFS MFT Advanced Forensic Analysis: https://www.deaddisk.com/posts/ntfs-mft-advanced-forensic-analysis-guide/
- MFT Slack Space Forensic Value: https://www.sygnia.co/blog/the-forensic-value-of-mft-slack-space/
- MFTECmd Documentation: https://ericzimmerman.github.io/
- SANS FOR500: Windows Forensic Analysis
Example Output
$ MFTECmd.exe -f "C:\Evidence\$MFT" --csv /analysis/mft_output
MFTECmd v1.2.2 - MFT Parser
==============================
Input: C:\Evidence\$MFT (Size: 384 MB)
Total MFT Entries: 395,264
Parsing MFT entries... Done (12.4 seconds)
--- Deleted File Recovery Summary ---
Total Entries: 395,264
Active Files: 245,832
Deleted Files: 149,432
Recoverable: 87,234 (resident data or clusters not reallocated)
Partially Recoverable: 31,456 (some clusters overwritten)
Unrecoverable: 30,742 (all clusters reallocated)
--- Recently Deleted Files (Incident Window: 2024-01-15 to 2024-01-18) ---
MFT Entry | Filename | Path | Size | Deleted (UTC) | Recoverable
----------|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------|-----------------------|------------
148923 | exfil_tool.exe | C:\ProgramData\Updates\ | 1,258,496 | 2024-01-17 02:45:12 | YES
148924 | exfil_tool.log | C:\ProgramData\Updates\ | 45,312 | 2024-01-17 02:45:14 | YES
149001 | passwords.txt | C:\Users\jsmith\Desktop\ | 2,048 | 2024-01-17 02:50:33 | YES
149150 | scan_results.csv | C:\Users\jsmith\AppData\Local\Temp | 892,416 | 2024-01-17 03:00:01 | PARTIAL
149200 | mimikatz.exe | C:\Windows\Temp\ | 1,250,816 | 2024-01-18 01:15:22 | YES
149201 | sekurlsa.log | C:\Windows\Temp\ | 32,768 | 2024-01-18 01:15:25 | YES
149302 | .bash_history | C:\Users\jsmith\ | 4,096 | 2024-01-18 03:00:00 | NO
149400 | ClearEventLogs.ps1 | C:\Windows\Temp\ | 1,536 | 2024-01-18 03:01:12 | YES
--- $STANDARD_INFORMATION vs $FILE_NAME Timestamp Analysis (Timestomping Detection) ---
MFT Entry | Filename | $SI Created | $FN Created | Delta | Verdict
----------|---------------------|----------------------|----------------------|-----------|----------
148923 | exfil_tool.exe | 2023-06-15 10:00:00 | 2024-01-15 14:34:02 | -214 days | TIMESTOMPED
149200 | mimikatz.exe | 2022-01-01 00:00:00 | 2024-01-16 02:30:15 | -745 days | TIMESTOMPED
Recovered files exported to: /analysis/mft_output/recovered/
Full CSV report: /analysis/mft_output/mft_analysis.csv (395,264 rows)
Timeline CSV: /analysis/mft_output/mft_timeline.csv
How to use analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★30 reviews- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 16, 2024
analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Anaya Choi· Dec 4, 2024
We added analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Anaya Menon· Nov 23, 2024
analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 7, 2024
analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Oct 26, 2024
We added analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Meera Desai· Oct 14, 2024
analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Maya Sanchez· Sep 21, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Chinedu Ndlovu· Sep 1, 2024
I recommend analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Michael Rahman· Aug 20, 2024
Keeps context tight: analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Benjamin Sanchez· Aug 12, 2024
analyzing-mft-for-deleted-file-recovery is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 30