docs-seeker

mrgoonie/claudekit-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/mrgoonie/claudekit-skills --skill docs-seeker
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Intelligent discovery and analysis of technical documentation through multiple strategies:

skill.md

Documentation Discovery & Analysis

Overview

Intelligent discovery and analysis of technical documentation through multiple strategies:

  1. llms.txt-first: Search for standardized AI-friendly documentation
  2. Repository analysis: Use Repomix to analyze GitHub repositories
  3. Parallel exploration: Deploy multiple Explorer agents for comprehensive coverage
  4. Fallback research: Use Researcher agents when other methods unavailable

Core Workflow

Phase 1: Initial Discovery

  1. Identify target

    • Extract library/framework name from user request
    • Note version requirements (default: latest)
    • Clarify scope if ambiguous
    • Identify if target is GitHub repository or website
  2. Search for llms.txt (PRIORITIZE context7.com)

    First: Try context7.com patterns

    For GitHub repositories:

    Pattern: https://context7.com/{org}/{repo}/llms.txt
    Examples:
    - https://github.com/imagick/imagick → https://context7.com/imagick/imagick/llms.txt
    - https://github.com/vercel/next.js → https://context7.com/vercel/next.js/llms.txt
    - https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth → https://context7.com/better-auth/better-auth/llms.txt
    

    For websites:

    Pattern: https://context7.com/websites/{normalized-domain-path}/llms.txt
    Examples:
    - https://docs.imgix.com/ → https://context7.com/websites/imgix/llms.txt
    - https://docs.byteplus.com/en/docs/ModelArk/ → https://context7.com/websites/byteplus_en_modelark/llms.txt
    - https://docs.haystack.deepset.ai/docs → https://context7.com/websites/haystack_deepset_ai/llms.txt
    - https://ffmpeg.org/doxygen/8.0/ → https://context7.com/websites/ffmpeg_doxygen_8_0/llms.txt
    

    Topic-specific searches (when user asks about specific feature):

    Pattern: https://context7.com/{path}/llms.txt?topic={query}
    Examples:
    - https://context7.com/shadcn-ui/ui/llms.txt?topic=date
    - https://context7.com/shadcn-ui/ui/llms.txt?topic=button
    - https://context7.com/vercel/next.js/llms.txt?topic=cache
    - https://context7.com/websites/ffmpeg_doxygen_8_0/llms.txt?topic=compress
    

    Fallback: Traditional llms.txt search

    WebSearch: "[library name] llms.txt site:[docs domain]"
    

    Common patterns:

    • https://docs.[library].com/llms.txt
    • https://[library].dev/llms.txt
    • https://[library].io/llms.txt

    → Found? Proceed to Phase 2 → Not found? Proceed to Phase 3

Phase 2: llms.txt Processing

Single URL:

  • WebFetch to retrieve content
  • Extract and present information

Multiple URLs (3+):

  • CRITICAL: Launch multiple Explorer agents in parallel
  • One agent per major documentation section (max 5 in first batch)
  • Each agent reads assigned URLs
  • Aggregate findings into consolidated report

Example:

Launch 3 Explorer agents simultaneously:
- Agent 1: getting-started.md, installation.md
- Agent 2: api-reference.md, core-concepts.md
- Agent 3: examples.md, best-practices.md

Phase 3: Repository Analysis

When llms.txt not found:

  1. Find GitHub repository via WebSearch
  2. Use Repomix to pack repository:
    npm install -g repomix  # if needed
    git clone [repo-url] /tmp/docs-analysis
    cd /tmp/docs-analysis
    repomix --output repomix-output.xml
    
  3. Read repomix-output.xml and extract documentation

Repomix benefits:

  • Entire repository in single AI-friendly file
  • Preserves directory structure
  • Optimized for AI consumption

Phase 4: Fallback Research

When no GitHub repository exists:

  • Launch multiple Researcher agents in parallel
  • Focus areas: official docs, tutorials, API references, community guides
  • Aggregate findings into consolidated report

Agent Distribution Guidelines

  • 1-3 URLs: Single Explorer agent
  • 4-10 URLs: 3-5 Explorer agents (2-3 URLs each)
  • 11+ URLs: 5-7 Explorer agents (prioritize most relevant)

Version Handling

Latest (default):

  • Search without version specifier
  • Use current documentation paths

Specific version:

  • Include version in search: [library] v[version] llms.txt
  • Check versioned paths: /v[version]/llms.txt
  • For repositories: checkout specific tag/branch

Output Format

# Documentation for [Library] [Version]

## Source
- Method: [llms.txt / Repository / Research]
- URLs: [list of sources]
- Date accessed: [current date]

## Key Information
[Extracted relevant information organized by topic]

## Additional Resources
[Related links, examples, references]

## Notes
[Any limitations, missing information, or caveats]

Quick Reference

Tool selection:

  • WebSearch → Find llms.txt URLs, GitHub repositories
  • WebFetch → Read single documentation pages
  • Task (Explore) → Multiple URLs, parallel exploration
  • Task (Researcher) → Scattered documentation, diverse sources
  • Repomix → Complete codebase analysis

Popular llms.txt locations (try context7.com first):

Fallback to official sites if context7.com unavailable:

Error Handling

  • llms.txt not accessible → Try alternative domains → Repository analysis
  • Repository not found → Search official website → Use Researcher agents
  • Repomix fails → Try /docs directory only → Manual exploration
  • Multiple conflicting sources → Prioritize official → Note versions

Key Principles

  1. Prioritize context7.com for llms.txt — Most comprehensive and up-to-date aggregator
  2. Use topic parameters when applicable — Enables targeted searches with ?topic=...
  3. Use parallel agents aggressively — Faster results, better coverage
  4. Verify official sources as fallback — Use when context7.com unavailable
  5. Report methodology — Tell user which approach was used
  6. Handle versions explicitly — Don't assume latest

Detailed Documentation

For comprehensive guides, examples, and best practices:

Workflows:

  • WORKFLOWS.md — Detailed workflow examples and strategies

Reference guides:

how to use docs-seeker

How to use docs-seeker on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add docs-seeker
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/mrgoonie/claudekit-skills --skill docs-seeker

The skills CLI fetches docs-seeker from GitHub repository mrgoonie/claudekit-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/docs-seeker

Reload or restart Cursor to activate docs-seeker. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /docs-seeker) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.737 reviews
  • Dhruvi Jain· Dec 24, 2024

    docs-seeker is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Chinedu Kapoor· Dec 8, 2024

    docs-seeker is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Chinedu Lopez· Dec 4, 2024

    Keeps context tight: docs-seeker is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Michael Desai· Nov 27, 2024

    docs-seeker fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Oshnikdeep· Nov 15, 2024

    docs-seeker fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Dev Sethi· Nov 3, 2024

    We added docs-seeker from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Dev Taylor· Oct 22, 2024

    docs-seeker reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Daniel Sanchez· Oct 18, 2024

    docs-seeker has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Ganesh Mohane· Oct 6, 2024

    docs-seeker has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Sakshi Patil· Sep 25, 2024

    docs-seeker reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

showing 1-10 of 37

1 / 4