docs-seeker▌
mrgoonie/claudekit-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Intelligent discovery and analysis of technical documentation through multiple strategies:
Documentation Discovery & Analysis
Overview
Intelligent discovery and analysis of technical documentation through multiple strategies:
- llms.txt-first: Search for standardized AI-friendly documentation
- Repository analysis: Use Repomix to analyze GitHub repositories
- Parallel exploration: Deploy multiple Explorer agents for comprehensive coverage
- Fallback research: Use Researcher agents when other methods unavailable
Core Workflow
Phase 1: Initial Discovery
-
Identify target
- Extract library/framework name from user request
- Note version requirements (default: latest)
- Clarify scope if ambiguous
- Identify if target is GitHub repository or website
-
Search for llms.txt (PRIORITIZE context7.com)
First: Try context7.com patterns
For GitHub repositories:
Pattern: https://context7.com/{org}/{repo}/llms.txt Examples: - https://github.com/imagick/imagick → https://context7.com/imagick/imagick/llms.txt - https://github.com/vercel/next.js → https://context7.com/vercel/next.js/llms.txt - https://github.com/better-auth/better-auth → https://context7.com/better-auth/better-auth/llms.txtFor websites:
Pattern: https://context7.com/websites/{normalized-domain-path}/llms.txt Examples: - https://docs.imgix.com/ → https://context7.com/websites/imgix/llms.txt - https://docs.byteplus.com/en/docs/ModelArk/ → https://context7.com/websites/byteplus_en_modelark/llms.txt - https://docs.haystack.deepset.ai/docs → https://context7.com/websites/haystack_deepset_ai/llms.txt - https://ffmpeg.org/doxygen/8.0/ → https://context7.com/websites/ffmpeg_doxygen_8_0/llms.txtTopic-specific searches (when user asks about specific feature):
Pattern: https://context7.com/{path}/llms.txt?topic={query} Examples: - https://context7.com/shadcn-ui/ui/llms.txt?topic=date - https://context7.com/shadcn-ui/ui/llms.txt?topic=button - https://context7.com/vercel/next.js/llms.txt?topic=cache - https://context7.com/websites/ffmpeg_doxygen_8_0/llms.txt?topic=compressFallback: Traditional llms.txt search
WebSearch: "[library name] llms.txt site:[docs domain]"Common patterns:
https://docs.[library].com/llms.txthttps://[library].dev/llms.txthttps://[library].io/llms.txt
→ Found? Proceed to Phase 2 → Not found? Proceed to Phase 3
Phase 2: llms.txt Processing
Single URL:
- WebFetch to retrieve content
- Extract and present information
Multiple URLs (3+):
- CRITICAL: Launch multiple Explorer agents in parallel
- One agent per major documentation section (max 5 in first batch)
- Each agent reads assigned URLs
- Aggregate findings into consolidated report
Example:
Launch 3 Explorer agents simultaneously:
- Agent 1: getting-started.md, installation.md
- Agent 2: api-reference.md, core-concepts.md
- Agent 3: examples.md, best-practices.md
Phase 3: Repository Analysis
When llms.txt not found:
- Find GitHub repository via WebSearch
- Use Repomix to pack repository:
npm install -g repomix # if needed git clone [repo-url] /tmp/docs-analysis cd /tmp/docs-analysis repomix --output repomix-output.xml - Read repomix-output.xml and extract documentation
Repomix benefits:
- Entire repository in single AI-friendly file
- Preserves directory structure
- Optimized for AI consumption
Phase 4: Fallback Research
When no GitHub repository exists:
- Launch multiple Researcher agents in parallel
- Focus areas: official docs, tutorials, API references, community guides
- Aggregate findings into consolidated report
Agent Distribution Guidelines
- 1-3 URLs: Single Explorer agent
- 4-10 URLs: 3-5 Explorer agents (2-3 URLs each)
- 11+ URLs: 5-7 Explorer agents (prioritize most relevant)
Version Handling
Latest (default):
- Search without version specifier
- Use current documentation paths
Specific version:
- Include version in search:
[library] v[version] llms.txt - Check versioned paths:
/v[version]/llms.txt - For repositories: checkout specific tag/branch
Output Format
# Documentation for [Library] [Version]
## Source
- Method: [llms.txt / Repository / Research]
- URLs: [list of sources]
- Date accessed: [current date]
## Key Information
[Extracted relevant information organized by topic]
## Additional Resources
[Related links, examples, references]
## Notes
[Any limitations, missing information, or caveats]
Quick Reference
Tool selection:
- WebSearch → Find llms.txt URLs, GitHub repositories
- WebFetch → Read single documentation pages
- Task (Explore) → Multiple URLs, parallel exploration
- Task (Researcher) → Scattered documentation, diverse sources
- Repomix → Complete codebase analysis
Popular llms.txt locations (try context7.com first):
- Astro: https://context7.com/withastro/astro/llms.txt
- Next.js: https://context7.com/vercel/next.js/llms.txt
- Remix: https://context7.com/remix-run/remix/llms.txt
- shadcn/ui: https://context7.com/shadcn-ui/ui/llms.txt
- Better Auth: https://context7.com/better-auth/better-auth/llms.txt
Fallback to official sites if context7.com unavailable:
- Astro: https://docs.astro.build/llms.txt
- Next.js: https://nextjs.org/llms.txt
- Remix: https://remix.run/llms.txt
- SvelteKit: https://kit.svelte.dev/llms.txt
Error Handling
- llms.txt not accessible → Try alternative domains → Repository analysis
- Repository not found → Search official website → Use Researcher agents
- Repomix fails → Try /docs directory only → Manual exploration
- Multiple conflicting sources → Prioritize official → Note versions
Key Principles
- Prioritize context7.com for llms.txt — Most comprehensive and up-to-date aggregator
- Use topic parameters when applicable — Enables targeted searches with ?topic=...
- Use parallel agents aggressively — Faster results, better coverage
- Verify official sources as fallback — Use when context7.com unavailable
- Report methodology — Tell user which approach was used
- Handle versions explicitly — Don't assume latest
Detailed Documentation
For comprehensive guides, examples, and best practices:
Workflows:
- WORKFLOWS.md — Detailed workflow examples and strategies
Reference guides:
- Tool Selection — Complete guide to choosing and using tools
- Documentation Sources — Common sources and patterns across ecosystems
- Error Handling — Troubleshooting and resolution strategies
- Best Practices — 8 essential principles for effective discovery
- Performance — Optimization techniques and benchmarks
- Limitations — Boundaries and success criteria
How to use docs-seeker on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add docs-seeker
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches docs-seeker from GitHub repository mrgoonie/claudekit-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate docs-seeker. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /docs-seeker) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★37 reviews- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 24, 2024
docs-seeker is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Chinedu Kapoor· Dec 8, 2024
docs-seeker is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Chinedu Lopez· Dec 4, 2024
Keeps context tight: docs-seeker is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Michael Desai· Nov 27, 2024
docs-seeker fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 15, 2024
docs-seeker fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Dev Sethi· Nov 3, 2024
We added docs-seeker from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Dev Taylor· Oct 22, 2024
docs-seeker reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Daniel Sanchez· Oct 18, 2024
docs-seeker has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Oct 6, 2024
docs-seeker has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Sep 25, 2024
docs-seeker reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 37