tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis

mims-harvard/tooluniverse · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Comprehensive biological interpretation of spatial omics data. Transforms spatially variable genes (SVGs), domain annotations, and tissue context into actionable biological insights.

skill.md

Spatial Multi-Omics Analysis Pipeline

Comprehensive biological interpretation of spatial omics data. Transforms spatially variable genes (SVGs), domain annotations, and tissue context into actionable biological insights.

KEY PRINCIPLES:

  1. Report-first approach - Create report file FIRST, then populate progressively
  2. Domain-by-domain analysis - Characterize each spatial region independently before comparison
  3. Gene-list-centric - Analyze user-provided SVGs and marker genes with ToolUniverse databases
  4. Biological interpretation - Go beyond statistics to explain biological meaning of spatial patterns
  5. Disease focus - Emphasize disease mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities when disease context is provided
  6. Evidence grading - Grade all evidence as T1 (human/clinical) to T4 (computational)
  7. Multi-modal thinking - Integrate RNA, protein, and metabolite information when available
  8. Validation guidance - Suggest experimental validation approaches for key findings
  9. Source references - Every statement must cite tool/database source
  10. English-first queries - Always use English terms in tool calls

LOOK UP, DON'T GUESS

When uncertain about any scientific fact, SEARCH databases first (PubMed, UniProt, ChEMBL, ClinVar, etc.) rather than reasoning from memory. A database-verified answer is always more reliable than a guess.


COMPUTE, DON'T DESCRIBE

When analysis requires computation (statistics, data processing, scoring, enrichment), write and run Python code via Bash. Don't describe what you would do — execute it and report actual results. Use ToolUniverse tools to retrieve data, then Python (pandas, scipy, statsmodels, matplotlib) to analyze it.

When to Use This Skill

Apply when users:

  • Provide spatially variable genes from spatial transcriptomics experiments
  • Ask about biological interpretation of spatial domains/clusters
  • Need pathway enrichment of spatial gene expression data
  • Want to understand cell-cell interactions from spatial data
  • Ask about tumor microenvironment heterogeneity from spatial omics
  • Need druggable targets in specific spatial regions
  • Ask about tissue zonation patterns (liver, brain, kidney)
  • Want to integrate spatial transcriptomics + proteomics data

NOT for: Single gene interpretation (use target-research), variant interpretation, drug safety, bulk RNA-seq, GWAS analysis.


Input Parameters

Parameter Required Description Example
svgs Yes Spatially variable genes ['EGFR', 'CDH1', 'VIM', 'MYC', 'CD3E']
tissue_type Yes Tissue/organ type brain, liver, lung, breast
technology No Spatial omics platform 10x Visium, MERFISH, DBiTplus
disease_context No Disease if applicable breast cancer, Alzheimer disease
spatial_domains No Domain -> marker genes dict {'Tumor core': ['MYC','EGFR']}
cell_types No Cell types from deconvolution ['Epithelial', 'T cell']
proteins No Proteins detected (multi-modal) ['CD3', 'PD-L1', 'Ki67']
metabolites No Metabolites (SpatialMETA) ['glutamine', 'lactate']

Spatial Omics Integration Score (0-100)

Data Completeness (0-30): SVGs (5), Disease context (5), Spatial domains (5), Cell types (5), Multi-modal (5), Literature (5)

Biological Insight (0-40): Pathway enrichment FDR<0.05 (10), Cell-cell interactions (10), Disease mechanism (10), Druggable targets (10)

Evidence Quality (0-30): Cross-database validation 3+ DBs (10), Clinical validation (10), Literature support (10)

Score Tier Interpretation
80-100 Excellent Comprehensive characterization, strong insights, druggable targets
60-79 Good Good pathway/interaction analysis, some therapeutic context
40-59 Moderate Basic enrichment, limited domain comparison
0-39 Limited Minimal data, gene-level annotation only

Evidence Grading

Tier Criteria Examples
[T1] Direct human/clinical evidence FDA-approved drug, validated biomarker
[T2] Experimental evidence Validated spatial pattern, known L-R pair
[T3] Computational/database evidence PPI prediction, pathway enrichment
[T4] Annotation/prediction only GO annotation, text-mined association

Analysis Phases Overview

Phase 0: Input Processing & Disambiguation (ALWAYS FIRST)

Resolve tissue/disease identifiers, establish analysis context. Get MONDO/EFO IDs for disease queries.

  • Tools: OpenTargets_get_disease_id_description_by_name, OpenTargets_get_disease_description_by_efoId, HPA_search_genes_by_query

Phase 1: Gene Characterization

Resolve gene IDs, annotate functions, tissue specificity, subcellular localization.

  • Tools: MyGene_query_genes, UniProt_get_function_by_accession, HPA_get_subcellular_location, HPA_get_rna_expression_by_source, HPA_get_comprehensive_gene_details_by_ensembl_id, HPA_get_cancer_prognostics_by_gene, UniProtIDMap_gene_to_uniprot

Phase 2: Pathway & Functional Enrichment

Identify enriched pathways globally and per-domain. Filter FDR < 0.05.

  • Tools: STRING_functional_enrichment (PRIMARY), ReactomeAnalysis_pathway_enrichment, GO_get_annotations_for_gene, kegg_search_pathway, WikiPathways_search

Phase 3: Spatial Domain Characterization

Characterize each domain biologically, assign cell types from markers, compare domains.

  • Tools: Phase 2 tools + HPA_get_biological_processes_by_gene, HPA_get_protein_interactions_by_gene

Phase 4: Cell-Cell Interaction Inference

Predict communication from spatial patterns. Check ligand-receptor pairs across domains.

  • Tools: STRING_get_interaction_partners, STRING_get_protein_interactions, intact_search_interactions, Reactome_get_interactor, DGIdb_get_drug_gene_interactions

Phase 5: Disease & Therapeutic Context

Connect to disease mechanisms, identify druggable targets, find clinical trials.

  • Tools: OpenTargets_get_associated_targets_by_disease_efoId, OpenTargets_get_target_tractability_by_ensemblID, OpenTargets_get_associated_drugs_by_target_ensemblID, search_clinical_trials, DGIdb_get_gene_druggability, civic_search_genes

Phase 6: Multi-Modal Integration

Integrate protein/RNA/metabolite data. Compare spatial RNA with protein detection.

  • Tools: HPA_get_subcellular_location, HPA_get_rna_expression_in_specific_tissues, Reactome_map_uniprot_to_pathways, kegg_get_pathway_info

Phase 7: Immune Microenvironment (Cancer/Inflammation only)

Classify immune cells, check checkpoint expression, assess Hot vs Cold vs Excluded patterns.

  • Tools: STRING_functional_enrichment, OpenTargets_get_target_tractability_by_ensemblID, iedb_search_epitopes

Phase 8: Literature & Validation Context

Search published evidence, suggest validation experiments (smFISH, IHC, PLA).

  • Tools: PubMed_search_articles, openalex_literature_search

Data Discovery: HuBMAP Spatial Atlas Tools

Use HuBMAP tools to find published spatial biology reference datasets for comparison, validation, or cross-study analysis.

Tool Purpose Key Parameters
HuBMAP_search_datasets Search published spatial datasets by organ/assay/keyword organ (code: "LK"=Kidney, "BR"=Brain, "LU"=Lung, etc.), dataset_type ("RNAseq", "CODEX", "MALDI"), query, limit
HuBMAP_list_organs List all available organs with codes and UBERON IDs (no required params)
HuBMAP_get_dataset Get detailed metadata for a specific HuBMAP dataset hubmap_id (e.g. "HBM626.FHJD.938")

When to use: Phase 0 (find reference datasets for the tissue), Phase 8 (cross-reference findings with published HuBMAP atlas data).

See phase-procedures.md for detailed workflows, decision logic, and tool parameter specifications per phase.


Report Structure

Create file: {tissue}_{disease}_spatial_omics_report.md

# Spatial Multi-Omics Analysis Report: {Tissue Type}
**Report Generated**: {date} | **Technology**: {platform}
**Tissue**: {tissue_type} | **Disease**: {disease or "Normal tissue"}
**Total SVGs**: {count} | **Spatial Domains**: {count}
**Spatial Omics Integration Score**: (calculated after analysis)

## Executive Summary
## 1. Tissue & Disease Context
## 2. Spatially Variable Gene Characterization
  - 2.1 Gene ID Resolution
  - 2.2 Tissue Expression Patterns
  - 2.3 Subcellular Localization
  - 2.4 Disease Associations
## 3. Pathway Enrichment Analysis
  - 3.1 STRING, 3.2 Reactome, 3.3-3.5 GO (BP, MF, CC)
## 4. Spatial Domain Characterization (per-domain + comparison)
## 5. Cell-Cell Interaction Inference
  - 5.1 PPI, 5.2 Ligand-Receptor, 5.3 Signaling Pathways
## 6. Disease & Therapeutic Context
  - 6.1 Disease Gene Overlap, 6.2 Druggable Targets, 6.3 Drug Mechanisms, 6.4 Trials
## 7. Multi-Modal Integration (if data available)
## 8. Immune Microenvironment (if relevant)
## 9. Literature & Validation Context
## Spatial Omics Integration Score (breakdown table)
## Completeness Checklist
## References (tools used, database versions)

See report-template.md for full template with table structures.


Completeness Checklist

  • Gene ID resolution complete
  • Tissue expression patterns analyzed (HPA)
  • Subcellular localization checked (HPA)
  • Pathway enrichment complete (STRING + Reactome)
  • GO enrichment complete (BP + MF + CC)
  • Spatial domains characterized individually
  • Domain comparison performed
  • PPI analyzed (STRING)
  • Ligand-receptor pairs identified
  • Disease associations checked (OpenTargets)
  • Druggable targets identified
  • Multi-modal integration performed (if data available)
  • Immune microenvironment characterized (if relevant)
  • Literature search completed
  • Validation recommendations provided
  • Integration Score calculated
  • Executive summary written
  • All sections have source citations

Common Use Cases

  1. Cancer Spatial Heterogeneity: Visium with tumor/stroma/immune domains -> pathways, immune infiltration, druggable targets, checkpoints
  2. Brain Tissue Zonation: MERFISH with neuronal subtypes -> synaptic signaling, receptors, hippocampal zonation
  3. Liver Metabolic Zonation: Periportal vs pericentral -> CYP450, Wnt gradient, drug metabolism enzymes
  4. Tumor-Immune Interface: DBiTplus RNA+protein -> checkpoint L-R pairs, immune exclusion, multi-modal concordance
  5. Developmental Patterns: Morphogen gradients (Wnt, BMP, FGF, SHH), TF patterns, cell fate genes
  6. Disease Progression: Disease gradient -> inflammatory response, neuronal loss, therapeutic windows

Reference Files

  • phase-procedures.md - Detailed phase workflows, decision logic, tool usage per phase
  • tool-reference.md - Tool parameter names, response formats, fallback strategies, limitations
  • reference-data.md - Cell type markers, ligand-receptor pairs, immune checkpoint reference
  • report-template.md - Full report template with all table structures
  • test_spatial_omics.py - Test suite

Summary

Spatial Multi-Omics Analysis provides:

  1. Gene characterization (ID resolution, function, localization, tissue expression)
  2. Pathway & functional enrichment (STRING, Reactome, GO, KEGG)
  3. Spatial domain characterization (per-domain and cross-domain)
  4. Cell-cell interaction inference (PPI, ligand-receptor, signaling)
  5. Disease & therapeutic context (disease genes, druggable targets, trials)
  6. Multi-modal integration (RNA-protein concordance, metabolic pathways)
  7. Immune microenvironment (cell types, checkpoints, immunotherapy)
  8. Literature context & validation recommendations

Outputs: Markdown report with Spatial Omics Integration Score (0-100) Uses: 70+ ToolUniverse tools across 9 analysis phases Time: ~10-20 minutes depending on gene list size

how to use tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis

How to use tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis

The skills CLI fetches tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis from GitHub repository mims-harvard/tooluniverse and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis

Reload or restart Cursor to activate tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.652 reviews
  • Mateo Anderson· Dec 28, 2024

    tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • William Robinson· Dec 24, 2024

    Keeps context tight: tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Aanya Chawla· Dec 20, 2024

    We added tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Ganesh Mohane· Dec 4, 2024

    tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Charlotte Chawla· Dec 4, 2024

    tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Sofia Anderson· Nov 23, 2024

    tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Charlotte Malhotra· Nov 23, 2024

    tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Sakura Perez· Nov 19, 2024

    Useful defaults in tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Amelia Malhotra· Nov 15, 2024

    Registry listing for tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Sofia Zhang· Oct 14, 2024

    We added tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

showing 1-10 of 52

1 / 6