tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis▌
mims-harvard/tooluniverse · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Comprehensive biological interpretation of spatial omics data. Transforms spatially variable genes (SVGs), domain annotations, and tissue context into actionable biological insights.
Spatial Multi-Omics Analysis Pipeline
Comprehensive biological interpretation of spatial omics data. Transforms spatially variable genes (SVGs), domain annotations, and tissue context into actionable biological insights.
KEY PRINCIPLES:
- Report-first approach - Create report file FIRST, then populate progressively
- Domain-by-domain analysis - Characterize each spatial region independently before comparison
- Gene-list-centric - Analyze user-provided SVGs and marker genes with ToolUniverse databases
- Biological interpretation - Go beyond statistics to explain biological meaning of spatial patterns
- Disease focus - Emphasize disease mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities when disease context is provided
- Evidence grading - Grade all evidence as T1 (human/clinical) to T4 (computational)
- Multi-modal thinking - Integrate RNA, protein, and metabolite information when available
- Validation guidance - Suggest experimental validation approaches for key findings
- Source references - Every statement must cite tool/database source
- English-first queries - Always use English terms in tool calls
LOOK UP, DON'T GUESS
When uncertain about any scientific fact, SEARCH databases first (PubMed, UniProt, ChEMBL, ClinVar, etc.) rather than reasoning from memory. A database-verified answer is always more reliable than a guess.
COMPUTE, DON'T DESCRIBE
When analysis requires computation (statistics, data processing, scoring, enrichment), write and run Python code via Bash. Don't describe what you would do — execute it and report actual results. Use ToolUniverse tools to retrieve data, then Python (pandas, scipy, statsmodels, matplotlib) to analyze it.
When to Use This Skill
Apply when users:
- Provide spatially variable genes from spatial transcriptomics experiments
- Ask about biological interpretation of spatial domains/clusters
- Need pathway enrichment of spatial gene expression data
- Want to understand cell-cell interactions from spatial data
- Ask about tumor microenvironment heterogeneity from spatial omics
- Need druggable targets in specific spatial regions
- Ask about tissue zonation patterns (liver, brain, kidney)
- Want to integrate spatial transcriptomics + proteomics data
NOT for: Single gene interpretation (use target-research), variant interpretation, drug safety, bulk RNA-seq, GWAS analysis.
Input Parameters
| Parameter | Required | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| svgs | Yes | Spatially variable genes | ['EGFR', 'CDH1', 'VIM', 'MYC', 'CD3E'] |
| tissue_type | Yes | Tissue/organ type | brain, liver, lung, breast |
| technology | No | Spatial omics platform | 10x Visium, MERFISH, DBiTplus |
| disease_context | No | Disease if applicable | breast cancer, Alzheimer disease |
| spatial_domains | No | Domain -> marker genes dict | {'Tumor core': ['MYC','EGFR']} |
| cell_types | No | Cell types from deconvolution | ['Epithelial', 'T cell'] |
| proteins | No | Proteins detected (multi-modal) | ['CD3', 'PD-L1', 'Ki67'] |
| metabolites | No | Metabolites (SpatialMETA) | ['glutamine', 'lactate'] |
Spatial Omics Integration Score (0-100)
Data Completeness (0-30): SVGs (5), Disease context (5), Spatial domains (5), Cell types (5), Multi-modal (5), Literature (5)
Biological Insight (0-40): Pathway enrichment FDR<0.05 (10), Cell-cell interactions (10), Disease mechanism (10), Druggable targets (10)
Evidence Quality (0-30): Cross-database validation 3+ DBs (10), Clinical validation (10), Literature support (10)
| Score | Tier | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| 80-100 | Excellent | Comprehensive characterization, strong insights, druggable targets |
| 60-79 | Good | Good pathway/interaction analysis, some therapeutic context |
| 40-59 | Moderate | Basic enrichment, limited domain comparison |
| 0-39 | Limited | Minimal data, gene-level annotation only |
Evidence Grading
| Tier | Criteria | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| [T1] | Direct human/clinical evidence | FDA-approved drug, validated biomarker |
| [T2] | Experimental evidence | Validated spatial pattern, known L-R pair |
| [T3] | Computational/database evidence | PPI prediction, pathway enrichment |
| [T4] | Annotation/prediction only | GO annotation, text-mined association |
Analysis Phases Overview
Phase 0: Input Processing & Disambiguation (ALWAYS FIRST)
Resolve tissue/disease identifiers, establish analysis context. Get MONDO/EFO IDs for disease queries.
- Tools:
OpenTargets_get_disease_id_description_by_name,OpenTargets_get_disease_description_by_efoId,HPA_search_genes_by_query
Phase 1: Gene Characterization
Resolve gene IDs, annotate functions, tissue specificity, subcellular localization.
- Tools:
MyGene_query_genes,UniProt_get_function_by_accession,HPA_get_subcellular_location,HPA_get_rna_expression_by_source,HPA_get_comprehensive_gene_details_by_ensembl_id,HPA_get_cancer_prognostics_by_gene,UniProtIDMap_gene_to_uniprot
Phase 2: Pathway & Functional Enrichment
Identify enriched pathways globally and per-domain. Filter FDR < 0.05.
- Tools:
STRING_functional_enrichment(PRIMARY),ReactomeAnalysis_pathway_enrichment,GO_get_annotations_for_gene,kegg_search_pathway,WikiPathways_search
Phase 3: Spatial Domain Characterization
Characterize each domain biologically, assign cell types from markers, compare domains.
- Tools: Phase 2 tools +
HPA_get_biological_processes_by_gene,HPA_get_protein_interactions_by_gene
Phase 4: Cell-Cell Interaction Inference
Predict communication from spatial patterns. Check ligand-receptor pairs across domains.
- Tools:
STRING_get_interaction_partners,STRING_get_protein_interactions,intact_search_interactions,Reactome_get_interactor,DGIdb_get_drug_gene_interactions
Phase 5: Disease & Therapeutic Context
Connect to disease mechanisms, identify druggable targets, find clinical trials.
- Tools:
OpenTargets_get_associated_targets_by_disease_efoId,OpenTargets_get_target_tractability_by_ensemblID,OpenTargets_get_associated_drugs_by_target_ensemblID,search_clinical_trials,DGIdb_get_gene_druggability,civic_search_genes
Phase 6: Multi-Modal Integration
Integrate protein/RNA/metabolite data. Compare spatial RNA with protein detection.
- Tools:
HPA_get_subcellular_location,HPA_get_rna_expression_in_specific_tissues,Reactome_map_uniprot_to_pathways,kegg_get_pathway_info
Phase 7: Immune Microenvironment (Cancer/Inflammation only)
Classify immune cells, check checkpoint expression, assess Hot vs Cold vs Excluded patterns.
- Tools:
STRING_functional_enrichment,OpenTargets_get_target_tractability_by_ensemblID,iedb_search_epitopes
Phase 8: Literature & Validation Context
Search published evidence, suggest validation experiments (smFISH, IHC, PLA).
- Tools:
PubMed_search_articles,openalex_literature_search
Data Discovery: HuBMAP Spatial Atlas Tools
Use HuBMAP tools to find published spatial biology reference datasets for comparison, validation, or cross-study analysis.
| Tool | Purpose | Key Parameters |
|---|---|---|
HuBMAP_search_datasets |
Search published spatial datasets by organ/assay/keyword | organ (code: "LK"=Kidney, "BR"=Brain, "LU"=Lung, etc.), dataset_type ("RNAseq", "CODEX", "MALDI"), query, limit |
HuBMAP_list_organs |
List all available organs with codes and UBERON IDs | (no required params) |
HuBMAP_get_dataset |
Get detailed metadata for a specific HuBMAP dataset | hubmap_id (e.g. "HBM626.FHJD.938") |
When to use: Phase 0 (find reference datasets for the tissue), Phase 8 (cross-reference findings with published HuBMAP atlas data).
See phase-procedures.md for detailed workflows, decision logic, and tool parameter specifications per phase.
Report Structure
Create file: {tissue}_{disease}_spatial_omics_report.md
# Spatial Multi-Omics Analysis Report: {Tissue Type}
**Report Generated**: {date} | **Technology**: {platform}
**Tissue**: {tissue_type} | **Disease**: {disease or "Normal tissue"}
**Total SVGs**: {count} | **Spatial Domains**: {count}
**Spatial Omics Integration Score**: (calculated after analysis)
## Executive Summary
## 1. Tissue & Disease Context
## 2. Spatially Variable Gene Characterization
- 2.1 Gene ID Resolution
- 2.2 Tissue Expression Patterns
- 2.3 Subcellular Localization
- 2.4 Disease Associations
## 3. Pathway Enrichment Analysis
- 3.1 STRING, 3.2 Reactome, 3.3-3.5 GO (BP, MF, CC)
## 4. Spatial Domain Characterization (per-domain + comparison)
## 5. Cell-Cell Interaction Inference
- 5.1 PPI, 5.2 Ligand-Receptor, 5.3 Signaling Pathways
## 6. Disease & Therapeutic Context
- 6.1 Disease Gene Overlap, 6.2 Druggable Targets, 6.3 Drug Mechanisms, 6.4 Trials
## 7. Multi-Modal Integration (if data available)
## 8. Immune Microenvironment (if relevant)
## 9. Literature & Validation Context
## Spatial Omics Integration Score (breakdown table)
## Completeness Checklist
## References (tools used, database versions)
See report-template.md for full template with table structures.
Completeness Checklist
- Gene ID resolution complete
- Tissue expression patterns analyzed (HPA)
- Subcellular localization checked (HPA)
- Pathway enrichment complete (STRING + Reactome)
- GO enrichment complete (BP + MF + CC)
- Spatial domains characterized individually
- Domain comparison performed
- PPI analyzed (STRING)
- Ligand-receptor pairs identified
- Disease associations checked (OpenTargets)
- Druggable targets identified
- Multi-modal integration performed (if data available)
- Immune microenvironment characterized (if relevant)
- Literature search completed
- Validation recommendations provided
- Integration Score calculated
- Executive summary written
- All sections have source citations
Common Use Cases
- Cancer Spatial Heterogeneity: Visium with tumor/stroma/immune domains -> pathways, immune infiltration, druggable targets, checkpoints
- Brain Tissue Zonation: MERFISH with neuronal subtypes -> synaptic signaling, receptors, hippocampal zonation
- Liver Metabolic Zonation: Periportal vs pericentral -> CYP450, Wnt gradient, drug metabolism enzymes
- Tumor-Immune Interface: DBiTplus RNA+protein -> checkpoint L-R pairs, immune exclusion, multi-modal concordance
- Developmental Patterns: Morphogen gradients (Wnt, BMP, FGF, SHH), TF patterns, cell fate genes
- Disease Progression: Disease gradient -> inflammatory response, neuronal loss, therapeutic windows
Reference Files
- phase-procedures.md - Detailed phase workflows, decision logic, tool usage per phase
- tool-reference.md - Tool parameter names, response formats, fallback strategies, limitations
- reference-data.md - Cell type markers, ligand-receptor pairs, immune checkpoint reference
- report-template.md - Full report template with all table structures
- test_spatial_omics.py - Test suite
Summary
Spatial Multi-Omics Analysis provides:
- Gene characterization (ID resolution, function, localization, tissue expression)
- Pathway & functional enrichment (STRING, Reactome, GO, KEGG)
- Spatial domain characterization (per-domain and cross-domain)
- Cell-cell interaction inference (PPI, ligand-receptor, signaling)
- Disease & therapeutic context (disease genes, druggable targets, trials)
- Multi-modal integration (RNA-protein concordance, metabolic pathways)
- Immune microenvironment (cell types, checkpoints, immunotherapy)
- Literature context & validation recommendations
Outputs: Markdown report with Spatial Omics Integration Score (0-100) Uses: 70+ ToolUniverse tools across 9 analysis phases Time: ~10-20 minutes depending on gene list size
How to use tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis from GitHub repository mims-harvard/tooluniverse and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★52 reviews- ★★★★★Mateo Anderson· Dec 28, 2024
tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★William Robinson· Dec 24, 2024
Keeps context tight: tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Aanya Chawla· Dec 20, 2024
We added tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 4, 2024
tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Charlotte Chawla· Dec 4, 2024
tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Sofia Anderson· Nov 23, 2024
tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Charlotte Malhotra· Nov 23, 2024
tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Sakura Perez· Nov 19, 2024
Useful defaults in tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Amelia Malhotra· Nov 15, 2024
Registry listing for tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Sofia Zhang· Oct 14, 2024
We added tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 52