clojure-review▌
metabase/metabase · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
@./../_shared/clojure-style-guide.md
- ›@./../_shared/clojure-commands.md
Clojure Code Review Skill
@./../_shared/clojure-style-guide.md @./../_shared/clojure-commands.md
Review guidelines
What to flag:
- Check compliance with the Metabase Clojure style guide (included above)
- If
CLOJURE_STYLE_GUIDE.adocexists in the working directory, also check compliance with the community Clojure style guide - Flag all style guide violations
What NOT to post:
- Do not post comments congratulating someone for trivial changes or for following style guidelines
- Do not post comments confirming things "look good" or telling them they did something correctly
- Only post comments about style violations or potential issues
Example bad code review comments to avoid:
This TODO comment is properly formatted with author and date - nice work!
Good addition of limit 1 to the query - this makes the test more efficient without changing its behavior.
The kondo ignore comment is appropriately placed here
Test name properly ends with -test as required by the style guide.
Special cases:
- Do not post comments about missing parentheses (these will be caught by the linter)
Quick review checklist
Use this to scan through changes efficiently:
Naming
- Descriptive names (no
tbl,zs') - Pure functions named as nouns describing their return value
-
kebab-casefor all variables and functions - Side-effect functions end with
! - No namespace-alias repetition in function names
Documentation
- Public vars in
srcorenterprise/backend/srchave useful docstrings - Docstrings use Markdown conventions
- References use
[[other-var]]not backticks -
TODOcomments include author and date:;; TODO (Name 2025-01-01) -- description
Code Organization
- Everything
^:privateunless used elsewhere - No
declarewhen avoidable (public functions near end) - Functions under 20 lines when possible
- No blank, non-comment lines within definition forms (except pairwise constructs in
let/cond) - Lines ≤ 120 characters
Tests
- Separate
deftestforms for distinct test cases - Pure tests marked
^:parallel - Test names end in
-testor-test-<number>
Modules
- Correct module patterns (OSS:
metabase.<module>.*, EE:metabase-enterprise.<module>.*) - API endpoints in
<module>.apinamespaces - Public API in
<module>.corewith Potemkin - No cheating module linters with
:clj-kondo/ignore [:metabase/modules]
REST API
- Response schemas present (
:- <schema>) - Query params use kebab-case, bodies use
snake_case - Routes use singular nouns (e.g.,
/api/dashboard/:id) -
GEThas no side effects (except analytics) - Malli schemas detailed and complete
- All new endpoints have tests
MBQL
- No raw MBQL manipulation outside
lib,lib-be, orquery-processormodules - Uses Lib and MBQL 5, not legacy MBQL
Database
- Model and table names are singular nouns
- Uses
t2/select-one-fninstead of selecting full rows for one column - Logic in Toucan methods, not helper functions
Drivers
- New multimethods documented in
docs/developers-guide/driver-changelog.md - Passes
driverargument to other driver methods (no hardcoded driver names) - Minimal logic in
read-column-thunk
Miscellaneous
- Example data is bird-themed when possible
- Kondo linter suppressions use proper format (not
#_:clj-kondo/ignorekeyword form)
Pattern matching table
Quick scan for common issues:
| Pattern | Issue |
|---|---|
calculate-age, get-user |
Pure functions should be nouns: age, user |
update-db, save-model |
Missing ! for side effects: update-db!, save-model! |
snake_case_var |
Should use kebab-case |
| Public var without docstring | Add docstring explaining purpose |
;; TODO fix this |
Missing author/date: ;; TODO (Name 2025-01-01) -- description |
(defn foo ...) in namespace used elsewhere |
Should be (defn ^:private foo ...) |
| Function > 20 lines | Consider breaking up into smaller functions |
/api/dashboards/:id |
Use singular: /api/dashboard/:id |
Query params with snake_case |
Use kebab-case for query params |
| New API endpoint without tests | Add tests for the endpoint |
Feedback format examples
For style violations:
This pure function should be named as a noun describing its return value. Consider
userinstead ofget-user.
For missing documentation:
This public var needs a docstring explaining its purpose, inputs, and outputs.
For organization issues:
This function is only used in this namespace, so it should be marked
^:private.
For API conventions:
Query parameters should use kebab-case. Change
user_idtouser-id.
How to use clojure-review on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add clojure-review
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches clojure-review from GitHub repository metabase/metabase and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate clojure-review. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /clojure-review) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.8★★★★★61 reviews- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 24, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: clojure-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Noor Desai· Dec 16, 2024
clojure-review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Ama Tandon· Dec 16, 2024
Registry listing for clojure-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Diya Johnson· Dec 8, 2024
Registry listing for clojure-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Nikhil Srinivasan· Dec 4, 2024
Useful defaults in clojure-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Dev Mensah· Nov 27, 2024
Useful defaults in clojure-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Noor Dixit· Nov 23, 2024
Registry listing for clojure-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Nov 15, 2024
We added clojure-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Mia Gill· Nov 7, 2024
I recommend clojure-review for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Ama Patel· Nov 7, 2024
Useful defaults in clojure-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
showing 1-10 of 61