e2e-tests-studio▌
mastra-ai/mastra · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
CRITICAL: Tests must verify that product features WORK correctly, not just that UI elements render.
E2E Behavior Validation for Frontend Modifications
Core Principle: Test Product Behavior, Not UI States
CRITICAL: Tests must verify that product features WORK correctly, not just that UI elements render.
What NOT to test (UI States):
- ❌ "Dropdown opens when clicked"
- ❌ "Modal appears after button click"
- ❌ "Loading spinner shows during request"
- ❌ "Form fields are visible"
- ❌ "Sidebar collapses"
What TO test (Product Behavior):
- ✅ "Selecting an LLM provider configures the agent to use that provider"
- ✅ "Creating a new agent persists it and shows in the agents list"
- ✅ "Running a tool with parameters returns the expected output"
- ✅ "Chat messages stream correctly and maintain conversation context"
- ✅ "Workflow execution triggers tools in the correct order"
Prerequisites
Requires Playwright MCP server. If the browser_navigate tool is unavailable, instruct the user to add it:
claude mcp add playwright -- npx @playwright/mcp@latest
Step 1: Understand the Feature Intent
Before writing ANY test, answer these questions:
- What user problem does this feature solve?
- What is the expected outcome when the feature works correctly?
- What data flows through the system? (user input → API → state → UI)
- What should persist after page reload?
- What downstream effects should this action have?
Document these answers as comments in your test file.
Step 2: Build and Start
pnpm build:cli
cd packages/playground/e2e/kitchen-sink && pnpm dev
Verify server at http://localhost:4111
Step 3: Map Feature to Behavior Tests
Feature-to-Test Mapping Guide
| Feature Category | What to Test | Example Assertion |
|---|---|---|
| Agent Configuration | Config changes affect agent behavior | Send message → verify response uses selected model |
| LLM Provider Selection | Selected provider is used in requests | Intercept API call → verify provider in request payload |
| Tool Execution | Tool runs with correct params & returns result | Execute tool → verify output matches expected transformation |
| Workflow Execution | Steps execute in order, data flows between steps | Run workflow → verify each step's output feeds next step |
| Chat/Streaming | Messages persist, context maintained across turns | Multi-turn conversation → verify context awareness |
| MCP Server Tools | Server tools are callable and return data | Call MCP tool → verify response structure and content |
| Memory/Persistence | Data survives page reload | Create item → reload → verify item exists |
| Error Handling | Errors surface correctly to user | Trigger error condition → verify error message + recovery |
Step 4: Write Behavior-Focused Tests
Test Structure Template
import { test, expect, Page } from '@playwright/test';
import { resetStorage } from '../__utils__/reset-storage';
import { selectFixture } from '../__utils__/select-fixture';
import { nanoid } from 'nanoid';
/**
* FEATURE: [Name of feature]
* USER STORY: As a user, I want to [action] so that [outcome]
* BEHAVIOR UNDER TEST: [Specific behavior being validated]
*/
test.describe('[Feature Name] - Behavior Tests', () => {
let page: Page;
test.beforeEach(async ({ browser }) => {
const context = await browser.newContext();
page = await context.newPage();
});
test.afterEach(async () => {
await resetStorage(page);
});
test('should [verb describing behavior] when [trigger condition]', async () => {
// ARRANGE: Set up preconditions
// - Navigate to the feature
// - Configure any required state
// ACT: Perform the user action that triggers the behavior
// ASSERT: Verify the OUTCOME, not the UI state
// - Check data persistence
// - Verify downstream effects
// - Confirm API calls made correctly
});
});
Behavior Test Patterns
Pattern 1: Configuration Affects Behavior
test('selecting LLM provider should use that provider for agent responses', async () => {
// ARRANGE
await page.goto('/agents/my-agent/chat');
// Intercept API to verify provider
let capturedProvider: string | null = null;
await page.route('**/api/chat', route => {
const body = JSON.parse(route.request().postData() || '{}');
capturedProvider = body.provider;
route.continue();
});
// ACT: Select a different provider
await page.getByTestId('provider-selector').click();
await page.getByRole('option', { name: 'OpenAI' }).click();
// Send a message to trigger the agent
await page.getByTestId('chat-input').fill('Hello');
await page.getByTestId('send-button').click();
// ASSERT: Verify the selected provider was used
await expect.poll(() => capturedProvider).toBe('openai');
});
Pattern 2: Data Persistence
test('created agent should persist after page reload', async () => {
// ARRANGE
await page.goto('/agents');
const agentName = `Test Agent ${nanoid()}`;
// ACT: Create new agent
await page.getByTestId('create-agent-button').click();
await page.getByTestId('agent-name-input').fill(agentName);
await page.getByTestId('save-agent-button').click();
// Wait for creation to complete
await expect(page.getByText(agentName)).toBeVisible();
// ASSERT: Verify persistence
await page.reload();
await expect(page.getByText(agentName)).toBeVisible({ timeout: 10000 });
});
Pattern 3: Tool Execution Produces Correct Output
test('weather tool should return formatted weather data', async () => {
// ARRANGE
await selectFixture(page, 'weather-success');
await page.goto('/tools/weather-tool');
// ACT: Execute tool with parameters
await page.getByTestId('param-city'how to use e2e-tests-studioHow to use e2e-tests-studio on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
1Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add e2e-tests-studio
2Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
$npx skills add https://github.com/mastra-ai/mastra --skill e2e-tests-studioThe skills CLI fetches e2e-tests-studio from GitHub repository mastra-ai/mastra and configures it for Cursor.
3Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
◆ Which agents do you want to install to?││ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────│ • Amp│ • Antigravity│ • Cline│ • Codex│ ●Cursor(selected)│ • Cursor│ • Windsurf4Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/e2e-tests-studioReload or restart Cursor to activate e2e-tests-studio. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /e2e-tests-studio) or your agent's skill management interface.
⚠Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
Additional Resources
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
GET_STARTED →Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
✓Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
✓Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
✓Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviewsRatings
4.7★★★★★73 reviews- ★★★★★Sakura Jain· Dec 28, 2024
Useful defaults in e2e-tests-studio — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Noor Ramirez· Dec 20, 2024
Useful defaults in e2e-tests-studio — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 16, 2024
e2e-tests-studio has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Hassan Perez· Dec 16, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: e2e-tests-studio is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Neel Verma· Dec 16, 2024
e2e-tests-studio is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Naina Rao· Dec 12, 2024
We added e2e-tests-studio from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Jin Agarwal· Dec 12, 2024
e2e-tests-studio reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Jin Ndlovu· Nov 15, 2024
Useful defaults in e2e-tests-studio — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Nov 7, 2024
e2e-tests-studio reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Noor Abbas· Nov 7, 2024
I recommend e2e-tests-studio for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
showing 1-10 of 73
1 / 8