enforcing-typescript-standards

jgeurts/eslint-config-decent · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/jgeurts/eslint-config-decent --skill enforcing-typescript-standards
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Enforces the project's core TypeScript standards including explicit typing, import organization, class member ordering, and code safety rules.

skill.md

Enforcing TypeScript Standards

Enforces the project's core TypeScript standards including explicit typing, import organization, class member ordering, and code safety rules.

Triggers

Activate this skill when the user says or implies any of these:

  • "write", "create", "implement", "add", "build" (new TypeScript code)
  • "fix", "update", "change", "modify", "refactor" (existing TypeScript code)
  • "review", "check", "improve", "clean up" (code quality)
  • Any request involving .ts or .tsx files

Specific triggers:

  • Creating a new .ts or .tsx file
  • Modifying existing TypeScript code
  • Reviewing TypeScript code for compliance

Core Standards

Type Safety

  • Explicit return types: Prefer explicit return types when practical; omit when inference is obvious and adds no clarity
  • Explicit member accessibility: Class members require public, private, or protected
  • Type-only imports: Use import type for types: import type { Foo } from './foo.js'
  • Sorted type constituents: Union/intersection types must be alphabetically sorted
  • Only throw Error objects: Never throw strings or other primitives
  • Avoid any and type assertions: Prefer proper typing over any or as casts; use them only when truly necessary
  • Type JSON fields explicitly: Use Record<string, unknown> or specific interfaces for JSON data, never any
  • Use Number() for conversion: Prefer Number(value) over parseInt(value, 10) or parseFloat(value)
  • Reuse existing types: Before defining a new interface, search for existing types that can be reused directly, extended, or derived using Pick, Omit, Partial, or other utility types

Alternatives to Type Assertions

Before using as, try these approaches in order:

  1. Proper typing at the source
  2. Type guards (typeof, instanceof)
  3. Type narrowing through control flow
  4. Custom type predicate functions
  5. Discriminated unions
// Bad
const user = data as User;

// Good
function isUser(data: unknown): data is User {
  return typeof data === 'object' && data !== null && 'id' in data;
}
if (isUser(data)) {
  // data is now typed as User
}

Import Organization

  • Import order: builtin → external → internal → parent → sibling → index (alphabetized within groups)
  • No duplicate imports: Consolidate imports from the same module
  • Newline after imports: Blank line required after import block

Class Member Ordering

  1. Signatures (call/construct)
  2. Fields: private → public → protected
  3. Constructors: public → protected → private
  4. Methods: public → protected → private

Code Style

  • Simplicity over cleverness: Straightforward, readable code is better than clever one-liners
  • Early returns: Use guard clauses to reduce nesting; return early for edge cases
  • Nullish coalescing: Prefer ?? over || for defaults (avoids false positives on 0 or '')
  • Optional chaining: Use ?. for safe property access
  • Match existing patterns: Follow conventions already established in the codebase
  • Meaningful identifiers: Names must be descriptive (exceptions: _, i, j, k, e, x, y)
  • Function declarations: Use function foo() not const foo = function()
  • Prefer const: Use const unless reassignment is needed
  • No var: Always use const or let
  • Object shorthand: Use { foo } not { foo: foo }
  • Template literals: Use `Hello ${name}` not 'Hello ' + name
  • Strict equality: Use === except for null comparisons
  • One class per file: Maximum one class definition per file
  • Avoid reduce: Prefer for...of loops or other array methods for clarity
  • Functions over classes: Prefer exported functions over classes with static methods (unless state is needed)
  • No nested functions: Define helper functions at module level, not inside other functions
  • Immutability: Create new objects/arrays instead of mutating existing ones

Naming Conventions

  • Enum members: Use PascalCase (e.g., MyValue)
  • No trailing underscores: Identifiers cannot end with _

Comments

  • No redundant comments: Never comment what the code already expresses clearly
  • No duplicate comments: Don't repeat information from function names, types, or nearby comments
  • Meaningful only: Only add comments to explain why, not what — the code shows what it does

Boolean Expressions

  • Prefer truthiness checks: Use implicit truthy/falsy checks over explicit comparisons
  • Exception: Use explicit checks when distinguishing 0/'' (valid values) from null/undefined is semantically important

Testing

  • Minimize mocking: Avoid mocking everything; use real implementations and data generators when available
  • Test real behavior: Testing mocks provides little value — test actual code paths
  • Don't be lazy: Write thorough tests that cover edge cases, not just happy paths

Error Handling

  • Specific error types: Prefer specific error types over generic Error when meaningful
  • Avoid silent failures: Don't swallow errors with empty catch blocks
  • Handle rejections: Always handle promise rejections
  • Let errors propagate: Don't catch errors just to re-throw or log — let them bubble up to error handlers

Negative Knowledge

Avoid these anti-patterns:

  • console.log() statements in production code
  • eval() or Function() constructor
  • Nested ternary operators
  • await inside loops when Promise.all would be simpler (sequential awaits are fine when order matters or parallelism adds complexity)
  • Empty interfaces
  • Variable shadowing
  • Functions defined inside loops
  • @ts-ignore without explanation (use @ts-expect-error with 10+ char description)
  • Comments that restate the code: // increment counter above counter++
  • Comments that duplicate type information: // returns a string when return type is : string
  • Commented-out code (delete it; use version control)
  • Verbose boolean comparisons: arr.length > 0, str !== '', obj !== null && obj !== undefined
  • Disabling lint rules via comments (fix the code instead)
  • Overuse of any type or as type assertions
  • Over-mocking in tests instead of using real implementations or data generators
  • Empty catch blocks that silently swallow errors
  • Using || for defaults when ?? is more appropriate
  • Deep nesting when early returns would simplify
  • Catching errors just to re-throw or log them
  • Nested function definitions inside other functions
  • Mutating objects/arrays instead of creating new ones
  • TOCTOU: Checking file/resource existence before operating (try and handle errors instead)
  • Classes with only static methods (use plain functions instead)
  • Duplicating existing interfaces instead of reusing or deriving with Pick/Omit/Partial

Verification Workflow

  1. Analyze: Compare the code change against these TypeScript standards
  2. Generate/Refactor: Write or modify code to comply with all rules above
  3. Simplify: Review for opportunities to simplify — prefer clear, straightforward code over clever solutions
  4. Review naming: Verify variable and function names still make sense in context after changes
  5. Build: Verify types compile without errors (e.g., npm run build or npx tsc --noEmit)
  6. Lint: Run npm run lint to confirm compliance before completing the task

Examples

Comments Examples

// Standard
// Retry with exponential backoff to handle transient network failures
async function fetchWithRetry(url: string, attempts = 3): Promise<Response> {
  for (let i = 0; i < attempts; i++) {
    try {
      return await fetch(url);
    } catch {
      await sleep(2 ** i * 100);
    }
  }
  throw new Error(`Failed after ${attempts} attempts`);
}

// Non-Standard
/**
 * Fetches data from a URL with retry logic
 * @param url - The URL to fetch from
 * @param attempts - Number of attempts (default 3)
 * @returns A Promise that resolves to a Response
 */
async function fetchWithRetry(url: string, attempts = 3): Promise<Response> {
  // Loop through attempts
  for (let i = 0; i < attempts; i++) {
    try {
      // Try to fetch the URL
      return await fetch(url);
    } catch {
      // Wait before retrying
      await sleep(2 ** i * 100);
    }
  }
  // Throw error if all attempts fail
  throw new Error(`Failed after ${attempts} attempts`);
}

Boolean Expressions Examples

// Standard
if (myArray.length) {
}
if (myString) {
}
if (myObject) {
}
if (!value) {
}

// Non-Standard
if (myArray.length !== 0) {
}
if (myArray.length > 0) {
}
if (myString !== '') {
}
if (myObject !== null && myObject !== undefined) {
}
if (value === null || value === undefined) {
}

Early Return Examples

// Standard
function processUser(user: User | null): Result {
  if (!user) {
    return { error: 'No user provided' };
  }
  if (!user.isActive) 
how to use enforcing-typescript-standards

How to use enforcing-typescript-standards on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add enforcing-typescript-standards
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/jgeurts/eslint-config-decent --skill enforcing-typescript-standards

The skills CLI fetches enforcing-typescript-standards from GitHub repository jgeurts/eslint-config-decent and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/enforcing-typescript-standards

Reload or restart Cursor to activate enforcing-typescript-standards. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /enforcing-typescript-standards) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.746 reviews
  • Jin Huang· Dec 24, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: enforcing-typescript-standards is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Ren Sanchez· Dec 20, 2024

    enforcing-typescript-standards is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Shikha Mishra· Dec 8, 2024

    I recommend enforcing-typescript-standards for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Yash Thakker· Nov 27, 2024

    enforcing-typescript-standards fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Sakshi Patil· Nov 19, 2024

    Useful defaults in enforcing-typescript-standards — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Min Gonzalez· Nov 15, 2024

    enforcing-typescript-standards has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Arjun Gupta· Nov 11, 2024

    Keeps context tight: enforcing-typescript-standards is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Oct 18, 2024

    enforcing-typescript-standards has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Oct 10, 2024

    Registry listing for enforcing-typescript-standards matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Advait Chen· Oct 6, 2024

    enforcing-typescript-standards fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

showing 1-10 of 46

1 / 5