team-update

jezweb/claude-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/jezweb/claude-skills --skill team-update
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Post project updates to team chat, read and triage feedback, and plan next steps. Adapts to whatever communication and project tools are available.

skill.md

Team Update

Post project updates to team chat, read and triage feedback, and plan next steps. Adapts to whatever communication and project tools are available.

The Playbook Pattern

This skill uses a playbook file at .claude/team-update-playbook.md in the project root.

  • First run: Discover available tools, ask the user for preferences, execute, save a playbook
  • Subsequent runs: Read the playbook, skip discovery, execute directly
  • User edits playbook: Changes take effect immediately (channel, style, triage rules)

The playbook is plain markdown the user can edit. It captures tool configuration, channel preferences, message style, triage rules, and last-run metadata.


Phase 0: Playbook Check

Check if .claude/team-update-playbook.md exists in the project root.

If it exists: Read it. All tool configuration, channel info, message style, and triage rules are in there. Jump to Phase 1 with known config.

If it does not exist: Run Phase 0b (Discovery) first.


Phase 0b: Discovery (First Run Only)

Detect available capabilities by checking what MCP tools are connected and what local tools exist.

Read references/discovery-patterns.md for detection patterns.

Capability Detection

Check for each capability category:

Capability How to detect Fallback if missing
Chat MCP tools matching chat, slack, discord, teams Output formatted text for manual posting
Git git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree Skip commit summaries
Issues MCP tools matching github, linear, jira Skip or output text list
Tasks MCP tools matching tasks, todos, asana Skip or output text list
Knowledge Basalt Cortex (~/Documents/basalt-cortex/) Search for related knowledge notes

User Preferences (Ask)

After discovery, ask the user to confirm:

  1. Channel: Which chat space/channel to post updates to? (List discovered options)
  2. Identity: Post as yourself or a bot identity? (e.g. Anthro Morphic)
  3. Repo scope: Which repo(s) to track? (Default: current repo)
  4. Message style: Brief standup, detailed changelog, or conversational update?
  5. Team context: Any team members to be aware of? (Names, roles)
  6. Triage rules: Any custom rules for handling feedback? (Or use defaults)

Save Playbook

After discovery + user preferences, save the playbook to .claude/team-update-playbook.md.

Read references/playbook-format.md for the full template. Fill in all sections with discovered tools and user preferences. If a capability was not found, note it as "Not available" in the playbook.

Ensure .claude/ is in .gitignore (the playbook contains space IDs and preferences that shouldn't be committed).


Phase 1: Gather Context

Collect information from all available sources. Use the playbook's "Data Sources" section to know which tools to call.

1a. Determine Time Window

Check the playbook's "Last Run" section for the last update timestamp. If no previous run, ask the user how far back to go (default: 24 hours).

1b. Collect Data

Gather from each available source:

Source What to collect Tool
Git commits git log --oneline --since=<last-update> Bash
Chat messages Messages in the configured channel since last update Chat MCP tool from playbook
Open issues/PRs Recently updated or newly created items Issue tracker from playbook
Active tasks In-progress or recently completed tasks Task tracker from playbook

1c. Summarise for Drafting

Group commits by theme (not individual hashes). Note any issues closed, PRs merged, or tasks completed. Flag any team messages that need response.


Phase 2: Draft and Post Update

2a. Compose Message

Read references/message-composition.md for message patterns.

Follow the playbook's "Message Style" section. General principles:

  • Lead with what shipped or changed, not process
  • Group related commits into themes
  • Mention specific people only when relevant
  • Keep it scannable (short paragraphs, bullet points)
  • Write like a teammate, not an AI — no emoji spam, no hedging, no over-explaining context the team already has. See the Communication Style section in references/message-composition.md.

2b. Preview and Approval

Show the draft to the user. Include:

  • The composed message
  • Which channel it will be posted to
  • Whether it's a new message or thread reply

APPROVAL REQUIRED: Never post to external channels without explicit user approval.

2c. Post

Post the approved message using the chat tool from the playbook. If no chat tool is available, output the formatted message for the user to post manually.

2d. Update Playbook

After posting, update the "Last Run" section of the playbook with:

  • Current timestamp
  • Thread key (if applicable)
  • Brief summary of what was posted

Phase 3: Read and Triage Feedback

3a. Read Responses

Read messages from the configured channel since the update was posted. Look for:

  • Direct replies to the update
  • New messages in the channel that reference the project
  • Reactions or acknowledgements

3b. Classify Feedback

Read references/feedback-triage.md for classification patterns.

Use the playbook's "Triage Rules" section. Default classification:

Type Action
Bug report Create issue (label: bug)
Feature request Create issue (label: enhancement)
Question Draft reply for user approval
Blocker Flag immediately, suggest resolution
Acknowledgement Note, no action needed
Off-topic Ignore

3c. Present and Act

Present a summary of feedback with proposed actions:

## Feedback Summary

- Daniel: "Can we add dark mode?" -> Create issue (enhancement)
- Rabin: "Auth is broken on staging" -> Create issue (bug, priority)
- Karen: "Looks good!" -> No action

Proceed with these actions?

APPROVAL REQUIRED: Never create issues, post replies, or take external actions without explicit user approval.


Phase 4: Plan Next Steps

4a. Prioritise

From all gathered context (commits, issues, tasks, feedback), identify:

  1. Blockers: Things preventing progress
  2. High-priority: Bugs, urgent requests, deadlines
  3. Next up: Planned work, feature requests
  4. Backlog: Nice-to-haves, low-priority items

4b. Present (Not Posted)

Show the prioritised list to the user. This is for the user's planning only -- do NOT post it to any channel.

## Suggested Priorities

1. [BLOCKER] Fix auth on staging (from Rabin's feedback)
2. [HIGH] Complete API endpoint for user profiles (current sprint)
3. [NEXT] Dark mode support (from Daniel's request)
4. [BACKLOG] Refactor database queries

Autonomy Rules

Action Level
Read/create playbook Just do it
Discover tools (first run) Just do it, confirm preferences with user
Gather context (git, chat, issues) Just do it
Draft update message Just do it, show preview
Post to external channel Approval required
Create issues/tasks Approval required
Post replies to team Approval required
Update playbook "Last Run" Just do it
Present plan/priorities Just do it

Graceful Degradation

The skill works at any level of tool availability:

Available tools Experience
Git only Summarise commits, output text for manual posting
Git + Chat Full post/read cycle, manual issue creation
Git + Chat + Issues Full cycle with automated issue creation
Git + Chat + Issues + Tasks + Knowledge Full cycle with persistent tracking

Operating Modes

The skill responds to different trigger phrases:

Trigger Behaviour
"team update" / "post update" Full cycle: gather, draft, post, read feedback
"check team chat" / "what did the team say" Phase 3 only: read and triage feedback
"standup" / "sync with team" Phase 1 + 2: gather and post, skip feedback
"project update" Phase 1 + 2 + 4: gather, post, plan (skip feedback triage)
"feedback loop" Phase 3 + 4: read feedback and plan

Reference Files

When Read
First run — saving playbook references/playbook-format.md
First run — detecting tools references/discovery-patterns.md
Composing update messages references/message-composition.md
Classifying team feedback references/feedback-triage.md
how to use team-update

How to use team-update on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add team-update
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/jezweb/claude-skills --skill team-update

The skills CLI fetches team-update from GitHub repository jezweb/claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/team-update

Reload or restart Cursor to activate team-update. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /team-update) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.473 reviews
  • Emma Ghosh· Dec 20, 2024

    team-update is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Lucas Abbas· Dec 20, 2024

    Useful defaults in team-update — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Omar Desai· Dec 12, 2024

    Registry listing for team-update matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Camila Smith· Dec 8, 2024

    I recommend team-update for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Benjamin Choi· Dec 8, 2024

    team-update has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Ren Lopez· Dec 4, 2024

    Useful defaults in team-update — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Lucas Farah· Nov 27, 2024

    Keeps context tight: team-update is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Emma Dixit· Nov 27, 2024

    team-update fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Advait Dixit· Nov 23, 2024

    team-update is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Noor Shah· Nov 11, 2024

    Useful defaults in team-update — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

showing 1-10 of 73

1 / 8