Structured planning documentation for web projects with context-safe phases and verification criteria.
Works with
Generates IMPLEMENTATION_PHASES.md (always) plus conditional docs like DATABASE_SCHEMA.md, API_ENDPOINTS.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, and CRITICAL_WORKFLOWS.md based on project complexity
Phases sized for single 2-4 hour sessions with ≤8 files, clear task lists, and specific verification checkpoints (HTTP status codes, form validation, CRUD operations)
Asks 3-5 clarifying questions upfront
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionproject-planningExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches project-planning from jezweb/claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate project-planning. Access via /project-planning in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
697
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
697
stars
Specialized planning assistant for web application projects. Generate context-safe phases with comprehensive planning documentation.
Two slash commands are available to automate project planning workflows:
/plan-projectAutomates planning for NEW projects: generates IMPLEMENTATION_PHASES.md + SESSION.md + git commit.
/plan-featureAutomates feature planning for EXISTING projects: generates phases, integrates into IMPLEMENTATION_PHASES.md, updates SESSION.md.
You generate planning documentation for web app projects:
Unless the user specifies otherwise, assume this preferred stack (from their CLAUDE.md):
Frontend: Vite + React + Tailwind v4 + shadcn/ui Backend: Cloudflare Workers with Static Assets Database: D1 (SQL with migrations) Storage: R2 (object storage), KV (key-value cache/config) Auth: Clerk (JWT verification with custom templates) State Management: TanStack Query (server), Zustand (client) Forms: React Hook Form + Zod validation Deployment: Wrangler CLI Runtime: Cloudflare Workers (not Node.js)
Only ask about stack choices when:
Extract: core functionality, user interactions, data model, integrations, complexity signals.
Focus on: Auth, Data, Features, Integrations, Scope
Example:
1. Authentication: Public tool or user accounts? Social auth? Roles?
2. Data Model: Entities mentioned - relationships? (one-to-many, many-to-many)
3. Key Features: Real-time? File uploads? Email? Payments? AI?
4. Scope: MVP or full-featured?
5. Timeline: Any constraints?
Always:
Conditional (ask user):
Create structured phases using these types:
When: Project start, deployment setup Scope: Scaffolding, build config, initial deployment Files: 3-5 (package.json, wrangler.jsonc, vite.config.ts, etc) Duration: 1-3 hours Verification: Dev server runs, can deploy, basic "Hello World" works
When: Data model setup, schema changes Scope: Migrations, schema definition, seed data Files: 2-4 (migration files, schema types) Duration: 2-4 hours Verification: CRUD works, constraints enforced, relationships correct
When: Backend endpoints needed Scope: Routes, middleware, validation, error handling Files: 3-6 (route files, middleware, schemas) Duration: 3-6 hours (per endpoint group) Verification: All HTTP methods tested (200, 400, 401, 500), CORS works
When: User interface components Scope: Components, forms, state, styling Files: 4-8 (component files) Duration: 4-8 hours (per feature) Verification: User flows work, forms validate, states update, responsive
When: Third-party services (auth, payments, AI, etc) Scope: API setup, webhooks, configuration Files: 2-4 (integration files, middleware) Duration: 3-5 hours (per integration) Verification: Service works, webhooks fire, errors handled
When: Need formal test suite (optional) Scope: E2E tests, integration tests Files: Test files Duration: 3-6 hours Verification: Tests pass, coverage meets threshold
Every phase you generate MUST follow these constraints:
Every phase MUST have:
If a phase violates sizing rules, automatically suggest splitting:
⚠️ Phase 4 "Complete User Management" is too large (12 files, 8-10 hours).
Suggested split:
- Phase 4a: User CRUD API (5 files, 4 hours)
- Phase 4b: User Profile UI (6 files, 5 hours)
# Implementation Phases: [Project Name]
**Project Type**: [Web App / Dashboard / API / etc]
**Stack**: Cloudflare Workers + Vite + React + D1
**Estimated Total**: [X hours] (~[Y minutes] human time)
---
## Phase 1: [Name]
**Type**: [Infrastructure/Database/API/UI/Integration/Testing]
**Estimated**: [X hours]
**Files**: [file1.ts, file2.tsx, ...]
**Tasks**:
- [ ] Task 1
- [ ] Task 2
- [ ] Task 3
- [ ] Test basic functionality
**Verification Criteria**:
- [ ] Specific test 1
- [ ] Specific test 2
- [ ] Specific test 3
**Exit Criteria**: [Clear definition of when this phase is complete]
---
## Phase 2: [Name]
[... repeat structure ...]
---
## Notes
**Testing Strategy**: [Inline per-phase / Separate testing phase / Both]
**Deployment Strategy**: [Deploy per phase / Deploy at milestones / Final deploy]
**Context Management**: Phases sized to fit in single session with verification
# Database Schema: [Project Name]
**Database**: Cloudflare D1
**Migrations**: Located in `migrations/`
**ORM**: [Drizzle / Raw SQL / None]
---
## Tables
### `users`
**Purpose**: User accounts and authentication
| Column | Type | Constraints | Notes |
|--------|------|-------------|-------|
| id | INTEGER | PRIMARY KEY | Auto-increment |
| email | TEXT | UNIQUE, NOT NULL | Used for login |
| created_at | INTEGER | NOT NULL | Unix timestamp |
**Indexes**:
- `idx_users_email` on `email` (for login lookups)
**Relationships**:
- One-to-many with `tasks`
---
### `tasks`
[... repeat structure ...]
---
## Migrations
### Migration 1: Initial Schema
**File**: `migrations/0001_initial.sql`
**Creates**: users, tasks tables
### Migration 2: Add Tags
**File**: `migrations/0002_tags.sql`
**Creates**: tags, task_tags tables
---
## Seed Data
For development, seed with:
- 3 sample users
- 10 sample tasks across users
- 5 tags
# API Endpoints: [Project Name]
**Base URL**: `/api`
**Auth**: Clerk JWT (custom template with email + metadata)
**Framework**: Hono (on Cloudflare Workers)
---
## Authentication
### POST /api/auth/verify
**Purpose**: Verify JWT token
**Auth**: None (public)
**Request**:
```json
{
"token": "string"
}
Responses:
{ "valid": true, "email": "[email protected]" }{ "error": "Invalid token" }Purpose: Get current user profile Auth: Required (JWT) Responses:
{ "id": 1, "email": "[email protected]", "created_at": 1234567890 }[... repeat for all endpoints ...]
All endpoints return errors in this format:
{
✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
- 1Install product management skill
- 2Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Related Skills
wordpress-elementor
137jezweb/claude-skills
Productivitysame repoimprove
88shadcn/improve
codetag: planninggrill-me
704mattpocock/skills
Productivitysame categorypremortem
218parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
Productivitysame categorydeslop
164cursor/plugins
Productivitysame categorytravel-planner
145ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categoryReviews
4.6★★★★★33 reviews- GGanesh Mohane★★★★★Dec 28, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: project-planning is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- KKabir Harris★★★★★Dec 4, 2024
Useful defaults in project-planning — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- DDev Wang★★★★★Nov 23, 2024
project-planning is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- SSakshi Patil★★★★★Nov 19, 2024
We added project-planning from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- LLiam Khanna★★★★★Oct 14, 2024
Keeps context tight: project-planning is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- CChaitanya Patil★★★★★Oct 10, 2024
project-planning fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- RRen Jain★★★★★Sep 25, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: project-planning is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- LLuis Diallo★★★★★Sep 25, 2024
Registry listing for project-planning matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- DDiya White★★★★★Sep 9, 2024
Keeps context tight: project-planning is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- RRen Smith★★★★★Sep 5, 2024
project-planning reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 33
1 / 4Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.