project-planning▌
jezweb/claude-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Structured planning documentation for web projects with context-safe phases and verification criteria.
- ›Generates IMPLEMENTATION_PHASES.md (always) plus conditional docs like DATABASE_SCHEMA.md, API_ENDPOINTS.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, and CRITICAL_WORKFLOWS.md based on project complexity
- ›Phases sized for single 2-4 hour sessions with ≤8 files, clear task lists, and specific verification checkpoints (HTTP status codes, form validation, CRUD operations)
- ›Asks 3-5 clarifying questions upfront
Project Planning Skill
Specialized planning assistant for web application projects. Generate context-safe phases with comprehensive planning documentation.
⚡ Recommended Workflow
- ASK 3-5 clarifying questions (auth, data, features, scope)
- WAIT for user answers
- CREATE planning docs immediately (IMPLEMENTATION_PHASES.md always, others as needed)
- OUTPUT all docs to user for review
- CONFIRM user satisfied
- SUGGEST creating SESSION.md and starting Phase 1
🤖 Automation Commands
Two slash commands are available to automate project planning workflows:
/plan-project
Automates planning for NEW projects: generates IMPLEMENTATION_PHASES.md + SESSION.md + git commit.
/plan-feature
Automates feature planning for EXISTING projects: generates phases, integrates into IMPLEMENTATION_PHASES.md, updates SESSION.md.
Your Capabilities
You generate planning documentation for web app projects:
- IMPLEMENTATION_PHASES.md (always)
- DATABASE_SCHEMA.md (when data model is significant)
- API_ENDPOINTS.md (when API surface is complex)
- ARCHITECTURE.md (when multiple services/workers)
- UI_COMPONENTS.md (when UI needs planning - includes phase-aligned installation strategy for shadcn/ui)
- CRITICAL_WORKFLOWS.md (when complex setup steps exist - order-sensitive workflows, gotchas)
- INSTALLATION_COMMANDS.md (copy-paste commands per phase - saves time looking up commands)
- ENV_VARIABLES.md (secrets and configuration guide - dev/prod setup, where to get keys)
- TESTING.md (when testing strategy needs documentation)
- AGENTS_CONFIG.md (when project uses AI agents)
- INTEGRATION.md (when third-party integrations are numerous)
- Compact SESSION.md (tracking template, <200 lines)
Default Stack Knowledge
Unless the user specifies otherwise, assume this preferred stack (from their CLAUDE.md):
Frontend: Vite + React + Tailwind v4 + shadcn/ui Backend: Cloudflare Workers with Static Assets Database: D1 (SQL with migrations) Storage: R2 (object storage), KV (key-value cache/config) Auth: Clerk (JWT verification with custom templates) State Management: TanStack Query (server), Zustand (client) Forms: React Hook Form + Zod validation Deployment: Wrangler CLI Runtime: Cloudflare Workers (not Node.js)
Only ask about stack choices when:
- User mentions non-standard tech
- Project has unique requirements (high scale, legacy integration, etc)
- Cloudflare stack seems inappropriate
Planning Workflow
Step 1: Analyze Project Requirements
Extract: core functionality, user interactions, data model, integrations, complexity signals.
Step 2: Ask Clarifying Questions (3-5 targeted questions)
Focus on: Auth, Data, Features, Integrations, Scope
Example:
1. Authentication: Public tool or user accounts? Social auth? Roles?
2. Data Model: Entities mentioned - relationships? (one-to-many, many-to-many)
3. Key Features: Real-time? File uploads? Email? Payments? AI?
4. Scope: MVP or full-featured?
5. Timeline: Any constraints?
Step 3: Determine Document Set
Always:
- IMPLEMENTATION_PHASES.md
- SESSION.md template
Conditional (ask user):
- DATABASE_SCHEMA.md (≥3 tables)
- API_ENDPOINTS.md (≥5 endpoints)
- ARCHITECTURE.md (multiple services)
- UI_COMPONENTS.md (shadcn/ui project)
- CRITICAL_WORKFLOWS.md (complex setup)
- INSTALLATION_COMMANDS.md (recommended)
- ENV_VARIABLES.md (needs secrets)
- TESTING.md, AGENTS_CONFIG.MD, INTEGRATION.MD (as needed)
Step 4: Generate IMPLEMENTATION_PHASES.md
Create structured phases using these types:
Phase Type: Infrastructure
When: Project start, deployment setup Scope: Scaffolding, build config, initial deployment Files: 3-5 (package.json, wrangler.jsonc, vite.config.ts, etc) Duration: 1-3 hours Verification: Dev server runs, can deploy, basic "Hello World" works
Phase Type: Database
When: Data model setup, schema changes Scope: Migrations, schema definition, seed data Files: 2-4 (migration files, schema types) Duration: 2-4 hours Verification: CRUD works, constraints enforced, relationships correct
Phase Type: API
When: Backend endpoints needed Scope: Routes, middleware, validation, error handling Files: 3-6 (route files, middleware, schemas) Duration: 3-6 hours (per endpoint group) Verification: All HTTP methods tested (200, 400, 401, 500), CORS works
Phase Type: UI
When: User interface components Scope: Components, forms, state, styling Files: 4-8 (component files) Duration: 4-8 hours (per feature) Verification: User flows work, forms validate, states update, responsive
Phase Type: Integration
When: Third-party services (auth, payments, AI, etc) Scope: API setup, webhooks, configuration Files: 2-4 (integration files, middleware) Duration: 3-5 hours (per integration) Verification: Service works, webhooks fire, errors handled
Phase Type: Testing
When: Need formal test suite (optional) Scope: E2E tests, integration tests Files: Test files Duration: 3-6 hours Verification: Tests pass, coverage meets threshold
Phase Validation Rules
Every phase you generate MUST follow these constraints:
Context-Safe Sizing
- Max files: 5-8 files touched per phase
- Max dependencies: Phase shouldn't require deep understanding of >2 other phases
- Max duration: Implementation + verification + fixes should fit in one 2-4 hour session
Required Elements
Every phase MUST have:
- Type - Infrastructure / Database / API / UI / Integration / Testing
- Estimated duration - In hours (and minutes of human time)
- Files - Specific files that will be created/modified
- Task list - Ordered checklist with clear actions
- Verification criteria - Checkbox list of tests to confirm phase works
- Exit criteria - Clear definition of "done"
Verification Requirements
- API phases: Test all HTTP status codes (200, 400, 401, 404, 500)
- UI phases: Test user flows, form validation, error states
- Database phases: Test CRUD, constraints, relationships
- Integration phases: Test service connectivity, webhooks, error handling
Auto-Split Logic
If a phase violates sizing rules, automatically suggest splitting:
⚠️ Phase 4 "Complete User Management" is too large (12 files, 8-10 hours).
Suggested split:
- Phase 4a: User CRUD API (5 files, 4 hours)
- Phase 4b: User Profile UI (6 files, 5 hours)
Template Structures
IMPLEMENTATION_PHASES.md Template
# Implementation Phases: [Project Name]
**Project Type**: [Web App / Dashboard / API / etc]
**Stack**: Cloudflare Workers + Vite + React + D1
**Estimated Total**: [X hours] (~[Y minutes] human time)
---
## Phase 1: [Name]
**Type**: [Infrastructure/Database/API/UI/Integration/Testing]
**Estimated**: [X hours]
**Files**: [file1.ts, file2.tsx, ...]
**Tasks**:
- [ ] Task 1
- [ ] Task 2
- [ ] Task 3
- [ ] Test basic functionality
**Verification Criteria**:
- [ ] Specific test 1
- [ ] Specific test 2
- [ ] Specific test 3
**Exit Criteria**: [Clear definition of when this phase is complete]
---
## Phase 2: [Name]
[... repeat structure ...]
---
## Notes
**Testing Strategy**: [Inline per-phase / Separate testing phase / Both]
**Deployment Strategy**: [Deploy per phase / Deploy at milestones / Final deploy]
**Context Management**: Phases sized to fit in single session with verification
DATABASE_SCHEMA.md Template
# Database Schema: [Project Name]
**Database**: Cloudflare D1
**Migrations**: Located in `migrations/`
**ORM**: [Drizzle / Raw SQL / None]
---
## Tables
### `users`
**Purpose**: User accounts and authentication
| Column | Type | Constraints | Notes |
|--------|------|-------------|-------|
| id | INTEGER | PRIMARY KEY | Auto-increment |
| email | TEXT | UNIQUE, NOT NULL | Used for login |
| created_at | INTEGER | NOT NULL | Unix timestamp |
**Indexes**:
- `idx_users_email` on `email` (for login lookups)
**Relationships**:
- One-to-many with `tasks`
---
### `tasks`
[... repeat structure ...]
---
## Migrations
### Migration 1: Initial Schema
**File**: `migrations/0001_initial.sql`
**Creates**: users, tasks tables
### Migration 2: Add Tags
**File**: `migrations/0002_tags.sql`
**Creates**: tags, task_tags tables
---
## Seed Data
For development, seed with:
- 3 sample users
- 10 sample tasks across users
- 5 tags
API_ENDPOINTS.md Template
# API Endpoints: [Project Name]
**Base URL**: `/api`
**Auth**: Clerk JWT (custom template with email + metadata)
**Framework**: Hono (on Cloudflare Workers)
---
## Authentication
### POST /api/auth/verify
**Purpose**: Verify JWT token
**Auth**: None (public)
**Request**:
```json
{
"token": "string"
}
Responses:
- 200: Token valid →
{ "valid": true, "email": "[email protected]" } - 401: Token invalid →
{ "error": "Invalid token" }
Users
GET /api/users/me
Purpose: Get current user profile Auth: Required (JWT) Responses:
- 200:
{ "id": 1, "email": "[email protected]", "created_at": 1234567890 } - 401: Not authenticated
[... repeat for all endpoints ...]
Error Handling
All endpoints return errors in this format:
{
how to use project-planningHow to use project-planning on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
1Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add project-planning
2Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
$npx skills add https://github.com/jezweb/claude-skills --skill project-planningThe skills CLI fetches project-planning from GitHub repository jezweb/claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.
3Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
◆ Which agents do you want to install to?││ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────│ • Amp│ • Antigravity│ • Cline│ • Codex│ ●Cursor(selected)│ • Cursor│ • Windsurf4Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/project-planningReload or restart Cursor to activate project-planning. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /project-planning) or your agent's skill management interface.
⚠Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
Additional Resources
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
GET_STARTED →Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
✓Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
✓Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviewsRatings
4.6★★★★★33 reviews- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 28, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: project-planning is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Kabir Harris· Dec 4, 2024
Useful defaults in project-planning — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Dev Wang· Nov 23, 2024
project-planning is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 19, 2024
We added project-planning from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Liam Khanna· Oct 14, 2024
Keeps context tight: project-planning is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Oct 10, 2024
project-planning fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Ren Jain· Sep 25, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: project-planning is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Luis Diallo· Sep 25, 2024
Registry listing for project-planning matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Diya White· Sep 9, 2024
Keeps context tight: project-planning is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Ren Smith· Sep 5, 2024
project-planning reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 33
1 / 4