onboarding-ux▌
jezweb/claude-skills · updated May 10, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Audit a web app for onboarding gaps, then generate the in-app guidance to fix them. The goal: a new user should never stare at a blank screen wondering what to do.
Onboarding UX
Audit a web app for onboarding gaps, then generate the in-app guidance to fix them. The goal: a new user should never stare at a blank screen wondering what to do.
The Problem This Solves
You've built the features. They work. But when a new user logs in for the first time, they see:
- Empty tables with column headers and nothing else
- Sidebars full of labels that mean nothing to them yet
- No indication of where to start or what the app is for
- Features they don't know exist because nothing points to them
This skill finds those gaps and produces the content and code to fill them.
Browser Tool Detection
Same as ux-audit — detect Chrome MCP, Playwright MCP, or playwright-cli. See ux-audit's browser-tools.md reference if needed.
URL Resolution
Same as ux-audit — prefer deployed/live URL over localhost. Check wrangler.jsonc, CLAUDE.md, or running dev server.
Workflow
Phase 1: Audit — Find the Gaps
Browse the app as a brand new user. On every page, evaluate:
Empty States
Navigate to every list/table/collection page. For each:
| Check | Good | Bad |
|---|---|---|
| What does a zero-data page show? | "No clients yet. Add your first client to get started." + CTA button | Empty table with column headers, or blank white space |
| Is there a clear action? | Button: "Add your first [thing]" | Nothing — user has to find the action in the nav or a menu |
| Does it explain the feature? | "Clients are the people and businesses you work with. Add one to start tracking your relationships." | Just an empty container |
| Is the empty state designed? | Illustration or icon, helpful copy, prominent CTA | Identical to the populated state minus the data |
First Impression
Log in as a new user (or clear state to simulate). Evaluate:
| Check | What to look for |
|---|---|
| Landing page | Does the dashboard/home show something useful or is it empty? |
| Orientation | Within 10 seconds, do I know what this app does and where to start? |
| First action | Is the #1 thing I should do obvious and prominent? |
| Cognitive load | How many menu items, buttons, and options compete for attention? |
| Welcome content | Is there a welcome message, tour, or getting-started guide? Or just the raw app? |
Feature Discoverability
For each feature in the app:
| Check | What to look for |
|---|---|
| Can I find it? | Is it visible in the nav, or buried in a menu/submenu? |
| Do I know what it does? | Does the label explain it, or do I need to click to find out? |
| Keyboard shortcuts | Are there shortcuts? Are they discoverable (tooltip, help panel)? |
| Advanced features | Filters, bulk actions, search — are these visible or hidden? |
| Settings and configuration | Can I find the settings? Do I know what each setting does? |
Contextual Help Gaps
On each page:
| Check | What to look for |
|---|---|
| Form fields | Do complex fields have help text or tooltips? |
| Jargon | Any labels that a non-expert wouldn't understand? |
| Consequences | Do destructive or irreversible actions explain what will happen? |
| Validation | When I make a mistake, does the error message tell me how to fix it? |
Produce an Audit Report
Write to .jez/artifacts/onboarding-audit.md:
# Onboarding Audit: [App Name]
**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
**URL**: [app url]
## First Impression Score
[1-5] — Can a new user figure out what to do within 30 seconds?
## Empty States Found
| Page | Current state | Recommendation |
|------|--------------|----------------|
| /clients | Empty table, no guidance | Add empty state with CTA |
## Missing Guidance
| Location | Gap | Priority |
|----------|-----|----------|
| Dashboard | No welcome or getting started | High |
| Settings | No descriptions on settings | Medium |
## Feature Discovery Issues
| Feature | Problem | Fix |
|---------|---------|-----|
| Keyboard shortcuts | No way to discover them | Add help panel |
## Quick Wins
[Top 5 changes that would have the biggest impact on new user experience]
Phase 2: Generate — Build the Solutions
After the audit, generate the actual content and code. Read the project's codebase to match the existing tech stack and component patterns.
1. Empty State Components
For each empty state identified in the audit, generate a component:
// Pattern — adapt to the project's component library
function EmptyState({ icon, title, description, actionLabel, onAction }) {
return (
<div className="flex flex-col items-center justify-center py-16 text-center">
<div className="text-muted-foreground mb-4">{icon}</div>
<h3 className="text-lg font-medium mb-2">{title}</h3>
<p className="text-muted-foreground mb-6 max-w-md">{description}</p>
<Button onClick={onAction}>{actionLabel}</Button>
</div>
);
}
For each page, write specific copy:
- Title: What the feature is ("Clients")
- Description: Why it matters, in one sentence ("Track the people and businesses you work with")
- Action: What to do next ("Add your first client")
Write the copy so it feels like a helpful colleague, not a manual.
2. Welcome / First-Run Experience
Generate one of these patterns based on the app's complexity:
Simple app (3-5 features): Welcome banner on the dashboard
// Dismissable welcome banner — shown until user closes it or completes first action
function WelcomeBanner({ onDismiss }) {
return (
<div className="rounded-lg border bg-card p-6 mb-6">
<h2 className="text-xl font-semibold mb-2">Welcome to [App Name]</h2>
<p className="text-muted-foreground mb-4">Here's how to get started:</p>
<ol className="space-y-2 mb-4">
<li>1. Add your first client</li>
<li>2. Create a policy for them</li>
<li>3. Check your dashboard for what needs attention</li>
</ol>
<Button variant="outline" size="sm" onClick={onDismiss}>Got it</Button>
</div>
);
}
Complex app (6+ features): Checklist-style onboarding
// Persistent getting-started checklist — tracks progress
function OnboardingChecklist({ steps, completedSteps }) {
return (
<Card>
<How to use onboarding-ux on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add onboarding-ux
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches onboarding-ux from GitHub repository jezweb/claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate onboarding-ux. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /onboarding-ux) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★28 reviews- ★★★★★James Patel· Dec 20, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: onboarding-ux is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Dec 16, 2024
Registry listing for onboarding-ux matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Alexander Menon· Dec 4, 2024
We added onboarding-ux from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Alexander Yang· Nov 23, 2024
Useful defaults in onboarding-ux — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Kabir Ndlovu· Nov 11, 2024
onboarding-ux has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 7, 2024
onboarding-ux reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Oct 26, 2024
I recommend onboarding-ux for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Alexander Martin· Oct 14, 2024
onboarding-ux has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Nikhil Thompson· Oct 2, 2024
Useful defaults in onboarding-ux — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Olivia Bhatia· Sep 21, 2024
onboarding-ux reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 28