SRE practices for defining SLOs, managing error budgets, automating toil, and building resilient production systems.
Works with
Defines quantitative SLOs with SLI measurements, calculates error budgets, and enforces burn-rate policies to balance reliability with feature velocity
Provides golden signal monitoring (latency, traffic, errors, saturation) with multiwindow burn-rate alerting rules and PromQL query templates
Includes automation patterns for toil reduction, chaos engineering test desig
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionsre-engineerExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches sre-engineer from jeffallan/claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate sre-engineer. Access via /sre-engineer in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
1
total installs
1
this week
7.9K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
1
installs
1
this week
7.9K
stars
Load detailed guidance based on context:
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
|---|---|---|
| SLO/SLI | references/slo-sli-management.md |
Defining SLOs, calculating error budgets |
| Error Budgets | references/error-budget-policy.md |
Managing budgets, burn rates, policies |
| Monitoring | references/monitoring-alerting.md |
Golden signals, alert design, dashboards |
| Automation | references/automation-toil.md |
Toil reduction, automation patterns |
| Incidents | references/incident-chaos.md |
Incident response, chaos engineering |
When implementing SRE practices, provide:
# 99.9% availability SLO over a 30-day window
# Allowed downtime: (1 - 0.999) * 30 * 24 * 60 = 43.2 minutes/month
# Error budget (request-based): 0.001 * total_requests
# Example: 10M requests/month → 10,000 error budget requests
# If 5,000 errors consumed in week 1 → 50% budget burned in 25% of window
# → Trigger error budget policy: freeze non-critical releases
groups:
- name: slo_availability
rules:
# Fast burn: 2% budget in 1h (14.4x burn rate)
- alert: HighErrorBudgetBurn
expr: |
(
sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[1h]))
/
sum(rate(http_requests_total[1h]))
) > 0.014400
and
(
sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m]))
/
sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m]))
) > 0.014400
for: 2m
labels:
severity: critical
annotations:
summary: "High error budget burn rate detected"
runbook: "https://wiki.internal/runbooks/high-error-burn"
# Slow burn: 5% budget in 6h (1x burn rate sustained)
- alert: SlowErrorBudgetBurn
expr: |
(
sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[6h]))
/
sum(rate(http_requests_total[6h]))
) > 0.001
for: 15m
labels:
severity: warning
annotations:
summary: "Sustained error budget consumption"
runbook: "https://wiki.internal/runbooks/slow-error-burn"
# Latency — 99th percentile request duration
histogram_quantile(0.99, sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m])) by (le, service))
# Traffic — requests per second by service
sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m])) by (service)
# Errors — error rate ratio
sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m])) by (service)
/
sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m])) by (service)
# Saturation — CPU throttling ratio
sum(rate(container_cpu_cfs_throttled_seconds_total[5m])) by (pod)
/
sum(rate(container_cpu_cfs_periods_total[5m])) by (pod)
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Auto-remediation: restart pods exceeding error threshold."""
import subprocess, sys, json
ERROR_THRESHOLD = 0.05 # 5% error rate triggers restart
def get_error_rate(service: str) -> float:
"""Query Prometheus for current error rate."""
import urllib.request
query = f'sum(rate(http_requests_total{{status=~"5..",service="{service}"}}[5m])) / sum(rate(http_requests_total{{service="{service}"}}[5m]))'
url = f"http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/query?query={urllib.request.quote(query)}"
with urllib.request.urlopen(url) as resp:
data = json.load(resp)
results = data["data"]["result"]
return float(results[0]["value"][1]) if results else 0.0
def restart_deployment(namespace: str, deployment: str) -> None:
subprocess.run(
["kubectl", "rollout", "restart", f"deployment/{deployment}", "-n", namespace],
check=True
)
print(f"Restarted {namespace}/{deployment}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
service, namespace, deployment = sys.argv[1], sys.argv[2], sys.argv[3]
rate = get_error_rate(service)
print(f"Error rate for {service}: {rate:.2%}")
if rate > ERROR_THRESHOLD:
restart_deployment(namespace, deployment)
else:
print("Within SLO threshold — no action required")
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
sre-engineer has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Useful defaults in sre-engineer — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
sre-engineer fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: sre-engineer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
sre-engineer is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
I recommend sre-engineer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
I recommend sre-engineer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
sre-engineer reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: sre-engineer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: sre-engineer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 56