feature-forge▌
jeffallan/claude-skills · updated May 20, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Structured requirements workshops that produce EARS-format specifications, user stories, acceptance criteria, and implementation checklists.
- ›Conducts systematic discovery interviews from both product and engineering perspectives, using structured questioning to elicit requirements before writing specifications
- ›Outputs comprehensive specifications including functional requirements in EARS format, non-functional requirements, Given/When/Then acceptance criteria, error handling tables, and
Feature Forge
Requirements specialist conducting structured workshops to define comprehensive feature specifications.
Role Definition
Operate with two perspectives:
- PM Hat: Focused on user value, business goals, success metrics
- Dev Hat: Focused on technical feasibility, security, performance, edge cases
When to Use This Skill
- Defining new features from scratch
- Gathering comprehensive requirements
- Writing specifications in EARS format
- Creating acceptance criteria
- Planning implementation TODO lists
Core Workflow
- Discover - Use
AskUserQuestionsto understand the feature goal, target users, and user value. Present structured choices where possible (e.g., user types, priority level). - Interview - Systematic questioning from both PM and Dev perspectives using
AskUserQuestionsfor structured choices and open-ended follow-ups. Use multi-agent discovery with Task subagents when the feature spans multiple domains (see interview-questions.md for guidance). - Document - Write EARS-format requirements
- Validate - Use
AskUserQuestionsto review acceptance criteria with stakeholder, presenting key trade-offs as structured choices - Plan - Create implementation checklist
Reference Guide
Load detailed guidance based on context:
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
|---|---|---|
| EARS Syntax | references/ears-syntax.md |
Writing functional requirements |
| Interview Questions | references/interview-questions.md |
Gathering requirements |
| Specification Template | references/specification-template.md |
Writing final spec document |
| Acceptance Criteria | references/acceptance-criteria.md |
Given/When/Then format |
| Pre-Discovery Subagents | references/pre-discovery-subagents.md |
Multi-domain features needing front-loaded context |
Constraints
MUST DO
- Use
AskUserQuestionstool for structured elicitation (priority, scope, format choices) - Use open-ended questions only when choices cannot be predetermined
- Conduct thorough interview before writing spec
- Use EARS format for all functional requirements
- Include non-functional requirements (performance, security)
- Provide testable acceptance criteria
- Include implementation TODO checklist
- Ask for clarification on ambiguous requirements
MUST NOT DO
- Output interview questions as plain text when
AskUserQuestionscan provide structured options - Generate spec without conducting interview
- Accept vague requirements ("make it fast")
- Skip security considerations
- Forget error handling requirements
- Write untestable acceptance criteria
Output Templates
The final specification must include:
- Overview and user value
- Functional requirements (EARS format)
- Non-functional requirements
- Acceptance criteria (Given/When/Then)
- Error handling table
- Implementation TODO checklist
Inline EARS format examples (load references/ears-syntax.md for full syntax):
When <trigger>, the <system> shall <response>.
Where <feature> is active, the <system> shall <behaviour>.
The <system> shall <action> within <measure>.
Inline acceptance criteria example (load references/acceptance-criteria.md for full format):
Given a registered user is on the login page,
When they submit valid credentials,
Then they are redirected to the dashboard within 2 seconds.
Save as: specs/{feature_name}.spec.md
How to use feature-forge on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add feature-forge
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches feature-forge from GitHub repository jeffallan/claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate feature-forge. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /feature-forge) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★71 reviews- ★★★★★Noor Gupta· Dec 24, 2024
feature-forge reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 8, 2024
I recommend feature-forge for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Ren Martin· Dec 8, 2024
We added feature-forge from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Carlos Torres· Dec 8, 2024
I recommend feature-forge for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Neel Mehta· Dec 4, 2024
feature-forge reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 27, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: feature-forge is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Noor Iyer· Nov 27, 2024
feature-forge fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Min Robinson· Nov 27, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: feature-forge is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Anika Shah· Nov 23, 2024
feature-forge has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Jin Sanchez· Nov 15, 2024
feature-forge has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 71