academic-writing▌
jamditis/claude-skills-journalism · updated May 31, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
$22
Academic writing and research methodology
Systematic approaches for scholarly writing, research design, and academic communication.
Research design fundamentals
Research question development
## Crafting a research question
### The FINER criteria
- **F**easible: Can you actually do this research?
- **I**nteresting: Does it matter to the field?
- **N**ovel: Does it add new knowledge?
- **E**thical: Can it be done ethically?
- **R**elevant: Does it address a real problem?
### Question types
| Type | Purpose | Example |
|------|---------|---------|
| Descriptive | Document phenomena | "What are the characteristics of X?" |
| Comparative | Compare groups/conditions | "How does X differ between groups?" |
| Correlational | Examine relationships | "Is there a relationship between X and Y?" |
| Causal | Establish causation | "Does X cause Y?" |
| Exploratory | Generate hypotheses | "What factors might explain X?" |
### Refining your question
Start broad → Narrow progressively
Draft 1: "How does social media affect politics?"
Draft 2: "How does Twitter use affect political polarization?"
Draft 3: "How does exposure to partisan Twitter accounts affect
political attitude polarization among US adults?"
Draft 4: "Does increased exposure to ideologically homogeneous Twitter
feeds increase affective polarization among politically
engaged US adults aged 18-35?"
Literature review strategy
## Systematic literature search
### Database selection by field
- **Multidisciplinary**: Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar
- **Social Sciences**: JSTOR, ProQuest, SSRN
- **Communication**: Communication Abstracts, ComAbstracts
- **Health**: PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL
- **Education**: ERIC
- **Business**: Business Source Complete
### Search strategy template
1. **Identify key concepts** from research question
2. **Generate synonyms** for each concept
3. **Combine with Boolean operators**
Example for: "social media political polarization"
Concept 1: social media
- OR: Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, "social networking sites",
"online platforms", "digital media"
Concept 2: political
- OR: partisan, ideological, electoral, civic
Concept 3: polarization
- OR: division, extremism, "attitude change", radicalization
Combined search:
(Twitter OR Facebook OR "social media" OR "social networking")
AND (political OR partisan OR ideological)
AND (polarization OR division OR extremism)
### Inclusion/exclusion criteria
Document your criteria:
- Publication date range: [X to present]
- Languages: [English only / multiple]
- Publication types: [Peer-reviewed only / include preprints]
- Geographic scope: [Global / specific countries]
- Methodologies: [All / specific approaches]
### Managing your search
- Save searches to re-run later
- Export results to reference manager
- Track number of results at each stage
- Document date of each search
Citation management
# Zotero/reference manager integration patterns
# For automated citation workflows
CITATION_STYLES = {
'apa7': 'American Psychological Association 7th edition',
'mla9': 'Modern Language Association 9th edition',
'chicago': 'Chicago Manual of Style 17th edition',
'harvard': 'Harvard Reference format',
'ieee': 'IEEE',
'vancouver': 'Vancouver (medicine)',
}
# BibTeX entry template
BIBTEX_ARTICLE = """
@article{{{citekey},
author = {{{author}}},
title = {{{title}}},
journal = {{{journal}}},
year = {{{year}}},
volume = {{{volume}}},
number = {{{number}}},
pages = {{{pages}}},
doi = {{{doi}}}
}}
"""
# Common citation patterns by context
CITATION_CONTEXTS = {
'introducing_concept': "According to Author (Year), ...",
'supporting_claim': "Research has shown that X (Author, Year; Author, Year).",
'contrasting': "While Author (Year) argues X, Author (Year) contends Y.",
'methodology_reference': "Following the method developed by Author (Year), ...",
'direct_quote': 'Author (Year) states that "exact quote" (p. X).',
}
Paper structure and writing
IMRaD structure (scientific papers)
## Standard research paper sections
### Abstract (150-300 words typically)
- Background (1-2 sentences)
- Purpose/objective (1 sentence)
- Methods (2-3 sentences)
- Results (2-3 sentences)
- Conclusions (1-2 sentences)
### Introduction
**Funnel structure:**
1. Broad context - Why does this topic matter?
2. Narrow focus - What's the specific problem?
3. Gap identification - What don't we know?
4. Research question/hypothesis - What will you investigate?
5. Contribution preview - Why does this study matter?
### Literature Review
**Organize thematically, not chronologically:**
1. Theme 1: Key findings, debates, gaps
2. Theme 2: Key findings, debates, gaps
3. Theme 3: Key findings, debates, gaps
4. Synthesis: How themes connect to your study
### Methods
**The reproducibility test:** Could another researcher replicate your study from this section alone?
Include:
- Participants/sample (who, how selected, N)
- Materials/measures (what instruments, their validity)
- Procedure (step-by-step what happened)
- Analysis approach (statistical tests, qualitative methods)
- Ethical considerations (IRB, consent)
### Results
**Report, don't interpret:**
- Present findings systematically
- Use tables/figures for complex data
- Report effect sizes, not just p-values
- Address each research question/hypothesis
### Discussion
**Reverse funnel structure:**
1. Summary of key findings
2. Interpretation in context of literature
3. Theoretical implications
4. Practical implications
5. Limitations
6. Future research directions
7. Conclusion
Academic writing style
## Writing conventions
### Voice and tense
| Section | Tense | Example |
|---------|-------|---------how to use academic-writingHow to use academic-writing on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
1Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add academic-writing
2Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
$npx skills add https://github.com/jamditis/claude-skills-journalism --skill academic-writingThe skills CLI fetches academic-writing from GitHub repository jamditis/claude-skills-journalism and configures it for Cursor.
3Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
◆ Which agents do you want to install to?││ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────│ • Amp│ • Antigravity│ • Cline│ • Codex│ ●Cursor(selected)│ • Cursor│ • Windsurf4Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/academic-writingReload or restart Cursor to activate academic-writing. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /academic-writing) or your agent's skill management interface.
⚠Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
Additional Resources
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
GET_STARTED →Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
✓Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
✓Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviewsRatings
4.8★★★★★30 reviews- ★★★★★James Mensah· Dec 8, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: academic-writing is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Dec 4, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: academic-writing is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Liam Sanchez· Dec 4, 2024
We added academic-writing from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Aarav Wang· Nov 23, 2024
academic-writing reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Zara Mehta· Oct 14, 2024
Registry listing for academic-writing matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Fatima Mensah· Sep 13, 2024
I recommend academic-writing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Sep 9, 2024
I recommend academic-writing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Aug 28, 2024
Useful defaults in academic-writing — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Emma Choi· Aug 4, 2024
Useful defaults in academic-writing — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★James Kim· Jul 23, 2024
academic-writing is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 30
1 / 3