eve-manifest-authoring

incept5/eve-skillpacks · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/incept5/eve-skillpacks --skill eve-manifest-authoring
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Keep the manifest as the single source of truth for build and deploy behavior.

skill.md

Eve Manifest Authoring

Keep the manifest as the single source of truth for build and deploy behavior.

Minimal skeleton (v2)

schema: eve/compose/v2
project: my-project

registry: "eve"  # Use managed registry by default for Eve apps
services:
  api:
    build:
      context: ./apps/api           # Build context directory
      dockerfile: Dockerfile        # Optional, defaults to context/Dockerfile
    # image omitted by default; when build is present, Eve derives image name from service key
    ports: [3000]
    environment:
      NODE_ENV: production
    x-eve:
      ingress:
        public: true
        port: 3000

environments:
  staging:
    pipeline: deploy
    pipeline_inputs:
      some_key: default_value

pipelines:
  deploy:
    steps:
      - name: build
        action:
          type: build               # Builds all services with build: config
      - name: release
        depends_on: [build]
        action:
          type: release
      - name: deploy
        depends_on: [release]
        action:
          type: deploy

Registry Image Labels

Some registries require package metadata for permission and ownership inheritance. Add these labels to your Dockerfiles when supported by your registry:

LABEL org.opencontainers.image.source="https://github.com/YOUR_ORG/YOUR_REPO"
LABEL org.opencontainers.image.description="Service description"

Why this matters: Metadata helps preserve repository ownership and improves traceability. The Eve builder injects these labels automatically, but including them in your Dockerfile is still recommended.

For multi-stage Dockerfiles, add the labels to the final stage (the production image).

Registry Modes

registry: "eve"     # Eve-native registry (internal JWT auth)
registry: "none"    # Disable registry handling (public images)
registry:           # BYO registry (full object — see section below)
  host: public.ecr.aws/w7c4v0w3
  namespace: myorg
  auth: { username_secret: REGISTRY_USERNAME, token_secret: REGISTRY_PASSWORD }

For BYO/private registries, provide:

registry:
  host: public.ecr.aws/w7c4v0w3
  namespace: myorg
  auth:
    username_secret: REGISTRY_USERNAME
    token_secret: REGISTRY_PASSWORD

Managed Databases

Declare platform-provisioned databases with x-eve.role: managed_db:

services:
  db:
    x-eve:
      role: managed_db
      managed:
        class: db.p1
        engine: postgres
        engine_version: "16"

Not deployed to K8s — provisioned by the orchestrator on first deploy. Reference managed values elsewhere: ${managed.db.url}.

Eve-Migrate for Database Migrations

Use the platform's migration runner instead of Flyway, TypeORM, or Knex. It uses plain SQL files with timestamp prefixes, tracked in schema_migrations:

services:
  migrate:
    image: public.ecr.aws/w7c4v0w3/eve-horizon/migrate:latest
    environment:
      DATABASE_URL: ${managed.db.url}
      MIGRATIONS_DIR: /migrations
    x-eve:
      role: job
      files:
        - source: db/migrations
          target: /migrations

Migration files: db/migrations/20260312000000_initial_schema.sql. The x-eve.files directive mounts them into the container at /migrations.

In the pipeline, the migrate step must run after deploy (managed DB needs provisioning):

pipelines:
  deploy:
    steps:
      - name: build
        action: { type: build }
      - name: release
        depends_on: [build]
        action: { type: release }
      - name: deploy
        depends_on: [release]
        action: { type: deploy }
      - name: migrate
        depends_on: [deploy]
        action: { type: job, service: migrate }

For local dev, use the same image via Docker Compose for parity:

# docker-compose.yml
services:
  migrate:
    image: ghcr.io/incept5/eve-migrate:latest
    environment:
      DATABASE_URL: postgres://app:app@db:5432/myapp
    volumes:
      - ./db/migrations:/migrations:ro
    depends_on:
      db: { condition: service_healthy }

Legacy manifests

If the repo still uses components: from older manifests, migrate to services: and add schema: eve/compose/v2. Keep ports and env keys the same.

Services

  • Provide image and optionally build (context and dockerfile).
  • Use ports, environment, healthcheck, depends_on as needed.
  • Use x-eve.external: true and x-eve.connection_url for externally hosted services.
  • Use x-eve.role: job for one-off services (migrations, seeds). For database migrations, prefer Eve's eve-migrate image (see below).

Build configuration

Services with Docker images should define their build configuration:

services:
  api:
    build:
      context: ./apps/api           # Build context directory
      dockerfile: Dockerfile        # Optional, defaults to context/Dockerfile
    # image: api      # optional if using build; managed registry derives this
    ports: [3000]

Note: Every deploy pipeline should include a build step before release. The build step creates tracked BuildSpec/BuildRun records and produces image digests that releases use for deterministic deployments.

Local dev alignment

  • Keep service names and ports aligned with Docker Compose.
  • Prefer ${secret.KEY} and use .eve/dev-secrets.yaml for local values.

Environments, pipelines, workflows

  • Link each environment to a pipeline via environments.<env>.pipeline.
  • When pipeline is set, eve env deploy <env> triggers that pipeline instead of direct deploy.
  • Use environments.<env>.pipeline_inputs to provide default inputs for pipeline runs.
  • Override inputs at runtime with eve env deploy <env> --ref <sha> --inputs '{"key":"value"}' --repo-dir ./my-app.
  • Use --direct flag to bypass pipeline and do direct deploy: eve env deploy <env> --ref <sha> --direct --repo-dir ./my-app.
  • Pipeline steps can be action, script, or agent.
  • Use action.type: create-pr for PR automation when configured.
  • Workflows live under workflows and are invoked via CLI; db_access is honored.

Platform-Injected Environment Variables

Eve automatically injects these into all deployed service containers:

Variable Description
EVE_API_URL Internal cluster URL for server-to-server calls
EVE_PUBLIC_API_URL Public ingress URL for browser-facing apps
EVE_PROJECT_ID The project ID
EVE_ORG_ID The organization ID
EVE_ENV_NAME The environment name

Use EVE_API_URL for backend calls from your container. Use EVE_PUBLIC_API_URL for browser/client-side code. Services can override these in their environment section.

Interpolation and secrets

  • Env interpolation: ${ENV_NAME}, ${PROJECT_ID}, ${ORG_ID}, ${ORG_SLUG}, ${COMPONENT_NAME}.
  • Secret interpolation: ${secret.KEY} pulls from Eve secrets or .eve/dev-secrets.yaml.
  • Managed DB interpolation: ${managed.<service>.<field>} resolves at deploy time.
  • Use .eve/dev-secrets.yaml for local overrides; set real secrets via the API for production.

Eve extensions

  • Top-level defaults via x-eve.defaults (env, harness, harness_profile, harness_options, hints, git, workspace).
  • Top-level agent policy via x-eve.agents (profiles, councils, availability rules).
  • Agent packs via x-eve.packs with optional x-eve.install_agents defaults.
  • Agent config paths via x-eve.agents.config_path and x-eve.agents.teams_path.
  • Chat routing config via x-eve.chat.config_path.
  • Service extensions under x-eve (ingress, role, api specs, worker pools, cli, object_store).
  • API specs: x-eve.api_spec or x-eve.api_specs (spec URL relative to service by default).
  • App CLI: x-eve.cli declares an agent-friendly CLI for the service (see below).
  • Toolchains: agent-level toolchains declarations inject on-demand runtimes (see below).
  • Cloud FS mounts: configured via integrations, not the manifest (see references/integrations.md).
  • Per-org OAuth: each org registers its own OAuth app credentials via eve integrations configure (see eve-auth-and-secrets).

Example:

how to use eve-manifest-authoring

How to use eve-manifest-authoring on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add eve-manifest-authoring
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/incept5/eve-skillpacks --skill eve-manifest-authoring

The skills CLI fetches eve-manifest-authoring from GitHub repository incept5/eve-skillpacks and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/eve-manifest-authoring

Reload or restart Cursor to activate eve-manifest-authoring. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /eve-manifest-authoring) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.568 reviews
  • Aisha Nasser· Dec 28, 2024

    eve-manifest-authoring reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Shikha Mishra· Dec 20, 2024

    I recommend eve-manifest-authoring for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Valentina Shah· Dec 20, 2024

    eve-manifest-authoring reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Diego Ghosh· Dec 4, 2024

    eve-manifest-authoring is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • William Kim· Nov 23, 2024

    Keeps context tight: eve-manifest-authoring is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Sakshi Patil· Nov 19, 2024

    Useful defaults in eve-manifest-authoring — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Anika Dixit· Nov 19, 2024

    We added eve-manifest-authoring from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Yash Thakker· Nov 11, 2024

    eve-manifest-authoring fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Hana Park· Nov 11, 2024

    We added eve-manifest-authoring from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • William White· Oct 14, 2024

    We added eve-manifest-authoring from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

showing 1-10 of 68

1 / 7