fixing-accessibility▌
ibelick/ui-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Audit and fix HTML accessibility issues across ARIA labels, keyboard navigation, focus management, and WCAG compliance.
- ›Covers nine rule categories prioritized by impact: accessible names, keyboard access, focus management, semantics, forms and errors, announcements, contrast, media, and tool boundaries
- ›Provides targeted fixes for common patterns like icon-only buttons, form error linking, and focus trapping in modals
- ›Includes quick reference for when to apply (interactive controls,
fixing-accessibility
Fix accessibility issues.
how to use
-
/fixing-accessibilityApply these constraints to any UI work in this conversation. -
/fixing-accessibility <file>Review the file against all rules below and report:- violations (quote the exact line or snippet)
- why it matters (one short sentence)
- a concrete fix (code-level suggestion)
Do not rewrite large parts of the UI. Prefer minimal, targeted fixes.
when to apply
Reference these guidelines when:
- adding or changing buttons, links, inputs, menus, dialogs, tabs, dropdowns
- building forms, validation, error states, helper text
- implementing keyboard shortcuts or custom interactions
- working on focus states, focus trapping, or modal behavior
- rendering icon-only controls
- adding hover-only interactions or hidden content
rule categories by priority
| priority | category | impact |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | accessible names | critical |
| 2 | keyboard access | critical |
| 3 | focus and dialogs | critical |
| 4 | semantics | high |
| 5 | forms and errors | high |
| 6 | announcements | medium-high |
| 7 | contrast and states | medium |
| 8 | media and motion | low-medium |
| 9 | tool boundaries | critical |
quick reference
1. accessible names (critical)
- every interactive control must have an accessible name
- icon-only buttons must have aria-label or aria-labelledby
- every input, select, and textarea must be labeled
- links must have meaningful text (no “click here”)
- decorative icons must be aria-hidden
2. keyboard access (critical)
- do not use div or span as buttons without full keyboard support
- all interactive elements must be reachable by Tab
- focus must be visible for keyboard users
- do not use tabindex greater than 0
- Escape must close dialogs or overlays when applicable
3. focus and dialogs (critical)
- modals must trap focus while open
- restore focus to the trigger on close
- set initial focus inside dialogs
- opening a dialog should not scroll the page unexpectedly
4. semantics (high)
- prefer native elements (button, a, input) over role-based hacks
- if a role is used, required aria attributes must be present
- lists must use ul or ol with li
- do not skip heading levels
- tables must use th for headers when applicable
5. forms and errors (high)
- errors must be linked to fields using aria-describedby
- required fields must be announced
- invalid fields must set aria-invalid
- helper text must be associated with inputs
- disabled submit actions must explain why
6. announcements (medium-high)
- critical form errors should use aria-live
- loading states should use aria-busy or status text
- toasts must not be the only way to convey critical information
- expandable controls must use aria-expanded and aria-controls
7. contrast and states (medium)
- ensure sufficient contrast for text and icons
- hover-only interactions must have keyboard equivalents
- disabled states must not rely on color alone
- do not remove focus outlines without a visible replacement
8. media and motion (low-medium)
- images must have correct alt text (meaningful or empty)
- videos with speech should provide captions when relevant
- respect prefers-reduced-motion for non-essential motion
- avoid autoplaying media with sound
9. tool boundaries (critical)
- prefer minimal changes, do not refactor unrelated code
- do not add aria when native semantics already solve the problem
- do not migrate UI libraries unless requested
common fixes
<!-- icon-only button: add aria-label -->
<!-- before --> <button><svg>...</svg></button>
<!-- after --> <button aria-label="Close"><svg aria-hidden="true">...</svg></button>
<!-- div as button: use native element -->
<!-- before --> <div onclick="save()">Save</div>
<!-- after --> <button onclick="save()">Save</button>
<!-- form error: link with aria-describedby -->
<!-- before --> <input id="email" /> <span>Invalid email</span>
<!-- after --> <input id="email" aria-describedby="email-err" aria-invalid="true" /> <span id="email-err">Invalid email</span>
review guidance
- fix critical issues first (names, keyboard, focus, tool boundaries)
- prefer native HTML before adding aria
- quote the exact snippet, state the failure, propose a small fix
- for complex widgets (menu, dialog, combobox), prefer established accessible primitives over custom behavior
How to use fixing-accessibility on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add fixing-accessibility
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches fixing-accessibility from GitHub repository ibelick/ui-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate fixing-accessibility. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /fixing-accessibility) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★32 reviews- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 24, 2024
Keeps context tight: fixing-accessibility is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Ishan Shah· Dec 16, 2024
Registry listing for fixing-accessibility matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Min Liu· Dec 4, 2024
We added fixing-accessibility from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Jin Yang· Nov 23, 2024
fixing-accessibility reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 15, 2024
fixing-accessibility has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Min Kapoor· Nov 3, 2024
I recommend fixing-accessibility for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Evelyn Iyer· Oct 22, 2024
Useful defaults in fixing-accessibility — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Jin Martin· Oct 14, 2024
Registry listing for fixing-accessibility matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Oct 6, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: fixing-accessibility is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Jin Harris· Sep 9, 2024
We added fixing-accessibility from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 32