unit-test-wiremock-rest-api

giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill unit-test-wiremock-rest-api
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Unit test external REST API integrations with WireMock HTTP mocking and request verification.

  • Stub HTTP responses with configurable status codes, headers, and JSON bodies; verify request details including headers, query parameters, and request bodies
  • Test error scenarios (4xx/5xx responses, timeouts, malformed responses) without calling real APIs or hitting rate limits
  • Use dynamic port allocation to avoid conflicts in parallel test execution; automatic cleanup between tests via JUnit
skill.md

Unit Testing REST APIs with WireMock

Overview

Patterns for testing external REST API integrations with WireMock: stubbing responses, verifying requests, error scenarios, and fast tests without network dependencies.

When to Use

  • Testing services calling external REST APIs
  • Stubbing HTTP responses for predictable test behavior
  • Testing error scenarios (timeouts, 5xx errors, malformed responses)
  • Verifying request details (headers, query params, request body)

Instructions

  1. Add dependency: WireMock in test scope (Maven/Gradle)
  2. Register extension: @RegisterExtension WireMockExtension with dynamicPort()
  3. Configure client: Use wireMock.getRuntimeInfo().getHttpBaseUrl() as base URL
  4. Stub responses: stubFor() with request matching (URL, headers, body)
  5. Execute and assert: Call service methods, validate results with AssertJ
  6. Verify requests: verify() to ensure correct API usage

If stub not matching: Check URL encoding, header names, use urlEqualTo for query params.

If tests hanging: Configure connection timeouts in HTTP client; use withFixedDelay() for timeout simulation.

If port conflicts: Always use wireMockConfig().dynamicPort().

Examples

Maven Dependencies

<dependency>
  <groupId>org.wiremock</groupId>
  <artifactId>wiremock</artifactId>
  <version>3.4.1</version>
  <scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
  <groupId>org.assertj</groupId>
  <artifactId>assertj-core</artifactId>
  <scope>test</scope>
</dependency>

Basic Stubbing and Verification

import com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.junit5.WireMockExtension;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.extension.RegisterExtension;
import static com.github.tomakehurst.wiremock.client.WireMock.*;
import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat;

class ExternalWeatherServiceTest {

  @RegisterExtension
  static WireMockExtension wireMock = WireMockExtension.newInstance()
    .options(wireMockConfig().dynamicPort())
    .build();

  @Test
  void shouldFetchWeatherDataFromExternalApi() {
    wireMock.stubFor(get(urlEqualTo("/weather?city=London"))
      .withHeader("Accept", containing("application/json"))
      .willReturn(aResponse()
        .withStatus(200)
        .withHeader("Content-Type", "application/json")
        .withBody("{\"city\":\"London\",\"temperature\":15,\"condition\":\"Cloudy\"}")));

    String baseUrl = wireMock.getRuntimeInfo().getHttpBaseUrl();
    WeatherApiClient client = new WeatherApiClient(baseUrl);
    WeatherData weather = client.getWeather("London");

    assertThat(weather.getCity()).isEqualTo("London");
    assertThat(weather.getTemperature()).isEqualTo(15);

    wireMock.verify(getRequestedFor(urlEqualTo("/weather?city=London"))
      .withHeader("Accept", containing("application/json")));
  }
}

See references/advanced-examples.md for error scenarios, body verification, timeout simulation, and stateful testing.

Best Practices

  • Dynamic port: Prevents conflicts in parallel test execution
  • Verify requests: Ensures correct API usage by the client
  • Test errors: Cover timeouts, 4xx, 5xx scenarios
  • Focused stubs: One concern per test
  • Auto-reset: @RegisterExtension resets WireMock between tests
  • Never call real APIs: Always stub third-party endpoints

Constraints and Warnings

  • Dynamic ports required: Fixed ports cause parallel execution conflicts
  • HTTPS testing: Configure WireMock TLS settings if testing TLS connections
  • Stub precedence: More specific stubs take priority over general ones
  • Performance: WireMock adds overhead; mock at client layer for faster tests
  • API changes: Keep stubs synchronized with actual API contracts

References

how to use unit-test-wiremock-rest-api

How to use unit-test-wiremock-rest-api on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add unit-test-wiremock-rest-api
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill unit-test-wiremock-rest-api

The skills CLI fetches unit-test-wiremock-rest-api from GitHub repository giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/unit-test-wiremock-rest-api

Reload or restart Cursor to activate unit-test-wiremock-rest-api. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /unit-test-wiremock-rest-api) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.671 reviews
  • Yusuf Gupta· Dec 12, 2024

    Registry listing for unit-test-wiremock-rest-api matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Pratham Ware· Dec 8, 2024

    Registry listing for unit-test-wiremock-rest-api matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Evelyn Ndlovu· Dec 8, 2024

    Keeps context tight: unit-test-wiremock-rest-api is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Neel Verma· Dec 4, 2024

    unit-test-wiremock-rest-api fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Yash Thakker· Nov 27, 2024

    unit-test-wiremock-rest-api reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Ava Harris· Nov 27, 2024

    unit-test-wiremock-rest-api is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Kabir Jackson· Nov 27, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: unit-test-wiremock-rest-api is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Liam Ramirez· Nov 19, 2024

    We added unit-test-wiremock-rest-api from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Neel Huang· Nov 3, 2024

    unit-test-wiremock-rest-api reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Kofi Khanna· Oct 22, 2024

    I recommend unit-test-wiremock-rest-api for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

showing 1-10 of 71

1 / 8