unit-test-caching

giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill unit-test-caching
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Testing Spring Cache annotations without external infrastructure using in-memory cache managers.

  • Covers testing @Cacheable , @CacheEvict , and @CachePut annotations with patterns for verifying cache hits, misses, and invalidation
  • Uses ConcurrentMapCacheManager for fast, isolated unit tests instead of Redis or other external caches
  • Includes verification strategies via mock call counts, conditional caching with unless and condition parameters, and custom cache key generation with SpEL
skill.md

Unit Testing Spring Caching

Overview

This skill provides patterns for unit testing Spring caching annotations (@Cacheable, @CacheEvict, @CachePut) without full Spring context. It covers cache hits/misses, invalidation, key generation, and conditional caching using in-memory ConcurrentMapCacheManager.

When to Use

  • Writing unit tests for @Cacheable method behavior
  • Verifying @CacheEvict cache invalidation works correctly
  • Testing @CachePut cache updates
  • Validating cache key generation from SpEL expressions
  • Testing conditional caching with unless/condition parameters
  • Mocking cache managers in fast unit tests without Redis

Instructions

  1. Configure in-memory CacheManager: Use ConcurrentMapCacheManager for tests
  2. Set up test fixtures: Mock repository and create service instance in @BeforeEach
  3. Verify repository call counts: Use times(n) assertions to confirm cache behavior
  4. Test cache hit: Call method twice, verify repository called once
  5. Test cache miss: Verify repository called on each invocation
  6. Test eviction: After @CacheEvict, verify repository called again on next read
  7. Test key generation: Verify compound keys from SpEL expressions
  8. Validate conditional caching: Test unless (null results) and condition (parameter-based)

Validation checkpoints:

  • Run test → If cache not working: verify @EnableCaching annotation present
  • If proxy issues: ensure method calls go through Spring proxy (no direct this calls)
  • If key mismatches: log actual cache key and compare with @Cacheable(key="...") expression

Examples

Maven

<dependency>
  <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
  <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-cache</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
  <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
  <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-test</artifactId>
  <scope>test</scope>
</dependency>

Gradle

dependencies {
  implementation("org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-cache")
  testImplementation("org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-test")
}

Testing @Cacheable (Cache Hit/Miss)

// Service
@Service
public class UserService {
  private final UserRepository userRepository;

  public UserService(UserRepository userRepository) {
    this.userRepository = userRepository;
  }

  @Cacheable("users")
  public User getUserById(Long id) {
    return userRepository.findById(id).orElse(null);
  }
}

// Test
class UserServiceCachingTest {

  private UserRepository userRepository;
  private UserService userService;

  @BeforeEach
  void setUp() {
    userRepository = mock(UserRepository.class);
    userService = new UserService(userRepository);
  }

  @Test
  void shouldCacheUserAfterFirstCall() {
    User user = new User(1L, "Alice");
    when(userRepository.findById(1L)).thenReturn(Optional.of(user));

    // First call - hits database
    User firstCall = userService.getUserById(1L);
    // Second call - hits cache
    User secondCall = userService.getUserById(1L);

    assertThat(firstCall).isEqualTo(secondCall);
    verify(userRepository, times(1)).findById(1L); // Only once due to cache
  }

  @Test
  void shouldInvokeRepositoryOnCacheMiss() {
    when(userRepository.findById(1L)).thenReturn(Optional.of(new User(1L, "Bob")));

    userService.getUserById(1L);
    userService.getUserById(1L);

    verify(userRepository, times(2)).findById(1L); // No caching occurred
  }
}

Testing @CacheEvict

// Service
@Service
public class ProductService {
  private final ProductRepository productRepository;

  public ProductService(ProductRepository productRepository) {
    this.productRepository = productRepository;
  }

  @Cacheable("products")
  public Product getProductById(Long id) {
    return productRepository.findById(id).orElse(null);
  }

  @CacheEvict("products")
  public void deleteProduct(Long id) {
    productRepository.deleteById(id);
  }
}

// Test
class ProductCacheEvictTest {

  private ProductRepository productRepository;
  private ProductService productService;

  @BeforeEach
  void setUp() {
    productRepository = mock(ProductRepository.class);
    productService = new ProductService(productRepository);
  }

  @Test
  void shouldEvictProductFromCacheWhenDeleted() {
    Product product = new Product(1L, "Laptop", 999.99);
    when(productRepository.findById(1L)).thenReturn(Optional.of(product));

    productService.getProductById
how to use unit-test-caching

How to use unit-test-caching on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add unit-test-caching
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill unit-test-caching

The skills CLI fetches unit-test-caching from GitHub repository giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/unit-test-caching

Reload or restart Cursor to activate unit-test-caching. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /unit-test-caching) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.626 reviews
  • Pratham Ware· Dec 28, 2024

    unit-test-caching is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Kwame Ramirez· Dec 20, 2024

    We added unit-test-caching from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Arjun Bhatia· Nov 19, 2024

    unit-test-caching is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Carlos Robinson· Nov 11, 2024

    Keeps context tight: unit-test-caching is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Meera Liu· Oct 10, 2024

    Useful defaults in unit-test-caching — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Naina Verma· Oct 2, 2024

    unit-test-caching has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Meera Lopez· Sep 25, 2024

    We added unit-test-caching from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Yash Thakker· Sep 21, 2024

    Keeps context tight: unit-test-caching is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Hana Brown· Aug 16, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: unit-test-caching is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Aug 12, 2024

    unit-test-caching has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

showing 1-10 of 26

1 / 3