write-coding-standards-from-file▌
github/awesome-copilot · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Analyze existing code files to automatically generate a project coding standards document.
- ›Extracts syntax patterns (indentation, naming conventions, commenting style, braces, line length) from one or more files or entire folders to establish baseline standards
- ›Detects and optionally fixes inconsistencies across files, flagging deviations from the majority pattern in each category
- ›Outputs standards to a new file (CONTRIBUTING.md, STYLE.md, CODING_STANDARDS.md, etc.), README.md insert
Write Coding Standards From File
Use the existing syntax of the file(s) to establish the standards and style guides for the project. If more than one file or a folder is passed, loop through each file or files in the folder, appending the file's data to temporary memory or a file, then when complete use temporary data as a single instance; as if it were the file name to base the standards and style guideline on.
Rules and Configuration
Below is a set of quasi-configuration boolean and string[] variables. Conditions for handling true, or other values for each variable are under the level two heading ## Variable and Parameter Configuration Conditions.
Parameters for the prompt have a text definition. There is one required parameter ${fileName}, and several optional parameters ${folderName}, ${instructions}, and any [configVariableAsParameter].
Configuration Variables
- addStandardsTest = false;
- addToREADME = false;
- addToREADMEInsertions = ["atBegin", "middle", "beforeEnd", "bestFitUsingContext"];
- Default to beforeEnd.
- createNewFile = true;
- fetchStyleURL = true;
- findInconsistencies = true;
- fixInconsistencies = true;
- newFileName = ["CONTRIBUTING.md", "STYLE.md", "CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md", "CODING_STANDARDS.md", "DEVELOPING.md", "CONTRIBUTION_GUIDE.md", "GUIDELINES.md", "PROJECT_STANDARDS.md", "BEST_PRACTICES.md", "HACKING.md"];
- For each file in
${newFileName}, if file does not exist, use that file name andbreak, else continue to next file name of${newFileName}.
- For each file in
- outputSpecToPrompt = false;
- useTemplate = "verbose"; // or "v"
- Possible values are
[["v", "verbose"], ["m", "minimal"], ["b", "best fit"], ["custom"]]. - Selects one of the two example templates at the bottom of prompt file under the level two heading
## Coding Standards Templates, or use another composition that is a better fit. - If custom, then apply per request.
- Possible values are
Configuration Variables as Prompt Parameters
If any of the variable names are passed to prompt as-is, or as a similar but clearly related text value, then override the default variable value with the value passed to prompt.
Prompt Parameters
- fileName = The name of the file that will be analyzed in terms of: indentation, variable naming, commenting, conditional procedures, functional procedures, and other syntax related data for the coding language of the file.
- folderName = The name of the folder that will be used to extract data from multiple files into one aggregated dataset that will be analyzed in terms of: indentation, variable naming, commenting, conditional procedures, functional procedures, and other syntax related data for the coding language of the files.
- instructions = Additional instructions, rules, and procedures that will be provided for unique cases.
- [configVariableAsParameter] = If passed will override the default state of the configuration variable. Example:
- useTemplate = If passed will override the configuration
${useTemplate}default. Values are[["v", "verbose"], ["m", "minimal"], ["b", "best fit"]].
- useTemplate = If passed will override the configuration
Required and Optional Parameters
- fileName - required
- folderName - optional
- instructions - optional
- [configVariableAsParameter] - optional
Variable and Parameter Configuration Conditions
${fileName}.length > 1 || ${folderName} != undefined
- If true, toggle
${fixInconsistencies}to false.
${addToREADME} == true
- Insert the coding standards into the
README.mdinstead of outputting to the prompt or creating a new file. - If true, toggle both
${createNewFile}and${outputSpecToPrompt}to false.
${addToREADMEInsertions} == "atBegin"
- If
${addToREADME}is true, then insert the coding standards data at the beginning of theREADME.mdfile after the title.
${addToREADMEInsertions} == "middle"
- If
${addToREADME}is true, then insert the coding standards data at the middle of theREADME.mdfile, changing the standards title heading to match that of theREADME.mdcomposition.
${addToREADMEInsertions} == "beforeEnd"
- If
${addToREADME}is true, then insert the coding standards data at the end of theREADME.mdfile, inserting a new line after the last character, then inserting the data on a new line.
${addToREADMEInsertions} == "bestFitUsingContext"
- If
${addToREADME}is true, then insert the coding standards data at the best fitting line of theREADME.mdfile in regards to the context of theREADME.mdcomposition and flow of data.
${addStandardsTest} == true
- Once the coding standards file is complete, write a test file to ensure the file or files passed to it adhere to the coding standards.
${createNewFile} == true
- Create a new file using the value, or one of the possible values, from
${newFileName}. - If true, toggle both
${outputSpecToPrompt}and${addToREADME}to false.
${fetchStyleURL} == true
- Additionally use the data fetched from the links nested under level three heading
### Fetch Linksas context for creating standards, specifications, and styling data for the new file, prompt, orREADME.md. - For each relevant item in
### Fetch Links, run#fetch ${item}.
${findInconsistencies} == true
- Evaluate syntax related to indentations, line-breaks, comments, conditional and function nesting, quotation wrappers i.e.
'or"for strings, etc., and categorize. - For each category, make a count, and if one item does not match the majority of the count, then commit to temporary memory.
- Depending on the status of
${fixInconsistencies}, either edit and fix the low count categories to match the majority, or output to prompt inconsistencies stored in temporary memory.
${fixInconsistencies} == true
- Edit and fix the low count categories of syntax data to match the majority of corresponding syntax data using inconsistencies stored in temporary memory.
typeof ${newFileName} == "string"
- If specifically defined as a
string, create a new file using the value from${newFileName}.
typeof ${newFileName} != "string"
- If NOT specifically defined as a
string, but instead anobjector an array, create a new file using a value from${newFileName}by applying this rule:- For each file name in
${newFileName}, if file does not exist, use that file name andbreak, else continue to the next.
- For each file name in
${outputSpecToPrompt} == true
- Output the coding standards to the prompt instead of creating a file or adding to README.
- If true, toggle both
${createNewFile}and${addToREADME}to false.
${useTemplate} == "v" || ${useTemplate} == "verbose"
- Use data under the level three heading
### "v", "verbose"as guiding template when composing the data for coding standards.
${useTemplate} == "m" || ${useTemplate} == "minimal"
- Use data under the level three heading
### "m", "minimal"as guiding template when composing the data for coding standards.
${useTemplate} == "b" || ${useTemplate} == "best"
- Use either the data under the level three heading
### "v", "verbose"or### "m", "minimal", depending on the data extracted from${fileName}, and use the best fit as guiding template when composing the data for coding standards.
${useTemplate} == "custom" || ${useTemplate} == "<ANY_NAME>"
- Use the custom prompt, instructions, template, or other data passed as guiding template when composing the data for coding standards.
if ${fetchStyleURL} == true
Depending on the programming language, for each link in list below, run #fetch (URL), if programming language is ${fileName} == [<Language> Style Guide].
Fetch Links
- C Style Guide
- C# Style Guide
- C++ Style Guide
- Go Style Guide
- Java Style Guide
- AngularJS App Style Guide
- jQuery Style Guide
- JavaScript Style Guide
- JSON Style Guide
- Kotlin Style Guide
- Markdown Style Guide
- Perl Style Guide
- PHP Style Guide
- Python Style Guide
- Ruby Style Guide
- Rust Style Guide
- Swift Style Guide
- TypeScript Style Guide
- Visual Basic Style Guide
- Shell Script Style Guide
- Git Usage Style Guide
- PowerShell Style Guide
- CSS
- Sass Style Guide
- HTML Style Guide
- Linux kernel Style Guide
- Node.js Style Guide
- SQL Style Guide
- Angular Style Guide
- Vue Style Guide
- Django Style Guide
- SystemVerilog Style Guide
Coding Standards Templates
"m", "minimal"
```markdown
## 1. Introduction
* **Purpose:** Briefly explain why the coding standards are being established (e.g., to improve code quality, maintainability, and team collaboration).
* **Scope:** Define which languages, projects, or modules this specification applies to.
## 2. Naming Conventions
* **Variables:** `camelCase`
* **Functions/Methods:** `PascalCase` or `camelCase`.
* **Classes/Structs:** `PascalCase`.
* **Constants:** `UPPER_SNAKE_CASE`.
## 3. Formatting and Style
* **Indentation:** Use 4 spaces per indent (or tabs).
* **Line Length:** Limit lines to a maximum of 80 or 120 characters.
* **Braces:** Use the "K&R" style (opening brace on the same line) or the "Allman" style (opening brace on a new line).
* **Blank Lines:** Specify how many blank lines to use for separating logical blocks of code.
## 4. Commenting
* **Docstrings/Function Comments:** Describe the function's purpose, parameters, and return values.
* **Inline Comments:** Explain complex or non-obvious logic.
* **File Headers:** Specify what information should be included in a file header, such as author, date, and file description.
## 5. Error Handling
* **General:** How to handle and log errors.
* **Specifics:** Which exception types to use, and what information to include in error messages.
## 6. Best Practices and Anti-Patterns
* **General:** List common anti-patterns to avoid (e.g., global variables, magic numbers).
* **Language-specific:** Specific recommendations based on the project's programming language.
## 7. Examples
* Provide a small code example demonstrating the correct application of the rules.
* Provide a small code example of an incorrect implementation and how to fix it.
## 8. Contribution and Enforcement
* Explain how the standards are to be enforced (e.g., via code reviews).
* Provide a guide for contributing to the standards document itself.
```
"v", verbose"
```markdown
# Style Guide
This document defines the style and conventions used in this project.
All contributions should follow these rules unless otherwise noted.
## 1. General Code Style
- Favor clarity over brevity.
- Keep functions and methods small and focused.
- Avoid repeating logic; prefer shared helpers/utilities.
- Remove unused variables, imports, code paths, and files.
## 2. Naming Conventions
Use descriptive names. Avoid abbreviations unless well-known.
| Item | Convention | Example |
|-----------------|----------------------|--------------------|
| Variables | `lower_snake_case` | `buffer_size` |
| Functions | `lower_snake_case()` | `read_file()` |
| Constants | `UPPER_SNAKE_CASE` | `MAX_RETRIES` |
| Types/Structs | `PascalCase` | `FileHeader` |
| File Names | `lower_snake_case` | `file_reader.c` |
## 3. Formatting Rules
- Indentation: **4 spaces**
- Line length: **max 100 characters**
- Encoding: **UTF-8**, no BOM
- End files with a newline
### Braces (example in C, adjust for your language)
```c
if (condition) {
do_something();
} else {
do_something_else();
}
```
### Spacing
- One space after keywords: `if (x)`, not `if(x)`
- One blank line between top-level functions
## 4. Comments & Documentation
- Explain *why*, not *what*, unless intent is unclear.
- Keep comments up-to-date as code changes.
- Public functions should include a short description of purpose and parameters.
Recommended tags:
```text
TODO: follow-up work
FIXME: known incorrect behavior
NOTE: non-obvious design decision
```
## 5. Error Handling
- Handle error conditions explicitly.
- Avoid silent failures; either return errors or log them appropriately.
- Clean up resources (files, memory, handles) before returning on failure.
## 6. Commit & Review Practices
### Commits
- One logical change per commit.
- Write clear commit messages:
```text
Short summary (max ~50 chars)
Optional longer explanation of context and rationale.
```
### Reviews
- Keep pull requests reasonably small.
- Be respectful and constructive in review discussions.
- Address requested changes or explain if you disagree.
## 7. Tests
- Write tests for new functionality.
- Tests should be deterministic (no randomness without seeding).
- Prefer readable test cases over complex test abstraction.
## 8. Changes to This Guide
Style evolves.
Propose improvements by opening an issue or sending a patch updating this document.
```
How to use write-coding-standards-from-file on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add write-coding-standards-from-file
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches write-coding-standards-from-file from GitHub repository github/awesome-copilot and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate write-coding-standards-from-file. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /write-coding-standards-from-file) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★47 reviews- ★★★★★Liam Rahman· Dec 28, 2024
write-coding-standards-from-file has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Ira Kapoor· Dec 24, 2024
write-coding-standards-from-file reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Luis Mensah· Dec 20, 2024
Keeps context tight: write-coding-standards-from-file is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Dec 8, 2024
write-coding-standards-from-file is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Isabella Zhang· Dec 4, 2024
I recommend write-coding-standards-from-file for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Kabir Jain· Dec 4, 2024
We added write-coding-standards-from-file from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Nov 27, 2024
write-coding-standards-from-file fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Luis Okafor· Nov 23, 2024
Useful defaults in write-coding-standards-from-file — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Hana Bhatia· Nov 19, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: write-coding-standards-from-file is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Omar Liu· Nov 15, 2024
Registry listing for write-coding-standards-from-file matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 47