web-design-reviewer▌
github/awesome-copilot · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Visual inspection and source-level fixing of website design issues across responsive, accessibility, and layout concerns.
- ›Detects layout overflow, alignment problems, responsive breakpoints, accessibility contrast issues, and visual inconsistencies across mobile (375px), tablet (768px), desktop (1280px), and wide (1920px) viewports
- ›Supports static sites, SPAs (React/Vue/Angular/Svelte), full-stack frameworks (Next.js/Nuxt/SvelteKit), and CMS platforms with automatic framework and stylin
Web Design Reviewer
This skill enables visual inspection and validation of website design quality, identifying and fixing issues at the source code level.
Scope of Application
- Static sites (HTML/CSS/JS)
- SPA frameworks such as React / Vue / Angular / Svelte
- Full-stack frameworks such as Next.js / Nuxt / SvelteKit
- CMS platforms such as WordPress / Drupal
- Any other web application
Prerequisites
Required
-
Target website must be running
- Local development server (e.g.,
http://localhost:3000) - Staging environment
- Production environment (for read-only reviews)
- Local development server (e.g.,
-
Browser automation must be available
- Screenshot capture
- Page navigation
- DOM information retrieval
-
Access to source code (when making fixes)
- Project must exist within the workspace
Workflow Overview
flowchart TD
A[Step 1: Information Gathering] --> B[Step 2: Visual Inspection]
B --> C[Step 3: Issue Fixing]
C --> D[Step 4: Re-verification]
D --> E{Issues Remaining?}
E -->|Yes| B
E -->|No| F[Completion Report]
Step 1: Information Gathering Phase
1.1 URL Confirmation
If the URL is not provided, ask the user:
Please provide the URL of the website to review (e.g.,
http://localhost:3000)
1.2 Understanding Project Structure
When making fixes, gather the following information:
| Item | Example Question |
|---|---|
| Framework | Are you using React / Vue / Next.js, etc.? |
| Styling Method | CSS / SCSS / Tailwind / CSS-in-JS, etc. |
| Source Location | Where are style files and components located? |
| Review Scope | Specific pages only or entire site? |
1.3 Automatic Project Detection
Attempt automatic detection from files in the workspace:
Detection targets:
├── package.json → Framework and dependencies
├── tsconfig.json → TypeScript usage
├── tailwind.config → Tailwind CSS
├── next.config → Next.js
├── vite.config → Vite
├── nuxt.config → Nuxt
└── src/ or app/ → Source directory
1.4 Identifying Styling Method
| Method | Detection | Edit Target |
|---|---|---|
| Pure CSS | *.css files |
Global CSS or component CSS |
| SCSS/Sass | *.scss, *.sass |
SCSS files |
| CSS Modules | *.module.css |
Module CSS files |
| Tailwind CSS | tailwind.config.* |
className in components |
| styled-components | styled. in code |
JS/TS files |
| Emotion | @emotion/ imports |
JS/TS files |
| CSS-in-JS (other) | Inline styles | JS/TS files |
Step 2: Visual Inspection Phase
2.1 Page Traversal
- Navigate to the specified URL
- Capture screenshots
- Retrieve DOM structure/snapshot (if possible)
- If additional pages exist, traverse through navigation
2.2 Inspection Items
Layout Issues
| Issue | Description | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Element Overflow | Content overflows from parent element or viewport | High |
| Element Overlap | Unintended overlapping of elements | High |
| Alignment Issues | Grid or flex alignment problems | Medium |
| Inconsistent Spacing | Padding/margin inconsistencies | Medium |
| Text Clipping | Long text not handled properly | Medium |
Responsive Issues
| Issue | Description | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Non-mobile Friendly | Layout breaks on small screens | High |
| Breakpoint Issues | Unnatural transitions when screen size changes | Medium |
| Touch Targets | Buttons too small on mobile | Medium |
Accessibility Issues
| Issue | Description | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Insufficient Contrast | Low contrast ratio between text and background | High |
| No Focus State | Cannot determine state during keyboard navigation | High |
| Missing alt Text | No alternative text for images | Medium |
Visual Consistency
| Issue | Description | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Font Inconsistency | Mixed font families | Medium |
| Color Inconsistency | Non-unified brand colors | Medium |
| Spacing Inconsistency | Non-uniform spacing between similar elements | Low |
2.3 Viewport Testing (Responsive)
Test at the following viewports:
| Name | Width | Representative Device |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile | 375px | iPhone SE/12 mini |
| Tablet | 768px | iPad |
| Desktop | 1280px | Standard PC |
| Wide | 1920px | Large display |
Step 3: Issue Fixing Phase
3.1 Issue Prioritization
block-beta
columns 1
block:priority["Priority Matrix"]
P1["P1: Fix Immediately\n(Layout issues affecting functionality)"]
P2["P2: Fix Next\n(Visual issues degrading UX)"]
P3["P3: Fix If Possible\n(Minor visual inconsistencies)"]
end
3.2 Identifying Source Files
Identify source files from problematic elements:
-
Selector-based Search
- Search codebase by class name or ID
- Explore style definitions with
grep_search
-
Component-based Search
- Identify components from element text or structure
- Explore related files with
semantic_search
-
File Pattern Filtering
Style files: src/**/*.css, styles/**/* Components: src/components/**/* Pages: src/pages/**, app/**
3.3 Applying Fixes
Framework-specific Fix Guidelines
See references/framework-fixes.md for details.
Fix Principles
- Minimal Changes: Only make the minimum changes necessary to resolve the issue
- Respect Existing Patterns: Follow existing code style in the project
- Avoid Breaking Changes: Be careful not to affect other areas
- Add Comments: Add comments to explain the reason for fixes where appropriate
Step 4: Re-verification Phase
4.1 Post-fix Confirmation
- Reload browser (or wait for development server HMR)
- Capture screenshots of fixed areas
- Compare before and after
4.2 Regression Testing
- Verify that fixes haven't affected other areas
- Confirm responsive display is not broken
4.3 Iteration Decision
flowchart TD
A{Issues Remaining?}
A -->|Yes| B[Return to Step 2]
A -->|No| C[Proceed to Completion Report]
Iteration Limit: If more than 3 fix attempts are needed for a specific issue, consult the user
Output Format
Review Results Report
# Web Design Review Results
## Summary
| Item | Value |
|------|-------|
| Target URL | {URL} |
| Framework | {Detected framework} |
| Styling | {CSS / Tailwind / etc.} |
| Tested Viewports | Desktop, Mobile |
| Issues Detected | {N} |
| Issues Fixed | {M} |
## Detected Issues
### [P1] {Issue Title}
- **Page**: {Page path}
- **Element**: {Selector or description}
- **Issue**: {Detailed description of the issue}
- **Fixed File**: `{File path}`
- **Fix Details**: {Description of changes}
- **Screenshot**: Before/After
### [P2] {Issue Title}
...
## Unfixed Issues (if any)
### {Issue Title}
- **Reason**: {Why it was not fixed/could not be fixed}
- **Recommended Action**: {Recommendations for user}
## Recommendations
- {Suggestions for future improvements}
Required Capabilities
| Capability | Description | Required |
|---|---|---|
| Web Page Navigation | Access URLs, page transitions | ✅ |
| Screenshot Capture | Page image capture | ✅ |
| Image Analysis | Visual issue detection | ✅ |
| DOM Retrieval | Page structure retrieval | Recommended |
| File Read/Write | Source code reading and editing | Required for fixes |
| Code Search | Code search within project | Required for fixes |
Reference Implementation
Implementation with Playwright MCP
Playwright MCP is recommended as the reference implementation for this skill.
| Capability | Playwright MCP Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Navigation | browser_navigate |
Access URLs |
| Snapshot | browser_snapshot |
Retrieve DOM structure |
| Screenshot | browser_take_screenshot |
Images for visual inspection |
| Click | browser_click |
Interact with interactive elements |
| Resize | browser_resize |
Responsive testing |
| Console | browser_console_messages |
Detect JS errors |
Configuration Example (MCP Server)
{
"mcpServers": {
"playwright": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@playwright/mcp@latest", "--caps=vision"]
}
}
}
Other Compatible Browser Automation Tools
| Tool | Features |
|---|---|
| Selenium | Broad browser support, multi-language support |
| Puppeteer | Chrome/Chromium focused, Node.js |
| Cypress | Easy integration with E2E testing |
| WebDriver BiDi | Standardized next-generation protocol |
The same workflow can be implemented with these tools. As long as they provide the necessary capabilities (navigation, screenshot, DOM retrieval), the choice of tool is flexible.
Best Practices
DO (Recommended)
- ✅ Always save screenshots before making fixes
- ✅ Fix one issue at a time and verify each
- ✅ Follow the project's existing code style
- ✅ Confirm with user before major changes
- ✅ Document fix details thoroughly
DON'T (Not Recommended)
- ❌ Large-scale refactoring without confirmation
- ❌ Ignoring design systems or brand guidelines
- ❌ Fixes that ignore performance
- ❌ Fixing multiple issues at once (difficult to verify)
Troubleshooting
Problem: Style files not found
- Check dependencies in
package.json - Consider the possibility of CSS-in-JS
- Consider CSS generated at build time
- Ask user about styling method
Problem: Fixes not reflected
- Check if development server HMR is working
- Clear browser cache
- Rebuild if project requires build
- Check CSS specificity issues
Problem: Fixes affecting other areas
- Rollback changes
- Use more specific selectors
- Consider using CSS Modules or scoped styles
- Consult user to confirm impact scope
How to use web-design-reviewer on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add web-design-reviewer
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches web-design-reviewer from GitHub repository github/awesome-copilot and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate web-design-reviewer. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /web-design-reviewer) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★26 reviews- ★★★★★Sofia Tandon· Dec 24, 2024
web-design-reviewer reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Dec 4, 2024
web-design-reviewer fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Nov 23, 2024
web-design-reviewer is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Sofia Gupta· Nov 15, 2024
I recommend web-design-reviewer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Oct 14, 2024
Keeps context tight: web-design-reviewer is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Mateo Park· Oct 6, 2024
Useful defaults in web-design-reviewer — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Anika Khanna· Sep 17, 2024
web-design-reviewer fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Alexander Anderson· Aug 8, 2024
We added web-design-reviewer from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Benjamin Chawla· Jul 27, 2024
Keeps context tight: web-design-reviewer is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Jul 15, 2024
web-design-reviewer has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 26