Surgical code refactoring to improve maintainability without changing behavior.
Works with
Covers 10 common code smells: long methods, duplication, large classes, long parameter lists, feature envy, primitive obsession, magic numbers, nested conditionals, dead code, and inappropriate intimacy
Includes extract method, extract class, and introduce type safety patterns with before/after examples
Provides design pattern refactoring strategies: Strategy, Chain of Responsibility, and others for repla
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionrefactorExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches refactor from github/awesome-copilot and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate refactor. Access via /refactor in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
1
total installs
1
this week
28.7K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
1
installs
1
this week
28.7K
stars
Improve code structure and readability without changing external behavior. Refactoring is gradual evolution, not revolution. Use this for improving existing code, not rewriting from scratch.
Use this skill when:
- Code that works and won't change again (if it ain't broke...)
- Critical production code without tests (add tests first)
- When you're under a tight deadline
- "Just because" - need a clear purpose
# BAD: 200-line function that does everything
- async function processOrder(orderId) {
- // 50 lines: fetch order
- // 30 lines: validate order
- // 40 lines: calculate pricing
- // 30 lines: update inventory
- // 20 lines: create shipment
- // 30 lines: send notifications
- }
# GOOD: Broken into focused functions
+ async function processOrder(orderId) {
+ const order = await fetchOrder(orderId);
+ validateOrder(order);
+ const pricing = calculatePricing(order);
+ await updateInventory(order);
+ const shipment = await createShipment(order);
+ await sendNotifications(order, pricing, shipment);
+ return { order, pricing, shipment };
+ }
# BAD: Same logic in multiple places
- function calculateUserDiscount(user) {
- if (user.membership === 'gold') return user.total * 0.2;
- if (user.membership === 'silver') return user.total * 0.1;
- return 0;
- }
-
- function calculateOrderDiscount(order) {
- if (order.user.membership === 'gold') return order.total * 0.2;
- if (order.user.membership === 'silver') return order.total * 0.1;
- return 0;
- }
# GOOD: Extract common logic
+ function getMembershipDiscountRate(membership) {
+ const rates = { gold: 0.2, silver: 0.1 };
+ return rates[membership] || 0;
+ }
+
+ function calculateUserDiscount(user) {
+ return user.total * getMembershipDiscountRate(user.membership);
+ }
+
+ function calculateOrderDiscount(order) {
+ return order.total * getMembershipDiscountRate(order.user.membership);
+ }
# BAD: God object that knows too much
- class UserManager {
- createUser() { /* ... */ }
- updateUser() { /* ... */ }
- deleteUser() { /* ... */ }
- sendEmail() { /* ... */ }
- generateReport() { /* ... */ }
- handlePayment() { /* ... */ }
- validateAddress() { /* ... */ }
- // 50 more methods...
- }
# GOOD: Single responsibility per class
+ class UserService {
+ create(data) { /* ... */ }
+ update(id, data) { /* ... */ }
+ delete(id) { /* ... */ }
+ }
+
+ class EmailService {
+ send(to, subject, body) { /* ... */ }
+ }
+
+ class ReportService {
+ generate(type, params) { /* ... */ }
+ }
+
+ class PaymentService {
+ process(amount, method) { /* ... */ }
+ }
# BAD: Too many parameters
- function createUser(email, password, name, age, address, city, country, phone) {
- /* ... */
- }
# GOOD: Group related parameters
+ interface UserData {
+ email: string;
+ password: string;
+ name: string;
+ age?: number;
+ address?: Address;
+ phone?: string;
+ }
+
+ function createUser(data: UserData) {
+ /* ... */
+ }
# EVEN BETTER: Use builder pattern for complex construction
+ const user = UserBuilder
+ .email('[email protected]')
+ .password('secure123')
+ .name('Test User')
+ .address(address)
+ .build();
# BAD: Method that uses another object's data more than its own
- class Order {
- calculateDiscount(user) {
- if (user.membershipLevel === 'gold') {
+ return this.total * 0.2;
+ }
✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
- 1Install product management skill
- 2Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Related Skills
premium-frontend-ui
233github/awesome-copilot
Frontendsame repojava-springboot
53github/awesome-copilot
Backendsame repogrill-me
704mattpocock/skills
Productivitysame categorypremortem
217parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
Productivitysame categorydeslop
163cursor/plugins
Productivitysame categorytravel-planner
144ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categoryReviews
4.6★★★★★42 reviews- IIsabella Gupta★★★★★Dec 4, 2024
Useful defaults in refactor — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- HHenry Yang★★★★★Dec 4, 2024
Keeps context tight: refactor is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- YYash Thakker★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
refactor fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- AAanya Brown★★★★★Nov 23, 2024
We added refactor from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- LLiam Ramirez★★★★★Nov 23, 2024
refactor is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- DDhruvi Jain★★★★★Oct 18, 2024
refactor has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- AAanya Khanna★★★★★Oct 14, 2024
refactor reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- DDev Shah★★★★★Oct 14, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: refactor is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- OOshnikdeep★★★★★Sep 21, 2024
refactor reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- HHenry Chen★★★★★Sep 21, 2024
refactor is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 42
1 / 5Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.