sentry-pr-code-review▌
getsentry/sentry-agent-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Review and fix issues identified by Seer (by Sentry) in GitHub PR comments.
Sentry Code Review
Review and fix issues identified by Seer (by Sentry) in GitHub PR comments.
Invoke This Skill When
- User asks to "review Sentry comments" or "fix Sentry issues" on a PR
- User shares a PR URL/number and mentions Sentry or Seer feedback
- User asks to "address Sentry review" or "resolve Sentry findings"
- User wants to find PRs with unresolved Sentry comments
Prerequisites
ghCLI installed and authenticated- Repository has the Seer by Sentry GitHub App installed
Important: The comment format parsed below is based on Seer's current output. This is not an API contract and may change. Always verify the actual comment structure.
Phase 1: Fetch Seer Comments
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{PR_NUMBER}/comments --paginate \
--jq '.[] | select(.user.login == "seer-by-sentry[bot]") | {file: .path, line: .line, body: .body}'
The bot login is seer-by-sentry[bot] — not sentry[bot] or sentry-io[bot].
If no PR number is given, find recent PRs with Seer comments:
gh pr list --state open --json number,title --limit 20 | \
jq -r '.[].number' | while read pr; do
count=$(gh api "repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/$pr/comments" --paginate \
--jq '[.[] | select(.user.login == "seer-by-sentry[bot]")] | length')
[ "$count" -gt 0 ] && echo "PR #$pr: $count Seer comments"
done
Phase 2: Parse Each Comment
Extract from the markdown body:
- Bug description: Line starting with
**Bug:** - Severity/Confidence: In
<sub>Severity: X | Confidence: X.XX</sub> - Analysis: Inside
<summary>🔍 <b>Detailed Analysis</b></summary>block - Suggested Fix: Inside
<summary>💡 <b>Suggested Fix</b></summary>block - AI Prompt: Inside
<summary>🤖 <b>Prompt for AI Agent</b></summary>block
Phase 3: Verify & Fix
For each issue:
- Read the file at the specified line
- Confirm issue still exists in current code (not already fixed in a later commit)
- Review surrounding code to assess if it's an actual issue or false positive
- Implement fix (use suggested fix as starting point, or write your own)
- Consider edge cases and regression risk
Phase 4: Summarize and Report Results
## Seer Review: PR #[number]
### Resolved
| File:Line | Issue | Severity | Fix Applied |
|-----------|-------|----------|-------------|
| path:123 | desc | HIGH | what done |
### Skipped (false positive or already fixed)
| File:Line | Issue | Reason |
|-----------|-------|--------|
**Summary:** X resolved, Y skipped
Seer Review Triggers
| Trigger | When |
|---|---|
| PR set to "Ready for Review" | Automatic error prediction |
| Commit pushed while PR is ready | Re-runs prediction |
@sentry review comment |
Manual trigger for full review + suggestions |
| Draft PR | Skipped — no review until marked ready |
Troubleshooting
| Issue | Solution |
|---|---|
| No Seer comments found | Verify the Seer GitHub App is installed on the repo |
| Bot name mismatch | The login is seer-by-sentry[bot], not sentry[bot] |
| Comments not appearing on new PRs | PR must be "Ready for Review" (not draft) |
gh api returns partial results |
Ensure --paginate flag is included |
Common Issue Types
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Type Safety | Missing null checks, unsafe type assertions |
| Error Handling | Swallowed errors, missing boundaries |
| Validation | Permissive inputs, missing sanitization |
| Config | Missing env vars, incorrect paths |
How to use sentry-pr-code-review on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add sentry-pr-code-review
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches sentry-pr-code-review from GitHub repository getsentry/sentry-agent-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate sentry-pr-code-review. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /sentry-pr-code-review) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.4★★★★★39 reviews- ★★★★★Naina Menon· Dec 16, 2024
sentry-pr-code-review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Ren Ramirez· Dec 12, 2024
sentry-pr-code-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Dec 4, 2024
We added sentry-pr-code-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Nov 23, 2024
Useful defaults in sentry-pr-code-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Advait Liu· Nov 7, 2024
Registry listing for sentry-pr-code-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Sakura Farah· Nov 3, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: sentry-pr-code-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Lucas White· Oct 26, 2024
Useful defaults in sentry-pr-code-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Min Nasser· Oct 22, 2024
sentry-pr-code-review is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Oct 14, 2024
Registry listing for sentry-pr-code-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Yash Thakker· Sep 21, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: sentry-pr-code-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 39