sentry-pr-code-review

getsentry/sentry-agent-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-agent-skills --skill sentry-pr-code-review
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Review and fix issues identified by Seer (by Sentry) in GitHub PR comments.

skill.md

Sentry Code Review

Review and fix issues identified by Seer (by Sentry) in GitHub PR comments.

Invoke This Skill When

  • User asks to "review Sentry comments" or "fix Sentry issues" on a PR
  • User shares a PR URL/number and mentions Sentry or Seer feedback
  • User asks to "address Sentry review" or "resolve Sentry findings"
  • User wants to find PRs with unresolved Sentry comments

Prerequisites

  • gh CLI installed and authenticated
  • Repository has the Seer by Sentry GitHub App installed

Important: The comment format parsed below is based on Seer's current output. This is not an API contract and may change. Always verify the actual comment structure.

Phase 1: Fetch Seer Comments

gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{PR_NUMBER}/comments --paginate \
  --jq '.[] | select(.user.login == "seer-by-sentry[bot]") | {file: .path, line: .line, body: .body}'

The bot login is seer-by-sentry[bot] — not sentry[bot] or sentry-io[bot].

If no PR number is given, find recent PRs with Seer comments:

gh pr list --state open --json number,title --limit 20 | \
  jq -r '.[].number' | while read pr; do
    count=$(gh api "repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/$pr/comments" --paginate \
      --jq '[.[] | select(.user.login == "seer-by-sentry[bot]")] | length')
    [ "$count" -gt 0 ] && echo "PR #$pr: $count Seer comments"
  done

Phase 2: Parse Each Comment

Extract from the markdown body:

  • Bug description: Line starting with **Bug:**
  • Severity/Confidence: In <sub>Severity: X | Confidence: X.XX</sub>
  • Analysis: Inside <summary>🔍 <b>Detailed Analysis</b></summary> block
  • Suggested Fix: Inside <summary>💡 <b>Suggested Fix</b></summary> block
  • AI Prompt: Inside <summary>🤖 <b>Prompt for AI Agent</b></summary> block

Phase 3: Verify & Fix

For each issue:

  1. Read the file at the specified line
  2. Confirm issue still exists in current code (not already fixed in a later commit)
  3. Review surrounding code to assess if it's an actual issue or false positive
  4. Implement fix (use suggested fix as starting point, or write your own)
  5. Consider edge cases and regression risk

Phase 4: Summarize and Report Results

## Seer Review: PR #[number]

### Resolved
| File:Line | Issue | Severity | Fix Applied |
|-----------|-------|----------|-------------|
| path:123  | desc  | HIGH     | what done   |

### Skipped (false positive or already fixed)
| File:Line | Issue | Reason |
|-----------|-------|--------|

**Summary:** X resolved, Y skipped

Seer Review Triggers

Trigger When
PR set to "Ready for Review" Automatic error prediction
Commit pushed while PR is ready Re-runs prediction
@sentry review comment Manual trigger for full review + suggestions
Draft PR Skipped — no review until marked ready

Troubleshooting

Issue Solution
No Seer comments found Verify the Seer GitHub App is installed on the repo
Bot name mismatch The login is seer-by-sentry[bot], not sentry[bot]
Comments not appearing on new PRs PR must be "Ready for Review" (not draft)
gh api returns partial results Ensure --paginate flag is included

Common Issue Types

Category Examples
Type Safety Missing null checks, unsafe type assertions
Error Handling Swallowed errors, missing boundaries
Validation Permissive inputs, missing sanitization
Config Missing env vars, incorrect paths
how to use sentry-pr-code-review

How to use sentry-pr-code-review on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add sentry-pr-code-review
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-agent-skills --skill sentry-pr-code-review

The skills CLI fetches sentry-pr-code-review from GitHub repository getsentry/sentry-agent-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/sentry-pr-code-review

Reload or restart Cursor to activate sentry-pr-code-review. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /sentry-pr-code-review) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.439 reviews
  • Naina Menon· Dec 16, 2024

    sentry-pr-code-review reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Ren Ramirez· Dec 12, 2024

    sentry-pr-code-review has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Dec 4, 2024

    We added sentry-pr-code-review from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Piyush G· Nov 23, 2024

    Useful defaults in sentry-pr-code-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Advait Liu· Nov 7, 2024

    Registry listing for sentry-pr-code-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Sakura Farah· Nov 3, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: sentry-pr-code-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Lucas White· Oct 26, 2024

    Useful defaults in sentry-pr-code-review — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Min Nasser· Oct 22, 2024

    sentry-pr-code-review is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Shikha Mishra· Oct 14, 2024

    Registry listing for sentry-pr-code-review matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Yash Thakker· Sep 21, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: sentry-pr-code-review is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

showing 1-10 of 39

1 / 4